Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Any Questions for a Car Dealer?
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
And how come no one ever questions freight charges? I've been on these boards for months now and I don't recall ever seeing a post wondering why freight has to be itemized separately. Isn't it a given that the car has to be shipped to the market? The jeans at Walmart don't have a freight charge. So why no outrage over freight charges on cars? Everyone gladly pays for a car company's expense to ship the car to the store but get all in a lather over paying for the company's expense to advertise the car.
It really is too bad that advertising costs are different in different regions making it impossible to print on an MSRP sticker. But then, freight is actually different for different regions as well. Maybe the car companies should just add an average ad fee to every car. I guarantee that people would pay it and the whole ad fee issue would disappear.
Perhaps, Carsdirect has calculated this as the base price .... spend a few minutes, Edmunds will have the price and you can build in the options, and you will get a better idea ...
This way, you won't drive the Salesperson psycho ... l.o.l...
Terry.
Yes, the jeans at Walmart have a freight expense and an advertising expense. However, Walmart is smart enough to put a price tag on them that includes everything except sales tax. You are right in saying that if car companies just added an average cost to every car, that would alleviate the issue.
Secondly, and perhaps most importantly, if I pay $15.99 for jeans, the person buying the next pair of the same jeans will also pay $15.99. They will be $15.99 on the first day of the month and the last day of the month, and regardless of which salesperson sold them to me. They will be $15.99 regardless of when they were produced, how many other pairs of jeans are on the shelf, what color they are, or whether I purchase them in Alabama or Oregon.
Now, I realize that jeans and cars aren't similar products, nor is the average car dealer similar to Walmart. But car dealers made their own bed by forcing consumers to deal with a convoluted, and seemingly arbitrary, pricing system. Perhaps a better comparison, landru2, would be between car pricing and airline pricing. In both instances, you could wind up paying much more than the guy sitting or parking next to you, for the exact same product. In that environment, consumers have every right to question and negotiate to protect their self interest.
Not just cars either...A guy finds out that his neighbor bought the same lawnmower as he did a month later...on sale, and spent 25.00 less than he did.
But, to your point, I think it would be GREAT if everyone paid MSRP for every car...no haggling!
Then, folks like you would be content and my life would be so much easier.
I mean, to me...when I make a major purchase I look for what I think is a good value. If I think it is, I'll buy and I won't look back.
I won't scour sunday's paper looking to see if the dishwasher I bought is on sale somewhere else for less..Life is short.
But...that's me and we are all diffeent!
Would that bother you? Just curious.
The sense I get here is that the customers don't trust the auto dealers. Right or wrong, that is the impression.
To these folks, it seems unfair, that some people will pay more for the same vehicle based on the day of the week or month. Yet we all know that happens.
Craig, you know that even the sticker isn't good enough for many dealers, with the ADM sucker stickers many (but not your store) use. Not to mention that dealers mark up above the sticker, many in demand vehicles such as the hot selling Odyssey or Thunderbird.
Much of automobile sales is about emotion. It has to be for some of this iron to sell.
So why blame the customer when in this emotionally charged environment, you see both the good and bad emotions people can display.
You folks know I'm not against dealer profit. (I am against the government making more in taxes on a new car than the dealership does, FWIW.) But to place most of the blame on the consumer when the deck is often stacked against them is a bit much for me to swallow.
So what if a customer wants to negotiate to the lowest price. The store wants to get the highest price it can. Seems like two sides of the same coin to me.
I can just understand why people would see it as unfair if the neighbor got the same car for $1000 less than they did. So who's the buyer going to blame, himself (naww, this is America, no one understands personal responsibility) or the dealership.
The dealership is now considered, rightly or wrongly a crook in the eyes of this consumer.
TB
The issues of ad fees and freight charges are issues to take up with the manufacturers and the government. As far as I know, no one posts here that works for an auto maker. Car dealers can't do anything about those issues.
Gotta love your government at work.
I still don't believe it is soley the customer's fault for feeling ripped off when two customers pay two different amounts for the same car at the same dealership.
Perhaps those feelings are a bit strong, but as I've said before, the one who will suffer the ill will if the customer does feel that way is the store that sold him the car.
May not be rational, but then many automotive related decisions are not rational. Otherwise, how do you explain some of the 84 month loans on used cars seen in other threads.
But many stores are not about long term customer relationships, but rather let's get the most we can now.
I only understand the problem from the customer side. I have no idea what the solution is.
TB
Yes, life is short and I don't haggle over $25, or even $250. But $2,500 can pay for my kid's braces. We all have to protect our families' best interest, and when it comes to making a car purchase, that's the system car manufacturers and dealers have set up for us.
A lot of car buyers today are ingrained with the idea that they are suppose to buy a car at invoice minus holdback and more. And will go absolutely nuts if they know and suspect that they paid $1 more than the guy behind him.
I guess everybody has to decide for themselves on how far and how much time they are willing to spend to save a buck. To me, I value time more. Your mileage may vary.
Of course, I realize that everyone believes that everyone else is buying their cars cheaper but how many people actually know this?
A local Ford dealer is offering all '02 F150 Supercabs at $5000 off "bottom line" MSRP. Plus you get the Ford $2500 rebate or the financing deal.
I read this as $7500 off sticker. Have you heard of anyone else offering a deal like this or is it too good to be true? I'll try to confirm the details tomorrow but I wanted to bounce this off ya first. Its from a dealer with a good reputation. http://www.akinsford.com
Thanks for the insight.
I could read this as $5,000 off MSRP plus $2,500 rebate. Which takes it to $2,500 off MSRP.....
MSRP
-$5,000
+$2,500
-----------
= MSRP - $2,500
I agree with scully that as the savings goes up people are more interested in spending time to save money. I am a lower middle income earner. To me every penny counts. Are car salesman not consumers of other products? Some of the posts here seem to say "why worry about that $500?". While I agree that $500 on a $30,000 vehicle is a small percentage of the overall cost, $500 is a lot of money to me. I just can't understand why some cars salesmen here can't understand why lower and middle income buyers value $500 to $1000 in their pocket. Also, other retailers usually have a 30 day price guarantee. If I find it cheaper somewhere else I get the difference in price back in my pocket. I have used this several times on certain products that I have purchased. Overall it has added up to a pretty good chunk of change. If car dealers would do this, this would eliminate the buyers that feel like their friend got a better deal...LOL
I agree with Isell that it would be great if the was a no haggling price on every car, but I think it should be invoice price, not MSRP.
If holdback is causing so many problems with dealers and buyers, why not just stop the program? The dealers here have repeatedly stated that holdback is not profit, so it would not effect their profitability at all.
Landru, i think people do not have a problem with destination charge as much as advertising since the destination charge is printed right on the sticker. I agree that if it were on the sticker, or somehow included in the invoice cost to the dealer and not seperated out that people would not gripe so much about paying it.
Kudos to all of the dealer posters here for trying to inform the buying public better and as usual a great job by tbone.
Wonder why we don't have any Ford salespeople on the board?
Ed
j/k
TB
I thought I read that you thought fixed pricing would be a good thing, not at MSRP, but at INVOICE?
It's gonna be a rough day...and I don't go to work for a few hours...
tboner ...good posts...
scully, I understand...
I guess we can beat this to death.
Of course, the dealership wants to maximize profits...wouldn't you, if you had ten million or so invested in a store?
And the shopper wants the "best" price. that same shopper also wants to be treated with respect and wants a great experience before and after the sale.
My take is simply this...dealerships can pull some nasty tricks, and customers can get rude, petty and nasty in their quest to save another hundred bucks.
Again...life is short!
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
What I really meant was a price closer to invoice. Example, a $30,000 MSRP vehicle has an invoice of $26,000. The no haggle price would be $27,000. This price would become the MSRP. Of course this is predicated on the fact that no haggle pricing would have to be adopted by all dealers and manufacturers. If this were the case then hopefully there would be no need for invoice or MSRP prices to be researched at all by consumers. Car sales would be similar to other retail sales. This is the price and unless one dealership had a "sale" then the price is the price.
It has been said before on these forums that consumers would be shocked if they knew the real "invoice" cost of other items they buy, like furniture, clothes, and other retail items. But I do not see any websites like edmunds advertising invoice costs for these items. A store advertises a price and you compare it with any other places you can buy that item and you buy from the cheapest source on an identical item.
I understand that cars are a little different, and it is hard to find two exact vehicles alike in an area, but if manufacturers would get in the habit of making MSRP a little over invoice for the base price and the options I think life would be a lot easier for buyers and car dealers. I don't see where a dealer would have a problem with this pricing formula unles they are selling the majority of their cars at or near MSRP. But I find this hard to believe as most of the dealers on here have said that new car sales has become the loss leader for most dealerships and they are just breaking even or lossing on new car sales anyway. If this is the case then why not just make it easier on everyone by dropping the haggling and posting a fair price.
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
In August '94, I bought a red, '95 Maxima GXE with auto, sunroof, and comfort package (power locks, seats, and few other bric a brac features) via Autovantage for invoice + $700. I don't recall the exact price
One week later, a family member bought the exact same vehicle, same color even, but w/o the sunroof, from the same dealership. Though he used the traditional method of grinding.
When all was said and done, adjusting for the cost of the sunroof, he paid about $150 less than I did, plus he got the mats thrown in for free.
So there is at least one definitive example in history of someone paying less.
But no, I didn't/doesn't bother me. That's $150 of my inheritance still intact. Heh-heh!
I would guess that either they mean that the $5000 includes the $2500 rebate or that they have a pretty significant dealer cash at the moment.
Not slim enough though, I guess...
I just don't understand...
I do know of consumer groups that complain that Toyota's prices are now higher than they sold for before.
What I am concerned about is my credit. I had a BK about 7 years ago....since then my credit is perfect. I scored on Equifax at 630. I don't know what I scored on the others...My question is...can I qualify for a 36 month lease....what do you think my payments would be with $4000 down..that is with my trade all together...I this price for the vehicle realistic.....will a car dealer match Carsdirect....I could just go through Carsdirect...but I don't know if they have tier 1 and tier 2 leases...I dont want to get a bunch of inquiries on my credit and make my score worse then it is.
Another thing....should I tell the dealer first that I have bad credit.....
Thanks
I think the consumer really loses in this case. Most hagglers could get a much better deal. Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who's tested the system yet (and won!).
Chris
Find the same item for less in 30 days and we'll refund x% of the difference, where x is greaterthan or equalto 100
Probably a meaningless guarantee, as how many people keep looking at the price of other items after they buy. I really doubt many take advantage of this price guarantee. It probably does put many buyers at ease.
Now on cars, people always talk about what they paid. We are talking years if not decades down the road.
Hmmmm
TB
From what you have said about their success, kinda proves my point. Buyers are happier with the low one price/no haggle and the dealer sells more cars. I hope your situation in San Antonio catches on in the rest of the country. It would make car buying a whole lot more pleasant.
right ?
So while Saturn dealers don't deal on the price of the car, I'm sure the same negotiations most try to avoid, happen related to the trade.
So I think it is folly to believe that one will avoid negotiation.
TB
And I wonder how Saturn gets around the price-fixing laws, unless they own all their dealerships.
That isn't the classic definition of price fixing.
Now getting that price, is another matter 8^)
TB
That's why I wonder if Saturn owns all their own dealerships. I doubt they do, though. So how can Saturn dictate resale price to an independent dealer?
Or maybe the dealers are, legally / technically, distributors, and that's how the issue is avoided?
Dunno.
Within a couple of week, I think.
Personally, I used to think some people were pretty petty about this, I mean, I once signed a credit for less than two dollars on something.
But I guess it's MONEY and that's the most important thing....geez!
tboner - concur! The negotiation bit can't be ignored totally when a trade is involved. So there is always room to "play the game" I'm afraid...