Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Acura MDX (pre-2007)
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
And then there was the post from somebody grousing cause they got stuck in 20 inches of snow. Unless you were on your way to the emergency room you should not have been out there in the first place. I don't take the snowplow out until that much snow has been plowed off the road here in Bflo.
Steve, Host
Regarding a dark green MDX, try Acura of Brookfield, WI (an Acura Precision Team Dealer). Their website does not show the vehicle in stock, however I was there on Wednesday & Thursday ( 3/26 & 27) and it was parked on their "Used" lot. It has many accessories including wheel well trim and the rear window deflector. Their sales department and overall customer service is exceptional. Good luck.
Like my PT GT, the MDX fog lights take the same bulb as the low beam lights take. Changing to an 80 W bulb might be all you need. There are a number of bulb manufacturers, with prices starting as low as $20 per pair.
I believe the additive is in the VTM fluid, and that is why there is a change at 7500 miles.
Service in general is best at a trusted shop. I don't tust jiffy lubes, although I go there once and a while, however I always pull to the side of the lot immediately after and check oil levels, and for leaks underneath (i.e. they forgot to fill it or out the drain plug in properly) before pulling away.
I recommend doing the first 7500 mile maintenance at the dealer for the VTM flush. Regular oil changes I would go where you trust them to do it right...dealers aren't always good. Some shops list 25 things they do at a checkup, yet they probably just change the oil and air filter.
For the first oil change on the MDX, my dealer told me for mix driving, I should change it around 5000 miles. Since I drive it mostly in the city, I plan to change it at 4000 miles. He also told me that the factory shipped oil has a additive in there that collect metal shavings and also provide a slippery coating for the engine parts.
Here is where I need help.
The comparison includes:
1. Mercedez ML320
2. Lexus RX300
3. Acura MDX
4. Nissan Murano
6. Infiniti FX35
7. VW touregg
8. BMW X5 3.0
Here are the factors important for her:
1. Easy to drive
2. appeal (she loves the interior of the fx and the exterior of the Jeep GC)
3. No need for a third seat, just a little extra storage
4. leasing programs (residuals, price, maintenance)
5. Safety (no need for off road capabilities)
6. The standard 6 cyl. engines in all of these are plenty
What should be my first move?
Of those in your list only the MDX is a seven seat vehicle. The Mercedes can have a third row, but using it makes the middle row very tight.
All are easy to drive.
All are reasonably safe, though safety features vary between brands.
The RX300 is about to be replaced by the upgraded RX330.
The BMW is a true "sport" vehicle, but has very limited carrying space inside compared to the others.
It appears from your post you wife has already decided on the Infinity.
1) ML320 - Nice too minivan look and poor reliability
2)Lexus RX300 - Old Model underpowered Urinal like shifter (RX330 Might be a winner though)
3) Acura MDX - Good value, So So interior great reliability and resale (Probably my second favorite in your list)
4) Murano - Nice ride, cheap leather #3 on my list
5) Infiniti FX35 - Definately on the sporty side a little more engine noise and harsher ride than the others #1 on my list
6) VW - Looks nice but is still 6+ months away. Probably the most off road capable. ? reliability on first year VW
7) BMW x5 3.0 - waste of money now the fx35 is around unless you lease or must have a BMW
5) Infiniti FX35 - Definately on the sporty side a little more engine noise and harsher ride than the others #1 on my list
I would agree on this assessment as I have testdriven the FX35 also. If I may add, the FX35 is also a little short on cargo space, about 27 cu.ft.
4) Murano - Nice ride, cheap leather #3 on my list
I have not testdriven the Murano so I can't pass judgment at this time.
Right now, my list is like this:
1. Infiniti FX35 -- small cargo is holding me back, I have twin toddlers to lug around and this will be the wife's mommymobile. Not sure if it's practical. I could always get a cargo box for those long, extended trips, though. But for sure grins per mile, this is the SUV to get.
2. Volvo XC90 -- no discounts, can't get one as there seems to be no stock. Safety is priority here, not driving excitement.
3. Acura MDX -- like you said, good value. Lacking in safety features though, in comparison to the first two. Add to that, Acura dealer attitude is not that attractive. However, crash tests are exemplary. Hopefully, the 2004 model adds HIDs, side-curtain airbags, brake assist, electronic brake distribution, and headrest protection. Then, this will be the best, IMO.
4. Nissan Murano -- since I drive a Pathfinder and that jewel of an engine is in the Murano. A lot safety features much like the FX35 and a bit more cargo room. And styling is great to me, although, looks are subjective.
5. Honda Pilot -- great value also but lacking in safety features like MDX and some options like moonroof. And wife does not like styling at all.
The dealer gave me $1,600 under MSRP for the 189 model (touring package, navigation and DVD) so I don't have a problem waiting a few weeks.
I'm excitedly looking forward to driving it!
INKY
The FX35 AWD with sport package that I testdrove was going to cost less than $37K + TTL, MSRP for this was $40,515.
A Murano SE AWD with Popular Package and Dynamic Control Package will cost around $32K+TTL for me. MSRP around $35+.
I still like the XC90 because of the safety features. However, it's hard to come by and I'm not one to order vehicles. I think Volvo really flubbed on releasing this product. They advertised it profusely but really had no units to sell. The 2003 model was released November, and the 2004 model is being released in May, a real short 2003 model year and of course a price adjustment for 2004 models.
Hopefully, with the influx of thee new SUVs, Acura dealers get humbled. However, demand is still strong for the MDX. And I, for one, think it's not getting long in the tooth.
One point to make though is that if you visit a dealership that is located in a very high income area, they will not make any deals whatsoever. I went to the acura dealership in Annapolis, MD and the dealer wanted to sell me a used 2001 MDX -Touring with 8, 000 miles for $43K, and he was not willing to negotiate. I didn't even say anything else, i just laughed at him and walked out.
Transpower
For the first 12,079 miles the average is 16.57 mpg. Best tank - all freeway - was 23.2 mpg. Average for the first 2622 miles was 15.7 mpg and has been about 16.8 mpg since.
Your driving conditions are different than mine and freeway speeds where you drive are probably lower. Lower freeway speeds and less A/C use could increase the average mpg, maybe by as much as two mpg.
The MDX is no mpg champ, but it does okay for a vehicle of this type. Only premium fuel has been used.
thx.
I am quoted $1005.00 out of pocket and $499 a month for the lexus. Can Acura come under this or will it be more. I understand the MDX has more room but we do not need it. I just like the looks of the mDX a little more.
Can any one help?
Some folks have fixed their problem with the right adjustments. Some folks have added a lumbar cushion. Others have added expensive sheepskin covers.
Changes aren't always good. Honda has a good track record for implementing new technology/autos, however sometimes new model years have issues. I am happy I got my 2002 when I did...2001 gremlins had been worked out, It was the best of its class at the time, and still better than most.
The 2003 model is very good, check out edmunds most recent road test on the main page. 2004 may be better, may not...honda is usually very tight lipped out changes so you may be waiting a while for nothing. I don't think there has been any confirmation on changes for 2004?
Road Test: Follow-Up Test
Steve, Host
The lumbar adjustment doesn't have enough range to make much difference in feel, but back comfort has been okay no matter where the lumbar adjustment is set. It took a couple of months to get used to the seating position after I stopped raising the the rear of the seat.
In short, the seating position for me is not as good as my other cars or the car the MDX replaced. But, the seat has proven comfortable for non-stop six hour drives.
Also, the seat memory is poor in that over time the settings are gradually lost (doesn't move quite to where it is supposed to move and has be reset).
If the auto manufacturer says it's okay and if the child seat manufacturer says it's okay, it may be possible to install a child restraint in the center using the inner anchors of the two LATCH positions (obviously you wouldn't be able to use the two outer ones simultaneously). This according to the NHTSA. This is highly dependent on the vehicle and the child seat. E.g. I think Britax prescribes a maximum distance between the inner anchors for some of its seats.