Lexus RX 300

19798100102103183

Comments

  • explrsportexplrsport Member Posts: 34
    Roger, Roger...

    "what?"
  • zielinwzielinw Member Posts: 83
    I have be averaging 19.6 mpg on my RX300, this with driving about 50% on interstate and 50% on suburban roads.

    In addition, I find the factory installed mpg readings very accurate. I have had these devices in several cars since 1985. Generally they have a fuel flow sensor in the fuel line, and an odometer type sensor to determine the instant and average mpg.

    Low mileage can be cause my many factors, including the specific car, brake drag, fuel, tire pressure, wind resistance, etc.

    A good method to determine if the mpg is reasonable, is to look at the instant mpg when you are driving a constant speed, and watch the instant mpg when you are accelerating. The acceleration, and constant stop and goes are what really lowers, the mpg (at least in my experience).
  • mooretorquemooretorque Member Posts: 241
    "Give me a vector, Victor."

    "Roger."

    "Huh?"
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    You're sure about that?

    Some of us are beginning to wonder...
  • 1davidn1davidn Member Posts: 3
    Funny, you should ask....

    I have yet to notice any seat lumps but, there is a distinct lump in the seat back on the driver's side. Only mileage of 38k and I return it to Lexus next month at conclusion of lease.
  • gambiamangambiaman Member Posts: 131
    We bought a MY02 ES300 last week and it has many of the features that RX people have been complaining that the present RX lacks. It has auto door locks when transmission is put in gear, dual zone temp controls, a real in-dash CD changer and a 5-speed transmission. I assume most if not all of these features will be on the new RX model whenever that is since the RX is based on the ES and Camry.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Owning an SUV is today's form of "roughing it". you know, sleeping out in the wilderness with only the stars as a blanket.

    Too many niceties in the next RX and we may have to begin to call ourselves "spoiled".
  • jiaminjiamin Member Posts: 556
    Has anyone heard any news/romur about 2003 RX? Whatever changes, cosmetic or functional?
    Thanks.
  • ravlravl Member Posts: 129
    The way you word that Mr. Wwest, you make it sound like 'spoiled' is a bad thing. If you didn't buy your wife the RX300 (twice) to spoil her, then just why did you buy it?

    We know you know we know you know we love to be spoiled. I know I'm *much* happier when my husband is spoiling me. :)

    So there.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    So what have you done lately to spoil your husband in return?
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    That's easy. She lets him drive the Lexus now and then :-)

    Steve
    Host
    SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
  • ravlravl Member Posts: 129
    Why, Mr. Wwest, if I have to spell it out for you....I can't. This is a family forum. :-0

    p.s. I'm a really good cook, too.
  • ruskiruski Member Posts: 1,566
    ?
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Typo for rumor.

    Steve
    Host
    SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
  • jeffmust2jeffmust2 Member Posts: 811
    about the writing scrawled on a public bathroom wall..."For good time grils, call XXX-XXXX."

    Then the "grils" was crossed out and someone wrote above it, "girls."

    Then someone crossed-out the "girls" and wrote above it..."Hey, what about us grils?"

    Ok, ok, so it's a bit off topic.
  • pjirvinepjirvine Member Posts: 5
    I have a 02 RX300 with 1600 miles. I just noticed a fluid leak today. It does not feel like oil. Have you guys had any leak issues? I'm in Detroit where the temps have jumped from freezing to 80+ and so this is probably the first time the cooling system has turned on.

    Any advice? I shall also call the dealer tomorrow.
  • lexrx1lexrx1 Member Posts: 9
    pjirvine, are you sure it's not water leaking from your a/c running. I don't want to sound condescending but many people, suprising to me, don't know about this. After running your a/c you will get a puddle of water under your vehicle especially on warmer days b/c the condensation collected on the condensor. It's perfectly normal. Next time, get on the ground and inspect the fluid :-) It's probably water.

    Than again, it may be something else altogether...let me know.
  • pjirvinepjirvine Member Posts: 5
    Thanks, Lexrx1.

    I expected it to be a/c related and that was the reason why I mentioned the high temps over the past 2 days. But I do not remember water puddles on my Hondas. It might have been droplets. With the Lexus it is just a lot of water, and so I was concerned.

    Thanks.
  • raddboy41raddboy41 Member Posts: 249
    It's been in the 90's in NC this week and I too noticed (for the first time) a stream of fluid coming from underneath our RX. I quick dab with the figure and a sniff reveals that it IS just water.
  • rlui1rlui1 Member Posts: 93
    Speaking of leaks, I had an oil leak at 1200 miles. The dealer found that it was the high pressure powering steering line that needed tightening. It was disappointing to have to take it in for that when it should have been discovered during my 30-day service. Oh well, the mocha cappuchino was good.
  • lexrx1lexrx1 Member Posts: 9
    Let me correct myself: I called it a condensor when what I meant was the accumulator that builds up condensation and leaks water on the ground. Some vehicle do tend to leak more than others, but that just depends on the location of the accumulator and the design of the a/c system.

    We have an LS400 w/ dual-zone climate control and it has two accumulators. When you shut that thing off on a hot day after running the a/c you'll have TWO rivers of water :-)

    -nick
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    It is the A/C evaporator, liquid refrigerant to air heat exchanger, that is used to chill the incoming airflow and in the process of chilling that airflow it often reaches its dewpoint and thus airborne water vapor condenses onto the 10,000 square inches (92 LS) of damn cold (33-35F)evaporator surface area.

    As the A/C continues to operate more condensate accumulates and forms droplets large enough that gravity overcomes viscosity and so most of that condensate will drain away through the drain tube provided for that purpose. But because those surfaces are horizontally oriented some will always remain for extended periods or at least until those surfaces reach a high enough temperature that the remaining thin film of moisture will begin to evaporate. Absent any airflow through the evaporator plenum area the plenum atmosphere will soon become super-saturated with moisture which is why you oftentimes get that blast of condensation on the inside of the windshield early in your drive on a cold morning.

    That thin film of moisture that remains also is the cause of the moldy musty smell you get from the system when you first turn it on.

    Mold and mildew bacterial spores LOVE the damp, dark and warm (55F and up) environment of the evaporator and thrive very well there.
  • jeffmust2jeffmust2 Member Posts: 811
    oem
  • finch3finch3 Member Posts: 113
    Paid $15 for the engine air filter at local Toyota dealer. Checked out the Highlander and it's a nice option if Lexus tries to force a GPS on you. The tip on making your own A/C filter from a house A/C filter was a good one. I made one for a couple of bucks and it is working nicely. Of course, the Toyota oil filters work great in the RX.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    I'm not sure I would advise anyone to buy the RX over the HL, the only thing missing on the HL would be the HID.
  • gsenthilgsenthil Member Posts: 154
    What about finish/looks? Do you mean to say everone considering the ES should go in for a Camry as well?

    A solid thunk when closing the door is a big selling point for me than Nav/HIDs

    Senthil
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    If I wanted a FWD sedan I would buy the Avalon.
  • jiaminjiamin Member Posts: 556
    I'd really appreciate it if someone could AWD is worth the extra money if my driving is almost all city and highway, not off-road. I never drive an AWD. During rainy season or some other occasions road could be a little slippery, the AWD would help right? In the past I was told AWD is noisier than 2WD due to its nature, but I doubt it. The last thing is the HID. Dealer said it is available only with navigation system. Could it be special ordered?

    I am nearly ready to trade in my 00 RX for a 02 one.

    Thanks in advance for any reply.
  • malhokcmalhokc Member Posts: 83
    FINCH: What is the Toyota Part # for the Air Filter. Is this the filter that fits under the glove compartment or under the hood.

    Thanks
  • laurasdadalaurasdada Member Posts: 5,208
    HID does not require nav. We have an '02 with all options, including HID, except for NAV. I have seen many '02s on my dealers lot w/HID & w/o NAV.
    Depending on where you live, AWD may serve you well at trade/sell time...

    '21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)

  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    What do you call a FWD RX300?

    A minivan with a higher roll-over rate.

    Since you didn't give your locale there is no way to really judge your need for AWD. Frankly I'm one of those people who doesn't undertstand why ANY 2WD, front or rear, SUV is ever even built.

    I think I noticed that the FWD HL is not even available in Canada, makes sense.
  • kmhkmh Member Posts: 143
    In response to your post, I own a '99 AWD and have enjoyed the security and stability of the AWD. In a recent example, I was caught in a Spring downpour and pulled up to a stoplight. Next to me was a Chevy truck. We were on a slight incline and when the light turned green we both went. I pulled forward without any indication that the road was slick. On the other side, I noticed the truck's rear wheel just slipping and making a bunch of noise but barely moving forward.

    Long story short, I believe the AWD, helps in such situations to minimize slippage on wet pavement. It may not be the ideal setup for off-roading but that's not what I, and many other owners, intended to do with the RX.

    As for the noise, I don't believe there's a difference. I've driven a loaner 2WD and couldn't tell the difference from my AWD model.

    Enjoy and best of luck.
  • fantomfantom Member Posts: 211
    <<<Frankly I'm one of those people who doesn't understand why ANY 2WD, front or rear, SUV is ever even built>>>

    Can just about every auto manufacturer and millions of consumers be wrong? Do you think AWD vechile costs could be carried, if not for 2 WD SUVs? Could only Willard be right? I don't believe so.

    Wake up and count the 2 WD SUVs on the road. Then it's easy to understand.
  • learn2flylearn2fly Member Posts: 16
    1. AWD costs more.
    2. 2WD gives better fuel mileage
    3. In stopping a vehicle, AWD does zippo!
    4. It is better to have have Stability Control and traction control over AWD in climates where it does not show.
    5. AWD does little in rainy condition as long as you have traction control and Stability Control.
    6. If you are not doing off road driving, AWD is not a requirement.
    7. If you don't drive in snow, AWD is not a requirement.
    8. 2WD are cheaper to maintain.

    So there are some very good reasons for people to buy 2WD and manufacturers to make them. I am sure you have a very good reason to get an AWD for yourself. AWD has its own pros but every one who is buying a SUV does not need AWD.
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    I was simply pointing out that the only real difference between the fleet of minivans out there and a 2WD "SUV" is the ride height.

    I live in the Seattle area so a 2WD SUV just simply makes little sense to me.
  • pschiffepschiffe Member Posts: 373
    I have a '99 with FWD and TRAC and have never had a problem. First non-4x4 I've owned in decades and it's perfectly satisfactory unless you plan to go "off-roading". And, I live in the Buffalo Niagara area which is no stranger to snow and inclement weather.

    Pete
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    And, I live in the Buffalo Niagara area which is no stranger to snow and inclement weather.

    Been there, done that! '78 was particularly memorable.

    tidester
    Host
    SUVs
  • mooretorquemooretorque Member Posts: 241
    respectfully, of course:
    "4. It is better to have have Stability Control and traction control over AWD in climates where it does not show.
    5. AWD does little in rainy condition as long as you have traction control and Stability Control."

    Having both a 99 RX AWD with LSD and a GS430 with both TRAC (as Lexus used to call it) and VSC. Fundamentally, there is a difference in feel between wifey's RX and my GS in the rain. In her RX the viscous coupling works transparently and essentially instantly to the point that, even on the old Goodyear Notegritys with shallow tread, the thing felt like it was on rails. This, BTW, is the advantage that both Audi and Subaru trumpet in their advertising, but it is a very real one. And that was my rationale for buying it equipped that way. I want my wife and children to feel and be as safe as possible in inclement conditions.

    By comparison, VSC/TRAC work by selectively braking wheels and dethrottling my V8. This is NOT transparent activity, but very obviously perceived. It works well, but it's not very smooth nor does it provide a particularly enjoyable driving experience. And for someone not particularly savvy in the ways of it's workings, it MIGHT produce some scary moments. Not what I want my non-gearhead wife to think about suddenly when pulling out into traffic on a wet street.

    Mind you, again, I'm not saying that VSC/TRAC aren't effective. Just not as seamless as the viscous coupled AWD and LSD of the RX. mho, feel free to disagree.

    (Before anyone types anything, I might add that I'm also familiar with the feel of those systems in the RX, since that's my dealer's usual loaner, and I've, of course, "test driven" those systems on wet streets. And the seat-of-the-pants feeling just ain't the same.........)
  • ravlravl Member Posts: 129
    When you say the only real difference between a minivan and a 2wd SUV is ride height, are you talking only mechanical differences? I'd have to give better looks a high mark as well. Minivans are so yesterday. I wouldn't be caught dead driving one today. May sound shallow, oh well.

    On another subject, has anyone else caught Pontiac's Rendevouz commercial comparing it to the RX300?
  • wwestwwest Member Posts: 10,706
    Makes me wonder what would have been the result if Lexus had built the RX300 on a minivan platform.

    Minivans are so yesterday?

    So is my 01 AWD 911 but it's still a keeper.
  • kmhkmh Member Posts: 143
    I have a '99 RX that has the auto-dimming rear and side mirrors. I know the rear mirror works but not sure about the side ones. Are they supposed to dim as much as the rearview mirror? Does the dimming feature "wear out"? Just wondering...
  • fedlawmanfedlawman Member Posts: 3,118
    Minivans are also noisier due to the increased interior volume, and tend to have more squeaks and rattles (less structural rigidity).

    BTW, I haven't seen the Buick commercial, but I must with you. I don't think the RX300 stacks up against the Rendezvous either.
  • ravlravl Member Posts: 129
    Now, why would you glump your 911 into my "so yesterday" comment about minivans?!? Now, if you're talking the Porsche concept for their first SUV, then we have a discussion because that thing I saw last night on tv was uglee! Caught it on Motor Trend Week.

    And yes, minivans are *very* yesterday. I can't recall the last time one turned my head. The same thing will happen with "SUV"s in a few years. We Americans love our labels, huh? I personally don't think of my 'car' as an SUV.

    Funny, but the true SUV is a Jeep, but Jeepers don't want that title for their rigs either!
  • TanhuecoTanhueco Member Posts: 1
    Does anyone know what oil brand Lexus use for their vehicles? All indications in their web site point to non-synthetic oil but I would like to confirm since their recommended frequency of oil changes is for synthetic type.

    Also, who is the manufacturer of the oil?
  • wmquanwmquan Member Posts: 1,817
    "I don't think the RX300 stacks up against the Rendezvous either."


    Unfortunately, I have to agree. Please see the new NHTSA crash test results:


    http://www.nhtsa.gov/nhtsa/announce/press/pressdisplay.cfm?year=2002&filename=pr29-02.htm


    Rendezvous gets a frontal impact rating of 3 stars for the driver, 3 stars for the front passenger. For the side impact rating, the Rendezvous gets 5 stars for both front and rear.


    The RX300 scored 4 stars/5 stars for the frontal crash test, and 5 stars for the side impact tests.


    These tests further illustrate the crashworthiness differences first indicated in the IIHS offset frontal crash tests, where the RX300 scored "Good" with a "Best Pick" designation, and the Rendezvous scored "Acceptable."

  • tariktarik Member Posts: 344
    Same here, I couldn't find anyone in TH or at the dealership explain to me how to verify the function of the auto-dimming "elephant ears". The interior mirror dims noticeably, but the side mirrors don't seem to do anything at all. If you ever get something out of anybody, please let us know.

    Tarik
  • frank09frank09 Member Posts: 14
    You're right , Lexus recommends non synthetic oil f/the RX300. The brand probably changes by region.

    Here in L.I., NY the dealers seem to use AGIP (also Mercedes and BMW). I know it's not a "household name", but it is a highly respected Italian co that refines in PA using the new Group II base oils.

    To quote from their web site (www.americanagip.com) : "AGIP is among the first and still few in North America to have converted to Group II Base Oils. Group II base oils (obtained through a process called hydro-cracking, they are super-clear& almost entirely pure and free of contaminants" When I check my oil level it is a little disconcerting to see the dip stick look like it's measuring water, it's so clear.

    The dealers buy it in bulk and it's not available in retail stores, although it's avail directly from the NY distributor, in Westbury,NY. (no I don't work f/them or endorse the product, just passing along the info). Hope this helps
  • clee4clee4 Member Posts: 103
    To test auto-dim, sit in the garage/driveway/parking lot at night and turn your lights on, shine a flash light onto the sensor that is in the rear view mirrow. You will be able to tell if the side mirrows dim
  • jiaminjiamin Member Posts: 556
    I asked 2nd dealer for the HID without Nav system. They said to order that it'll take like 150 days and probably will be an 03 RX. Or they can search it for me from other dealerships. If found I should pay some extra shipping. Since I won't be ready until at least a month later I let them search.

    CarsDirect.com got QX4 2WD for about $1200 less than invoice. Sounds very good but the overall price would be similar to 2WD RX similarly equipped. So to me it's not quite worth. It's got more little things than RX. However my impression is RX has better overall quality. CarsDirect.com's 2WD RX is $180 over invoice which I think is good enough.
  • bigorange30bigorange30 Member Posts: 1,091
    I just bought a QX4 in January and have been very impressed with it. I like the appearance much better than the RX300. I am not sure where you get the information about overall quality but I don't agree with just making that blanket statement. The RX300 has much more chance of developing engine oil sludge than the QX4 does. I would highly recommend the QX4.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.