Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
You really do need to get out more; for pure driving enjoyment the Focus SE is a very poor second to a GTI.
Well, driven in the same manner as my 2009 Mazda3 i TVE 5-Speed, the GTI gets about one MPG better than the Mazda. That said, if I put my foot into the GTI, the fuel economy does drop off.
Now, if Mazda had seen fit to allow us to buy a Mazda3 with the same options available in the "s GT" combined with the SkyActive engine and the 6-Speed manual, I would have been compelled to bump the Mazda3 further up the list. In the end, such a Mazda would have come to within $1,500 of the price of our GTI, and for that price delta, the GTI would probably still have gotten the nod.
A TSB is an automatic indication of there being a problem. TSB's are often just issued for informational purposes or for a new method of doing a repair.
In this case, Ford issued a TSB to reprogram the transmission to shift differently if someone complained. Technically, it's working as designed.
http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/transmission-woes-addressed-by-ford-b- ut-too-late-for-consumer-reports/
The Sandman :sick: :shades:
2023 Hyundai Kona Limited AWD (wife) / 2015 Golf TSI (me) / 2019 Chevrolet Cruze Premier RS (daughter #1) / 2020 Hyundai Accent SE (daughter #2) / 2023 Subaru Impreza Base (son)
Today, only the to-be-discontinued Lancer has a decently wide rear-view out, followed by the E90/E92 3-Series & maybe the C-Class sedan. The 1-Series Coupe isn't too bad, either.
The new Focus sedan is tolerable if you remove the right rear headrest. If those "ST turbo" Recaro seats become an option on the sedan, then I might go for it!
You sure you tried the '05-07 ST sedan? It was never available w/ slushbox. Only the '05-07 ST & '01 Street Edition versions of the MkI Focus sedan do not have "weak knee-ed" front springs!
Here's what I've found.
Steering feel: the GTI is the hands down winner. I'm not saying the Focus is bad, but the GTI is probably got the best steering feel out of any affordable car on the road.
Handling: the GTI is slightly better, but only because the steering setup is so dang good.
Power: GTI wins, hands down. But then, it better... considering that it's got 40 more horses than the Focus.
Fuel economy: Focus wins
Electronic gizmos: Focus wins
Seats: Focus wins with softer seat bottoms (GTI's were hard as a rock)... combined with good, but not intrusive, seat bolstering
Interior material quality: GTI wins, as it's got high quality cloth covering every bit of the roof and pillars. Focus has plastic coverings on the pillars, though it does have good quality woven cloth for the ceilings. As for the rest, it's a wash. Both have soft touch plastics and buttons that are pleasing to the touch.
Transmission: Focus wins it. Despite all the talk of the DSG transmission 'problems', it's actually smoother off the start than my GTI. The actual shifts are quicker in the GTI, but then... you also have to put up with the herky-jerky starts that you'd find on a manual if you don't give it the time to get into gear.
Price: Focus wins. When I bought my GTI, I paid $24,000~ for it, with leather seats, 6-disc CD player, automatic dual-zone climate control, and a moonroof. To get nearly the same thing, it's roughly $28,000... and you won't find the automatic dual-zone climate control included.
Whereas I can get all that and more in the Focus for the same price.
---
So to sum it up:
If you aren't pinching your pennies; if power and handling are paramount; if fuel economy isn't an issue; and a solidly-made interior focusing on performance is your cup of tea... then the GTI is the best car.
But if you are pinching your pennies; if interior comfort matters slightly more than performance orientation; if fuel economy is something you worry about; and you're willing to settle for performance and handling that are very good but not masterfully superb; then the Focus is more your speed.
Said another way, the 6-Speed in the GTI is the finest manual I've ever driven in a transverse engined FWD car, the 5-Speed in the Focus is just run-of-the-mill.
The vehicle should be thoroughly broken in first.
I see MPG figures from 27 to 41mpg, so this much variation leaves me concerned.
Thanks for your time and assistance
DrVette
Well, it's a good thing Ford doesn't have a single Focus with an automatic transmission, isn't it? :shades:
You see, the Ford Focus has either a straight up manual or an automated dual-clutch sequential transmission.
YMMV.
Nope, the only correct description of the Ford dual-clutch transmission is "Automatic transmission with a semi-automatic mode". Don't believe me, get out a dictionary.
There's no doubt these A1-platform VW's w/ 70's technology is still one of the best today. That's why I collected an used Mk1 Jetta. But I'm pretty sure the car is even better if its rear suspension is replaced w/ multi-links.
Would you still choose the GTI if its Control Blade multi-links are replaced w/ the torsion beam just like how Jetta's std suspension evolved from Mk5 to Mk6?
Yup, in a heartbeat; I loved flinging my Scirocco around tight curves on three wheels. :shades:
You may want to check a simplistic dictionary, but I'll stick with more technical resources.
An automatic transmission has a torque converter:
http://www.familycar.com/transmission.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_transmission
A semi-automatic transmission is a transmission with manual characteristics (such as an actuated clutch and a lack of a torque converter) but with computer controls taking over some number of these functions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-automatic_transmission
A sequential manual transmission is a manual transmission that can only be shifted up and down gears, without skipping, and in which the clutch may be computer controlled.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequential_manual_transmission
So the Focus "automatic" is actually a sequential manual transmission with additional automation of the shifts, or a semi-automatic transmission. If you want to get really technical, it's a dual-clutch automated sequential transmission, commonly referred to as a DSG.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_clutch_transmission
Here's a nice article that explains all five (yes five) major transmission types: automatic, manual, CVT, sequential manual, and dual-clutch DSG. I suppose if you separate out the torque-converter automatic-based manumatics you get six.
Go get out the Internet. :shades: The Focus has a manual, and a dual-clutch DSG. There is no automatic. The Focus is not the first car to do this. The VW Golf TDI and the VW GTI are only available with a manual and a dual-clutch DSG. The Toyota MR2's final version was only available with a sequential manual, no automatic.
I realize there's people out there who want things to read as follows:
"Manual transmission: any transmission with a clutch pedal"
"Automatic transmission: any transmission without a clutch pedal"
Get over it. :shades:
Isn't Control Blade a Ford-owned trademark?
So the Golf 2.5, which has longer suspension travel, is the most comfortable "Focus" in the world.
I was at the dealer yesterday & noticed that the Sport Package on the SE adds an "up & down" arrow on the shifter button to shift manually, as oppose to the "one way" button.
Long story short, there is no true industry related technical resource, such as the SAE, which will refer to various automated mechanical gearboxes now penetrating the market as anything other than "Automatic" transmissions (or "Semi-Automatic" transmissions when the driver must always indicate which gear he or she wants). If a good dictionary isn't "good enough", then ask Porsche, VW, Audi, Ferrari, and even Ford; not one of them refers to this type of transmission as a "Manual".
- Audi refers to the DSG in the A3 as a "six-speed S tronic automatic"
- VW refers to the DSG in the GTI as a "6-speed DSG automatic"
- Ferrari refers to their transmission as a Formula-1 "type" of gearbox (not a help in and of itself, but the Formula1.com web site says, "Formula One cars use seven-speed semi-automatic gearboxes")
- Porsche avoids the matter entirely by calling their Automatic transmission a "Porsche Doppelkupplung" or "PDK", which literally translated means "Double Clutch".
- Ford refers to their dual clutch transmission simply as a "Six-Speed PowerShift Automatic Transmission"
As I said before, no cars with Automatic transmissions (of any stripe) need apply for housing in our garage.
It's probably a similar multilink design, but I bet either they have to change it enough to avoid a Ford lawsuit, or they have to pay Ford a licensing fee to use a similar design.
There is nothing "manual" about shifting in that manner; all the driver is doing is requesting a gear change. If (and only IF) the computer agrees with the requested change, then it will actuate the various relays and such to perform the gear change "automatically".
CVTs are not manual at all, nor would one want them to be since that would obviate the purpose of a near-infinite set of gear ratios provided by the connecting band. "Manual" shifting shifts between several pre-selected gear ratios which might be nice for fun but defeats the purpose of the transmission type. It's arguable that CVTs are even less manual than an "automatic" transmission, which generally has either "L" or "1" and "2" positions on the shifter.
My previous post may have mistated things a bit. While I agree you understand the "technical" construct of the various transmission types (not difficult concepts), you seem to be "technically" challenged when it comes to how the English language (the best "technical" language in the world) is used to describe a "technical" item. Automatic is a automatic does, if something is capable of automatically performing a task from start to finish, it is an "Automatic".
In the end, you can call any given item anything you want, but calling a frog a swan doesn't make it so.
I always laugh when repeately hearing some of the girls told me (in Chinese) that they can't stand driving "self shift", b/c it's too tiring (operating the clutch pedal) in heavy traffic.
So I replied -- If you really don't like "self shift" (transmission), then take "manual shift" (transmission). :P
Anyway, I'm done on this topic, back to the wonderful vehicle that is the 2012 Focus. Since it is so much better than the GTI in the FE department. :shades:
The Sandman :sick: :shades:
2023 Hyundai Kona Limited AWD (wife) / 2015 Golf TSI (me) / 2019 Chevrolet Cruze Premier RS (daughter #1) / 2020 Hyundai Accent SE (daughter #2) / 2023 Subaru Impreza Base (son)
Of course, if I can get there without shuddering at the creepy-crawly speeds of rush hour traffic that would be good too. But the most recent Focus I test-drove creeped along very well in "S" mode and reasonably well in "D" mode. They must have applied the new programming to it, it doesn't quite make it imitate an automatic, but it resembles the behavior enough where it should be easier to make the transition.
Here are some lame manual transmissions, b/c it does not "self shift". If you're guessing the Hondamatic 2-speed transmission w/ torque converter, then you're right.
I remember it now, b/c it was only months ago I got to drive a 1972 Super Beetle w/ a "semi-H" pattern shifter, but no 3rd pedal. It has "1st gear", "2nd gear", "super-low-range gear", & of course, the "R gear". As soon as your hand touches the shift knob, a magnet inside is so sensitive that the clutch would instantly release into neutral, then back into gear when it detects your hand's absence -- how entertaining! The engine continues to idle when the car stops completely & can take off even in 2nd gear w/o lugging, so I'm pretty sure it's got a torque converter... No wonder I heard about "clutch-less VW's" from my folks during my childhood, & then later scratched my head wondering why didn't they call it "automatic".
Today, these DSG's are even better performing than "stick shift w/ a 3rd pedal" in both acceleration & MPG. Just make sure it doesn't have a flawed design that will grind its self up.
Even some slushboxes now lock up the torque converter quite frequently while keeping that graceful move in stop-&-go situations. VW seems to encourge Golf 2.5 buyers to take the 6-sp Japanese slushbox (see what Winding Road said) by offering only 5-sp on the manual tranny, especially w/ that long "deep down" clutch-pedal travel! & if you add a pedal extension on that 3rd pedal to solve this problem, then your knee might hit the bottom of the steering wheel! :mad: My 2.3 Focus ST sedan doesn't got this issue, plus the pedal is effortlessly light! No wonder stick is its only transmission choice.
Remember the old days when VW only lets you choose b/t a 5-sp manual or a rather slippery 3-sp slushbox?
The fact is, that Automatic and Manual are diametrically opposed terms and proper language constructs prevents one from modifying the other. Why? Because when you do it (from a language perspective), you describe neither.
Proper technical language requires us to describe items by their properties, as such, transmissions of the DSG ilk can be correctly called Automatic gearboxes, Automated-Mechanical gearboxes, or be trade named (as in DSG or PDK); the one thing such transmissions manifestly are not are Manual gearboxes. Why? There is nothing "Manual" about their operation (pressing a button or pulling a toggle to ask a computer to do something for you doesn't qualify as "Manual").
Yeah, what will become of the world with the introduction of concepts like grey, twilight, sleep mode, certified pre-owned, and (s)he? :shades:
Isn't Whited-Black the most popular car color right now? Personally I like the darker Whited Black Metallic on the Focus, it's almost as nice as the Candy Red Metallic.
Most of the cars I had since the late 1960's have been Clutch cars. Who ever tought me how to drive the standard transmission must have tought me well, because none of those cars had ever needed clutch replacement. So there is a bit of a "Chauvanism" of the Professional driver which is still here as a part of me. Yet, (BTW) I am old enough to remember Jim Hall and his Chevy Engined Chapperall which dominated road racing back in the 60's. Those racing cars did indeed have torque converters.
Today with the Automatic transmission equaling and going beyond the manual in the fuel efficiency, and with a some times bad knee for working the clutch, I have no problem allowing the best of technology to do the job of converting engine torque to the wheels.
No, it's the exact opposite; the transmission has a semi-automatic mode.
It does not have torque converters or CVTs, and will not change gears if the programming does not allow it to do so."
Precisely why it is an Automatic transmission with a semi-Automatic mode.
I most of the cars I have had since the late 1960's have been Clutch cars. Who ever tought me how to drive the standard transmission must have tought me well, because none of those cars had ever needed clutch replacement. So there is a bit of a "Chauvanism" of the Professional driver which is still here as a part of me. Yet, (BTW) I am old enough to remember Jim Hall and his Chevy Engined Chapperall which dominated road racing back in the 60's. Those racing cars did indeed have torque converters.
I too am old enough to remember the excitement and controversy caused by the legendary Jim Hall. While I don't dispute there are situations where automatics of all stripes have their place, they're called what they are, "Automatic transmissions"; even the FIA/Formula One folks refer to the gearboxes in their race cars as "Semi-Automatic gearboxes".
Today with the Automatic transmission equaling and going beyond the manual in the fuel efficiency, and with a some times bad knee for working the clutch, I have no problem allowing the best of technology to the job of converting engine torque to the wheels.
Funny thing, in the EPA tests there are any number of automatic equipped cars which best their manual transmissioned siblings in fuel economy, however, with the possible exception of Subaru's Impreza (CVT vs. old-school 5-Speed), I've yet to see any real-world reports which support the EPA results. Said another way, while the controlled environment under which the EPA tests are conducted may well show that automatic transmissions can now exceed those of a manual transmission under some circumstances, for the time being at least, the real-world says otherwise.
Anectdotal evidence ( sitting next to many drivers in stick-shift cars ) informs me that many do not shift optimally for efficiency in mileage. BTW, the EPA procedure is under controlled experimental conditions, as you say, and manual shift changes are done at optimal points.
me.
Exactly, that's why EPA believes that most drivers are not smart enough to upshift earlier for close-ratio manual boxes. EPA also done enough statistics to show that not all drivers follow the "upshift light", so the EPA's rating also only follows that "upshift light" part time.
The "upshift light" maybe best working on that "treadmill" EPA test rather than in the real world. When Motor Trend (or some other magazine) tested the Mk1 Jetta w/ the "upshift light", they found this light asking you to upshift too early & actually made their "good driver" increased fuel consumption from 25mpg to 24mpg. Or maybe that light always comes on a little too early to allow slow-reacting drivers to follow a second later?
I think what's even more important is a warning buzzer to warn driver that he is lugging the engine & needs to downshift! So the crankshaft bearing won't be prematurely worn just like the overpowered E46 M3 engine!
I kept seeing "future Saab" in the new Kia Optima.
I even had a chance to see the future Kia Forte (or its equivalent) in person -- It looks just like the new Focus sedan from behind but more gorgeous through out.
For my mother...
It's automatic if you don't have to tell it what to do.
For a manual it won't go unless you tell it what to do.
So she doesn't care if a torque converter is involved, if it's a cvt or has automated dual clutches or quad clutches...if she could just press the gas and go it's an Automatic.
Most people are like this. Even if there is no clutch...if you 'have' to tell it what gear to go in it's a manual.
My preferred Automatic is a DSG (which is VW talk).
No contradiction what-so-ever, what I said was that I've yet to see any real-world reports which support the EPA results, however, I've seen plenty of real-world reports which show otherwise.
"Anectdotal evidence ( sitting next to many drivers in stick-shift cars ) informs me that many do not shift optimally for efficiency in mileage. BTW, the EPA procedure is under controlled experimental conditions, as you say, and manual shift changes are done at optimal points."
So what are you saying; that you're okay with the EPA results because you've seen too many incompetent manual drivers? :confuse:
Keeping the VW running "per" suggested maintenance schedule will break Howard Hughes, even worse than keeping a Japanese vehicle maintained.
On the other hand, VW's typically handle rough roads much better and tolerate them without breaking or bending alignment parts as much.
So it's kinda a "push and pull" deal.
If you are gonna beat the heck outta the suspension, go with the VW
If you plan to pamper it and stick to smooth asphalt roads, go Ford.
The Mazda should be pretty tough overall, worse real world fuel economy, VERY LOUD DB in the passenger compartment but this may be fixed with some of the adhesive backed rubber sound absorbent mat, maybe.
For TCO [total cost of ownership] check the intervals for timing belt change, check the price of them and clutch R&R [the Ford auto has a "Dual Clutch" electronically shifted "Manual" instead of a Torque Converter & AT.
Both of the VW engines [Gas & TDI] do have a "Interference Engine" and Timing Belt which means when the timing belt breaks,, you lose a $4,000.00 engine.
Neither the Ford Focus or Mazda 3 are listed at Gates as having a "Timing Belt"
[Double Check with their service dept. for clarity on this]
http://www.gates.com/part_locator/index.cfm?location_id=3598
DrVette