Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
You bet they do! Many old cars do have heart and soul!
I do not consider my 99 BMW e46 as old since I do like keeping my cars for several decades as we intend to do with our family heirloom (1983 MB300D)!
Although I do intend to buy a new car in the next few years (the next generation BMW 5 series turbodiesel, MB 320CDI or a turbodiesel Audi Avant, I am in no rush since our current cars are incredibly cheap to maintain!
Why would I only buy a new turbodiesel? Because I would never buy any car unless there is a good likelihood it can be driven reliably for at least a million miles!
That's why I got a BMW 545 instead of an LS430.
Nothing lacking in the soul department with this baby.
What is your point?
BMW is Number One in luxury car sales in USA.
It appears members here are so bored with their cars that they try to justify their decision with sales statistics! It appears to be reassuring for them to know that other people are driving the same cars as they do.
You know the saying: Misery Loves Company! Or should I say Tedium Loves Company!
Yes they are. Why again are we supposed to leave SUVs out of the count? Because it is only on that basis that BMW is #1.
Isn't this forum all about high-end sedans, not suv's?
just checking.
I believe that sometimes people get reinforced by advertising as to what their cars are portrayed as, and to some extent, in contrast to what is real. I stand by the test drive results as I described. No doubt about it, the vehicle is extremely comfy, smooth tranny (now that I've added that), nice audio, great rear seat, buzzy engine under full acceleration at top rpm's, too much road thump enters cabin over nasty roads, wind noise is noticeable at freeway speeds, handling is good, but not exciting, power is decent, but not exhilerating, and the styling is bland. This is a well-made vehicle that is comfy but there was no particular F-U-N in the drive and the styling, while attractive to some extent, was not seductive by any means.
The majority of reviews do NOT say much different. I do NOT read that the car has a reputation for seductive styling, exhilerating performance, tremendous handling, or a kick-in-the-pants drive. It is NOT a style leader, but a handsome-enough successful-appearing adequately styled vehicle. It won't starve anyone, but it won't fill 'em up either. That IS the Lexus story so far. Nicest Japanese rendition of reliable transportation so far. I'll give you that, but give me a break, the Lexus just doesn't tend to quicken the pulse. I am surprised that you don't get that, as you have been a very smart contributor to this forum for a long time.
Take care,
TagMan
Yes it is about the marques, which means the BMW 7-series, not the 3- and 5-series lumped in by you and dewey. Of course, which of these marques is the #1 in America ? Lexus LS430.
Every car has their attributes, and are designed for a purpose. Does it tell you something that this car happens to be the best selling luxury full-size sedan in America ? Does it tell you something that of the 745, XJR, A8, S500, LS430, most Americans prefer the LS430 over these other cars ? They must want something that the LS provides, whatever that is, much more than whatever the Germans provide in this market space. Enjoy your heart and soul car, whatever that is. The LS is not for you, find what appeals to you and enjoy it. Its your money do whatever you like with it. But do not question the motives of others who choose the LS.
Does Porsche sell more vehicles than Ferrari? It makes no difference, as one of the marques is more likely to raise my pulse when it goes flying by. Maybe a poor analogy at the moment, but you get the point. To some, a car is great based on units sold. To me, there are other considerations.
And for goodness sakes, enjoy your Lexus. I'm not suggesting you shouldn't. I just couldn't. A lot of people do buy them. Does EVERYBODY have to now?
Ok, now its 3-5 years instead of the previous 3 you gave back in 2001! Ok. Either way, ain't gonna happen. Lexus ain't gonna build the top-end cars or have the world-wide presence of Mercedes-Benz to do that.
M
Sorry but this makes absolutely no sense at all. If Mercedes were cheaper they'd sure as heck sell more to regular folks. Truly rich people buy what they want now so price has no affect on them. Problem with your theory is that the average person you see riding down the road in a Benz or any other luxury car this side of a Bentley, isn't a "rich" person in most cases. Well-off, maybe, but truly rich nope. For you theory to be valid all the people in the world who didn't buy a Benz because of the price would have never existed. To say they wouldn't sell more SL500s if the car was 65K instead of 90K is just plain silly.
M
Must have taken a while to come up with this one OAC. I haven't called anyone anything. It amazes me how you holler "personal" and/or "foul" when you can't compete on the facts.
I have said it repeatedly, the key fact you all seem to run away from, and instead castigate and de-mean is that a for-profit company like Toyota created a luxury division and within 15 years became #1 lux nameplate in the world's most important market. This irks all of you, I bet. It must eat away at you for such vitriol against Lexus. What else makes this incessant attacks - wannabe, copy cat, synthetic, not a luxury company, a Toyota in fancy clothes, etc that you all throw around here.
Yep and we've all yawned at it repeatedly because this alone doesn't mean that everything Lexus does is perfect like you and some others like to believe. I personally have never, ever cared about a sales race with a brand with prices below that a Mercedes. The only sales race I even mildly care something about is the one with BMW. The majority of Lexus' sales are in the 35-50K category so why wouldn't they take the lead enventually?
If reliability is so unseemingly, why is MB doing its darnest best to position themselves as fixing this problem ? Why do BMW strive so hard to improve this aspect of their product with theri freebie program ? And don't even get me started on marketing ! Puleaze... The slogan - "The Ultimate Driving Machine" is all marketing BS. What is ultimate about the mainstream BMW cars or trucks ? If they are that great why create another expensive SP option, or M version ? If MB were that much driver's cars, why the need for auto-trannied AMG cars ? Truth is, MB S-sedans are luxury cruise mobiles, just like their Lexus counterpart. They are overpriced for what you get. Imagine a V6 E350 selling for $50K and change ? Pure robbery. Those who want the 3-pointed star do pony up this money, and more power to them. But I am sure Merc1 you won't spend your hard-earned money on such a car, or would you ?
Wow. I guess this paragraph full of shots is due to getting battered over the last few weeks by a BMW enthusiast and me having to set you straight on more than a few things - as always you'll hype up anything that appears bad about Mercedes, like that Distronic episode. Who here said that reliability was "unseemingly" (whatever that means)? Who said that OAC? Now BMW's slogan is BS? This kills the last bit of credibility you had with me. BMW's are the definition of what a driving machine is. If you can honestly tell me that they aren't (in the luxury segment) then you really don't much about cars at all. Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't you driven a 330Ci only to come away raving about it? Sounds like to me this whole paragraph was typed during an emotional moment because it has zero facts and doesn't make any sense whatsoever. BMW's mainstream cars like the 330i, 530i, 550i, 750i Sport at their "mainstream" cars and they're sportier than all of their competition in sport guise. Are you telling me they aren't? I really need to get an answer here. Their Motorsport cars only hammer home the point of which they do on a regular basis even over more powerful Mercedes AMG models.
Let me see if I can state this again so you'll understand it. No one here said that Mercedes' were drivers cars like BMWs. Ok got that part? What I and others have said that they are more in touch wiht the road than the average Lexus is. Only Lexus cars like the GS430 and IS350 are the exceptions to this. Since you brought up AMG cars, where are Lexus' performance vehicles?
But I am sure Merc1 you won't spend your hard-earned money on such a car, or would you ?
I love this one. When all else fails you turn right about an do what you acuse me and Dewey of doing - get personal.
Question is how many times are you going to pass off incorrect statements about sales (like the recent one about the LS outselling the S and 7) to make an pointless argument about sales, only to lose credibility when any one of us actually look at the numbers? I like how you cleaned it up by going back to 2004 to make your point. Nice.
M
Facts: As of Dec 1, LS430 YTD sales = 23723, 7-Series YTD sales = 15989, S-Class YTD sales = 14124. 30113 COMBINED.
Unvanishedly made up. Good job.
Oh this isn't the first time the sales thing has been blown up to favor Lexus when it fact it favored another brand. Sadly this is what you get here now, hype passed off as facts from Lexus fans, well at least some of them. Once there was a debate about who sells more cars, not SUVS and the numbers were posted showing Lexus to be within 1000 cars of Mercedes YTD, but the numbers for Mercedes were short a month.
M
No it doesn't because you don't know if the majority of these buyers even considered or test drove a Benz before buying a Lexus. Though I do halfway agree with this theory, it still makes too many assumptions.
Indeed MB's product line starts marginally lower in price than Lexus'. In other words, MB brackets Lexus' price structure. If Lexus ran from 30-80 and MB from 40-170, then the price arguement would hold water in regards to overall nameplate sales. But the reality is different.
How so? After the E-Class/GS level Mercedes and Lexus aren't playing the same game. Mercedes lineup starts a few hundred dollars cheaper than Lexus' hardly even worth mentioning.
M
Have driven the Jag a few times - don't like it one bit. Would never even consider getting one.
Have driven an S430/500 at least 50 times. The LS is quieter and smoother in the city and on the highway or at least it was in the 2001-2004 time frame. As SYSWEI has stated often it seem from comments made by reviewers the S is trying to be more in tune with the LS in the upcoming model though and CR even said it may have gotten there with the 2005 model. Soul - in an S class - it's imagined at least in the way you seem to define soul. Luxury - it's plenty luxurious but I'm no fan of the current interior. Sorry - as stated we are in total and complete disagreement. So let's just leave it there.
Being a Lexus fan, I just added an LX470 to the home fleet joining my venerable and still highly reliable 1999 LS400. After 109K miles and still outstandingly quiet, smooth and refined, it makes most sense for another Lexus. At least I am putting my money where my mouth is, not just blowing hot air around here !!!
M
I have shown in many posts how you personalize everything in your posts. What was your response to it ? Paraphrasing you here: it was your way of getting back at those who continually remind you that you don't OWN an MB you argue so hard for. Want me to provide you links to your posts on this ?
Who here said that reliability was "unseemingly" (whatever that means)? Who said that OAC? Now BMW's slogan is BS? This kills the last bit of credibility you had with me.
Obviously you have a huge ego about yourself, so much that I need to be credible with YOU. Hmmm ! This car thingy sure goes to the head... Just remember that you are a poster here like everyone else. As to reliability, wow... where do one start ? There is too much track record here of your statements.... Better to let sleeping dogs lie.
BMW's are the definition of what a driving machine is.
You don't drive this car daily so how can you know ? Or are you going to give us the auto rag definitions, and your test drive impressions ?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't you driven a 330Ci only to come away raving about it?
Of course. I even drove a e90 330i SP just a couple months ago, and loved it. Ultimate driving machine these cars are NOT. I still say it is pure BS. Do you know what *ultimate* means ? Check out its definition and see if you can attach it to mainstream BMW cars. A statement repeated long enough can become fact... That doesn't make it so, just bcos many people believe it...
BMW's mainstream cars like the 330i, 530i, 550i, 750i Sport at their "mainstream" cars and they're sportier than all of their competition in sport guise. Are you telling me they aren't? I really need to get an answer here.
It all depends on what you want in a car. Sportier than others suggest others are aiming for sportiness in their products as well. What if they aren't ? What if each car is biased towards some strength of its maker ? Do you understand market/product differentiation ? A product that doesn't differentiate itself is doomed to failure. Lexus' strength and differentiators are luxury, refinement, reliability and customer service. And that's why they have been so hugely successful. BMW may appeal to *sportiness* and that may make them successful. MB may appeal to heritage and marqueness, and that may be enough for them to be successful. Do you even remotely get this ?? So pls stop the *ultimate* driving machine sloganeering. It only matters to those who target such feature.
Let me see if I can state this again so you'll understand it. No one here said that Mercedes' were drivers cars like BMWs. Ok got that part? What I and others have said that they are more in touch wiht the road than the average Lexus is.
Yep. MBs are more in touch with the road than Lexus ! You can say that with a straight face ? Have you owned or driven extensively an S-500 and LS430 to judge that ? Or is it what you read in auto mags ?
Question is how many times are you going to pass off incorrect statements about sales (like the recent one about the LS outselling the S and 7) to make an pointless argument about sales, only to lose credibility when any one of us actually look at the numbers? I like how you cleaned it up by going back to 2004 to make your point. Nice.
You are simply looking for something to trump out as non-credible. The post of mine you quote stated NOTHING about a timeline. I said LS was outselling S + 7-series COMBINED. Did I tell you which year that was, or like your colleague, you simply assumed I meant 2005 YTD? So when I specified the timeline, why not prove that wrong instead of denigrating my post ? If you have the facts for 2004 why not present it ?
The tone you adopt is rather defensive. Throwing and casting aspersions on everything. Credibility with you ? You must have such a lofty view of yourself, Merc1. You and I are like night and day in our lifes... You just don't know it. The only way we cross paths is Edmunds. So pls lay off credibility with you.
Maybe 20 times.
I have never seen anyone who wasn't a geezer driving one.
Most of the younger folks, especialy the young suburban mall princesses are huge purchasers of Lexus SUV's.
To get the average Lexus age down in the 40's, those SUV purchasers are probably included in the stats and are responsible for lowering the average age, IMHO.
It would have been nice for them to say if cars really meant cars.
At 58.7yr for MB, imagine how they arrived at the mid-point ? Must have 70-something S-class owners + 30-somthing C/E owners.... The geezer mobile is MBs... hehehe...
Just an FYI. This board discusses the 7-, A8, LS430, Jag, etc level of cars. Only within THIS class of cars are we debating the sales numbers. So there is no need to extend these beyond the confines of HELM. We are not debating Porsches and Ferraris here. Pls use the example pertinent here. When we say the LS430 is #1 luxury full-size car in America, that is within HELM scope, and is correct.
So of the cars in HELM, which one would you rather own ? Not one you'd rather dream about, but one you'll actually BUY.
"You (Merc1) don't drive this car daily so how can you know?"
I have driven BMW's daily since 1993 except for 1 day when I had a fight with a neighbor and didn't leave the house for fear of bodily harm, which is a story for another day.
I have had 2 325i's and now have a 545i.
I have driven the LS430 and the driving experience doesn't even come close.
Unlike Tagman, I cannot say anything good about the seats in the LS.
I agree with Merc1. The seats are rather "undistinguished" except of course to Lexus apologist, Consumer Reports.
My comfort seats are much better. You cannot even compare them.
The car is what it is. A lot of geez.... er, uh, people like it.
Good. God bless them.
You can compare any car in any category where BMW "lives."
It doesn't matter-whether it's SUV's or sedans, it is a simple fact of life.
BMW's are the Ultimate Driving Machines in their price categories.
This is not to say that I am not looking forward to the 2007 LS.
I am and look forward to driving it.
I hope the seats, the steering and the barge-like feeling are improved in the new model.
I always try to get my kids to eat brocholli. I remind them its good for them, but they go eeewwwww !!!! See, kids by-and-large don't like what their parents tell them *is good for them*, especially teen-age ones.
Thats all fine and good, problem is posting incorrect sales figures, statements about Mercedes safety systems failing and how they invited journalist to come and watch are extremely mis-leading at best, to say the least. It does a great diservice to readers who tend to believe any and everything they read on the internet and if it weren't for others double checking most of this stuff it would be left to stand as fact, when it couldn't be any further from the truth.
It all depends on what you want in a car. Sportier than others suggests others are aiming for sportiness in their products. What if they aren't ? What if each car is biased towards some strength of its maker ? What you have no clue about is market/product differentiation. A product that doesn't differentiate itself is doomed to failure. Do you even remotely get this ?? So pls stop the *ultimate* driving machine sloganeering. It only matters to those who target such feature.
It seems to me that BMW has proven over and over that they are just that, the ultimate driving machine. Now since Lexus opened their big mouth and said they were targeting this and failed we get this spin about this slogan only meaning something to people that BMWs appeal to! You're kidding! I thought that was the whole reason for having a slogan or advertising in the first place - to reach a core group of people or a select audience. All the irrelevancy about customer service and what not the Lexus fans constantly tout likewise only matters to people who place such things above all else.
Lexus' strength and differentiators are luxury, refinement, reliability and customer service. And that's why they have been so hugely successful. BMW may appeal to *sportiness* and that may make them successful. MB may appeal to heritage and marqueness, and that may be enough for them to be successful.
Who is arguing with this? You act as though no other car other than a Lexus is luxurious or reliable. The truth is that other cars are just that, at least enough to keep their buyers interested. The ridiculous theory about Lexus selling so many cars and being so perfect because of that is just plain silly when other brands are in the same sales ballpark, esepcially BMW. That alone tells you that their are other factors besides reliability and customer service that sells these cars.
Yep. MBs are more in touch with the road than Lexus ! You an say that with a straight face ? Have you owned or driven extensively an S-500 and LS430 to judge that ? Or is it what you read in auto mags ?
Nope, don't need to own a car to know how it drives. Another fallacy given here constantly, that you have to own a car to know how it drives. You're able to tell how a 330i drives from a test drive of a few minutes, or at least to be able to tell it drives sportier, but no one else is able to do the same with a test drive of a LS430 vs the competition. I've driven the LS430 a few times now and the S-Class many times and my opinions on both as to how they drive are based on such driving experience. Don't need to own one to see and feel how they drive, don't be ridiculous. If I made a statement about which car was more reliable or disputed the fact that the LS shows to be more reliable in survey - then I'd need to own one of them of both. Not to know that the LS430 keeled over like a barge at Lexus' own test drive event.
You are simply looking for something to trump out as non-credible. The post of mine you quote stated NOTHING about a timeline. I said LS was outselling S + 7-series COMBINED. Did I tell you which year that was, or like your colleague, you simply assumed I meant 2005 YTD. So when I specified the timeline, why not prove that wrong instead of denigrating my post ? If you have the facts for 2004 why not present it ?
Well it really doesn't require much "looking" to see the hype often presented here. Sales figures YTD that have been light by one month for the non-Lexus brand or articles about safety equipment failing without the whole story being posted - nothing but hype.
Lastly, this about Lexus and their product differenation skills is a joke. They have 4 sedans and 3 SUVs, yet they're so diversified as to make them all boring (except the IS350) and drive more or less alike (again except the IS350), yeah that is product "differentiation" alright. Seems to me they've made their success on making the same type of product for different segments not because they offer something from everyone as you try to imply. People looking for sporty car that isn't small like the IS or a sporty car without 4-doors are out of luck at a Lexus store. Seems to me product diversity is something they're only just now trying to do with sportier cars like the IS and to a lesser degree the new GS. Until now all they had was boring, yawnish sedans and even more drole SUVs.
Oh, If BMWs aren't the ultimate driving machines in the luxury segment then what brand is? It certainly isn't Lexus. Yet if someone were to suggest that the ultimate in luxury is a Lexus, this would be gladly excepted as some type of fact. If BMW isn't the maker of the ultimate driving machine from the 325i all the way up to a 760i Sport, then who is?
M
It doesn't matter-whether it's SUV's or sedans, it is a simple fact of life.
BMW's are the Ultimate Driving Machines in their price categories.
Geez... I have some free time today... no golf game, hence time for Edmunds HELM...
Ultimate; adj, Representing or exhibiting the greatest possible development or sophistication; n: The greatest extreme; the maximum...
If defined narrowly as you do: in its space, then maybe. But I doubt if BMW defines this so narrowly.
I've tried buying one, so far... no can-do... Maybe someday when I am a geezer - retired and wanting to re-live my youthful years all over again, after the pampering by Lexus sedans and trucks...
Exactly!
M
Of course,"in its space."
One cannot compare a $60,000 545 to a $200,000 Italian race car.
Oh, If BMWs aren't the ultimate driving machines in the luxury segment then what brand is? It certainly isn't Lexus. Yet if someone were to suggest that the ultimate in luxury is a Lexus, this would be gladly excepted as some type of fact. If BMW isn't the maker of the ultimate driving machine from the 325i all the way up to a 760i Sport, then who is?
In its space as you and hpowders have defined it, I'd say BMW is truly a much better *driving* car than some others. The M twins are pretty good too. I have driven the M35. The IS350 is pretty good as well. I have driven it too. The IS350 and M-twins are new challengers to the BMW crown in this space. Only in the last couple of years have there been any serious challenge to BMW in this area. What it portends is more challenge in the future. Hopefully, more challenge means better cars in the future. I still want a small compact lux sedan. May be a 330i (hate the e90, prefer the e46) or an IS350 (too expensive, gotta wait for it to come down), but my real target is a convertible. Which car meets my needs at that time (kids left home for College) will get my money.
Or maybe step up to the real (affordable) ultimate driving machines - the Porsches, and get a 911 or 940. That'd be a real driving sports car, just for wifey and I.
Infiniti is trying to build the same type of house in Japan and they're well on their way to doing so, but they've got some details yet to iron out before approaching BMW overall.
M
You totally and completely disagree with my assessment of the very good comfort? How about the smooth tranny? What about the good audio?
I gave a lot of praise as well as expressed where I thought the Lexus was lacking. My opinion, of course, but
heck, you obviously just don't like it that I found ANY faults with the Lexus, like the engine being buzzier than others at higher revs.
Wow, any criticism at all, and we agree on NOTHING? C,mon, now, that New Jersey air can't be THAT bad, can it? Extreme positions just lose credibility in my opinion.
So that's the picture painted. I just wanted to summarize all this to show how ridiculously absurd the points are. But of course if it's what a German car lover wants to believe, maybe needs to believe, then go on believing it.
Now of course some of this is being peddled by a person who doesn't even own a German car, and in fact bought a Japanese car instead, but what the heck.
Good sense of humor on rare occassion!
That was good. Thanks.
Forgot one thing though - there's one thing we all have in common per our beloved designman (who BTW needs to beg forgiveness if he ever wants me to talk to him again - for saying I wouldn't understand anything about performance) - that being we are a bunch of Yenta's.
And they will be removed from here on out.
If you cannot keep your comments restricted to the topic, you need to just skip it altogether.
That doesnt mean we've all forgotten how to drive, or that cars can be fun. I love cars like the E55, the 911 Turbo, etc. The problem with said vehicles is that I could use their capabilities... maybe 1% of the time, if even that. It just doesnt seem like thats worth the money to actually own one.
Now they must redesign the Q45.
Is anybody buying that car?
Now there's a car in need of a miraculous refurbishing.
If anyone can do it, Infiniti can.
The difference between you and the German/European school of posters here is we accept your description as gospel.
Nothing facetious about it.
I intend to be the first BMW kid on my block to do so.
I have driven the current LS several times and had several criticisms of the car.
I hope the new LS improves upon those things.
I also hope the new LS will be more appealing to younger buyers.
A smart re-styling should fix that.