Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
From the one live motorist that was able to get his UA vehicle into the dealership. This is well documented. The service manager witnessed the car at WOT without the gas pedal depressed. The resolution was changing several sensors and the throttle body controller. Was this a one off or a fluke? I don't know. But there are hundreds of reports to the NHTSA saying their Toyota accelerated and the throttle was in the idle position. Lentz kind of let the cat out of the bag in his interview saying something to the affect that they were looking into the electronics of the engine and transmission. I know that all the people that feel real strongly about the superiority of Toyota would like to blame all the UA on the drivers. Remember most of the complaints came from people that felt the same as you about Toyota, before they had their bad experience.
so you knew that they knew it before you don't know that they knew it?
is this some kind of "I approved it before before I disapproved it" thing?
On the other hand, Toyota always had this image of superior quality, reliability, fuel economy, and resale value; they could do no wrong. Now, all that is being stripped away. They will recover, but they'll never have that image of invincibility again.
And Ford was able to tell people to look at the company behind the tree--the tire people: it was the tire's fault, Ford said.
In this case it's toyota and they stalled for years about determining a real problem's cause. In fact, it paralleled many people's perception of handling of the sludge problem. They blamed the customer and it's difficult to prove the engine design, or in this case the computer and system, was at fault.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
I don't have to prove anything. It is the US Government that is holding Toyota's feet to the fire on proving there is not an electronic or software problem with the UA issue. The NHTSA got stung by Toyota last year with the "Floor Mat being the cause" story. When in fact Toyota knew that they had sticking throttle devices. I don't think Toyota will get to spin their way out of this mess with a kludged up fix with a shim.
I don't think people see the parallels here. The Germans went through all this chasing electronic gremlins a decade ago. Now it is Toyota's turn in the hot seat. The more you depend on electronics the more places for bugs to creep in. Toyota is just late to the DBW game and are finding out it is far from the perfect solution.
You'll get tired of hearing this too, but the Lexus that the Trooper was in out in California had a button, not an ignition switch. No key to turn.
Actually those are EXACTLY the kind of decisions I get paid to make, just don't know about the relative pay scale.
"...what if you want to induce..."
Why would you want to introduce an issue that is unique to 0.000123% of the driving population into this discussion. On the other hand the PSM in my 911/996 seems to figure out that I know what I'm doing in those type of situations and remains inactive.
I was approaching a traffic light and moderately braking and realized that I had to use more brake in order to stop in time. The more I pressed on the brake pedal the more the engine RPM rose to counter my additional braking effort. The car, Mazda minivan, finally stopped, safely (my good luck), a good way out into the intersection.
Travelled 100 feet, maybe, not enough time to even think about braking alternatives so a "failsafe" would have most definitely been of help.
The 3 seconds was probably designed to keep a driver from shutting off the engine inadvertently, and the problem of "unintended acceleration" was not considered.
Should Toyota have put a label at the push button, saying "New Feature-Push for 3 Seconds to Stop Engine"? I think not.
"When you look at the statistics we are putting an awful lot of effort on a very small risk," he said.
"There has been something like 2,000 complaints of unintended acceleration in some 20 million Toyota vehicles -- it's almost like trying to find a needle in a haystack."
Champion lamented as "unfortunate" that it took the death of an off-duty California state trooper and three members of his family to prompt Toyota to issue a mass recall in September to address the problem.
But he said a congressional investigation was an "overreaction" and noted that the "sticky" pedal problem that caused Toyota to halt production and sales of eight models last month was not linked to any accidents or injuries.
"I'm sure it's going to hurt Toyota in the short term over the next year or so," Champion said.
"But if their products are as good as they have been in the past, we're going to see that Toyota's going to bounce back as Ford has from the Firestone (tire recall) fiasco."
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5im7AzPBsRb2Q_qT0FXa8DxrjjLwA
Sounds like CR is ready to label toyotas as all wonderfully safe and reliable. I thought they learned their lesson a few years back when they just labelled them as OK without actually looking and driving--just because they said toyota on them.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Please refer to links below regarding UA car control. First is video demonstration auto engineeer auto comparison between a Toyota model and a VW done by Consumer Reports Auto Engineer. I have seen news multiple reports and have bookmarked giving same advice. He says people alerts people/may not want to stop vehicles engine as steering wheel power drive will be lost and/or steering wheel may lock up. I go to CNN and see they have up stop engine as one of their steps in the process for stopping UA vehicles.
Please note I am not promoting VW products. I sincerely apologize if you own VW - they are good autos. But models just do not meet my own personal needs. Appears brake overrride systems are promoted here. And yes, I do like these systems as seem to be excellent final last safty measure - when all else fails, etc. Seems Toyota likes - they announced Nov, 2009 they will install on all 2001 models- & is before last recall..
Questions:
(1)May I please request your opinion?
(2)Will steering wheel lock? Have seen it will.
(3)Yikes - somehow I feel safer just switching to neutral, even if engine damage occurs, keep easier control vehicle w power steering intact. Note realize I am skipping mention of certain steps of process -as already aware & would do. As mentioned in my past posts have already checked if my vehicle will go into N at 60mph & no problem - I have lost power steering in past, and was not easy to drive that vehicle. IS MY CONCLUSION FAULTY?
.
Consumers report
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/video-hub/cars/safety/how-to-stop-your-car-du- ring-sudden-acceleration/17188412001/48234862001/
Refer to Q & from Toyota - seems to indicte can shut down engine - but power sterring lost
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/RunawayToyotas/toyota-recall-car-owners-driving-ca- rs-safety-recall/story?id=9670956&page=2
I look forward to hearing from you. Please accept this as an advance thank you.
1. Why no national TV time by Toyota to explain the true facts.
2. Where is the top man from Tokyo !! scared to face the press.
3. The Top guy in the US is not capable of dealing with this crisis.
4. Dealers are no help, will customers cars be repaired before stock?
5. Toyota have the unions and La Hood working against them on behalf of GM.
Toyota get on the TV and say sorry and "we will put it right"
Get some fantastic discounts and lease deals out there and be prepared to loose a lot of revenue. Me I would not purchase a new Toyota the residuals scare me.
Stop scam and deciptfull practices by distributors, underbody treatments - paint protection - heated seats in Florida - Stop scamming your customers and come clean.
1. wot at 50 mph
2. key back ONE position,(two will lock the steering) motor instantly off, loss of power steering and brakes, but still hard steering and brakes available to glide, press on brakes and steered back and forth to get the feel, truck still in drive.
3. Shift into nuetral and start the vehichle.
4. Shift into drive and drive normally
The first time she tried this she was terrified, and that was at only 40mph and there are a definetly a whole whack of people out there that are totally incapable of trying anything like this and they should NEVER try it, however I beleive any advance driving skill you can SAFELY add to your repetoire whether it be this or backward escape 180s. Might (no guarantees) someday save your bacon.
Let's hope neither you nor your daughter ever has to put the training to the test.
i see they have now recalled 275,000 Priuses (Prii?) for the brake problem. Guess that means the new motto replacing "Toyota - Suddenly Moving Forward" will be "Toyota. You can't Stop us."
Remember their motto from sometime like the late '70's? (no joke): "Get your hands on a Toyota and you'll never let go" :P
Smile -. Actually I am an RN that is trained to study and react in emergency situations. And for approximately 20+ years worked as RN - until one year ago. I was on Code Blue Team(team of emergency professional personnel that responds immediately to Code Blue overhead announcement for life threatening emergencies) for approximately 7-8 years. I was a RN Manager. My husband was CEO of ambulance firm San Francisco, past Caliornia State EMS Commissioner appoinjted by Willie Brown during the 1980's. Many of California's EMS laws regarding EMS that became law during the 1980's he was involved in. Posthumously I was humbly honored when he was awarded a lifetime service award named in his honor for his lifetime EMS work California at state level, California Ambulance Association involvement, and in San Francisco/and is now a yearly award carrying his name - SF Department of Public Health. Our son is an MD, who doesn't work as an MD, professionally does development/engineering auto computer software.
Smile - all three of us have been trained well how to react in emergency situations, and have actually taught emergency courses. Some at university level.
We are/were just very interested in safety - not just auto safety but medical emergencies as well. But we do live and enjoy life.
I joined recently after this UA started - to learn. Plus I have attempted to research extensively. And speak with my son.
Once again I apologize if I did not explain my posting well.
But let's go back to the California state trooper. He was presumably well trained to react in emergency situations. But when it happened to him, why didn't he shift to neutral or try to have his passenger remove the floor mats? This was a situation where he was the victim, not a responder.
I'm a whitewater canoeist and I've "rescued" probably 100 boaters over the last couple of decades (and been "rescued" a couple dozen times myself). But I've never been in a pin situation where seconds count before I drown. That's a lot different from being the guy trying to chase down a swimmer in a rapid, or the EMT responding to a crash scene.
We all aren't going to be Captain Sullys when circumstances require us to ditch our car.
I could not find CNN video when I went back to save, but found on this site . Here it is.
http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/02/video-gas-pedal-stuck-stop-car-like-this/
How do we know he didn't try every one of the things anyone by hindsight might think up.
Were the floor mats the actual problem..??
The fact that they were burned/fused to the bottom of the gas pedal isn't enough to convince me. Into the air twice, rolled, and then burned.
As ever, if Detroit wants people to buy its cars and rebuild their trust, it needs to take care of its own business — and stop minding Toyota's.
Toyota may not even have access to the source code required to "trouble-shoot" the DBW firmware. And even if they do have access it is still highly unlikely they would have the talent on board for the task at hand.
Smile - I loved your Captain Sully comparison. We are all human and as humans emergencies can/may be difficult. Humans make mistakes. Guess you may call it the human error factor. Teaching/ practicing does help decrease this factor. The wide publicity and videos advising consumers/owners on this is great.
What, why, accident occurred? I don't know. Questions? Sadly we will never know. Was tragic.
I'm not sure the folks in here have heard your "torque lockup" theory. And the cruise control theory may continue to rear its head.
Isn't there something odd about Microsoft, through its MSN portion, commanding others to take care of their own house?
Can we say Windows 2000? Windows Millenium? Windows Vista? And can we say that porker's name, Office.
Microsoft the kind of lockup and crashing systems with bugs is lecturing GM on behalf of toyota. I find that's really amusing.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Edmunds hasn't opened a section regard OS but I've been running Microsoft platforms since '95 and never really had any of these problems (95, 98, 00, ME, XP). My wife runs MacOS and it is flawless as well.
As a Virginia State Trooper, my father worked wrecks in the years after WWII that were caused by accidental/careless pedal misapplication. It happened then, it has continued to happen over the years and figuring out which UA reports are mechanical vs. human error seems to be impossible.
It's about the unintended acceleration, not what or who caused it.
JT, aka beachfish, aka beachfish2
You are the only person on earth who hasn't. had trouble with MS OS software.
Microsoft having MSN critique US brands is related to the topic at hand. Steve, Clair are the listed hosts here. I believe there's going to be a problem with the firmware/software in the computers. And adding a brake sensor input to trigger return to idle won't work if it's dependant upon the defective computer to always retake control of the motor.
Hopefully toyota is going to finally get serious about this and save some lives.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Yeah, but no one taught Sully how to ditch an Airbus A320. It's not in the flight manual or in the simulator programs (maybe they'll add it now). You don't learn to "land" airliners in the water - that's why they call it ditching and not landing.
They ain't Cessnas on floats, and we don't get driver's ed like troopers do.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/video-hub/cars/safety/how-to-stop-your-car-du- ring-sudden-acceleration/17188412001/48234862001/
Consumer Reports is consumer advocate. Maybe this is why. And they are well respected.
Be wary of saying that around here. There are cynics among us here ( myself excluded) who think CR are a bunch of "bought and paid for" biased dudes and dudettes......:)
As the computer guy at work I had a lot of experience with every MS operating system since DOS. Win 3.10 was not too good. 3.11 was a bit better. Win95 and Win98 had lots of problems. Win98 SE was very solid. WinNT got better with Win2000 Pro. Win ME was a disaster. I have used a lot of machines with WinXP and like the Pro version best. My wife has Win Vista and we hate it. If they get the bugs out of Win7 we will upgrade.
I have lots of friends with MacOS and it is far from flawless. The Apple image reminds me of Toyota. Lots of perception of greatness, without much to back it up. Apple almost went bankrupt without Jobs to market their products.
Toyota needs some leadership that can bust this trend of diminished quality over the last 5-6 years.
Talk Back Tuesday: Does This Fatal Crash Expose Technology's Darker Side? (Edmunds CarPool)