Lexus IS 300

1131416181957

Comments

  • frank2917frank2917 Member Posts: 3
    Hi Paul J.:

    I am also in the market for the IS300. Some thing to share, I was told by the dealer that Lexus has reduced the production, all dealers are getting less IS300 than one month ago, so the price went up. I called two dealers two weeks ago, none of them had IS300 in stock. But they were telling me they will get the car this week (6/30). I have sent mail to all dealers in Bay Area on 6/29 night, but have not heard any reply yet. Would you mind telling me your email so that we can share the information. I'll let you know if I hear any good deal. You are right, we are paying much more than other area. Check www.carsdirect.com, if you enter LA zip code, the price is about $600 over invoice. Try to enter your zip code to see the price, don't be shocked.

    I did get one offer from Lexus Fremont, $32,320 for Lether Package and Moonroof only, not Luxury Package, people in LA is paying $31,500 for Luxury Package + Moonroof + LSD, Heated seat + ... every thing.

    Good luck. Please let me know if you got any good deal.

    Frank
  • jrct9454jrct9454 Member Posts: 2,363
    I think you will find the price in NorCal, as suggested above, to be substantially above what you have to pay in SoCal. If I were buying at this moment, I would lean VERY hard on a Bay Area dealer with this data, and then without hesitation head to LA if they didn't move. Online quotes for SoCal are in the area of $400-500 over invoice. The difference is too substantial to ignore.
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    I'd agree fully on your WRX analysis except for the rear seat thing. Both the IS and WRX have very tiny back seats (so does the A4). I don't think you could say any of them are comfortable or roomy.

    But the other reasons you mentioned are the reasons I got the A4 over the WRX. Talk about econobox interiors!
  • v_techv_tech Member Posts: 52
    can you really compare a subaru to a lexus??? one other thing to add on to the WRX responses. i would suspect that a 24K dollar car rattles with a kaboom when you slam the door shut with the same force you normally would on any lexus.

    vvti
  • v_techv_tech Member Posts: 52
    will the new nissan sentra SE-R really outperform the manual IS 300??? anybody?? i doubt it. to me it is a futile arguement because if it were faster than a manual IS it would be faster then any A4, 325i, c240, volvo s40, and a lot of other sedans out there that cost 30K (well close to 30K). why pick on the lex only??

    but i do understand where corkfish is coming from in a small way because i have tried the same approach with the IS300 and its more expensive competition. however, i was talking a cheaper lexus vs bmw, mb, and volvo. corkfish is trying to compare subaru and nissan to lexus which doesn't make any sense. everyone knows this but i will say it again. the IS300 was meant to bring a solid balance of performance and luxury to the pavement. it wasn't meant to be the ultimate rocket. even a integra GSR four door can sprint to faster times then a auto IS or even many automatic or manual luxury sport sedan like the A4, 325i, and c240 for sure.

    i think those who are against the IS are still very wary of its AUTOMATIC performance capabilities. the automatic lex has great talent just imagine how their cars will stack up against the manual.

    vvti
  • raybearraybear Member Posts: 1,795
    jrct9454 is right, but there are dealers willing to do even better than he describes.
  • symessymes Member Posts: 10
    LX470 in for service, they gave me an IS300.

    eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

    I love, love, love how this car drives, smooth, but fast, solid, on cam accel and it stops SOOOO well too.

    Give me back my arm rest and fully auto 4 windows though!

    I just wish it didn't look like a low-rider!

    I love the 'steel with holes' look inside, although I think that keeping the dash black would have retained more of a classy feel than mixing grey knurled plastic in around the AC controls etc.

    I wouldn't want to give this back, except of course to get my LX back again, but there really aren't any roads around here that are twisty enough with sufficiently high speed limits to enjoy it to the full.

    Any chance for Lexus to make a poor man's SC430 and put a fabric top on one with the Mark Levinson stereo?......
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    The armrest is coming, and the brushed aluminum is gone I think with 2002, so the dash will remain black throughout. First year buyer's ISs will look like they put on an aftermarket dash kit after a few years once the black is standard :-)

    You must have felt like your butt was scraping the ground going from the LX to the IS :)
  • pslosarpslosar Member Posts: 2
    Thanks to those posters for feedback. Frank, my mail is pslosar4@ix.netcom.com

    I am tempted to buy a 1 way ticket to LA/ manta Monica if any So gal posters have suggestions for a dealer. Might be nice to drive back in a new IS. I will put the pressure on local dealers as the difference in quotes is substantial. Thanks again.
    pul
  • jrct9454jrct9454 Member Posts: 2,363
    Pick up a copy of the LA Times, preferably on Friday and/or Saturday...available at any Bay Area large bookchain. Go to classifieds and start making calls. You can go online at the Lexus site to start e-mailing dealers, as well. And CarsDirect will, when you enter any SoCal zip code, pop you a quote on an IS that is hundreds of dollars less than if you use a NorCal zip at the same site.

    Armed with that data, you should have all you need to know which way to go. When I was first shopping for an IS, within a month or so of intro, no one in NorCal wanted to move off MSRP; with a couple of phone calls, I had two SoCal dealers, including the one in Thousand Oaks, who is the closest, offering $1000 off MSRP, which was a big deal at the time. We actually drove down there with every intention of making the deal, but 20 minutes on 101 south in the IS with 17" wheels, wavy concrete surface, and I knew it would be a mistake for what I wanted. The point is, however, that the market down there is and always has been far more competitive for all luxury makes than the Bay Area...period.
  • lexusis300lexusis300 Member Posts: 1
    if you're interested or own an IS300, i suggest you take alook at www.is300forum.com for more info. it is a very active forum that would be a lot of help, enjoy!
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    That new forum has over 200 members in a couple days. So nice to have it back.
  • v_techv_tech Member Posts: 52
    i don't know if anybody has seen the july 01 issue of R/T but there is a article on the IS titled "2001 lexus IS 300 the unofficial sedan of generation X." it is basically their long term test on the IS.

    "Is this the ultimate gen-xer's car, or what?" says Paul Dean, Editorial Director of sister publication Cycle World. "From a styling standpoint, it offers the kinds of features they hold in high regard: low-profile tires on 17-in. wheels, xenon headlights, Swatch watchlike instrumentation, chrome-plated shifter ball, killer sound system. Fortunately, the lexus IS 300 is more than just a Generation X marketing vehicle; it's also a damned nice car."

    "The ride quality is excellent," exclaims Production Manager Tonia Troncone. "I really enjoyed its smooth downshifting when ahving to pass cars on my drive to Las Vegas. On rougher sections of highway the road noise was louder tan i expected, but compared to my own car, this lexus is as quiet as a mouse."

    One chink in the IS 300's otherwise pristine armor is the transmission. "From rest, or when picking up the throttle from cruise, the transmission can slip, the engage rather harshly. Bam!! Pretty unsettling, and it doesn't BODE WELL FOR LONGEVITY," reports Executive Editor Doug Kott.

    Senior Editor andrew bornhop concurs. "I notice this abrupt shifting too, but i find it slips, then 'bams' when i do a California style stop or am creeping through a parking lot slowly before accelerating swifly."

    they took it in for maintenance and their dealer told them they are unaware of similar problems iwth other IS300's.

    any thoughts on all of this??

    silverlex does this have to do with the trac thing you were talking about earlier sorry i kinda whipped over a lot of posts too fast i will probably go back and read them later since this does sound problematic to me if these guys are questioning the longevity of this engine.

    personally i don't understand how this car could have engine longevity issues when it is practically or supposedly almost the same engine as the GS300 right??? i don't know i am no expert on these kinds of things.
  • v_techv_tech Member Posts: 52
    here are the specifics of the R/T IS test car.

    Total miles 23,350
    miles since last report 9907
    average mpg to date 21.1
    Best mpg (avg of 3) 24.8
    Worst mpg (avg of 3) 17.4
    Repair costs to date 0
    Maintenace costs to date $430
    Delivered price $34,696

    vvti
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    of this problem, and I believe that's addressed in the ECU fix, but I can't say for sure. There are two individual fixes: an ECU reprogram and a TRAC ECU replacement.
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    has returned and is fully operational.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Edmunds.com includes the IS 300 in its just published Entry Level Luxury Sport Sedans Comparison Test. Check it out by following the link in the Additional Resources box on the left sidebar of this page.

    The IS 300 finished in tie for third with the Volvo S60 T5 - read the article and let us know what you think.

    Pat
    Host
    Sedans Message Board
  • flywithmeflywithme Member Posts: 4
    Just got my IS, black fully loaded for 31.5K from Oxnard, CA. It was a very painless experience. SoCal is definitely more willing to negotiate than Northern California. I live in NorCal & the Fremont dealer was going to dealer trade for me to get the IS I wanted but he wanted 33K and no room for negotiation. I went to Colma dealer and after I finished test driving they told me the car had just been sold!! Anyway, I feel that due to more supply and less demand in SoCal (especially cities just outside of SoCal like Oxnard), plus lower cost of living in general, you will be able to get a much better deal.

    TRAC/ECU problem: Just spoke to a service consultant regarding this. He told me that if they do the "fix" the car will shift a lot harder and it will be very noticeable. Basically, it involves reprogramming the computer. Also, he made it very clear that once the fix is done there is no removing it. In fact, 3 people they have done the fix for are now unhappy with the way the car shifts. He also said that this is not really a "problem"--this is the way the luxury side of the car is supposed to handle. However, many younger drivers want the racy type feel so they have the change done. WHOA--this is the first I hear of this. Seems like the "controversy" continues. Can people who have had this fix tell me how the car now handles?
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    Plenty of opinions on IS300.net. Just do a search for "ECU". Many are satisfied. I've yet to read one who wasn't. Sounds like they don't want to waste their time (time = money).
    You don't have to be a racer type to need this fix. If you ever merge into traffic from a stop, you'll want it. The TRAC fix should keep the traction from being too sensative.
  • jkmfromlajkmfromla Member Posts: 22
    first of all, let me start out by saying i didn't read the entire article. with that out of the way, i didn't think this was a fair comparison due to the price range and layout.

    a fully loaded 330i costs over $43K, but a comparable millenia only cost around $35K. i don't think it's fair to compare vehicles which are $8,000 apart. when i think of entry level, i think of the 325i, IS300, I30t, TL-S, C240, LS v6, mid-level S60 and maybe the Passat GLX. the S60 T5, 330i, C320 and LS V8 are over $40K and start getting closer to the GS430, Saab 9-5, and BMW 528 range.

    the layout is related to price. instead of going with the Lincoln LS V8, they should've gone with the LS V6. the same with the Volvo, BMW and MB. this way the cars would've had similar power and price. lexus, infiniti, mazda, etc. shouldn't be punished because they don't make 2 "entry" level luxury sedans.

    i'm sure (i hope) edmunds thought of this before it did its comparison, but instead of comparing 2 levels of sedans and discounting the results by the cost of the vehicle, why not just compare comparable vehicles?
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Interesting comments, jkmfromia. You might want to consider passing them on to the folks in charge of these reviews by emailing editor@edmunds.com.

    Pat
    Host
    Sedans Message Board
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    I wonder what their reply would be. Cut and paste that post to them and see if you get a response.
  • mstsscmstssc Member Posts: 89
    I agree with jkmfromla. This type of comparison is typical though. I have a few comparisons from various publications and it is always the IS300, T5, 330i, C320 etc, never the S60 base or 2.4T or the 320/325 or C240. I am currently in the market for an 'entry level' and have recently drove the IS300, Xtype, S60 (base), Type S and S40. Personally, I would rank them in that order. My comparisons are always within a certain budget I have in mind. To narrow things further, I am leasing so residuals and interest rates are also important. When these are factored in the IS300 is by far the most car for the monthly payment (they are dicounting them a bit in Canada, high residual and reasonably good interest rate). The europeans have either low residuals or high interest rates.

    I guess my question is how did the type S get first place. I realize it is well equipped for the money but the drive was uninspiring and it came across to me as a hopped up Accord. Especially when compared against the IS300 and Xtype.
  • fxashunfxashun Member Posts: 747
    put it in first place. The type S while FWD is a raging performance value. There's no arguing that. The IS, while nice, is a disappointment with only 200hp. I mean the Altima is going to have 185/240hp next year. The IS needs to up the ante. A crazy interior and racy tail lites only go so far. Heck with only 200hp no one gets to see the tail lites anyway.
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    First, do some research before posting Fxashun: The IS has 215 HP / 218 torque. But you were close. You got the interior and tails right though, so you at least have seen the car apparently. The IS will also have a stick this fall, knocking it under 7 seconds for sure.

    Nissan claims the 240 HP Altima in its 4 speed automatic form, will run 7.2 from 0-60. Lexus claims 7.1 for the IS, running on a .5 liter smaller engine and 25 less ponies. And I don't care if you put 300 HP in the Altima, it remains an Altima. Believe it or not, some enthusiasts actually buy their cars based on factors other than straight line giddy up, or how fast the latest Nissan looks blazing across a salt flat with a "pump you up" sountrack in the background. :-)

    Rather the Altima should "raise the ante" as you put it, since the WRX (a sedan in the same price range) is already spanking it cold. Should all car makers shoot for a low fives 0-60 to keep up with Subaru?
  • shawn325ishawn325i Member Posts: 100
    I agree with many about the comparison, should have been done with different cars ie. 325i

    I also agree with Silver about the Altima, Hp alone does not make a fast car or a better performing car. The WRX not only is "spanking the Altima cold" but also the IS300 and many others for that matter.

    As far as the 0-60 time for the new manual IS300 being under 7 sec for sure, well we'll have to see about that. Although Lexus on THEIR site and in THEIR printed material claim 0-60 times of 7.1, there is only one other test that I have seen out of many that have the IS300 doing 7.1, most have it at 7.5-7.6 (for the auto of course)
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    Ran the IS at 7.1 in the shootout with the 330, C320 and T5. But yes, this is but one publication.
  • shawn325ishawn325i Member Posts: 100
  • frank2917frank2917 Member Posts: 3
    Flywithme:

    For $31,500, what options do you get? Luxary package or Lether package?
  • fxashunfxashun Member Posts: 747
    Strange you got stuck on the Altima but forgot to compare the IS to the TL which is what started this. It's all a matter of preference of course but the TL has a usable back seat, awesome reliability, aggressive pricing, Acura service, and a 260hp sport shift. Again that's why it won. I agree the IS is a nice car but it's interior is smaller and questionably styled, and it is slightly underpowered compared to the competition. That's why it didn't win.
  • shawn325ishawn325i Member Posts: 100
    Basically won because of the price and standard equipment, with 260hp it should be more of a performer! No point and even starting the FWD vs RWD
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    I don't disagree. The TL is a great car. Why must you dump on other cars to get that point across though? It's makes sound you less credible.

    "The TL-S has a usable back seat"

    Last time I had 4 people in the IS, the back seats were being used. And no, they weren't little people. Just because they're smaller, doesn't mean they're not usable. The Lexus SC430 does not have usable back seats for instance.

    "The TL-S has awesome reliability"

    Ever heard of Lexus reliability? It sets the bar for Acura.

    "The TL-S has agressive pricing"

    The IS is almost 10K less than cars in its class of sports sedan.

    "Acura service"

    Again, I refer you to the history of Lexus service and reliability.

    You make good points, and I don't disagree with them, but you make them in a manner as to imply the IS 300 does not also have these qualities, and that every buyer should want a bigger back seat and a straight line pull box. In a sense, it ridiculous to compare them at all. Each were made for different audience, with different tastes and needs. I, for example, value the fun factor over overall legroom, or ride comfort. Am I out of my mind for doing so?
  • maggienmaggien Member Posts: 6
    I have recently driven the 325i, S60 TL-S type and the IS300. As far as price is concerned I think the IS is the best deal. The 325i was uninspiring in the curves and was still going to be more than the IS. I asked if they could get 1 without leather and he said he would have to check. The S60 is safe but feels like a Grandma car if you're driving a base model- and looks like 1 as well. My friend is selling Volvos but I can't buy 1 even for him. Drove the S type and really enjoyed it - feels like a luxury sedan but with a lot of power. Thing is I commute almost 2 hours a day and want something fun as well as functional. I would be interested in knowing what was on the 31k car that was purchased in Oxnard. After months of searching it looks like I'll be going back to the IS - its where I started and appears to be the best bang for my buck. Does anyone know if the insurance is high on it? My record isn't so clean. That could play a major role in the decision.
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    Honestly, I love my IS, but I might actually discourage you a little here. If fun/excitement/performance is number one on your list, ignore the rest of this. But if your looking for a car with more balance for your long commute, I might suggest the TL-S. Reasons being:

    1. More comfortable seating. They're not the sport bucket feel you get in the IS, which is more designed for support in the corners than support in traffic.

    2. Gas milage. The TL-S is gonna save you some cash on the drive. No arguing that. I'm not sure if the TL-S require premium, but the IS drinks 93 octane.

    3. Tires. The IS has Z rated tires, and as with any high performance tire, you can expect to get less than 20K on them. The cheapest you'll see these tires go for are about $100 each, but most run around $150-$200. I'm not familiar with the tires on the TL-S, but I do remember they are not so geared towards performance, but rather some longevity. The trade off is, of course, performance. I've brought the baby Lex through some curves faster than I should have, and it sticks like glue. Not suprising with a skidpad of nearly 1G. I'll gladly fork it out on rubber for that kind of fun though.

    Other than that, the luxury is fairly matched. It's my opinion the 240 watt stereo system in the IS 300 (Fujitsu Ten) is hands above the Bose in the Acura, but that's purely subjective.

    Just some thoughts. Hope that helps.
  • fxashunfxashun Member Posts: 747
    The question was why did the Type S win the comparison test. I was giving some good reasons why. I didn't compare with my reasons I just listed them. Why are you so defensive?

    But as far as back seat room goes...I'm 6'6' so if I'm in the front seat of the IS with my seat in a comfortable position for me there is about 2 to 3 inches of room back there.

    The IS is a great car but I think it needs a boost in the hp to be a real contender. I also wish the type S or any Acura/Honda with that engine were RWD and 5 speed manual but we all can't get what we want.
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    Ok, I hear you. We would all love more HP. I'm not going to sit here and tell you I don't wish it had more. But I think you're missing a vital point, thus my frustration with you and countless others who are locked in on this "HP rules all" mentality.

    The IS300 was designed with the 3 series in mind - not pumped up, FWD pull boxes like the TL-S and Altima. That means Lexus had to develop a sedan with strong mid-to-upper range acceleration, perfectly balanced handling, razor sharp steering and extremely strong braking - qualities we all come to associate with "the ultimate driving machine". A screaming 0-60 is not the highest priority. If it was, they would've thrown in a bigger engine, adding more weight, shifting the balance and reducing all those characteristics I just listed above to become not a 3 series competitor - but a TL-S/Maxima/Altima one.

    Of course, Lexus won't get the serious consideration it deserves until they throw in the 5 speed manual. And yes, the 330i has more HP than the IS to begin with, but certainly not the 260 the new Maxima/TL-S etc are putting up. Do you think that's because they don't know what they're doing, or perhaps they have a different goal in mind? My guess is it's the latter, but you're welcome to feel different.
  • v_techv_tech Member Posts: 52
    just a luxurious version of the accord??? i think the IS300 belongs in the sports sedan market and the TL belongs in the boaty sedan market. what is the boaty sedan market??? cadillac catera, lincoln LS, mazda millenia, to name a few.

    vtec
  • v_techv_tech Member Posts: 52
    you put a honda vtec 260hp TL type S engine in a toyota camry???? you then have a super camry not a super accord. just a thought.

    vvti
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    This is an interesting conversation - how about one of you hop over to the Comparisons - Sedans vs. Sedans folder and fire up a discussion on this subject?

    I'll post a link to it here and in the TL-S discussion if you'd like.

    Pat
    Host
    Sedans Message Board
  • flywithmeflywithme Member Posts: 4
    I got the Luxury package with 17" wheels for 31.5K at Lexus of Oxnard. This also included Cargo Net, Trunk Mat, and Wheel Locks. MSRP was $35124, including $545 destination fee. If you go there, talk to Joe Greene (no, not "mean" Joe Greene). Hope this helps.
  • fxashunfxashun Member Posts: 747
    the boaty luxurious TL Type S was better than the razor sharp handling and sporty looking but comparitively slower IS. In fact it beat it in all but 1 judged category.

    http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/comparison/articles/46528/page032.html

    Again I'm just answering the "why did the TL win" question posed before. I wasn't one of the judges.
  • maggienmaggien Member Posts: 6
    Silverlex - thanks for the info.
    I wanted a sports car and was seriously looking until I totaled 2 cars. Obviously a sports car is out. Was checking on-line info and stumbled across the IS300 site and felt like I had entered boy racer heaven. Is this type of driver/driving going to up the insurance prices? If it is I will have to go for a TL-S type or maybe a Maxima which is a lot of options and car for not as much $. Also saw the charges for maintenance on the IS300. Pretty stiff. The TL-S type only needs oil changes and doesn't have a scheduled tune-up until 100k miles.
  • corduroygtcorduroygt Member Posts: 19
    Which means luxury is more important than sporty handling and driving pleasure. That's why the Acura won. In a Sport-Luxury comparo, where sportiness would be the most weighted criteria, I have no doubt that the BMW and IS would share top honors, (both manual of course) and a FWD auto like the Acura would have no place in it (it wouldnt be fair)
  • silverlexsilverlex Member Posts: 156
    Our insurance for the IS is 800/year. We're both 25. It's a four door sedan, and loaded with safety features. I don't see any reason for it to be any higher than the TL-S or Max.

    On the maintenance issues, those costs are not really associated with tune ups, but rather checkups every 5K which include oil change, tire rotation, filter changes etc.

    The 15,000 mile checkup, for instance, is priced at $229 and for this they change the AC Pollen Filter, tranny fluid, rear end differential fluid, tire rotation, and oil change and other stuff you could probably check yourself.

    I'll be the first to admit Lexus service is not cheap. But weigh that against the fact that Lexus builds a bullet proof engine. Some cars (not referring to Acura here) I wouldn't want to own after the warranty is up.
  • v_techv_tech Member Posts: 52
    fxashun-we aren't just talking SPORTS sedans here are we?? edmunds did a good job in the comparo i guess but i don't think they had "sport" in mind when they did this comparo. tell me if you actually believe the TL can perform better than any IS or 3 series in the braking, skidpad, slalom, or steering departments?? in the subjective rating "most fun to drive" tell me also how the TL could compare to a IS or 3 series.

    also, i am just curious if you have taken your logic with the TL type S to the bimmer 3 series board and what kind of responses you have gotten. if you haven't yet i bet they laugh you out of the building with the TL "accord deluxe" type S. if you don't believe me go and give it a shot. =) i have no idea why you are sizing up the IS anyway it finished third you should go after the bimmer lovers because afterall that car is 43K loaded. i think the fact that a 32K car can actually beat a 43K bimmer in any type of comparo done by anybody is somewhat disappointing.

    vtec
  • v_techv_tech Member Posts: 52
    i haven't driven the TL but i sat in one at the showroom. i guess it is just me but the interior is just plain boring compared to the IS.

    vvti
  • fxashunfxashun Member Posts: 747
    I think he sums it up.
    Yes the IS handles better....Yes the IS is slower blah blah. The styling is a love it/hate deal... Like I said...The TL won because it's a raging value. That's it. Don't shoot me because the IS lost I didn't write the comparo. I guess if my car lost I'd be whining too.
  • shawn325ishawn325i Member Posts: 100
    Boring, I think not, mature yes.

    IS interior boring, I think not, young & techno yes
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.