2017 Audi Q7 Road Test | Edmunds.com

Comments

• stiney Member Posts: 28

  May 2015

  It really looks more like a Station Wagon than a "crossover"

  1
• ttbuyer Member Posts: 45

  May 2015

  This is proportioned like a German Chrysler Pacifica (anyone remember those?) It is A M A Z I N G to me that AUDI charges extra for blind spot detection, a back-up camera and rear cross-traffic detection on a car that starts at $50,000.00. My wife has a MAZDA6 Touring (the mid- line trim) that lists for less than $25K and has all that safety equipment standard (the MAZDA will likely be far more dependable too). I do wish the MAZDA6 wagon would come to the USA market.

  0
• mrburley Member Posts: 1

  May 2015

  Brilliant engineering and beautiful interior, but why the uninspirational exterior design?

  0
• schen72 Member Posts: 433

  May 2015

  Once again, Audi prices this way because they can. I think Audi cars are beautiful and very nice, but I would never buy one with my own money. I've had Audi company cars in the past, and they are just too unreliable.

  0
• huntm2000 Member Posts: 6

  January 2016

  All the pictures you see are from the European version. the US version sits higher and has a more aggressive front nose/grill
  
  
  
  

  IMG_2867.JPG 604.5K

  IMG_2863.JPG 780.3K

  IMG_2864.JPG 829.4K

  IMG_2862.JPG 618.3K

  0
• dfelix70 Member Posts: 143

  January 2016

  Odd how the article would state it has "few faults", yet two of the faults mentioned are pretty darn important: lack of utility and over-reported mpg ratings. And let's not forget its completely dowdy exterior styling.

  0