By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
SIRIUS Satellite Radio (Nasdaq:SIRI), known for delivering the very best in
commercial-free music and premium sports programming to cars and homes
across the country, today announced a new signal translation device at the
National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) Convention & Exposition in
Las Vegas, that enables owners of satellite-ready radios in General Motors
and Honda vehicles to receive SIRIUS.
I guess that's pretty cool, if you don't like the XM in your new Hondas, you can always switch to Sirius. Personally, I don't really care (I'm pretty happy with XM, especially now that it's commercial-free)...but it's nice to know that there will be a choice. I wonder when this will be available???
lelandhendrix -- glad the switch to 17" worked so well for you.
dust90 -- I could switch to 16" when I get new tires down the road, as you say, but another factor is that I was told by the service manager there's a little bit of a speedometer (odometer too?)issue with different sized wheels. So I still may stick with the 15" size. I like the idea of Honda alloys, for the reasons you say, even though they're more expensive than aftermarket.
Now if Honda would just come out with a clean new design for their 15" alloys, I'd be all set. In the meantime, I think I'll just stand pat.
Thanks for all your input.
the 16" wheels would be fine with you speedo, you would adjust your tire size accordingly. ditto for the 17". since you bought the LX i get the feeling you want your Accord sedan to look like an Accord sedan, so i wouldn't do anything over 16". i have seen the 17" wheels that Honda installed a few sedans at my dealer, and those sedans sit in the showroom.....and sit, and sit, and sit....haha
did the LX get new wheel covers for 2004?
All accords have the same overall wheel diameter, or distance from edge to edge of the rubber. The difference between the LX's steel 15s, the EX's 16s, and the V6MT coupe's 17s is compensated for in the profile (height) of the rubber.
I verified that my speedo didn't change in the slightest all the way up to 100mph by using my gps's speed indication. Speedo stayed accurate, pre- and post-upgrade.
Have u noticed a significant difference when u use the synthetic oil, compared to HONDA's oi?
Again, I don't know why I waste my time responding to stuff like this. I won't again.
We had several inches of fresh snow last night and the traction control kicked in a few times (mostly when pulling away from a stop), but the Accord felt very solid all around. I have the OEM tires and I have no complaints about them.
I'm still trying to get used to the ABS brakes, though. The ABS doesn't kick on all that often, but when it does, and I hear that loud clunking noise, my first instinct is to take my foot off the brake. I know that's exactly what you're NOT supposed to do, but it just sounds like something's wrong. It sounds like there are big rocks under my brakes. I'll guess I'll get used to it eventually. My husband's Lexus has ABS, but that just has a minor grinding noise, not a loud clunking. It's much less alarming.
There is a 100+ point inspection, and the car must be newer than 1997 and with less than 80,000 miles i believe. They come with a 1 year/12K mile complete warranty, and a 7 year/100K mile ppowertrain warranty (from original build date, not from when YOU buy it).
They can sell it as a certified vehicle if it has had less than 3 body panels replaced. They cannot sell it with a salvaged, totalled, or stolen title. However, different dealers will try different things to sell it. Mine, bought in Boston, had all the body panels replaced except the door (obviously I didnt know this at the time), and yet they still sold it as certified. Now living in CA, dealers here say they are under much stricter guidelines on which cars they can and cannot certify.
Hope this helps!
I'm considering filing a diminished value claim against the other persons insurance company, so I wanted to know for sure how many body panels could be replaced.
Thanks again for your help.
Thanks.
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2004/honda/accord/100336788/photogalle- ry.html?pg_type=Sedan&imgsrc=%2Fpictures%2FVEHICLE%2F2003%2FH- onda%2F100144773%2F005045-T.jpg
at times i feel i dropped the ball when i got an accord instead of the tsx - an accord with the ingot solid feel of the jetta. sure you'll lose some accleration (probably felt only at highway speeds) but everything else favors the tsx (like exclusivity) except for interior space.
You will lose some acceleration with the TSX, especially off the line. Don't get me wrong, the car has plenty of pep, but so far for me the gas mileage is nowhere near what it's advertised to be. And you must run premium fuel. I've averaged about 22.5 MPG to this point (2000 miles). Not good. I hope it improves. I could have gotten the 240 HP EX V6 for $3000 less, gotten better fuel mileage, and run regular gas.
So far I've enjoyed the TSX, it's fun to drive, but I think about the Accord a lot. Truth be told, it may suit my day-to-day needs better. In fact, I know it does. My previous car was a 2000 Accord.
You didn't drop the ball. Enjoy your Accord. It's a damn fine car.
Johnny
The thing is pretty darned good in the winter.
Granted, there is some slip when accelerating, but the anti-locks work like a charm--be they noisy.
What makes the car downright great is what I have always loved from Hondas: Great communication through the steering wheel. I could detect slip and drift instantly and adjust accordingly. (no pun intended) I would dread to have to drive in snow and ice in a car with numb or vague steering. Many SUVs fall into this category, even though people think they are going to be so great in the snow.
What did I see in lots of ditches and stuck on/run up curbs? Camaros and Cavaliers. Of course, it might have something to do with the drivers as well.
We just put new tires on our '01 Accord EX, which had Michellin MXV4 Energy Plus tires as OEM. They cost $160 per tire in 195/65-15H sizes and were VERY noisy. They did last 55 miles, however.
I replaced them with Bridgestone Turanza LS-T in a 205/60-15T size. I drove the car for the first time this weekend, including a strech of I-94 that is concrete. You can't believe the difference in noise reduction. You can actually hear what people in the back seat are saying or listen to the radio at 1/4 volume. Amazing. Plus, the tires were $91 each installed with road hazzard protection. The "T" rated tire has a 70,000 mile tread warranty versus 40,000 miles for the "H" rated tire.
I make it a hard and fast rule not to buy any tires that won't last at least 100 miles...
Fortunately I didn't learn this the hard way. I will now be sure to check all spares a couple times a year. You might want to do the same.
http://intellichoice.com/best_value_2004/bovyTemplate1.cfm/templa- te/Midsize.cfm?CFID=2720536&CFTOKEN=39827888
..........Richard
So, opinions vary and you cannot conclude that looks were not considered.
Consider this: if the 3-series is obviously nicer, could it be that it has "approx. 27,000 styling elements" and that the Neon has only 13,000 ?
A study of the detail level given by stylists to those cars yields the above data (source: "Strategic Management of Technology & Innovation" by Burgelman, Maidique and Wheelwright, 2001).
One key measurement is the number of curves, indentations, etc. when viewing the cross-section of a fender or door, per that study.
Motor Trend, in one issue some time ago, tested the previous generation Accord and Camry and observed that the Accord, on closer inspection, had more styling elements than the Camry.
The implication of that study makes sense to me. The Accord on the road is just "another car" but ogled in the driveway or garage, the richness of its styling details hits you.
Wasn't their first attempt tainted by connections with someone at one of the tire companies and their valuation system mysteriously gave that
'winter' tire a highest rating over others?
I read that story here on Edmunds. I had questioned how that tire was rated above others.
Oh, but I forgot, CR is always above reproach on any of their work... grin.
I don't think I'd give CR much credibility on tires...
Tire rack, and consumer anecdotal ratings are another story.
"Michelin X-One's but they are a bit noisey"
I can't believe X-Ones are noisy... I have them
on a LeSabre and they're quieter than any tire I've had
in two decades, including other Michelins. Can't even
hear them.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
The Firestone tires on my '01 Civic were just fine for all of the 23,000 miles I put on the car.
And weren't there stories about using rubber that a workman in the plant said should not have been used... a quality problem in some of Firestone's tires...
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Any manufacturer is capable of making a mistake. At the quantities made per day in these factories, it only take a couple days of machine error to pump out a lot of bad product. The fact is that the problem has been fixed, and they are probably paying such close attention to quality now that they are better than ever. -JD
Cheat me once, shame on them.
Cheat me twice, shame on me.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
If I had an Explorer, I might think twice about replacing with Bridgestones/Firestones. On my Accord, the Turanzas LS's are a big improvement over the Michelin Energy's.
http://autos.msn.com/advice/article.aspx?contentid=4021802&sr- - c=msn
Hope that helps.
As an aside - I understand now why Anony, and others, say the fog lights are more for looks than light. The difference is not drastic, but in wind blown snow and fog, they are a great help.
1. Does the car handle well in snow?
2. It comes with XM radio but can you use regular frequencies instead?
3. Average price paid?
Thanks
2.Yes
3.Read previous posts on the prices paid board and get out your calculator.