Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Any Questions for a Car Dealer?

13334363839315

Comments

  • abtsellerabtseller Member Posts: 291
    demos .15/ mile. It depends on the model, I suppose. Our managers usually drive demos that are desirable enough that we don't have to sell them under invoice, and we rotate them before they get 5000 miles on them.

    Ed
  • bretfrazbretfraz Member Posts: 2,021
    Once he got there he was put in a room with several drop dead gorgeous Swedish Blonde's

    I've been dreaming about that my entire life.

    I'm going out and buying a new Saab today!!!!
  • rbrenton88rbrenton88 Member Posts: 186
    Whenever the discussion involves financing a car through an equity credit line, the "might lose the house" thing comes up.
    If you became unable to pay the debt, wouldn't opt to sell the car rather than foreclose on the house?
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    ...losing the house is a possibilty when you use that a collateral. The way I look at it, if you can't pay the mortgage or the home equity line, selling the car ain't gonna appease the bank if they start foreclosure proceedings. If one can sell the car before that process begins and one isn't upside down, then one would be ok. Walking away from a car loan is one thing - they repo the car. With an equity line, they repo the house.

    Personally - and that means me - I don't see the need to risk a home in order to reap the tax savings on an auto loan. In my neighborhood, houses go for $400K - I'm not putting that on the line for a $25,000 Accord. I am lucky in the fact that my history has shown that I could pay off an equity line if I wanted to - not everyone does. It's just a personal value.
  • suvshopper4suvshopper4 Member Posts: 1,110
    ... but I did play one once in a Japanese TV mini-series...

    and I believe in using a home equity line of credit (or loan) for buying a car.

    It's for those who can handle credit, of course.
    And it has many advantages.
  • audia8qaudia8q Member Posts: 3,138
    If somebody uses a home equity line to pay for a car, thats fine...but if the consumer does not have the commitment to pay off the loan in a timely fashion...it can turn into a 10+ year car loan.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    ...that's a great point. I've seen some people continuously put big ticket items on their home equity line. When it comes time to close out the line (since most are for a fixed time), they suddenly realize they are still paying on the car they traded 2 cars ago and the lawn tractor that died 3 years ago.

    So what do they do - they refinance the mortgage to roll it up into one nice big payment.

    It's a viable financing method - just not for everyone.
  • suvshopper4suvshopper4 Member Posts: 1,110
    You're right. My HELOC is amortized over 15 years. But, knowing that and not wanting to go to an unreasonable term for a car loan, I pay considerable additional principal each month.
    I'll have it paid off in under 3 years.

    Like I said, it's for people who can handle credit. And understand it.

    There are other advantages to opening and using a HELOC, as well (besides the tax deductibility of the interest).
  • rerenov8rrerenov8r Member Posts: 380
    GM has one.

    Ford has one.

    Maybe even Chrysler.

    Ford & GM have expanded their plans to the point where huge numbers of folks are elegible to buy considerably below invoice. (By combining eligible "cash in lieu of 0.0%" and/or 'collge grad' incentives).

    This is undoubtedly done to bolster their market share vs the non-Ford/GM imports. Frankly this does put considerable "distance" between many imports.

    Word is they do this in part by cutting the "dealer holdback".

    Although there are not many posts here about the programs, it seems clear that this can be a good way for a consumer to get at low hassel deal.

    Is this a "limited time" thing that GM & Ford will eventually phase out?

    Do dealers HATE these programs?

    What about the stores for brands that don't have these -- is this something that MORE automakers should do?
  • landru2landru2 Member Posts: 638
    I assume you are talking about the plan available to employees of Ford supplier companies, called X-Plan (A-Plan is for actual Ford employees)

    X-plan prices are not below invoice but they are usually very close. A-plan prices are considerably below invoice. If someone is eligible for X-plan it provides an opportunity for a very easy, hassle-free deal. A dealership cannot "kink" the deal (with extra fees, etc.) because Ford will just kick it back until it is fixed to meet the program's requirements.

    It is totally up to the dealerships discretion whether they will offer X-plan pricing and they may not want to on a very hot seller. X-plan also applies to current model year product so right now most remaining 2002 product will not qualify.

    Generally, dealers don't mind doing these deals because they are compensated by Ford for doing them. However, it is also against Ford's rules to give away any of this compensation to make the deal more attractive than another Ford dealership's deal. In my neck of the woods this would result in severe consequences for a dealer caught trying to "sweeten" X or A-plan deals.
  • tronsr1tronsr1 Member Posts: 149
    You forgot to mention that the dealer is "NOT" allowed to add any of the "extra costs" as they do with regular consumers. Just TT&L.I bought a Ford Escape in Nov.2000 for $200.00 below invoice, also used my Ford Credit Card money {it was 5 % at that time {no more} but GMAC card still pays 5%}, so I nended up with about $1400 below invoice.
  • audia8qaudia8q Member Posts: 3,138
    I would like the X-plan, S-plan etc..alot better if consuemrs would follow the rules of the program.
  • prodigalsunprodigalsun Member Posts: 213
    When does NADA come out with used car values for 2002 vehicles.
  • huge450huge450 Member Posts: 1
    I traded my car into a dealership that was closing in one hour. I signed all the paperwork and left the lot in my new car. The next day I call the dealer with my previous loan information, and he says thiers a small problem with the bank and he needs more information than I want to give regarding a part time job and bank statements. My question is this do I have to give this info since the papers were already signed. Should he have let me leave the lot in the car w/o knowing this before hand. He also mentioned that stopping buy 5 days later when I'm off work is to long and I need to bring it back by tuesday (3days later). Should I just return the car and go to another dealership.
  • bretfrazbretfraz Member Posts: 2,021
    I'm no expert here but it is clear you were spotted. The finance company never actually approved your loan and now it is them who want additional info in order to make a decision. If you do not want to provide the info then you are making the decision for them. You will have to return the car and whatever paperwork you have will be null and void. Read it carefully; I am sure there are exclusions and whatnot in it.

    Going to a different dealer probably will not cut it. If you want to throw a curve ball past some loan officer you are better off obtaining a loan away from a dealership and just bring them the money and buy a car cleanly.

    BTW, "spotting" is completely legal in many states and is common practice. Research it if you want to but it ain't your car legally and there is no official loan.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    I'm curious...what is the big deal about providing the information? It kinda sounds like perhaps your credit is a bit shaky or else the bank needs to see more income before approving the loan.

    If you go elsewhere and start the whole process over again, chances are good they will want that information anyway.
  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    I work for a large company that is a "preferred partner" for Ford, GM and Nissan. Since I'm in the market for a new car, I've looked into these programs a little bit.

    As mentioned above, it provides for a 'hassle free' pricing structure. With Nissan (called VPP), the price is a small % below invoice, with a little tacked on for advertising and such. Basically washes out to invoice. With GM, pretty much the same pricing scenario (even with Saturn, which is about the only brand of GM I'm considering). Haven't looked into Ford, since they don't offer anything I'm terribly interested in this time around.

    Now I've just got to decide which vehicle I want. Fortunately, I've got a month or so to figure it out.
  • tblazer503tblazer503 Member Posts: 620
    I guess I don't see the problem with what they are asking for. Anytime I have applied for a loan, car or mortgage, I have been asked for roughly 2-3 current paystubs, and 2mo's of bank statements. Paystubs verify your employment/wages, and bank statements show "overdraw's" /assets... Not too fun, but I'm sure that if you were loaning someone thousands of dollars, you wouldn't take their word on income, etc.

    Don't let a little hassle scare you from a car you like... It's all part of the loan process...
  • force98force98 Member Posts: 81
    Strange--my wife and I have purchased/leased 8 new cars in the last 10 years and have never been asked to provide any paperwork other than a partially completed credit application.
  • abtsellerabtseller Member Posts: 291
    to document earnings if you have been on the job for more than a few years, and if your credit report jives with the information on the application.

    The weaker your credit or income, the more you're going to have to bring to the table (as far as proof) for financing.

    Ed
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    lots of stuff when we were younger. Since my credit has been squeaky clean for many years, a partial ap is all I need too. I can afford to be somewhat critical about some of the information they ask for (as in "You don't need to know my neighbor's income - run it through without it.")

    The flip side of having excellent credit, though, is that dealers don't have as much room to make money on the back end, so they need to make their profit on the price of the car. So be it.

    Here's a question for a car dealer:

    Why couldn't I reach the final price on a car with the salesperson, then cut a deal with the F&I guy in which I agree that the dealer can write the loan at a higher interest rate than I could qualify for, and net themselves, say an extra $500 (provided there's no pre-payment penalty)? In return, they give me a reduced price on the car of $250. I then simply refi the loan at my CU at a very low rate, saving myself the $500. Net savings to me $250. Net increased gross to the dealer: $250. Would that work?
  • raybearraybear Member Posts: 1,795
    Sounds like fraud.
  • landru2landru2 Member Posts: 638
    but I don't think many banks will pay a dealership $500 for 1 day loans.
  • tblazer503tblazer503 Member Posts: 620
    I doubt that many banks will pay $500 as a "finders fee" without securing their interest... besides, no matter what a dealer says, you have to read the actual contract, because most contracts say that any verbal contracts are null and void unless written... Oh, and the bank owns the lein, so they can refuse to let the loan be paid off early... at least they did w/ my friend w/ a high risk loan...
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    Not talking about fraud or verbal deals. Just accepting a loan rate that gives the dealer some back-end profit in exchange for a break on the front-end price, knowing that I intend to refinance the loan to get a better rate later. Obviously it wouldn't work if there was a pre-payment penalty.
  • tbonertboner Member Posts: 402
    What would their incentive be. They probably make a lot more doing deals with that bank than on any individual sales transaction.

    Besides, even dealers have to bring good clients to the table to get financed, so someone with good credit helps strengthen the lenders loan profile.

    To tblazer503, how can a bank refuse to let a loan get paid off early unless there is a clause in the contract? What happens if the vehicle is traded or totalled? Does you friend, in the case of a total, get a big check and keep making payments.

    Sounds a bit fishy to me.

    TB
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    Good point. Stands to reason the F&I shop would have stronger loyalties to a lender than to any individual customer, profit or no.
  • caramocaramo Member Posts: 93
    If I'm not mistaken, the dealer would be charged back by the lender if the loan is paid off early, thereby eliminating the back end, so there would be no incentive for the dealer to make such an arrangement.
  • tblazer503tblazer503 Member Posts: 620
    I'm sure there was a large penalty because we talked about it, he owed $200/mo for 18 more months, but an early payoff would have been in excess of $5,0 so he stashed the extra money, and used it as a down payment on his new one when it ran out... I'm sure there was a clause since he was high risk, but he didn't read well enough because he didn't know until he asked what payoff would be... =oD
  • abtsellerabtseller Member Posts: 291
    if the contract didn't run (I think) 90 days minimum.

    I can't believe how people gripe about car dealers who play dirty tricks on them, how sleazy they are, etc, then they seem so self-righteous about getting one over on the dealer.

    double standard?

    Ed
  • brianw220brianw220 Member Posts: 38
    Are you really that cheap? The dealer would be charged back and a relationship with a lender that probably yields a few millionin cash flow a year would be damaged. Not to mention the front-end gross that the salesman gets paid on would be decreased thereby reducing his or her commission, which to work with a person like you they maid very little to start. In F & I we never cut front-end profit to make back-end profit. It's stealing from the salesman.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    it was just a question. I wanted to better understand the dynamics of a purchase. I've been an ally of the salespeople on this board for 2+ years - why dump your 'tude on me?

    abtseller: "I can't believe how people gripe about car dealers who play dirty tricks on them, how sleazy they are, etc, then they seem so self-righteous about getting one over on the dealer. double standard?" You referring to me here? Where did I mention anything that amounted to "getting one over on the dealer"? I asked if it was feasible for a buyer to work with a dealer to their mutual advantage. If anything that would "get one over" on the lender, and as was pointed out a dealer would not want to do that either. OK - I got a reasonable answer that makes sense. What's your point?

    brian: "Are you really that cheap? The dealer would be charged back and a relationship with a lender that probably yields...." Kinda a cheap shot, wouldn't you say? I ask a question, you wait for the answer to emerge, then accuse me of being cheap as if I knew it all along? I didn't know the answer - that's why I asked. How the hell would I know that moving profit from the front-end to the back-end is "stealing" from the salesman? Here's a news flash: Customers don't know or care about your commissions.

    Part of the problem with peoples' attitudes toward car dealers is that the salespeople and F&I people know the answers to most of the detailed aspects of a car deal, and the buyers don't. You guys talk glibly and knowingly about stuff we never heard of, toss around the lingo like front-end vs back-end profits like they were taught to all of us in third grade, and snicker at the idiots who blunder into a high-gross deal. We I ask a question, you line up to drop your attitude on me like seagulls. Do you seriously wonder where grinders come from?
  • abtsellerabtseller Member Posts: 291
    switching the "profit" from the front end of the deal (cost of car) to the back end (finance) you're reducing the commission of your salesman.

    The inherent tone of your question implied that you were trying to pull a fast one. I apologize if I mistook your question.

    Ed
  • rroyce10rroyce10 Member Posts: 9,332
    .... I musta missed something .. the front end gets chopped ..? -- I don't think so ....

    Terry.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    Maybe I should have phrased it better - no appology necessary.

    I guess I should have asked what prevents that sort of thing. It seemed to be an obvious way for the dealer and the buyer to work together, and I didn't understand why it wouldn't work. I failed to recognize how closely F&I works with lenders.
  • golicgolic Member Posts: 714
    Completed purchase of '03 Ody last week and sat down with F&I. Best rate he was offering was 5.89% (aside note, I consider myself to have excellent credit). He said that is best he can do lowest rate in town etc...

    I said fine I will then use my peoplefirst.com check which was giving me 4.99%. First he tried to poke holes in it, but when he realized it was legit he asked for the opportunity to match it, I liked the guy so I said sure, what do I care who gets the loan payments. Plus I liked the idea of having a local bank. He made a copy of my letter to get a match rate.

    Question is, how is the dealership compensated? % of loan balance, flat fee, fee plus commission on a higher interest rate.

    I don't care how much dealer makes as long as I can get the best interest rate I can acquire.

    Just curious.
  • afk_xafk_x Member Posts: 393
    Depends how much you financed. If you have excellent credit he may have picked up 1/2 point through Chase or simply gotten a 200 flat fee.
  • abtsellerabtseller Member Posts: 291
    buying a loan from the bank. This will get him a fee ($150-200) and some goodwill from the bank in case he needs to get an iffy loan bought in the future.

    Ed
  • brianw220brianw220 Member Posts: 38
    Perhaps I and others were quick to blast you on your question. I apologize. However, you are not one of the buyers who can plead ignorance. As you say, you've been coming to Edmunds for two years. Frankly, you probably know more about this business than many of the people who are in it full-time.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    no problem. But dealer finance is an area I know little about, and I find interesting.

    If I had to accurately characterize my job I would say that I am a "business process analyst" (sort of a cross between an industrial engineer and a systems analyst, I suppose.) After 30 years of that I find that I am fascinated by business processes that seem to have holes in them, or don't make sense to me. So, I ask questions to learn why my perception isn't true. I've learned a ton here in TH, but sometimes it doesn't add up.
  • abtsellerabtseller Member Posts: 291
    nice to figure out in a statistical process would be people. They seem to ruin every mathematical model that has ever been built. Just when you think you have them figured out, they change tactics and you have to start over.

    Ed
  • rmbaxterrmbaxter Member Posts: 9
    with so much information available on the internet about invoice prices and how to negotiate a fair deal, how accurate is the information on KBB, carsdirect, edmunds, etc. the dealers must be wise to this by now and have changed to some other ways to increase profits.Just think about this scenario; the invoice information on the web is could very well be written by companies who have an arrangement with the dealers. If everyone uses theses websites I just wonder how much we are actually saving or think we are saving? I'm not looking to get a car at dealer cost just questioning the whole information bit on the websites. Maybe someone can shed some light on the subject.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    They update their websites from behind the grassy knoll....
  • brianw220brianw220 Member Posts: 38
    Another conspiracy theorist! Just when the consumers crack the code on the whole invoice thing, the dealers go to double secret invoice. rmbaxter, in all seriousness, the information provided on kbb, etc. is probably lower than reality in many cases due to regional variances in invoice pricing. If you inspect, drive and research the vehicle, and the price quoted is equal to or less than the value you find in the product, then it's a good deal.
  • audia8qaudia8q Member Posts: 3,138
    Some of you may not realize...even when the finance rate is marked up above the 'buy rate' the dealership does not get 100% of the spread. The finance source keeps a certain percentage of the finance reserve..the amount varies per bank but can be substantial.

    Rich
  • bretfrazbretfraz Member Posts: 2,021
    I could not have said it better myself:
    Part of the problem with peoples' attitudes toward car dealers is that the salespeople and F&I people know the answers to most of the detailed aspects of a car deal, and the buyers don't. You guys talk glibly and knowingly about stuff we never heard of, toss around the lingo like front-end vs back-end profits like they were taught to all of us in third grade, and snicker at the idiots who blunder into a high-gross deal. We I ask a question, you line up to drop your attitude on me like seagulls. Do you seriously wonder where grinders come from?

    As much as I respect many of the car sales pros here, Al did not deserve those comments. I appreciate the insiders viewpoint but how 'bout cutting us civilians some slack? At least take it out on those who treat you abusively.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    they've gotten used to some seagulls too, from the "civilian" side, LOL. Where is snurple these days?
  • shawnmaloneshawnmalone Member Posts: 71
    In your post #1796, Rick, you touch on a question, or series of questions, that I've seen asked dozens of times on Edmund's forums. I've seen plenty of responses to that question, most of them hostile, but I've never really seen an answer (and I don't expect to).

    It's natural to wonder where Edmund's and KBB and other Internet sites get their invoice info. It's quite complete and detailed. The most obvious explanation would be, they get it from the manufacturers. Of course, if that were true, it would easy to wonder how accurate the invoice info is - - after all, what incentive would the manufacturers have to publish it? Unless, of course, they inflated the numbers to make consumers think they were getting a better bargain than we really are.

    When I first started visiting these forums, I emailed Edmunds to ask them where they obtained the information, and they declined to say. That got me wondering: If not from the manufacturers, then who?
  • tbonertboner Member Posts: 402
    They "floor plan" dealers, so they know the costs each dealer pays for his cars.

    The banks may or may not know holdbacks and other things, but they probably get really close on the costs of the "hardware"

    FWIW,

    TB
  • bretfrazbretfraz Member Posts: 2,021
    IIRC, Edmunds buys their info from a 3rd party. Which prolly explains why some of the regional info is not always accurate.

    Other websites get their info directly from mfr's or from those who need to know, like banks and credit unions.

    It's been my impression that the history of consumers obtaining invoice pricing came from banks who offered that info to their best customers in order to obtain their business. It then trickled down to consumers and exploded with the internet. I remember when you had to buy publications from Edmunds or Pace or even KBB to get invoice prices, or go to your local library to see a copy of KBB. Now the info is everywhere.
This discussion has been closed.