By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
The relevant Tech Service Bulletin is number 00059.
I landed on a Civic, a fine car, well appointed, and perfectly adequate power with the 115hp engine. I live in a small city with one dealer and the closest 120 miles away. They have nothing but EX's and LX's in an Accord so I have not driven one.
I talked to a salesman in Dallas today (300 miles away). In the course of the conversation he suggested I consider an Accord with the Value Package available at his dealership for $15,300. He said they had $1000 in dealer incentives that made this price possible. Now I'm thinking I ought to bump her up to the Accord VP which is very little more than a Civic LX. All she loses is power windows (no big deal to her)as far as I can tell.
Anyone have experience with the 135hp engine with an automatic or the Value Package? Doing this long distance I can't drive the car without a 5 hour trip. If the 115hp Civic feels good enough to me, you think an Accord with the 135hp engine is as good or better? I tend to think you get more value buying the cheapest version of a higher dollar car than a loaded version of a cheaper car. Would you rather have an Accord with less options for $500 more?
Thanks.
Also, its worth it to get a basic version of a high dollar car than a loaded version of a lower priced car because the diffrence between the 2 is feel. My mom says that her 97' Accord feels better and more secure than her 99' Civic.
Normally I wouldn't want to get the cheapest version of a more expensive brand (eg. buy a Mercedes C240 just to be able to say I own a Mercedes), but if you are comparing the Civic to the Accord, then I would definitely prefer a more basic Accord than a loaded Civic. The Accord will be a more satisfying vehicle in the long run. It just feels more substantial. It's quieter, quicker, more comfortable. The air conditioning and heater is more powerful, the interior has better quality materials, etc, etc.
I agree with above post, if timing belt has not been changed, I'd be leary. The previous owner probally could not afford to have it changed, so you wonder about other maintenance that wasn't done.
Also, not only does your mom lose out on power windows, she loses the power door locks and mirrors(important) 15 extra horsepower, illuminated visor vanity mirrors, map lights, driver's manual height adjustment, and cruise control. Not having Cruise control would be enough for me to get the LX over the VP, plus VPs are very rare (at least in my area.)
The SE is one of the better values IMO, but it probably wouldn't work well for your mom.
It adds the sunroof, keyless entry, height adjustment(powered), and alloy wheels.
The EX isn't a bad value either.
From my own experiences with my grandmother. She would prefer at least the Accord LX, but would probably end up with the EX. She would have brought a 2002 Accord EX by now if she hadn't die earlier this year of breast cancer. Bottom line man, get your mom the car she wants, and if she wants you to decide, I'd say go with the Accord LX
I have a 94 Honda Civic 150K miles. I have not changed the timing belt. Recommended change is 90K miles. This is a non-interference engine. Means if the belt breaks, engine stops, no damage to pistons, valves, etc. Replace belt you are OK. I obviously do not know what the general condition of the Accord you are thinking about is. However, if you adjust the price wanted by seller by a) belt replacement and any other major repair/maintenance, I would think is not a bad deal if the price is at least 10% under wholesale and otherwise is fine and you can look at maintenance records or receipts. I would be a whole lot more concerned about oil changes and type of oil used as well as valve adjustments if required on that engine and brake fluid changes. Used cars do have some risk, you really need to evaluate how much risk you are willing to take. If this is real low, then maybe a certified used car from Honda is your answer.
P.S. I am not a dealer, just a private owner who has no agenda and does his own maintenance on Hondas, my experience, much better than average overall.
V
EX and SE difference is about $520 with online purchase. $1300 for disn brake/ABS is way high, not worth it. Last week I purchased a SE from Riverside Honda (Sothern California) with the promotional price (4 miles on the odometer):
$15988 + $440(desination charge) + $590(dealer installed option) = $17018
One catch though, I had to go with their auto loan program of 7.9% for 60 months, which I intend to pay it off in the first month after I receive the payment coupon.
My friend purchased another identical SE the same day with same price and conditions. Yesterday one of my coworker purchased a EX V6 leather(top of the line) with $20650 from differnt dealership. ANyway, Honda dealers here are eager to deal their 2002 Accord now.
I'm not a mechanic (or mechanically inclined for that matter), but this is what I have been told.
Can anyone else clarify this?
Any better prices? Where?
Is $1303 worth 4 disc/ABS, side airbags, CD changer?
Thanks
Some that I remember - sunroof, 6 disk CD, leather, alloy wheels, TCS (traction control), automatic climate control.
I may be wrong about some of these. Look them up.....
*Driver lumbar adjustment
*4 wheel disc brakes w/ABS
*Side airbags (optional on SE)
*6 disc CD changer
*steering wheel audio controls
*Auto-off headlights
The SE includes simulated wood dash trim.
Both models have 15" alloy wheels and a power moonroof.
Neither model has traction control.
The ABS alone should be incentive enough to go with the EX...every car should have it. Figure about $700 for the ABS and $600 for the rest.
Good luck
Jerry
You are taking a serious chance and you really shouldn't suggest that others do the same.
Now...having said that...I understand that quite often a person will get lucky and no damage will occur. Guess this depends on the speed, etc when the belt breaks. Still, the pistons can collide with the valves and this can get expensive.
Still...even if it were a non interference engine. I don't understand why a person would want to tempt fate. If the belt breaks, it will be a very troublesome thing!
Could be a dark rainy night in the fast lane of the freeway with your wife and kids in the car.
But, people drive on bald tires all of the time too, I suppose.
Does anyone know if the Sequential Sport Shift will be available on the V-6 Sedan? College Hills also indicates that a 5speed auto will be available but they don't know for sure if it will sequential sport or plain vanilla auto (hope not!)
This is just my interpretation of his message... I have no information that confirms his statements regarding availability of this engine/transmission setup.
As to my "source" it's Honda, ok?
Jerry
How much more "inside" does the information have to be?
I know that this is Accord forum, just really would like to share with all of you this information.
So, since we now have an unimpeachable source, did Honda retain the double wishbone suspension on the 2003's?
Jerry