Subaru Crew - Future Models

18911131439

Comments

  • nematodenematode Member Posts: 448
    Hey All,

    I've been gone for while and I seem to have missed a lot.

    That number is with EVERY option including the trailer hitch, gate bar, security upgrade, everything. I'm not sure where this dealer got the number (MSRP? or close to it I'm sure) but thats what he is going to have on his lot for after a the initial few months of introduction. I was not aware all those numbers had been released but I thought I would post it for what its worth. I'm not going to say who the dealer is because initially he plans on putting it on the lot for $35,000 even......with "dealer prep options" (yea right!). Lets just say if you are in the St. Louis area you can probably figure out who it is.....
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Bob,

    Yes, the Escape/Tribue does look promising. The reviews on it so far have been very positive and I do think it will make a big dent in Subaru, Honda and Toyota sales. I kind of expect that since Ford/Mazda have the data from existing models to know what consumers are looking for. I'm looking forward to see what the response will be from Subaru as well as Honda in future models. Things can only get better!

    I read somewhere that Ford was having initial production problems with the Escape due to the transmission. Has anyone heard if that's been cleared up?
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Ken, I think the red spy pics could be the next impreza, sure. It does look a lot like the silver and black mules.

    The problem with the tribute is that it's FWD natively. And according to carpoint.msn.com, the DX is only available with the 130HP inline4. (did you look under the hood? or perhaps it was an LX) 4WD is a $1200 option. You also forgot to mention that all the v6 models have an automatic transmission. Additionally, a Tribute ES (think Forester S) starts at $23,500 with AWD/4WD.

    I wouldn't be at all surprised to see the Forester get a power upgrade though!

    -Colin
  • lergeson1lergeson1 Member Posts: 15
    My 2 cents on the whole value/price/upscale marketing debate:

    People have a budget in mind, but when it comes right down to making a choice it will be what feels right. For me the Subaru fits the bill.

    I will be looking strongly toward the VDC and LL Bean models when they come out. Although I would rather stay under the $30k mark, I find Subaru wagons extremely appealing, far more than the VW or Audi (or whatever) competitors.

    Here's why: I am an outdoorsman at heart and I expect to pay higher dollars for new and improved technology. If I want the improved technology and stability of the VDC, I will need to shell out the cash for it. That is just the way it works. Yet, what will make me choose a Subaru over a Passat or Audi is the Subaru will not leave me stranded when I make my way to and up a mountainside. With the VW or Audi, I just can't see taking them off-road. The darn paint might get chipped and I might get some mud on the floormats! If I was the type that wanted to stay on the freeway, I would buy the Audi or the Passat.

    When I think of Subes, I think of reliability and the sure footedness and utlity they offer. If I can get some luxurious amenities, a nice sound system and more power, all more reason to make the purchase.

    As an aside, my wife just spent a week in San Francisco and she saw more Outbacks and Subarus on the road than she could bat an eye at. Currently S.F.'s median housing price is scaling to the $500k+ level, thus, I term the city as pretty darn up-scale. More and more technologically-minded dot.com entrepeneurs and brighter and younger business-minded people are finding their way there. One could say it is "yuppiedom" or "suburbia". The people that reside there could drive the Audi, VW, Saab or anything else (they have the cash --- if it is not all tied in stock options), but it seems like they are chosing the Subarus. So, whether Subaru wants to take sales and their cars up-scale or not, it seems like they have already arrived in some parts of the country.
    -Leif

    P.S. I will be flying from LA (where I reside) to Seattle this weekend. I will be keeping a close eye on the Subaru population there. I expect high volumes since I am a Washingtonian :)
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    No question, buyer beware. It is after all, v1.0.

    Subaru has the superior AWD system. The Tribute/Escapes (T/Es) have a on-demand system which works much like the CRVs -- meaning FDW until slippage occurs, then 4WD engages.

    What I like about the T/Es is that the basic packaging is just about perfect -- the overall size-to-roominess ratio. Like I said, it's 2" shorter than the Forester, but quite a bit roomier. And... the price is a knockout.

    Juice, I agree, Honda has more to worry about with the CRV than Subaru does with the Forester. However, both are going to suffer. Same with the RAV4, Grand Vitara, Cherokee, etc.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The dealer markups won't last. Even here at Subaru Crew there aren't any "I must be the first on the block to have one at any cost" types.

    Ken: you sure it wasn't the new Cherokee, with those production troubles? Jeep pushed the intro back a year, to next summer.

    Colin: how could I forget? No manual tranny with the V6, and the 4 banger with the stick is underpowered and heavy. I doubt it'll handle as well as the Forester, either.

    Ford should offer a V6 "SVT" edition, with a bit more power, 6 speed, 17" alloys. Then watch out.

    Leif: you remind me of Lucien, who bought his '99 Outback over a pricier Passat because the Passat seemed "too nice" for his uses. Subaru owners aren't pretenders - they actually practice all those outdoor activities in their ads.

    Your house price comment reminds me of my basic rule of thumb for cars: your car should cost only about 10% of the price of your house. That means SFers should spend $50k for a car. So the Subie is a bargain to them! ;)

    Bob: v1.0? LOL! My Escort was a first-year car, but it felt more like a v0.9 Beta test!

    The Escape is a lot wider and probably taller too. Still, I agree with you on the packaging - it's proof that a vehicle doesn't have to be ungainly in size to be practical.

    OK, perhaps I'm a bit too optimistic for Subaru. After all, they did let Muller go :(

    Forester has 2 model years left before the redesign, and perhaps it will get more power. H6? Turbo 2.0l from Japan or UK? Supercharger from the ST-X? I'll take any one of those.

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Bob: the hitch is here. I should be able to get it installed this weekend. I'll keep you posted, and share instructions and photos as usual with the Crew.

    -juice
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    juice,

    I managed to dig up the link. I don't remember where I first saw it, but here it is:

    http://www.blueovalnews.com/escape_trans_problems.htm
  • aakersonaakerson Member Posts: 71
    I want to comment on several of the posts:

    first -- I'm from St. Louis and would really like to know who is the dealer that is pricing the new OB-6 so dearly. I just hope it's not a certain dealer located in WG. I just "disappointed" my dealer by purchasing a standard Outback 5-speed instead of waiting for the 6-cylinder. Reasons? I didn't want to spend the money, didn't want an automatic. And actually, he wasn't too disappointed -- he had a plethora of 5-speeds, and I don;t think those are real salable in comfortable old St. Louis.

    second -- to respond to a comment on how many Subarus another writer was looking forward to seeing in Seattle -- you will be awed. As I mentioned in an earlier post, when we were up there (Seattle and Portland) recently, it was wonderful to see the streets full of Outbacks, Foresters and Legacys instead of F-150s, Caravans, Expeditions, Cherokees Grand and otherwise, and all that other big iron that does nothing but make the sun go down early for everyone unlucky enough to be caught behind them.

    third -- I also got a new company car, an Acura TL recently,with the nav. system. To this 50-something, it's really cool -- though it did show me driving right through Busch Stadium, over second base, a few weeks ago.
  • barresa11barresa11 Member Posts: 277
    "P.S. I will be flying from LA (where I reside) to
    Seattle this weekend. I will be keeping a close
    eye on the Subaru population there. I expect high
    volumes since I am a Washingtonian :)"

    Lergeson1: I live in Seattle and I can vouch that we have mucho Soobs here. We have high housing prices (especially in the City) and all the dot.com (Microsoft included)$$. I draw the same conclusion as you do about San Franciscans.

    To others that ? Subaru's upward movement, I can assure you that I wouldn't have seriously considered an Outback prior to 2000. In fact, many dealerships in the Puget Sound area could not keep 2000 Ltd's in stock back in Feb when I was buying. Why, because those that were considering VW's (yes, they were lowly before the current Passat...not that long ago, HELLO?), Audi's and even Volvo's, were attracted to the Ltd (especially) and bought! Subaru made major changes to the interior and to a lesser extent, the exterior. I see no reason why the H6's won't continue the success. I agree with Juice that real world pricing will put the Subaru as even better value than the AWD Passat.

    To the individual that exclaimed that reliability is not a big draw for those in the market for an upscale wagon....HA HA...I mean...LOL! Those that I know in this market are even more concerned (and discerning) about this as they are shelling out considerably more bucks than they would for a Taurus/Sable wagon, as an example.

    I think that Subaru has learned from their mistake in the early 90's about moving to fast upmarket. They are not about to repeat.

    Stephen
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    my basic rule of thumb for cars: your car should cost only about 10% of the price of your house.

    Holy crap! Homes are fairly cheap here in Wichita... a nice 3 bedroom with full basement can be had for $85k-110k. With your formula juice, I would be way overspending on an Impreza turbo. ($25k-28k they say...)

    -Colin
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    wow! 85-110K for a HOUSE. You cannot get a doghouse for this money in the SF Bay Area...
    According to Juice's formula, I need a Land Cruiser, to match my house price... ;-(
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    It is FWD, no low range, and the rear kicks in after you are skidding.

    2nd It's a FORD. Ford is known to have bad tranny problems especially on it's small to midsize cars (Can we say Escort and Tarus) I too had an escort that eventually was ruined by AAMCO and bought by their insurance company.

    Fords have the worst build quality. My buddy drives a 2 year old contour V6 that he babied since day 1 and has had nothing but problems, not major ones, but on week 1 the glove box kept falling open, and hasn't closed properly since. He has replaced front brakes numerous times...

    You couldn't give me a ford... if you did, i'd promptly sell it back to the dealer for 50% off the sticker.

    -mike

    :)
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Who the hell has rear drum brakes in 2000? That is unheard of. I will simply never buy a car with rear drums ever....

    -mike
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Hmm interesting, C&D has it at 17mpg as thier test, with a 20/24 listed. 17mpg is what I get with my Trooper and I'm heavy on the throttle. The forester is probably close to 26ish?

    -mike
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Subaru Impreza L and Outback Sports have rear drum brakes. My '96 Impreza Outback has rear disk brakes. Subaru downgraded the above mentioned models in '97.

    Fords aren't that bad. I've a few problems, but nothing out of the ordinary.

    Bob
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    for a little vacation. Talk to you all in a week!

    Bob
  • iscottsiscotts Member Posts: 28
    The "domestic" manufacturers make cars that almost always have more stuff for less money. If it's a feature comparison for the same sticker, they usually win out. Cost of ownership is another matter, and the smart middle classes take this into account. (Upper classes don't care, it's just that the domestics don't make many 40-80K cars).

    So, Ford, Chrysler, GM: build your Forester-killers, and bring 'em on!

    [NOTE: Americans can make great cars - they made my Outback in Indiana.]
  • abhidharmaabhidharma Member Posts: 93
    Doesn't the Brighton have drums?
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    iscotts, they also make the Honda Passport/Isuzu Rodeo at that very same Indiana plant... check out the suv comparison on the edmunds homepage (right now at least!) and see what they thought of it.

    But I have compared the build quality of a legacy/outback to a forester/impreza (built in Japan) and it's not bad. the japanese models are a bit better, but I respect the subaru half of the Indiana plant. ;)

    -Colin
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    and it went 120,000 miles w/o a single visit to the dealer. 2 sets of brake pads, 1 set of tires, and oil changes every 3K miles... So don't go ditching on the other 1/2 of the plant.

    And yes, the base models do have drum brakes, but on the Ford it's NOT EVEN AN OPTION!

    -mike
  • amishraamishra Member Posts: 367
    Well I'd like to add to the Ford commentary, but unfortunately my mother still has her 1984 Ford LTD with 326,000 KMs on it. Yes, it's had the occasional problem, but in another 4 years it'll qualify as a classic :)

    ash
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Ford made outstanding RWD cars and the older ones aren't too bad. My dad has a '85 Towncar with 250,000 miles on it, but the FWD/4WD and '90->Newer are crappola.

    -mike
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Glenn Wallace has added some more photos to his site. These are actual (unretouched) snapshots of a left-hand drive (US version?) model WRX, from Mag-X.

    http://www.new-impreza.com/

    The more I see it, the more I like it.

    Bob
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    I still don't dig the headlights but I did own a '97 Neon ACR, so I wouldn't avoid this car for that reason. ;) (although the new Neon headlight is much more like that...)

    I have no problems with the sides, trunk and taillights.

    But for $25k-27k US, it needs more than 220HP... it needs much better suspension and tires than the RS, better seats... Better paint would be nice but ever since the conversion to powder based paint that's pretty much a universal complaint of mine.

    -Colin
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Yeah read that article and tell me that the Passport/Rodeo's build quality was a fluke. I'm glad yours was built better, but the 2000 model Edmunds had for review made GM look good!

    -Colin
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Maybe the one edmunds had was bad? I dunno, I know a lot of people with em, only problem is the vibration in the 98-99 models...

    -mike
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    I was looking at the "latest" Impreza spy pics and I can't help but to notice that the front fender flares look a bit like those on the Forester. Maybe they also threw in a dash of Forester along with Neon when cooking up these photos. :)
  • nematodenematode Member Posts: 448
    I HAD a 1996 Ford Contour V6 LX with just about everything from the SE Sport Package. Thats what we traded in for my wifes 2k OB Ltd. The car was a blast to drive when working. I cant say enough about how much I enjoyed driving that car WHEN IT WAS WORKING. On the other hand the problems it had were:
    1) Major electrical gremlins. None of these were fixed properly even after visiting 3 dealers.
    It would stall (go completely dead) at 70mph on the highway. Happened 4 times and was scary as hell. Random and could not be reproduced.
    It would stall if you drove through more than tiny bit of water (sometimes). Dealer could never fix properly. Although one dealer seemed to make it better for a while.
    It burned turn signal bulbs on all corners (4 total in 55k miles). No clue???
    Ford "Premium" Sound
    CD player would freak out and not play or give back the CD and just make whirring/buzzing noises. Totally random (about 10-15 times) and could not be reproduced.
    The right front speaker would sometimes cut (20 times?) out and then return at random times.
    2) Engine problems. Never solved by 3 dealers.
    4 (yes 4) O2 sensors (3 under warranty)
    3 throttle body problems (before 55k miles)
    1 replacement (after warranty)
    1 cleaning after warranty
    1 cleaning under warranty
    Strange loud engine noises (not the same as the "moosing" sound accociated with the 2.5L) starting at 30k miles
    Strange engine vibrations at 55k miles
    Check engine light (not O2 sensor related) 2 times that required reset. Never solved.
    3) Transmission. Traded it in.
    Very harsh shifts at random times
    Might have been slipping slightly at 55k
    4) MPG
    3200lbs, 2.5L V6, 170hp, no AWD and only 24mpg on the highway.

    On the other hand........
    I currently drive a 1990 Ford Taurus with 140k+ miles with good old pushrod Vulcan V6. I got it a few years ago FREE with 90k miles. Original transmission!!! Miracle of miracles!!!! Other than age related problems (oil seepage of about 1qt every 3000miles, replaced water pump 2x, replaced alternator 2 times, AC required work and conversion) its been a dream car. It seems to require about $200 a year to keep running and thats just fine with me. I would really like to see it hit 200k but I'm not sure it will make it quite that far. After a while its just fun to see how far it will go. Sometimes they just screw one together correctly I guess. By the way, it still gets almost 30 MPG on the highway at 60mph. Just amazing.

    Do I bash Ford? Yes and no. I'm angry about taking a loss on the Contour but happy that the Taurus has been a loyal family hauler for so long.
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    "Controversial" definitely was the right word to use. It does bare a strong resemblance to the European Toyota Corolla. The rear deck lid looks kind of short though. Since Prodrive just built 2 new WRC rally cars, I can't imagine them going to this new platform just yet.

    I wonder how the 5 door hatchback version will look. I think it will take some time for me to get used to the front end though. Right now, I don't really like it either. Then again, I hated the then new E-class goggle-eye look when it first came out in late '95, but now I own one of them.

    One thing I don't understand is why they said that these cars are waiting for delivery for North America. I thought the new Impreza was only supposed to arrive for MY2002. Did I make a mistake somewhere?

    Drew
  • FrankMcFrankMc Member Posts: 228
    in Japan for export to the US, we don't get the 1 year delay like we do with the Legacy. (Where we continue the old Legacy for a year). Since they build them in Japan we may not get every model but the ones we do get will be up to date.
  • FrankMcFrankMc Member Posts: 228
    but I had to catch up. I too have some concerns about Subaru's move upscale, but it seems to be working so far. The nice thing is that we will soon find out for ourselves how well it does work. I'm sure Subaru will adjust it's strategy depending upon the results. It will be interesting to see how well they (the 6 cyl) sell, but as others have stated, VW is moving upscale along with everything else. It should be interesting.
  • bdevbdev Member Posts: 13
    A few months ago the OB/Pickup was all the rage at the auto shows and mags. As I recall, at that time production was a given. Since then, I've heard virtually nothing this project. Any updates on this?

    While on the subject - I'm one of those weekend warriors who could use the open pick-up for the home projects - the old VW Rabbit pickup would work OK for me. Any promise of a future similar Subaru offering? I strongly suspect that they have similar vehicles for other markets.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Drew, if those cars were really headed to the US (and it's very possible as they are LHD), then that makes sense to me. SOA and SOC should get a few pre-production test/press mules before the mass shipments start arriving. 9 months before? Seems strange, but possible.

    But then again, I'm POSITIVE the 2001 2.5RS is perfectly normal and will be arriving at dealers *very* soon.

    -Colin
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Bruce, I am sure that whatever uprated powertrain makes it into the Legacy GT will be offered with a 5 speed manual transmission. They're not about to have another SVX on their hands.

    However, that engine might be a 2.0L turbo instead of the 3.0L six cylinder.

    -Colin
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    The pre-production mules makes sense, but in WRX trim and as you said, 9 months ahead of time? Maybe they want to fine tune the car for the North American market. I guess this would be another good question for Patti.

    I agree that the '01 Impreza should be completely "normal", as indicated '01 Impreza brochure.
  • 3dogs3dogs Member Posts: 4
    Currently have a 96 Legacy GT Wagon and will be soon in the market for a Sedan type.
    Would love to see more power in this vehicle
    and it sounds like some of you might have some information.
    Sorry for not being up to speed on the lingo, but can you tell me what the H-6 is?
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    H6 is a flat six cylinder 212hp engine. Likely to be in the 2002 Legacy line. The Outback in 2001 will have the H6 in it in the upscale LL Bean and VDC trims...

    -mike
  • nematodenematode Member Posts: 448
    For the 2001 model I see that there will only be 1300 VDC models available for the US. The source is C&D for this month. With only that number available (if true) my bet is that prices will stay near MSRP for quite a while. That would mean $34k+tax+tags loaded. $30k???, more like $35k!!! Ouch!!! I guess thats one way to keep the car upscale. Limited production. Anyone here determined get one this year?

    On an unrelated note, I'm having PIAA 1000 (instead of the CATZ MSX) series driving lights installed on my wifes 2k OB Ltd. to combat what I think is a overly wide and diffuse lighting pattern. They will be for use with the low beams and extend the lighting area approx. 15-20' further. They will be aimed as not to offend people. I'm parital to the "E-code" pattern. They will be installed next to the licence plate.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Oh please, bring the Legacy B4 RSK here. Wagons, too. For the wife, it would be perfect. She already secretly prefers my Forester over her Mazda, but this would really take her out of the closet.

    Bruce: I'd wait and see. Your '98 is already a nice ride, so wait until you can get the H6 or a turbo so it's a significant step up.

    The ST-X has the green light for production, according to rumorville. Expect it in MY2003 or so.

    So, how do you ex-Ford owners really feel? ;) Semms like I hit a nerve, but someone correctly pointed out the smaller FWD models seem to give the most trouble, and that's what the Escape is, essentially.

    LHD WRX? My, my. Who cares what it looks like? Hope they don't make it too "soft" for the US market.

    Colin: given you're a true enthusiast, who even goes as far as autoXing his main ride, I'd say yours falls under the hobby category, and you are therefore exempt from the 10% rule.

    :o)

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    BTW, if you read the new XC reviews, the alternative most often mentioned is the Outback. So at least on occasion Volvo and Subaru are mentioned in the same breath.

    And while I did test drive a Passat sedan, I'm glad I picked the Subaru. I just installed a hitch on Friday, and the harness is pre-wired, and there is a plug for you to get the wiring to where the hitch is. Piece of cake.

    The Passat is not rated for towing at all. Where's the utility? Aren't these supposed to be SUV alternatives, in a way? Isn't the frame strong enough? I'm sure you'd have to splice electrical wires to connect the harness, and that would suck. To top it off, the roof rack is pretty flimsy.

    Advantage: Subaru.

    -juice
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    The XC has a surprising amount of ground clearance though. But, like the Outback, I'd be reluctant to take it too far off-road; even more so with the XC since I don't think it has any (available) skidplates. I recall that R&T magazine took their XC on a light offroad track and they knocked out the turbo intercooler's plug underneath, or something like that. They ended up using duct tape to patch the hole and it worked!! The fact that it was a light pressure turbo probably helped too.

    Drew
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I hear you, I just installed the rear skid plate myself. Now I'm waiting for Subaru to offer a real, metal skid plate to replace the flimsy plastic bottom engine cover.

    -juice
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    Is the plastic bottom engine cover at the front of the engine, or directly underneath the middle of the engine? I would imagine that most skid plates for the front (with brushguards, anyway) would be directly in front. Doesn't Subaru also offer other skidplates (oil pan/fuel tank/front diffy)? I vaguely recall reading something stating that.

    My brushguard has sturdy skidplate which protects the radiator and oil pan, I think. MB designed everything to be tucked up and within the frame rails, so for North American spec vehicles, I don't believe there are any (or a minimal number of) skidplates. Austrailian spec MLs have locally fitted heavy duty plates though for driving in their environment - Outback - though.

    Oh BTW, have you seen the skidplates (actually it's more like a skid tray) that cover the entire underside of the WRC car? It really takes a lot of
    punishment on those jumps. I imagine that their forerunner Foresters should have similar underside trays as well.

    Drew
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    And that's exactly the type of thing I'm hoping they'll start to carry.

    The plastic cover starts at the bumper and stretches past the oil pan. It's got good coverage, but it doesn't provide any real protection except for water and mud.

    The rear diffy protector is the only functional skid plate Subaru offers. Everything else is vulnerable, and the front push bar is cosmetic.

    -juice
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    That ginormous skidplate Drew is talking about is actually a Prodrive part, not STi. And I know someone that has a (slightly) used one for sale, $500USD. He paid about $1000 for it with shipping and all. It absolutely dwarfs normal skidplates, like the one Primitive Racing sells... but it weighs quite a bit more too.

    -Colin
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Man, aftermarket parts can be painfully expensive. A grand? The rear diffy protector was just $55. Now I feel better :)

    -juice
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    Man, that Prodrive undertray would be a PITA to remove whenever servicing was needed. I know that they have to remove (and change) the trays quite frequently on the WRC cars. Oh, that reminds me...Rally of New Zealand footage at 5pm PST on Speedvision today; this was the race where both WRC Imprezas suffered identical mechanical problems and had to be retired. Damn!

    FWIW, oil changes on MB cars are done using a topsider pump. Removing the drain plug from underneath is unnecessary and rather messy. This is why my skidplate doesn't really interfere with any basic maintenance tasks.

    Drew
  • texsubarutexsubaru Member Posts: 242
    I notice that you said "the front push bar is cosmetic"; assuming you mean what Subaru bills as its "brush guard," do you think it provides no protective value at all to the front of a Forester or do you just mean it provides no special underbody/skid protection?
  • scarwafscarwaf Member Posts: 33
    I would like to purchase a 2001 Subaru H6VDC. Is it worth the extra $7000.00 opposed to the 2000 Subaru OB Limited H4?
    Would appreciate hearing from you.
    Thanks,
    Bob
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.