Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
2009-10 Hyundai Tucson
Does anyone know when the Tucson will be updated with new styling and more powerful engines?
I am guessing it will use same structure as the Kia Rondo....I am hoping the interior will be like the Elantra.
I4 should be the 2.4L with 165hp and V6 should be rated at 190Hp and 5 speed AT transmission on both engines
I am guessing it will use same structure as the Kia Rondo....I am hoping the interior will be like the Elantra.
I4 should be the 2.4L with 165hp and V6 should be rated at 190Hp and 5 speed AT transmission on both engines
Tagged:
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Hyundai should realize that what people want is a compact SUV with offroad capability (not just crossover) and 5-seats. The only shortcoming of the present Tucson is its limited off road feature. The VW Tiguan is the answer for this sector of costumers wishes and the germans has addressed this. Why engine power has to be linked to 7 seats?
I could be happy if Hyundai improve the multi-link suspension (rear) capable of doing the same that the Sorento, for example. Stronger structure.
I would like to see the next gen Tucson NA version switch to the fuel efficient 2.4L I4 Theta engine used in the Sonata (NA). At the same time, cancel the 2.7L V6 used in both the Tucson and the Santa Fe.
And just looking back in my last post here, my wish came true!! Hyundai is going to delete the 2.7L V6 on both the Tuscon and the Santa Fe (US market), with fuel efficiently 4 cyclinders, which I believe would be Thetas.
http://www.hyundainews.com/Media_Kits/2009_Models/Tucson/Press_Release.asp
link title
Any idea when 2010 Hyundai Tucson will hit the dealers? It looks great. i initially wanted to buy a Honda CRV, but i think Tucson is worth waiting. any information on this subject is highly appreciated.
Wow, the new ix 35 or Tucson looks like a much more expensive vehicle.
The new Lexus RX which is a major disappointment to my eyes should have looked like the new Tucson.
The contrasting lines are fantastic and I cannot wait to see one in the flesh.
Hyundai is on the move and thier styling makes the current crop of small SUV's look very long in the tooth except for the CRV.
The Rogue and the RAV need a nip and tuck remake.
Any word on the pricing or when we can order????
http://blog.caranddriver.com/hyundai-unveils-new-2-4-liter-direct-injection-four- -cylinder/
http://hyundainews.com/Auto_Show_News/Los_Angeles_Auto_Show/2009_LA_Auto_Show_-_- Tucson/Press_Release.asp
http://hyundainews.com/Media_Kits/2010_Models/Tucson/Pricing.asp
2010 Hyundai Tucson: Sleeker, Stingier, Stronger, Better (Edmunds Daily)
2010 Hyundai Tucson First Drive in Beverly Hills and Malibu (Edmunds CarPool)
What I see as a weakness is the pricing.
It looks like option for option the Tucson is $1500.00 cheaper than the CRV and the RAV4.
This is not enough to compensate for the weak resale value of Hyundai vs. the very strong resale of Honda and Toyota.
I would bet that Hyundai will have to offer rebates after the first six months to meet the competition. The RAV is overdue for a complete makeover.
We have owned CRV's and their resale value is amazingly good.
Eventually I would guess that resale will improve for Hyundai as they are massively improving their product mix.
I will consider the Tucson if I can buy it for $3000.00 less than the CRV and RAV equally equiped.
Love the Halo 3 styling.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
Would like to see for a few more bucks,as options or on limited.
Blind spot system,even the extra mirrors that the 2010 Escape uses, as opposed to an electronic system.
HID lights
HD radio
New DI engine
Old Mike
To the poster choosing between the Tucson and a CR-V - CR-V wins hand's down!
The major problem Hyundai faces now is resale value which is very weak compared to the Japanese competition.
The new Tucson automatic with four wheel drive will have an MSRP of approximately $24,000.00 and that is without a sunroof.
This price will buy you a 2010 Subaru Forrester with a sun roof for an MSRP of approxmately $24,500.00.
I would guess that after three years the Honda and Toyota would hold about $6000.00 more in resale value than the Tucson.
My guess is after the honeymoon is over if there is one Hyundai will have to rebate this model.
If the dollar strenghtens they may have ample room which would then make it more attractive to me.
One other disadvantage of the Tucson is that it has approximately 15 less cubic feet of storage than the Japanese competition.
My girlfriend has the CRV and we love it and I am leaning towards the Forrester.
Go out 5 years and the TCO for everything gives Subie the edge, but only around $1,500 worth.
The 5 year depreciation difference between the '09 Tucson and '09 CR-V is about $2650 (base models).
We have owned two prior CRVs and resale value has been golden. Easy to sell and I could not believe what people paid.
Love can conquer all and if I love the Tucson in person that may overcome my left brain.
The Forrester has a strong appeal because of the four wheel drive system which as a good reputation.
Hondas and Toyotas are probably easier to sell because of their name recognition, but I think the gap is narrowing. Subarus attract another type of owner, and they are golden in the NE and mountain states. I don't think my '97 Outback has lost much value at all in the last couple of years, and it's still worth stupid money considering how old it is.
But yeah, you have to drive what you like (unless what you really like is money in the bank).
His closing statement: •Overall: Could be the new champ among small SUVs.
Enjoy.
USA Today
As I mentioned while I very much like the styling of the new Tucson, Hyundai has not yet achieved the resale value of the Japanese automatkers.
The Forrester, CRV and RAV are all larger by 7 inches than the Tucson and have approximatley 15 more cubic feet of luggage space.
If one decided to sell the Tucson for something more exciting in a few years you will get killed price wise vs. the CRV, RAV, etc. I would guess that after three years the CRV would hold $4000.00 more.
As some have mentioned it would be wise to wait for rebates and larger discounts if one is sold on the Tucson.
We have a 2009 CRV with 15,000 miles and the build quality is a generation ahead of the other Japanese competitors in my opinion.
The CRV is the best selling sport ute in the US, period and there is a good reason for that.
.
Most professional reviews of SUVs will tell you the same that the CRV is best in class.
The Subaru has won SUV of the year for 2010 and has a very competent four wheel drive system. If you live in a northern climate Subaru should be a strong consideration.
The Forrester is a closer match to the CRV and won SUV of the year for 2009. Pricing is a little lower than the CRV.
I would not even consider the 2009 Tucson over the 2010 with the rebate as it is over the hill regarding technology and build quality.
The Toyota RAV 4 while a very competent vehicle is overdue for a complete makeover being six years into its model cycle.
I would choose between the Subaru Forrester and the CRV.
The CRV is the gold standard for resale value and this should be a strong consideration for you. Interior fitment seems like some type of alien technology it is so tight.
It feels like it was carved out of a block of steal like a BMW and handles great for a cute ute.
If you can afford it buy the CRV. If you cant buy a used CRV.
Lastly make sure that the CRV was produced in Japan as noted in the VIN number where you will see a J in the beginning.
The RAV4 is only one year older than the CR-V you're praising so unabashedly (RAV introduced for 2006, the CR-V, 2007).
I have three Hondas in my driveway, but the CR-V is just one competitive vehicle in a set of many; it doesn't blow all others out of the water.
The best advice? Drive them all yourself, choose from that!
My mistake in that the Toyota RAV 4 is entering model year 5 as opposed to the sixth model year that I mentioned.
I could be wrong but I believe on average that Japanese vehicles have model runs of 6 years.
I have test driven the majority of vehicles in this class repeatedly and of course I am just expressing my opinion. My girlfriend and I have both been in the market for these vehicles over the last number of years.
The RAV 4 has some major positives which are:
1. Class leading luggage space with easy access
2. Bullet proof Toyota resale value
3. A six cylinder that really scoots
4. Excellent gas milage with the four cylinder
5. Pleasent looking to my eye if not generic and non descript. Certainly not as fun to look at as the 2010 Tucson.
6. Consumer Reports ranked the RAV the best until the Subaru came along.
7. Large dealer network.
8. Made in Japan.
What killed the Toyota for us is the following:
1. Steering feels totally disconnectedd to me
2. Body integrity fees a gereration behind regarding solidity. Feels more like a truck ride.
3. The biggest disappointment for me is the interior which is the pits regarding design and fabric, Drab and cheap would be the best description. The Subaru is not much better with miles of cheap plastic.
4. The body style is simply too plain and non descript but totally non offensive. Toyota really showed some passion and fun with the design of the FJ Cruiser.
Of course this is just one mans view and the RAV 4 is a very competent vehicle and a very intelligent purchase regarding the Toyota reputation and resale. Cant go wrong here.
With auto passion and good cheer,
Brandon
I'm not that familiar with mechanic thing..
recently I change my ATF from a garage they put Toyota T-IV and at 4 liters though they said it works the same with the OEM ATF.
Q> 4 liters is enough? some forums said it should be 7.8 liters. I didint change my oil filter yet.
Thanks!
We both love manual transmissions and give thanks to Hyundai for being one of the few manufacturers that offer SUVs with a stick. We are dissapointed with the cheapness of Forester's interior -- our '04 Forester's interior is a low-buck shambles and the new Forester appears to use even cheaper materials.
I know this is not the "Prices Paid" forum, but I wanted to address a previous poster's comment on Tucson incentives.