Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Wait a few years, we'll see all the kids slam their Ridgelines to the ground, put big loud exaust pipes on them and decorate with Asian letter stickers.
Have you read anything about the construction of this truck???? Apparently not, Please do your research before you post.
That's what I've been reading in some of the Ridgeline reviews. It's more targeted to SUV owners who have an occasional need to put extra stuff in the back. Not for serious towing or off roading truck needs.
One thing I don't like about the Ridgeline, and also the Pilot, is there's no 2WD model. I'm in Florida and have no use for AWD. I bought a Highlander over the Pilot last year simply because with the options I wanted, I saved $5K.
I've been considering a Tundra or the Ridgeline and even the Tundra 2WD double cab V8 is less than the Ridgeline. I haven't priced both out in detail yet though. I'm waiting until Edmunds gets the pricing details of the new X-SP sport package.
This is a function of the need for strong engine braking on the way DOWN, not the strength of the transmission on the way UP.
Also, all Hummers are banned from the road as well (too large)
http://www.mt-washington.com/autoroad/autovehiclelimits.html
Midnightsun - Took my CR-V along with several others up Mt. Washington last summer.
Anyone have any thoughts on this issue? Thank you!
Whether the owners know to *use* the lower gears is another question.
By increasing the number of engine revs to the number of tire revolutions, low gearing allows the engine to reach higher rpms while attempting to accomplish the same job. These are random numbers but... that means you can apply as much torque at 5 mph as the engine normally would at 10 mph.
Equally important though, is the advantage lower gears gives the driver in terms of control. Throttle response is easier to manage while in low gear. You can avoid "jerking" a load or lurching over a rock while driving off-road.
The Ridgline has a D1, as well as a D2 as well as a way to down drive from Drive to D3.
If you're talking dirt, not correct. There are lots of steep, long unpaved roads in the U.S. (at least in the western U.S.), and I'm not even talking 4x4 trails. Sure, the Accord or Civic is not likely to be taken on those kinds of roads, but the Ridgeline is being projected as some kind of supertruck. That's why people get into trouble: they believe the marketing hype.
There's also the possibility that the manufacturers just plain f*ck up in spec'ing the vehicle. Every summer, for years, I'd pass by lines of Chrysler minivans (the early ones), hoods up and antifreeze spewing all over the place, near the buffalo viewing area on I-70 near Genesee (CO). The cooling system in those vehicles was just not up to the ascent. There are bound to be the oddball poorly-maintained or just bad-luck vehicles on that climb, but when I see ONE make/model consistently having the SAME breakdown, I am suspicious.
I bet the market segment Ridgeline is targeting is those minivan buyers, who then "moved up" to SUVs, and now think a truck would be cool. Honda ads on TV gush about being rated "most family-friendly". Fine. I just hope those families don't think they are better *trucks* than the other products out there, based on some misleading statements posted by Honda salesmen.
coming in a little late on this but something to keep in mind is the wording in the orignal post was "5200# boat" I know my boat is listed with its weight and not boat/trailer, good chance this was a 5200 lb boat on a 1200 lb trailer, which would put this WAY over the limit.
Also I agree I would not get a truck that will just tow the intended load. If I am towing 3500# I will shop for a 5000# rating.
But pretty sweet already pulling almost 18mpg!!
Ridgeline has a independent 4 wheel suspension delivering a true Sedan ride on a truck! "
WHY are you buying a TRUCK????
Do you know why independent suspension does over rough terrain or when heavily loaded?
If you want a Luxury CAR, buy one. If you want a TRUCK, don't knock them because it's a truck. I have a truck, an Outback, and a Jeep Wrangler. All have features that would ruin the others if shared. The Wrangler would SUCK with a loaded interior and independent suspension, the Outback would SUCK with solid axles, a box frame, and a straight six.
Perhaps an loaded indie suspended SUV would be perfect for you?
Why yes I do know how a independent suspension performs over a rough terrain, because I just bought a Ridgeline, and it performs superbly off road unlike the full size Chevy 4x4 I'm used to that practically give occupants whiplash over the same trail. The Ridgeline rides like a soft cloud by comparison. If you want a refined truck that is every bit as rugged, but with great ride get a Ridgeline, or stay with the same old stuff. I'm moving into the future of truck design with Honda.
Your definition of "off road" is probably quite different than mine.
Actually, you said "rough terrain", which I would not use to describe something like Rattler down at Paragon.
Fact is very few puck-up trucks will do well in technical off-road situations. They require modification. And while making those modifications will grant the vehicle greater capability on the trails, it will also impact how the vehicle performs on the road and under load. Take a look at what happens to the Frontier's max payload when you add the Nismo package.
So far, the Ridgeline has proven that it can handle loads. They've tested it on the track with other vehicles loaded the same way for comparison. The Ridgeline handled the loads just fine and bettered them all when it came to moving the load around corners. Off-road it handles hills, ruts, rocks, water, and mud just as well as the next truck. Anybody looking to tackle boulders is going to make those modifications I mentioned above.
If we were talking about trucks with Super HD packages, I would agree without on Honda's choice of suspension. But it appears that the IRS set-up under the Ridgeline is equal to the kind of tasks mid-size trucks are expected to perform. In fact, with a payload of 1,550 lbs, it is rated higher than any other mid-size pickup.
I just can't get past the shear uglyness of the Ridgeline. I'm sure the engine and drive train is excellent...but that face!
I went with the 05 Tacoma Sport......I just couldn't do it......
If I had never seen the Ridgeline prototypes, I'd have guessed that a Honda truck would have a conservative exterior with an upscale, car-like interior. Instead we got an odd exterior with a completely boring interior.
Much better improvements IMO that the 05 Taco doesn't have:
-The Ride quality (can't beat that 4 wheel independant suspension)
- This is one quiet ride (stone quiet compared to the Taco I drove).
- Side air bags (I like Honda's safety for all program. Safety should not be a hard to find option. Way to go Honda)
-No partime 4X4. I love the AWD off road and VSC and VTM-4 lock, which locks the rear diff.
- Leather interior, moon roof, XM Radio, navigation. The interior cab is also roomier. Over all, far classier interior. The center console is also a much better design. Dual climate control ( can't remember if the Taco has this, sorry.)
-Flip up back seats offer far more storage in cab than the 05 Taco.
-Bed design. Do I need to even say it? The inbed Trunk beats any truck hands down, and may be the sole reason many people buy this truck. The tailgate is rated at 300 lb capacity vs the 200 lb rating of the Taco. 2 way opening tail gate.
Hope this gives some people some food for thought.
My 05 Sport drives very quiet compared to my previous Taco 01 and was comparable to the Ridgeline I drove. I've heard the comments about the noise level from a few people. Maybe a lesser model?
I do hope the Ridgeline gives Toyota a wake up call.
If you want a tow truck, buy a tow truck.
If you want a garbage truck, buy a garbage truck.
If you want a serious off-road truck, fix one up yourself.
But if you want a comfortable vehicle to enjoy life in, buy a Ridgeline. It's worth every penny!
I want a truck for occasional hauling that's also a daily driver. Limited slip or locker is fine. I'm going to look at a Ridgeline, but for what I need it's going to be a few thousand more than a Toyota or Nissan (will look at those also), and the side bed height really bugs me. The ride & refinement may be enough to overcome that, but Honda hardly put out a slam dunk. I have an Odyssey that I'm very happy with, but it's far from perfect too.
If we explained that the combination of a ladder frame and unibody was more than twice as stiff as the next best truck would that make it understandable?
Anyway, a good explanation really would be appreciated.
-Wes-
There's a reason most pickup trucks are body-on-frame, Einstein. Just because the Ridgeline's design is best for you & your application doesn't mean it's best for every truck out there.
Would you care to elaborate, treyh1?
Thanks.
Getting back on track...
Apparently you guys don't know much about trucks if you're questionning frame stiffness as a positive attribute. So I'll try to keep it less than technical. Every other piece of hardware on a truck is attached to the frame/chassis. Stuff like the suspension, the bed, the engine, etc. If the frame is al dente, those parts will have a hard time doing their job.
Try playing basketball on a hardwood court. Now imagine playing on loose rocks. You can't jump as well when the ground shifts beneath you. You can't run as fast. You can't stop and change direction as easily.
The same applies for trucks. A vehicle's suspension is tuned with a specific geometry in mind. As the truck body flexes, that geometry is changed, and the suspension can't do its job. That limits the loads it can carry. It limits the amount of weight the truck can control. That has nothing to do with how I might use a truck. It's simply the basics of engineering.
Wanna know why the mid-size Ridgeline's 1,500 lbs payload is higher than even the full-size F-150? Stiffer chassis.
As for the theory of bending is better, that is simply not true. You'll never find a hardcore off-roader boasting about how his ride flexes. Call one of their trucks "flexible", and they'll reach for a baseball bat. :sick:
I said the best engineers. They would be the ones working at Honda.
Suspension provides the flex. Chassis flex messes up the suspension characteristics thereby limiting all kinds of good things (handling, load carrying, off roading, going around a curve, etc.)
Look, the reason the independent rear suspension is so good, is exactly because it flexs. The reason the Taco solid axle is bad, is because the wheels don't flex independent of each other.
None of this is rocket science, just common sense.
John
Fair enough, but I am not convinced that a frame like that on my old '69 is not supposed to flex. After all, the cab and the box are not one piece, but two entirely separate ones that have a 1/2" of gap between them. I'd say that it is designed like this to allow flex.
I am certainly not arguing against the advantages of IRS for its intended purpose here. I am just discussing stiffness.
But, I think John answered the question: "Chassis flex messes up the suspension characteristics thereby limiting all kinds of good things (handling, load carrying, off roading, going around a curve, etc.)" The clarifying point is that you do not want a vehicle to flex where it is not designed to flex, and if you put a unibody on a ladder frame, you are trying to mitigate the chassis flex.
if u want a truk thats nice looking pick the tacoma
if u want a truk thats a truck and not a minivan missing the back seat and a trunk pick the ridgeline
if u want a truk thats a truk and not an overpriced minivan pik the taco
if u want a slow truck that drives like a minivan pik the ridgeline
if u want a quik truk that drives like a celica that mated with a tundra pik the tacoma
very ez choice
if u want a truk pik the taco
if u want a deformed minivan pik the ridgeline and u can become the next coolest thing to a soccer mom ..... a soccer dad...
im not biased... its the truth
--------------------------------------------------------
?????????? :confuse:
Tacos are good, but drives like a Celica, please, thats a lie. Ive got a highschool buddy with a Tacoma x-runner.How he got one maybe he is a Toyota stockholder. I've driven the x-runner and it is the only Taco that is sportscarlike in handling, to get one you are either very lucky or a liar.If you have the x-runner, then I would agree with you that it's a quick truck. However the x-runner is only 5-10% of all the Tacomas produce, haven't seen one in MD, PA, DE, and VA.
If you have the everyday ordinary Tacoma, the Ridge is way lot better in every department except for towing and the looks.And if being a soccer dad means people/ girls rolling down there windows and taking a second look at you, then won't mind being a soccer dad at all. When a co-worker and me were in a Ridge we got more looks in this truck over my RX8, with matching thumbs up. Amazing but true, Friends who owned Tacos havent complained of the the same thing. Guess the Taco is the more handsome truck but the Ridge got charisma. Gals dig charisma better. THATS THE TRUTH .End of disccusion.
P.S.
I drive a leased 05 Frontier, an 04 Mazda RX8 (thats why I understand sporty handling) and a Pilot 03.
If the research was done..I would be very afraid of hondas auto transmission woes with the V-6.
Yota ain't a bad truck either.................
ME.....I am just a certified redneck that owns a big Chevy truck.
But it fits MY needs for heavy towing, hauling, and snowplowing !
And NO I don't have a gunrack......I keep my gun under the seat in a LOCKED compartment....................
Carry ON guys............Remember...BUY what YOU like ! :P
If you can't comprehend it, don't comment on it.
If you can't handle it, don't cry about it.
And, obviously, you can't handle the truth!
Jealousy and envy are the best compliments...Thanks!
--------------
Minivan? I don't know where you see the similarities. I'd say it's more like a mini-Avalanche, which Edmunds describes as "Combining the comforts of a Suburban with the practicality of a Silverado, the Avalanche is a crossover vehicle that creatively provides the best of both worlds." However, the Honda is even better for many reasons.
So, for all of you who are seriously considering the Ridgeline, sort through the Taco-owner posts, then read the Ridge-owner posts, and put yourself into the group that best suits you based on your needs (and intellect). For all of you who are just here to bash the vehicle you either can't afford or can't comprehend, or just because you can't handle the fact that you bought an inferior vehicle, you can crawl back in your shell, er Taco, and fantasize about soccer moms and soccer dads.
What about my posts isn't about vehicles?
Forget about it. You're in the wrong place. Bye now.
(Educating some people is like trying to teach a fish to write. It ain't gonna happen!)