By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
The plant in on line, but I don't know what they have begun producing yet.
Test drove the auto CRV - much quieter and faster than out '00. I would like a stick with the roof but can't option the behicle this was in Canada. tood bad.
Four and five-year-old models were eligible for this study, which meant the CR-V was finally eligible this year. I think this result bodes well for all owners of a first-generation CR-V.
Bonus Question: Shouldn't Honda/Acura be credited with having FOUR entries on that list? <WINK>
In return, the UK facility will be dedicated to vehicles on Civic platform (3/5 door Civics and CRVs), and they will be exported to Japan as well (and we get the German designed 3-door Civic Si/SiR from the plant as well).
A friend of mine in UK owns a '98 Accord Type-R (made in UK ofcourse) and absolutely loves it. He has not had any kind of problem. Based on reviews from several European magazines, I would believe in Honda quality control.
Thanks for the information on the Sacramento area prices. I am in the process of buying a 2002 CRV right now. By the way, have you heard from the other dealers on their prices?
I sounds to me that a $500 over invoice is acheivable.
Wildfire
Rebecca
I have a 2001 cr-v se and am looking for an add-on remote starter that will work happily with the existing remote entry system. Does anyone have any information on this? I'm going to install it myself and want to use the same key fob that came with the V. Is there a place where I can find the wiring diagram for the factory remote entry module? Any info is appreciated. Thanks.
I agree the Suz might be better off-road (don't know). Still, along with the impractical 3rd row seat previously mentioned, it is a much cruder vehicle with older technology; resale value and reliability / frequency of repair ratings are far below the Honda.
Down the road, I expect I'd be happier with a three-year-old Honda vs a three-year-old Suzuki. I'd spend more up front if possible.
Rver2 - Those prices look pretty steep to me too. Ditto what tmanmiata says.
As for stuff built in the UK; I have been over to the UK to do some projects and the Brits' love for pubs makes me think twice about buying stuff from there! All joking aside, who knows what the work ethic is like in other countries? I worked with some German people closely related to Daimler and with respect to the DC merger both sides seemed to have an over inflated impression of the other.
http://www.automotive-online.com/English/Channel_1/channel1.htm
1. "Nearly three-quarters of employees voted in favour of having union representation by the Amalgamated Engineering and Electrical Union at Honda's Swindon plant."
Based on my experience with UAW and with how unionized plants operate, I hope the Swindon plant or any North America plants will not be unionized.
2. "Isuzu will end SUV production in Japan"
And why is the Lexus LX450 named, but no mention of the Land Cruiser, which is almost equally expensive and is basically the same vehicle?
Likewise, if the Ford Expedition is named, where's the Lincoln Navigator? I mean, the Maxima and Infiniti I30 are both on the list (under different categories)...
More and more, I find myself questioning these J.D. surveys.
Don't make the mistake of comparing British engineering with British manufacturing. British cars are known for problems because they were designed with problems. It dosn't matter if the guy putting it together is named Johnson or Yakimoto. Most of the time, the guy putting it together has a serial number on its robotic tush, rather than a name.
Intersting to see that Japanese-built Odyssey #1 (and Isuze Oasis) was a market champ re: quality, while Ontario-built Odyssey #2 is much more problem-plagued (even if most auto reviewers rank it #1).
Now I have a question about keyless entry. Does anybody know 2002 model already had receiver installed or not? I heard all 2001 CR-V installed receiver and just need programming when got transmiter. The handa-accessories.com shows 2002 model need install receiver ourselves , is that correct?
Thanks!
I almost went for $500 over invoice as a few others here have done, but having already been turned down at $700, and given my wife really wants the CR-V, I figured I had a better chance at $700, so I still saved $1,000.
Anyone else have this problem?
tidester
Host
SUVs
Canadiancl - I agree that poor workmanship will result in a poor product, but I don't think that poor workmanship has ever been a problem. When a plant has a problem with the workforce, you'll see quality issues all over the place. When there is an issue with the design, you'll see consistent problems. Take the first year Odys with their problematic power sliding door as an example. The few problems we see with Hondas are typically design bugs. Every manufacturer has them. The build quality bugs are much less common.
So far I see reports where Honda's UK plants have received high marks for reliability. I have it on good authority that Honda is using the QC standards. The only reason I see to doubt the quality of UK manufactured Hondas is that different companies with different products have failed and they happened to be British. IMHO, the cars made in the Ontario facility are the ones that I'd suspect.
Atuzai - Congrats on your new CR-V! H and A Accessories has a pretty good reputation. How quickly would they lose that rep if they sold me a receiver and, when I went to install it, I found that one was already there. I think Honda learned their lesson with the first gen CR-V. The dealers ended up losing quite a few accessory sales because of that design and they probably complained.
How did you find the email addresses for all Honda dealers within 2 hrs of you? I put a deposit on an silver EX-CRV about two weeks ago. Yesterday I called the dealer to inquire about status - he tells me that he will have a VIN # in about 2 weeks and then the car should be in 10 days after that. I live in South Florida and think I should check around with some other dealers. He took $500 off the sticker price so sounds like you got a better deal. I assume your price did not include tax, title, and dealer prep? They added $199 for dealer prep - is this a standard charge?
Thanks!
varmit: I noticed the new Jazz in that link you provided, and that is one cute mini! I really like the styling, it's easily Honda's most attractive small car.
I also saw the Stream in Autoweek, but didn't like it's styling as much. They should try to copy the Jazz, but on a bigger scale.
The Stream could sell here successfully, but it may need a face-lift before then. I say make it look Jazz-y, or more rugged and SUV-ish.
-juice
Carguy62 - You're right. Honda keeps optioning to a minimum to simplify the manufacturing process. My guess is, they though this was worth the effort.
Thanks
Our needs are for a small suv type to transport our dogs- 2 of them, weighing 75lbs+ each, as well as something a little higher and larger than my wifes 87 civic, that she can drive comfortably. We live in Oregon and bad weather is a consideration, though snow is not. I don't think I can go wrong with either one and it may come down to getting the best deal.
Yes the Ody has plenty of room for the dogs and all other hauling needs, and we love the v6, but we'd like both vehicles to be a little more interchangeable.
Thanks in advance
The Forester's back seat splits and folds flat, even with the head rest in place, which is convenient. Liftover is low so dogs should have no problem hopping in.
The CR-V's seat fold up and forward, leaving a low, flat floor. It too would seem like a good choice for the pups.
Hondas ought to come down to near invoice soon, but Foresters are already there. No rebates, mind you, but deals at invoice with low finance rates can be had. That translates to about $19k for an L 5 speed up to $24k for a loaded S Premium automatic with leather.
I'm shopping Odysseys, funny enough, but the short warranty has me a little concerned. Subaru's warranty is longer, as is almost everyone else's.
I think you'll be happy with either choice. Drive both and pick according to the biggest smile on the driver's face.
-juice
And I also have 2 large dogs and one of the things that attacted me to the CR-V was the flat floor you can get after folding down the rear seats. But I think folding down the seats in the Forester will work too.
For me, it wasn't any one thing that made me decide. Looks-wise, I think they're about equal - someone once said the new CR-V is homely from the front and the Forester is homely from the back and I have to kinda agree.
I think the key is driving both cars and seeing what feels right. I think they're both good cars. There were just a few things in the CR-V that bugged me enough to think twice about getting it. And when I drove the Forester, it just felt right.
Definitely make sure that you're driving a 2002 version of each car. You want to make sure you're comparing apples to apples.
Price-wise, in Massachusetts, I'm getting quotes of invoice to $100 over invoice for a Forester. Subaru is also offering financing at 2.9%
Makes way more sense than 26K for an Insight.
I like the Stream too.....that pic in Autoweek wasn't the greatest....I've seen ones where it looks much better than that.
But that's only measuring quantity, not the quality of the sound. For that you'll have to visit your dealer for a test drive. :-)
-juice
CR-V vs. Forester? Now more than ever, I'd say go for the CR-V. The Forester's largest advantage over the previous CR-V was it's more powerful engine. That has pretty much been evened up. Noise is no longer a big concern. The new CR-V isn't Lexus-quiet, but it's no louder than your average car. Space-wise, the "02 model competes with the Outback, not the Forester. With 72 cu.ft. and a more regular shape, it should hold as much if not more than the Outback (68 cu.ft?). Plus it's on even footing with most mid-sized SUVs in terms of passenger capacity. I'd still give the Forester the advantage in handling and probably braking, but the CR-V is no slouch. I'd also give the Soob the advantage with AWD, but, since you're not concerned about snow, it shouldn't matter. Ditto what Juice said about price, though. The new CR-V isn't going to leave the lot for free.
Obviously, we'll need to have a rematch when the Forester's '03 model comes out.
Looks like in usual Honda fashion, it will come in a few well equipped trim levels and undercut the Toyota Sequoia. This will be another Odyssey, in terms of demand and dealer price gouging.
Great pick-up-have not revved over 4400 rpm YET.
Smooth and fast shifter (snik-snik)
Loaded 6 Cds and found all the favorites fiddled with the bass and treble and found a great combo of settings.
QUIET when I turned off the player.
It was misting and breezy and the ride felt very solid.
I'm 6'1-220 and found the perfect seat position. My back was a little tired after the ride to the dealer but it got better on the ride back.
Set tilt on the moon roof and set the floor heat on low and didn't have to turn the defroster on.
Ex cloth looks better to me, I test drove an auto LX and it has a different feel.
Came over Afton mountain on interstate 64 in 5th pulling strong, had to slow to 55 (truck) and got right back to 70 with no downshift-it has a real sweet spot at 3250 rpm that is 70. Can't wait to check out the upper cam setting of the vtec-I have to keep telling myself "break-in period, break-in period".
Put my two kids in it this morning and the comment was "sweet".
Now to the things I don't like.
Maybe I should of gotten that Subie nah!
I'll let you know about mileage once I fill up. 295 miles so far on the Factory tank of gas reading 1/4 left.
If you are cross shopping you should drive the 02 V before you buy. Did I mention Honda quality.
Got to go my wife is wondering what I'm doing on the computer so long.
Can you see the smile on my face,
Dave