Subaru Crew - Future Models II

1412413415417418446

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    If they update the Legacy the same way they updated the Forester, which created sales success, I think it would be wise. The rear seat got the biggest upgrade.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showpost.php?p=25142168&postcount=879

    Supposedly this is very close to the production model, which likely will debut at the NY show.

    Bob
  • samiam_68samiam_68 Member Posts: 775
    Is it just me, or does this thing have a HUGE front overhang? I like the door handles :)
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    http://www.worldcarfans.com/9090111.019/subaru-legacy-concept-front-details-reve- aled

    The more I study it, the more I like it. I see some (good) Acura, BMW and other influences. Wheelbase is 108.3 inches. Length is up over current Legacy by about 4 inches, width by roughly the same.

    Bob
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    Dang, I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but that is just plain UGLY. Over-styled, with every auto-fashion cliche imaginable, including some from the truck/SUV bag of schlock, (the wheel arches and chevy-esque truck grill). Bad, bad, bad, bad, and dumb! Just awful !!!!! :sick:

    On a positive note, I mostly like the current Impreza and Forester. :)
  • samiam_68samiam_68 Member Posts: 775
    Dang, I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but that is just plain UGLY.

    Yes, I agree, it is quite hideous, both inside and out. The exterior proportions and angles are all wrong. Looks like a love child of a 2005 Kia Amanti and a 2007 Chrysler Sebring, on steroids.

    Interior looks like a mish-mash of factory and aftermarket. No coherent theme. I wonder, with all those touch screens, if they ever figured out how to make the climate control actually work...

    I seriously hope they tone this thing down for production. Subaru - if you're listening - please don't bring us another Tribeca!

    On the plus side, the 3.6 liter engine would be nice if they keep the weight under control.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    New Legacy
    Wheelbase x 108.3
    Length x 188.8
    Width x 71.7
    Height x 59

    Old Legacy
    Wheelbase 105.1
    Length x 185
    Width x 68.1
    Height x 56.1

    Camry
    Wheelbase x 109.3
    Length x 189.2
    Width x 71.7
    Height x 57.7

    Accord
    Wheelbase x 110.2
    Length x 194.1
    Width x 72.7
    Height x 58.1

    Mazda6
    Wheelbase x 109.8
    Length x 193.7
    Width x 72.4
    Height x 57.9

    Altima
    Wheelbase x 109.3
    Length x 189.8
    Width x 70.7
    Height x 57.9

    Passat
    Wheelbase 106.7
    Length x 188
    Width x 71.7
    Height x 59.7

    A4
    Wheelbase 110.6
    Length x 185.2
    Width x 71.9
    Height x 56.2

    3 Series
    Wheelbase 108.7
    Length x 178.2
    Width x 71.5
    Height x 56.1

    Taurus
    Wheelbase 112.9
    Length x 201.8
    Width x 74.5
    Height x 61.5

    Malibu
    Wheelbase 112.3
    Length x 191.8
    Width x 70.3
    Height x 57.1

    Fusion
    Wheelbase 107.4
    Length x 190.2
    Width x 72.2
    Height x 57.2

    S40
    Wheelbase x 103.9
    Length x 176.2
    Width x 69.7
    Height x 57.2

    S60
    Wheelbase x 106.9
    Length x 181.2
    Width x 71.0
    Height x 56.2

    9-3
    Wheelbase x 105.3
    Length x 182.9
    Width x 69
    Height x 57.1

    TSX
    Wheelbase x 106.5
    Length x 185.6
    Width x 72.4
    Height x 56.7

    TL
    Wheelbase x 109.3
    Length x 195.3
    Width x 74
    Height x 57.2

    IS
    Wheelbase x 107.5
    Length x 180.1
    Width x 70.9
    Height x 56.1

    GS
    Wheelbase x 112.2
    Length x 190
    Width x 71.7
    Height x 56.1

    G35
    Wheelbase x 112.2
    Length x 187
    Width x 69.8
    Height x 57.8
  • rblnrrblnr Member Posts: 124
    Here's a thumbs up vote on the looks -- pretty cool! Lots of Acura in the shoulders and wheel wells(even Mercedes here, though everyone's highlighting them now), BMW a_s. Yet coherent.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    If I were an executive at Acura, I would be preparing the trademark-infringement lawsuit right now!

    I like the current model better, but I wouldn't call the concept "hideous looking". Certainly, it will be more the right size to compete in the midsize market in the U.S. with the WB stretch.

    There will still be wagons too, I hope?

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Trademark infringement? Never happen. Jeep tried that with Hummer because it had a Jeep-like 7-slot grille, and lost big time. I do agree that Subaru did a lot of "borrowing" of styling cues: Acura TL/TSX and Nissan Altima for the profile; a hint of Audi for the front, and BMW 5-7-series for the rear.

    There will be a wagon, but we won't see it. We'll get the Outback wagon, just like now.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The inside reminds me of the Lexus RX, which is odd because it's not even in the same class. It's those vertical vents, I guess.

    Outside, though, I mostly see G35/37 influence. I like the stacked headlights.

    There's too much chrome on there, IMO. The grille looks like Acura designed it, and I don't care for the wide chrome stripe on the back side, either.

    It looks best in Profile. Big windows should give it good visibility.

    This is a concept, so if they tone it down like I think they will, the end result should look good.

    Also - it's good that we are all bringing up upscale/luxury brands when we compare it, note that noone has said Kia or Neon like a lot of previous Subarus.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I do agree on the Infiniti G35/37 visual like. We don't agree on the chrome issue.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Perhaps they'll save the chrome for the Limiteds.

    On the Forester, only the LTD gets chrome door handles, I believe.
  • wmarton64wmarton64 Member Posts: 12
    Nice to see that the Legacy is getting a bit bigger. This is one of my gripes with my 2001 OB VDC...for such a long car, it doesn't have much interior room, especially regarding width.

    Re. the looks: I don't know. The reaction that I have been reading is a bit Tribecaesqe, i.e., very polarized. I personally don't care for the front, which is a not very original amalgam of Audi, Acura, and Infiniti. It also looks a bit front heavy, but I'd have to see it in person.

    I'll be very interested in seeing what the 2010 Outback looks like. I have great difficulty envisioning how the Legacy concept translates. Also, there is a rumor at cars101 (Joe Spitz's website) that the Legacy and Outback will NOT have the 3.6l engine this year.

    wilbur
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Keeping the 3.0l H6 would be a mistake. It's now underpowered for the class, and it wants premium fuel. They need the 3.6l pronto.

    I noticed all the size increases, too. Looks like it gained about 3 inches in every direciton (length, width, even height). So it should feel a lot bigger inside.
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    First thing that came to my mind was Altima/G37 and then a Ford truck or Caddy grill which I'm not a big fan of, but don't hate.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    From what I've heard, the 3.0 is going away.

    Bob
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,716
    Well, hmm.

    I will reserve my final judgement for the wagon, which is my preferred body style, but the exterior of the car is okay to my eye. Not fantastic, but I am not repulsed. It is "typical modern." The interior, though, is disappointing. I love the apparent room in the rear seats - the style of the front seats really serves to enhance rear leg (knee) room. But, Subaru should have stuck closer to the gorgeous interior of the Tribeca (which was done nicely on the Impreza and Forester). This concept's interior is blocky, disjointed.

    I look forward to seeing more. I hope a wagon is revealed before too long. The look of that Legacy, in direct translation, would not work well on an Outback.
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • wmarton64wmarton64 Member Posts: 12
    "I look forward to seeing more. I hope a wagon is revealed before too long. The look of that Legacy, in direct translation, would not work well on an Outback."

    I agree. The last generation Outback was pretty much a slightly stylized, raised Legacy wagon, which ironically, was pretty close to what the original mid/late 1990s Outback was, i.e., a Legacy wagon with cladding and an outdoorsy image courtesy of Paul Hogan. The early 2000s Outback were a bit more unique. It will be interesting to see what the 2010 Outback looks like.

    wilbur
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    actually, the Outback didn't get cladding until 2000 and the departure of Paul Hogan. Outback hasn't ever been anything more than a straight up Legacy wagon with a raised suspension and 2 tone paint. And body cladding from 2000-2004 ;)

    (yes, there is a leetle cladding from 2004 I know, but it's just along the rocker panel, not the half-the-door treatment from before) :blush:
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    This is interesting: I noticed that the wiper stalk has a "rear wiper" control. Might this be a 5-door hatch model, with the rear wiper tucked down under the rear deck lip and out of sight?

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Bob sent me the pics, and I saw the switch he's talking about, which is weird...

    The back window has a slight gap, but I don't think it's big enough for a wiper to tuck away.

    Maybe it's for the wagon and they just forgot to take that out? Or it's JDM?

    I don't think the concept has a rear wiper.
  • wmarton64wmarton64 Member Posts: 12
    Yes, other than the cosmetics, the Legacy and OB are the same vehicle; however, Subaru didn't market the two vehicles this way. The OB is supposed to be the outdoorsy, crossover vehicle. So much so that the "Legacy" name was dropped in 2000 and the (over) cladding appeared along with the two-tone paint. To further distinguish between the two vehicles, Subaru completely dropped the wagon from the lineup in 2008. Assuming that Subaru continues with the OB line (they would be stupid not to), how does this Legacy sedan concept translate? I don't know. The "evolved" Legacy is much more Impreza-like than outdoorsy. If Subaru moves away from the cross-over image for the OB, it might as well release a sporty Legacy wagon. But the fact is that the OB sold MUCH better than the Legacy wagon here in the U.S. Subaru has alot riding on the OB redesign.

    wilbur
  • toboggantoboggan Member Posts: 283
    Looks like a little Audi influence in the grill area. And maybe a wee bit from the Chrysler 500 (or was it the 300.. :confuse: )

    MNSteve (Brrrr!)
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    there is the issue of 2.5 inches more ground clearance for the Outback. Given recent weather, that's not just cosmetic.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The seats are also mounted higher.

    I once measured. The Outback's seats, even at the lowest position, were a full 4" higher off the ground than in our Legacy.

    So the seats are raised up 1.5" taller as well.
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    oh that's right, because the roof is blistered. I forgot about that. Even on our '99 it is. Although we swapped in 2.5RS seats....but the extra height is in the drill holes, not in the seats themselves.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    It appears to be the production version of the Legacy wagon. The car appears to be considerably longer than the current Legacy/Outback wagon. Now if only we could get a larger image...

    http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showpost.php?p=25194956&postcount=1172

    Bob
  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    I bet not for us. We probably get stinking Outback only, while the rest will get both. :cry::cry:

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Yep.

    Bob
  • lirrmikelirrmike Member Posts: 4
    From what I have heard the Legacy and Outback are going to be completely different from each other. So you possible could se a Legacy wagon here. I would not be suprised if the Exiga is actually the next Outback. As far as the Legacy Concept, I like it. However I do hope the use the 3.6 H6 and get rid of the 3.0. However a 3.0 diesel would be nice too. Maybe they could even make a new Baja. Which was a nice little truck.
  • altimatealtimate Member Posts: 74
    As someone who recently leased an 09 Legacy SE I was very curious about the 2010 model since my lease will be up the end of 2010. To say the least I'm a bit disappointed in the styling. Not that it's awful or anything but it's totally generic and looks like numerous current midsizers out there. The C-Pillar is an absolute clone of the Altima, Accord, G35, BMW 3 and who knows how many others. I was kind of hoping for a unique and sleeker design. As for the front end I suspect it will be toned down in the production model. I also don't like the center stack another copycat design.

    Frankly, I leased the Legacy because it was a bit different stylistically than most of the other current midsizers and has an equisite interior for its price point. Likely that I'll stick with my current choice and buy it off lease. It's been flawless in the first four months of ownership.

    Still, we'll have to see the actual production car and check its price and features to make a final judgement. I do like the idea of the extra width and height assuming that translates into real interior room.

    Recently rented the horrific Chrysler Sebring which is longer and wider than the Legacy and found it far more cramped so size doesn't always translate into room.

    Bottom line is I love my 09 Legacy and still think it's the best value out there.

    My choice for best of production car NAIAS would be 2010 Taurus. A bit big for my taste but looks good inside and out at a mid 20's price.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    From an email invitation:

    _____________________________

    Come Preview the Legacy Concept at the Philadelphia International Auto Show

    Innovation is what drives the new Legacy Concept. We took 20 years of sedan heritage and performance and gave it a sleek and modern twist. Our goal was not to redefine the Legacy, but to make it more well defined than ever. Be sure to stop and check it out! To find out more about the Legacy Concept, click here.

    The Subaru booth will also have the all-new 2009 Subaru Forester! Stop by and see why Motor Trend voted the 2009 Forester #1!

    Philadelphia International Auto Show

    The Pennsylvania Convention Center
    1101 Arch Street
    Philadelphia, PA 19107

    January 31 - February 8

    Sat., 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.
    Sun., 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
    Mon. - Fri., 12:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m.
    Sat., 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.
    Sun., 9:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m.

    _____________________________

    Bob
  • saedavesaedave Member Posts: 694
    Lowered more aerodynamic roof rails, sculpted fenders on the wagon and add the raised suspension for the Outback. Seems like a nice update to my 2005 3.0R. Too bad I have only 16,000 miles: it will be a few years. :)
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Still not sure if this is the real deal, but I bet we're real close here with these images.

    Bob
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,716
    Yeah, I suspect you are right. I looks somewhat boxy to me, which I think is a step backward. It reminds me, to some extent, of the 2000-2004 models, which I think were the least aesthetically pleasing of the Outbacks.
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Boxy means more cargo space, though. The current model is raked so you lose space for tall cargo.

    They need to move the rear seat back 3" or so, then box off the rear so no cargo space is lost.

    It worked for the Forester. January sales were DOUBLE vs. 2008 in the middle of the 2nd Great Depression.

    I don't think the Exiga will be our Outback because it's too narrow. It's basically a stretched Forester, so it would be forced to compete with the Mazda5 and Kia Rondo in a lower price class.

    The Outback should be Tribeca sized. Then make the Tribeca about the size of a Pilot or Outlook.
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,716
    I agree with you, AJ, about the cargo area being boxy. I like a cargo space where I know that if a load fits within the confines of the floor space, the hatch is going to close. I was referring more to the overall shape of the car. I think an SUV or a crossover can pull off the boxy look okay, but a wagon should be sleek, at least in its overall contours. We went through the '80s once, and it wasn't pretty. ;)
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I see what you mean. The next Outback would be less a wagon and more a crossover, though.

    Prettier wagons from the 80s were the Audi 5000 and Taurus - both roundish.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    for the Outback to remain a wagon - a segment where it has little competition, and basically NONE in its price range - than puff up and become just one more among hundreds of midsize crossovers on the market, with nothing to distinguish most of them. Just one opinion. Being a wagon is what has always made it unique.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • saedavesaedave Member Posts: 694
    for the Outback to remain a wagon

    But the new Forester is slightly larger inside than the present Outback. If I needed a new car, the Forester would replace my Outback 3.0R. Many others might do the same.

    While I don't need anything larger than the Forester, OTOH those with several children may require more room for car seats that fit in the middle of the back seat, toys and dogs.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    It does have to grow, or at least be re-packaged.

    The Legacy concept is bigger so I'm sure the Outback will grow too, if not more.
  • orangelebaronorangelebaron Member Posts: 435
    the new legacy will be wider and have the seats up off the floor and the firewall further away from the front passengers... oh and have more interior lighting and small storage area... should I stop now or keep going?

    It doesn't need to be bigger (just a couple inches wider)... just have better interior layout. I also have a 2000 Volvo that is virtually the same size as my 2005 OB, but way ahead in terms of passenger space / comfort.

    Hopefully Subaru has hired some experts in this area instead of using the same people who design the engines to design the passenger compartment.
  • cptpltcptplt Member Posts: 1,075
    this weeks Top Gear show on BBC America has them trying to go from Basel , Switzerland to Blackpool, England- 700+ miles on one tank of gas. I am watching the show as I type this, they are presently in France and the legacy is averaging 68mpg (imperial gallon I assume)!!!! a little 3 cylinder VW diesel is getting low 70s.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Sweet..
  • eps105eps105 Member Posts: 216
    I'm sitting in my Subaru dealer getting service and I have in my hand an offical teaser spec sheet sent to the dealer. This is not a rumor, this is an offical release from SOA to the dealers.

    First of all, I think it dispells the myth that the Legacy and Outack are going to be totally seperate cars/platforms. The specs here apply to both. Subaru is simply going to unveil them at different times to try to differentiate them more, but they are the same platform.

    2010 LEGACY/OUTBACK

    Rear double wishbone
    CVT with paddle shifters
    6 speed manual
    More powerful turbo
    Bluetooth
    Electric parking brake
    GT Premium and Limited trims
    3.6 inches wider (Not a typo -- yup, 3.6"!)
    4 inches increased rear legroom (no, there is no listing for overall length)
    18" wheels on GT
    Single exhaust in 4 cylinder
    8 colors, 2 blues, 6 colors are new
    30 MPG!! (Presume this is the 4 cyl manual)
    3.6L H6 (from the Tribeca -- it's confirmed!!)
    IPOD USB port
    Streaming Bluetooth audio support

    Dealer says 2010's are already built from SIA but will not be allocated until July or August at the soonest.

    Subaru is planning heavy advertising for the launch with 15% more ad spend and increased prime time and mainstream TV advertising.

    That's all I've got, so please don't ask me for more!!

    Elliot
  • eps105eps105 Member Posts: 216
    Oops, I missed a couple!

    * 17" wheels on Outback
    * Lower rocker panel moldings
    * Increased cargo capacity

    Elliot
  • saedavesaedave Member Posts: 694
    3.6 inches wider (Not a typo -- yup, 3.6"!)
    4 inches increased rear legroom (no, there is no listing for overall length)


    Sounds like the Tribeca is outclassed with more comfortable seating and the same engine available.

    The 30mpg could be a CVT 4 cylinder. If the CVT provides the same performance as in Nissans Rogue and Murano, 0-60 will be ok. The CVT is most likely the same one as Nissans...from JATCO I have driven Muranos and like it.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    My understanding is the CVT was engineered in-house, like the 4EAT.

    Bob
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.