Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
But my main concern is the future. The rumored BMW Minivan that will compete with the MB R Class is definitely one example.
Another example was the link I posted previously showing BMW's focus on electronic nannies for driving assistance. Most such technologies do not belong in enthusiast cars, IMO.
Retuning the radio through iDrive unfortunately becomes a major project.
But you were the one that posted something about "serving real world needs like driving a family"
Interesting.
For a split second last week, when I drove the Porsche, I thought that the "performance" was too darned easy and simple to achieve. I know that should be a great attribute, but I did think it.
But any of us here could have come up with a better slogan.
I don't know what they were thinking of.
A BMW R-type vehicle? I also hope not.
Also, thanks for that other thing I noticed you took care of.
I think BMW should pay more attention to what the M division guys do, for example replacing E-steering with good old fashioned hydraulics, dumping the run-flats, and active steering. Why are those things necessary?
In fact they almost unanimously say steer (pardon!) clear.
The active steering on the GS430 played a major roll in my turning (pardon!) the car down.
M
I could not agree more. I think BMW should make the features mentioned above as options . But then again this would backfire since luxury buyers expect their luxury cars to be loaded with gizmos to compete with other luxury cars. Apparently performance plays a secondary role for the majority of BMW buyers. And BMW knows that.
World Car Of The Year-a beauty contest?
NOT!
I guess there's no Lexus ad because...let me guess...uh...they didn't win any important international awards? :P
TagMan
You know, merc, I have to give Mercedes credit for being an innovator regarding the R, even if not entirely successful. Mercedes took a pretty big risk with the R. I agree with you that the others probably will learn from the belly-flop, and not go into production of a similar vehicle.
TagMan
You can lease this behemoth in V6 version for only $500/month for 27 months.
I have not sat in one, but the vehicle has been praised for its first-class roomy seats and interior.
I drove behind one 2 weeks ago and I must say, it looked pretty nice for a van, but then again, this is coming from someone who likes what Bangle did with the 5 Series. :shades:
They thought they might catch "Lightning in a Bottle", and they were wrong, but they didn't really risk anything on this test case.
To this day, I have never seen one on the street.
The HPX has nothing to do with the Toyota concept, nor the R-Class. The HPX is a VERY LARGE SUV concept, physically bigger than the LX470, similar in size to the Caddy SRX.
A vehicle that size, sold by Lexus, wiould never see the light of day at less than $40k. If anything, it will be a nice transition from the GX470, which is falling out of favor as trucks have recently.
A bigger RX is a great idea, and I'm surprised Lexus hasn't been all over it! Smaller Hummer, bigger RX, not hard to figure out what is working here. :mad:
Since the HPX hasn't come close to seeing the light of day in 3 years, when Lexus can build a concept to production in 2 years, I question if it will ever come.
And I don't think Lexus is waiting with baited breath to see if Super Station wagons will become hot. That's Diamler/Chrysler's baby.
We now know where the line is drawn.
RX, cool :shades:
R-Class, not so much :sick:
Car-like, good. :shades:
Wagon-like, not good. :sick:
DrFill
The updates it needs is engine, power train and probably a new fresher interior, may be some electronic toys as well.
The engine should be updated to 350+ hp coupled with the new 8-speed transmission and then I suspect things will change.
Lexus should easily move 30,000 + units after the update.
The Chrysler products that use M-B hardware are all last generation platforms, aren't they? (Crossfire\SLK320, 300\E430). I think there would be a lot of hubbub if Mercedes rebadged a Chrysler.
Speaking of the R, I saw one in a Baltimore parking lot last weekend. Enormous.
Aston Martin and Porsche seem to think there's a market for their CLS competitors. It will be interesting to see if they work or not.
The main point Doc, is that it is rarely small pocket change to introduce a new model automobile. The risks are certainly the financial investment in the vehicle and the further risk is the one we all see here . . . about the reputation, which can become diluted. In this case, I don't see major damage to the marque, as the sales and exposure are fairly minimum.
Why blast them so harshly for taking the risk, as though they should have known better? Do you see them as the all-knowing prophet of auto manufacturers? Risk is part of the business. Look at the Lexus SC. Maybe not quite the disaster of the R, but not all that far behind, sir.
TagMan
The R-Class is the most shocking. It's based on the ultra-stiff M/GL chassis. And this is why all three pass easily in the Tuscaloosa, Alabama assembly line right in line with each other.
:sick:
True it isn't much of a risk due to the shared platform, but that platform is shared with the GL and M, NOT the Pacifica. The Pacifica is built on a entirely different platform.
M
You've got to learn to look at the big picture, the car sold over 50K in its first full year worldwide, that is why Porsche, BMW, Audi, Aston-Martin and even VW are rushing to do something similar. For a car as compromised in the name of style to sell that well for prices above the E-Class equals a big hit. Of course sales are going to cool down once everyone who has to have one gets one, just like the Lexus' equally drooping GS.
M
In Depth Article
I like it myself, particularly the interior. BMW has gone back to a gear shift lever, but a very trick one of course.
M
Well it seems they haven't given up on the original yet. I'm reading that for 2007 the price has been cut by 5K on both the R350 and R500 and the option packages have been shuffled around like on all other 2007 MB models. We'll have to see if this helps sales. The R320 CDI should help out a little also.
M
The NAD must think the public as gullible and foolish . How can anyone take this humorous ad seriously?
link title
M
I saw a picture of what the new 2009 BMW 5 series may look like in the September Automobile Magazine. The styling of this car appears very conservative. Maybe Chris Bangle is under some kind of restraining order and is not allowed to enter any BMW design studios/premises?
Designman,
it appears BMW is reading your posts.
The new one looks pretty much like the old one from the side.
Not a very exciting re-do, IMO.
The pains MB takes just to make the audible experience of driving a joy goes beyond what any other car company would do. Over-engineered MBs may be derided here but there are definite advantages in this type of over-engineering.
The first-class comfort offered by the new Mercedes-Benz CL-Class is also an audible experience. Thanks to meticulous development work and the most modern testing procedures, the coupé is by far the quietest car in its class.
In addition to the noise configuration and sound insulation of the engine, exhaust system and chassis of the new CL-Class, it is the car’s good aero-acoustics in particular that make it a very quiet driving experience for drivers and passengers. As early as the conceptual phase, Mercedes engineers took pains to ensure that the bodyshell was optimally streamlined so that wind noise was reduced.
It was with this in mind that they designed the airflow-efficient A-pillars, developed a more rigid bodyshell with reinforced outer surfaces and achieved a new sealing concept for the doors, which is acoustically even more efficient than in the preceding model. This exemplary noise insulation is also helped by the side windows, which have a thickness of six millimetres in the new CL-Class coupé.
link title
I like the interior as well. It reminds me a bit of the new 3 series, but without those cupholders that mess up the flow of the dash. Definitely better than the ML.
Its all about BMW this, and MB that... Like I said, its cool with all these Euro talk cos Lexus is primed and ready to pounce. I'm taking some time sitting on the sidelines myself. I'll be back in full force after launch of the LS460. Then we'll see whose got the mojo to scoot through this class unscathed. I predict soon, all the Bimmer/MB fans are going to start talking/hyper ventillating about this new LS. Its gonna rock....
Any of you catch the MT short blurb on the LS460 and the 600hL ? Simply put, for the 600hL, MT stated that: "Lexus is about to change the automotive world. Again."
See what I mean about the LS series rocking...
I'll be seeing you all later.... My wedding anniversary beckons... Going away the rest of the week/weekend.
ps: Tag: How's that Elise treating you so far ? You are a lucky chap/bloke/mate/guy... just plunking down that kinda cash on an Elise. What do you do for a living again ?