Older Honda Accords

1282283285287288389

Comments

  • bolivarbolivar Member Posts: 2,316
    Buy a new, shiny, pretty car and hang a big black rubber mat on its nose.

    ugh!
  • atlantabennyatlantabenny Member Posts: 735
    Got one from eBay $45 delivered. Quick to install and remove. Protects approx. 80% of nose surface most susceptible to chipping. Only complaint is slight cosmetic damage on the mask when removing, but it's not critical to functionality; seller sent replacement.

    Ideal for black or graphite pearl Accord, where the mask's black color makes it virtually unnoticeable.

    Definitely won't scratch paint.
  • sockpuppet1969sockpuppet1969 Member Posts: 308
    I had the Honda front end mask which I I used for about 6 months or so (2003 Accord, Desert Mist). I was religious about removing it when it got wet and for washing. I put a new coat of wax on every time before putting it back on.

    I stopped using it because it is impossible to stop grime from getting beneath the fabric and scratching the paint. I've had the car over a year now and I guess I am just not as anal about its appearance. I barely notice tiny little blemishes now and when I do they don't really bother me.

    It's not like it is a high end luxury or sports car - don't all you die-hards take this the wrong way, but it is just an Accord.
  • reblack_jrreblack_jr Member Posts: 57
    I think I might have the same problem referred to the in the following link by Bobby.
    http://autorepair.about.com/library/faqs/bl441h.htm
    Does anyone have any more info on removal of the corroded gold colored piece? Do I need to remove the whole system to get at the part? It is a fair amount of work to get inside to remove the motor assembly.
    Thanks in advance!
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    "It's not like it is a high end luxury or sports car - don't all you die-hards take this the wrong way, but it is just an Accord."

    Just an Accord? Yes, and the Mona Lisa is just a painting, Citizen Kane is just a movie, a Rolex is just a watch and the Big Mac is just a hamburger. Ooops, never mind about the last one.

    Just kidding, of course! ;)

    Seriously, though, everyone has different standards for what to them would be a car worth handling with meticulous care. Even though it's "just an Accord" to you, on the other hand we have the lady whose 2004 Accord is her first new car, which makes it very important to her. And she's understandably very upset that someone keyed her car across the entire driver's side.

    For me, my Accord EX is probably as close as I'll get to "high end luxury", unless I win the lottery. And as long as the Accord continues to offer the comparative level of quality and refinement that it does now, I doubt that I'll feel the need to "trade up".

    And for the record, the 3/8 inch rock chip on the leading edge of the hood on my Noble Green Accord was a bit upsetting.
  • carguy58carguy58 Member Posts: 2,303
    "Even though its "just an Accord" to you, on the other hand we have the lady whose 2004 Accord is her first new car, which makes it very important to her. And she's understandably very upset that someone keyed her car across the entire driver's side."

    If somebody keyed my car aross the driver's side I would be jumping around and being very upset.
  • sockpuppet1969sockpuppet1969 Member Posts: 308
    I was not referring specifically to the key job.

    Obviously, we are all going to get upset when we notice an imperfection on our car. This varies depending on the size of the imperfection and the magnitude of our response. Almost everyone would justifiably be upset if the whole side of their car got keyed. For one thing, this is a deliberate act and it is very noticeable. Especially when this happens to a new car. I have an uncle who has a Jaguar XKR convertible. He had both sides of his car keyed and he blew it off and doesn't see the need to have it fixed. Like you said, cars have different value to different people.

    As cars age, smaller imperfections (door dings, rock chips, etc.) become less important to most people.

    My original comment was referring to the front end mask. When I first got my Accord I was obsessive about keeping the paint perfect. That is why I got the front end mask. In my opinion, the mask caused more scratches than it prevented. I still park away from other cars when I can but I don't agonize over every imperfection that I notice. That doesn't mean I wouldn't go ballistic if someone keyed the thing.

    By "just an Accord", all I meant is that as a high volume, average price car that is everywhere, it holds no extra value above and beyond what it is - a relatively plain family car.

    That last comment probably won't help things much. Oh well :^)
  • sandhurst1sandhurst1 Member Posts: 2
    I am buying an 04 EX. The dealer is getting the color that I want from another dealer. I do not know the location of the other dealer. The car will have some miles on it from being driven here, although because there are many dealers within a 150 mile radius the number of miles should not be excessive.

    Is there a point at which a car has so many miles it is not "new"? I don't mind the car having 150 miles, but let's say it has 450. Would that be a source of concern to any of you? How would you handle this situation?

    Thanks for your advice.
  • jrct9454jrct9454 Member Posts: 2,363
    ...and truck it between dealerships. Offer to split the cost with them. I have had bad experiences with dealer personnel moving cars on the road for dealer trades. Just one opinion...
  • maddy1maddy1 Member Posts: 1
    Hello,

    I live in the Akron area and am looking to buy a new Accord LX 2004. I need to decide whether to buy a V6 or 4-Cylinder. Given that it snows heavily in winter in the Akron area, does a V6 or 4-Cyl make a big difference when driving in snowy conditions?
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    Just because you do not care about dings and sctratches doesn't mean other people shouldn't care. While it may be "just an Accord" to you or other people to some it is their first new car, their first car, or maybe they just take pride in the appearance of their vehicles. To someone coming out of a 95 Dodge Neon the Accord is a luxury car. Who are you to judge these people (myself included) for caring about what happens to their car. Anyone who has ever worked for what they own should be ticked when someone so blatantly disregards someone else's property.
  • sockpuppet1969sockpuppet1969 Member Posts: 308
    Settle down. I am not judging anyone. I do care about my car. A lot. But in the grand scheme of things it is only a car. And I did work for it by the way. My apologies to anyone who I may have offended by my statement. I bought the Accord because it is a great car with lots of features for a great price. I just don't see myself falling in love with this car like I have with some other cars I have owned in the past. The Accord is the most expensive car I have owned so far. Just because a car costs a lot does not mean it will move your soul. The 'just an Accord' remark was meant more in a spiritual way.
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    "Just because a car costs a lot does not mean it will move your soul."

    And obviously, just because a particular car doesn't move your soul doesn't mean it doesn't move someone else's soul. I'm sure you'd agree with that.

    We really should move on.
  • sockpuppet1969sockpuppet1969 Member Posts: 308
    It's just an opinion, not directed at any one person.
  • breckcobreckco Member Posts: 62
    Hi! I'm now the happy owner of an 04 EX 4 cyl Graphite Pearl. So far I'm very impressed with it.

    I have a suggestion for the nose mast/bra question. I buy quite a few new cars and usually have purchased a full bra for each car. I take very good care of my cars. I've found most full bra's are not worth the trouble. The paint has to be perfectly clean and dry, and they're a pain to attach and line up. I rarely used them. With the new Accord I ordered the half mask - goes on in a couple of minutes and protects the most vulnerable painted metal surfaces. The plastic bumper is more durable and if it is too chipped down the road it is easy to have just the bumper painted. Also, bra's should not be left on all the time. Dirt gets under the mask and scratches the paint and moisture gets trapped and can cause "clouding" of the paint.
  • lexusguylexusguy Member Posts: 6,419
    I dont see why it would. Under snowy conditions you want slow starts, but thats why automatics have a "2". If you're really concerned about winter driving, perhaps you might consider a new Legacy.
  • qwe_1948qwe_1948 Member Posts: 1
    I replaced a 1991 Accord 4-cyl, 5 spd man with a 2004 V6 LX because I wanted the traction control. I live in northern Delaware and at the bottom of a hill. I never had any "real" trouble with the '91 during snowy weather but I wanted a bit more sure footedness without going to some type of all wheel drive. Through the past winter, I never had any trouble with the OEM tires still on the car.
    BTW, at about 50 mph, the engine RPM will be about 1500 and should the need arise, you can probably pass 75% of the other cars on the road. If you have a lead foot, I'd stay away from the V6.
  • richards38richards38 Member Posts: 606
    I came from Cleveland (now in San Francisco) and your area is pretty flat. Even if you had to climb hills, the 4 cyl. Accord is very quick--not as fast as the V6, but fast enough. I have the '04 Accord EX-L, AT, 4 cyl. which is ideal.

    You really must drive both of them to see if you can't live without the extra power. The Accord's 4 cyl. engine is smoother and faster than some V6s--it will amaze you.......Richard
  • tlaurotlauro Member Posts: 504
    Black nose masks are so circa 1980's. I expect to see Z28's and Monte SS's with them...not new cars.

    Look into Clear 3M Bras. I've had them for years on many different cars. Can't go wrong.

    Just my biased opinion.
  • tlaurotlauro Member Posts: 504
    The miles at which a vehicle is considered new while never having been titled will vary from state to state. Typically 5k-7k miles.
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    Traction control on the V6 is one factor to consider. I had a 2000 Accord V6 (without traction control) and now have a 2003 Accord V6 with traction control. The TCS makes a big difference in snowy conditions IMO.
  • richards38richards38 Member Posts: 606
    The V6 is likely to need TCS much more than the 4 cylinder car because the 4 generates much less torque. The 4 can be put into the transmission's D2 mode for 2nd gear starts which gives more control on ice and snow.
    Test drive Accords with both engines and see if you really need the extra power. The 4 is so smooth and quick that you might be just as happy with 4 cylinders.......Richard
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    I did the "D2" thing with my previous (less torquey) 2000 Accord V6. It helped, but now that I have a point of comparison with my 2003, the D2 method pales by comparison to TCS when it comes to overall control. TCS manages the abundant power of the current, more powerful V6 with incredible ease. If you're concerned with performance and safety in bad weather, you won't regret the decision to go with the V6 if that's what you decide.

    The V6 brings the Accord into "near luxury" car territory, in my opinion and that of many automotive experts. It's been recognized as one of the finest engines available in a production automobile, suitable for a much more expensive car... as you probably know, the considerably more expensive Acura TL uses a slightly larger variant of the same V6 engine. Class leading smoothness and effortless power are its claims to fame. And it rewards you with a satisfying induction growl when you really put your foot into it... auto enthusiasts use the term "ripping silk" to describe this, and it's an apt description. It's an exhilarating experience.

    Yes, an Accord with the V6 is more expensive than one with the I4. If you look at things from a pure "dollars spent" perspective, that could be a deciding factor. But there are other perspectives... I look at my 2003 Accord EX V6 as providing a large measure of the features, performance and luxury of the new Acura TL, for significantly less money. If you look at it based on that perspective, the Accord V6 is a killer value among entry level luxury sedans.

    I'm not trying to get into a debate about the relative merits of the Accord's engine choices, just trying to present a balanced picture. As shown by this and previous posts, both engines are outstanding in their own way. In the end, set aside the breathless accolades you've seen here and test them for yourself. You're the only person who can decide what "you much be just as happy with."
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    I thought all Accord V6's had traction control? I know my 01 V6 coupe did. Did they only add the traction for the "updated" 01-02 Accord V6's?
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    "Did they only add the traction for the "updated" 01-02 Accord V6's?"

    Correctamundo!

    Also, if I understand correctly, the Gen 6 V6 units had "low speed" traction control that relied on brake control only. The Gen 7 units have "higher speed" traction control that relies on a combination of brake and throttle control.
  • justinjustin Member Posts: 1,918
    wow. i always thought D2 in automatics meant that the car would not shift ABOVE 2nd gear. or D3 meant it wouldn't shift above 3rd gear, etc.

    you guys are saying that D2 means the car is actually locked in D2, from start to stop and stop to start? ditto for D3?

    why the heck is Traction Control bothered with then?
  • chucko3chucko3 Member Posts: 793
    Your thought is correct.
  • chucko3chucko3 Member Posts: 793
    450 miles, that's too much for a new car. It could be a demo car you are getting.
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    You learn something new every day. After more thought I do recall saying "the V6's have traction now" when I was looking at my coupe.
  • justinjustin Member Posts: 1,918
    so i am right? what does D2 REALLY mean? car only moves in 2nd gear, or is locked out of any gear ABOVE 2nd, but will start in 1st and downshift to 1st?
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Put snow tires on the car and you won't have problems. Why would you spend a couple thousand for a larger engine to get traction control which will not help you nearly as much as a set of dedicated snow tires, and will do nothing to help you stop. About $500 for 4 snows on seperate rims. Well worth the money, and you save wear and tear on your summer tires and rims.
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    "Why would you spend a couple thousand for a larger engine to get traction control which will not help you nearly as much as a set of dedicated snow tires, and will do nothing to help you stop."

    You don't spend a couple thousand for a larger engine to get traction control. You spend a couple thousand to get the larger engine. The extra goodies, like traction control, are just that.

    Apparently, Honda goes along with the mindset that traction control is the way to go... as of 2005 or 2006, all Honda cars sold in the US will have it. So they must think it has some value. And I agree wholeheartedly.

    My Accord has always been great in snow... I've never even given a thought to the expense of snow tires and the hassle of switching back and forth. Isn't that pretty much the whole idea of all season tires?

    Hey, if you don't find that the V6 offers good value to you, don't buy one. But don't imply that those of us who appreciate what it offers are somehow lacking in common sense. As much as I enjoy the V6, I'd never suggest that someone who went with the I4 should have gotten the V6. I have my reasons for going with the V6, just as I'm sure you have your reasons for going with the I4. You spend your money on what you like, and I'll spend my money on what I like. And we can show each other the courtesy of respecting each other's choices.
  • slorenzenslorenzen Member Posts: 694
    I agree that we're only talking about a car, but where I live(Oregon), there's LOTS of trucks on I-5 that kick up a lot of debris. I drive a Tacoma 4WD, and when I ordered that truck I requested the deflector on the front. That thing has paid for itself several times over now. We're talking 2"x6" pieces of bark, deflecting at 60-75 mph. Usually not heavy enough to dent at that angle, but it can certainly scratch things. I didn't like the way the deflector looks on the Accord's nose, and that 3M stuff is wonderful, but it's also approx. $600 installed. Couldn't justify that...
  • lmacmillmacmil Member Posts: 1,758
    I see this debate on almost every forum for vehicles that offer the option. Here's a simple way to decide: if you have always driven a 4 cyl, have you ever wished you had more power? If so, get the 6. The extra $ will be small in the monthly payment and will not be missed in the long run. Gas mileage difference is negligible. I don't know anyone who ever said "I wish my engine weren't so powerful."
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    "I don't know anyone who ever said "I wish my engine weren't so powerful.""

    LOL!!! Nice way to put it all into perspective.
  • carguy58carguy58 Member Posts: 2,303
    It worked like a gem in this year's Jersey winter.
  • lmacmillmacmil Member Posts: 1,758
    I recently saw a table in a car mag (can't for the life of me remember which one) which listed traction capability by vehicle configuration. IIRC, RWD with traction control was better than FWD without but obvioulsy FWD with TC was better yet.
  • gregoryc1gregoryc1 Member Posts: 764
    We have a 2003 4 cylinder automatic Accord. It has plenty of power. No need for the V6! ---Just my opinion.
  • tlaurotlauro Member Posts: 504
    Not all cars computers perform a 2nd gear start when the shifter is in 2nd. Many do though....My 02 Trailblazer, 03 MPV and 03 Accord, all start in 2nd when in D2. It's computer controlled. The 03 Accord however, starts in 1st gear in all other positions.

    Together with Traction Control, it allows for a much more controlled start on slick surfaces.
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    "We have a 2003 4 cylinder automatic Accord. It has plenty of power. No need for the V6!"

    You're absolutely right. It isn't "need" that leads one to get the V6. It's an indulgence, I'll admit, but one that makes me enjoy my Accord just that much more. IMO, the V6 transforms the Accord from competent family sedan into a "TL on a budget".

    Hershey's or Nestle's chocolate may be all the chocolate you "need", but I'm sure glad they make Godiva for when what you "need" isn't quite enough.

    Just my opinion...
  • richards38richards38 Member Posts: 606
    What we know as the American Accord is called the Honda Inspire in some overseas markets.

    Here's a video of the Inspire--note the chromed front and the horizontal bar across the upper part of the trunk lid.......Richard

    http://www.honda.co.jp/INSPIRE/cm/cm03/index.html
  • gregoryc1gregoryc1 Member Posts: 764
    If you stay away from the V6 Accord, you can avoid all the problems of that vehicle!----(Transmission problems, Headliner problems, Interior noises, ---etc)-----There is a BIG difference in quality between the 4 cylinder and the 6 cylinder Accord! The V6 Accord has the quality of a Hyundai! It is a joke!
  • lmacmillmacmil Member Posts: 1,758
    "There is a BIG difference in quality between the 4 cylinder and the 6 cylinder Accord!"

    Please provide some real data (not a personal anecdote) to support this statement. They all go down the same assembly line and use all common components except for the powertrain.
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    "If you stay away from the V6 Accord, you can avoid all the problems of that vehicle!----(Transmission problems, Headliner problems, Interior noises, ---etc)-----

    Actually, dear Gregory, you've got it backwards...

    Based on currently available TSBs for '03 and/or '04 Accords:

    The following affect L4's only:

    Out of spec transmission case - L4 transmission problem
    Engine vibrates while idling in gear - L4 noise/vibration problem
    Evaporative canister drain joint malfunction
    Multiplex Integrated Control Unit problem
    No reverse condition - L4 transmission problem
    Intake air breather pipe defect

    The follow affect both L4's and V6's:

    Creaking/popping when accelerating/decelerating - L4 interior noise problem
    Wind noise - front window - L4 interior noise problem
    Headliner sag - L4 headliner problem
    Rotten egg smell
    Rattle from rear shelf - L4 interior noise problem
    ABS light comes on
    Brake shudder

    The following affect V6's only:

    Long crank
    PCM update

    "There is a BIG difference in quality between the 4 cylinder and the 6 cylinder Accord!"

    I'll say, but the truth of that statement seems to be quite the opposite of how you try to portray it. Looks like the L4 has many more problems than the V6, at least according to Honda. At the very least, the L4 certainly has no advantage over the V6 quality-wise, contrary to your assertions.

    "The V6 Accord has the quality of a Hyundai! It is a joke!"

    Good grief, I was just expressing an opinion. Is all this hysteria really necessary? Is the attempt at the cheap shot really called for? How about trying a little civil discourse for a change, instead of screaming your responses all the time?
  • nw1997nw1997 Member Posts: 227
    Talon95,

        What is the PCM Update? Does it only affect the 04's?

    Thanks
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    It affects only 03's. If there is a transmission failure, the updated PCM is recommended when it is replaced.
  • chucko3chucko3 Member Posts: 793
    You are right about the locked out of the gear and downshift to 1st.
    However, some transmissions will allow the car to start in 2nd gear.
  • nw1997nw1997 Member Posts: 227
    Talon95,

         What should we be concerned in regards to our 04 V6 Accord. The only noise I hear is a whistling noise at around 40 - 50 MPH, noticeable after removing foot off of gas.

    Thanks
  • simonsez5simonsez5 Member Posts: 21
    I'm not sure if you guys are trying to discourage a prospective buyer from getting an Accord but from reading the last few posts, I'm not sure if I want one anymore?? I feel all this tension between the I4 and V6 owners! It sounds like both engines have their problems! Please, someone here reassure me that the Accord is the best buy out there!! Anyways, about traction control, I've never had it on any of my cars, what I've always had, however, is a manual transmission and IMHO I can say that, used correctly, it can really do wonders in the snow.
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    "I feel all this tension between the I4 and V6 owners! It sounds like both engines have their problems!"

    Don't take our petty squabbling too seriously... sometimes it seems like we're just one big, mostly happy, occasionally dysfunctional family. Unfortunately, you're always going to find some people who can't resist the urge to try and beat others into submission with their choices... I'm guilty of this myself from time to time. Fortunately, this doesn't happen all that often.

    In general, you'll find that most members on this forum respect the choices of others. Like other V6 owners, I like my V6 a lot. Most I4 owners like their cars as well and as a V6 owner, I say "Good for you! Enjoy the ride!", rather than "You should have gotten the V6". The I4 is an excellent choice... it just that my preferences and priorities lead me to choose the V6. However, I don't consider the fact that someone else chose the I4 to be a personal affront, or an insinuation that that person is criticizing my choice. For the most part, we treat each other like fellow Accord owners, and the distinction between DX/LX/EX and I4/V6 matters very little.

    As for the TSBs, keep in mind that not all units are affected... they often represent problems that affect a small series of serial numbers. And even among units that are potentially affected, many never exhibit the problem covered by the TSB. For example, of the ones I listed that might affect the V6, I've only actually experienced 3 of them.

    And regarding the reliability issue, I just checked the listings for the Camry on alldata... I figured that's the most likely comparison from a reliability standpoint. The Camry and Accord have almost exactly the same number of TSBs, and they're of roughly comparable severity.

    The Accord in any form is still one of the most reliable cars out there, so don't be concerned.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.