Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Voided or Denied Warranty Experiences
Mr_Shiftright
Member Posts: 64,481
in General
I started this discussion after reading a most interesting case over in our "Answers" department, and it prompted me to wonder a) if anyone has heard of the situation I am about to describe and b) if YOU have had a warranty denied, warranty claim denied, or were in a warranty dispute and how did it resolve itself?
THE INTERESTING CASE:
Someone purchased a used but fairly new Volvo from a Mitsubishi dealer. After receiving the car, he went for warranty service at a Volvo dealer because his car definitely had warranty remaining on time and miles.
However, the Volvo dealer said his warranty was "partially" voided, with regards only to the fuel system, based on the actions of the previous owner!
Ever heard of anything like this? I never have in all my years.
Do you have similar experiences of the shock of having a warranty you were EXPECTING to be honored, to fall apart for one reason/claim/situation or another?
Shiftright
Visiting Host
THE INTERESTING CASE:
Someone purchased a used but fairly new Volvo from a Mitsubishi dealer. After receiving the car, he went for warranty service at a Volvo dealer because his car definitely had warranty remaining on time and miles.
However, the Volvo dealer said his warranty was "partially" voided, with regards only to the fuel system, based on the actions of the previous owner!
Ever heard of anything like this? I never have in all my years.
Do you have similar experiences of the shock of having a warranty you were EXPECTING to be honored, to fall apart for one reason/claim/situation or another?
Shiftright
Visiting Host
0
Comments
Prev owner probably modified the fuel system in some way and got caught.
This is mostly an issue w/ modded cars.
Was this an S60R by any chance?
I wonder about the legality of such a partial voiding of the warranty. I mean, wouldn't the manufacturer have to wait until there was some damage, before the denial? How can you deny a claim that hasn't happened yet?
What modification were you thinking of for an S60R? I'm curious.
Let's say I put some aftermarket springs on my car, then I take it in complaining about unusual tire wear.
The service dept notes the springs, the manufacturer sees the claim and flags the suspension.
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport; 2020 C43; 2021 Sahara 4xe 1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica Wife's: 2015 X1 xDrive28i Son's: 2009 328i; 2018 330i xDrive
Your warranty isn't with your dealer. It is with the builder of your car.
Now, some dealers are more easygoing when it comes to modded cars.
However,if a modded part causes a failure, the dealer cannot get the manufacturer to pay the warranty claim. No way, no chance.
Dealers can't void the warranty. I presume what they do is check with the Zone Office before they submit a claim to see if the factory will go for it or not, prior to making the repair? (if they are in doubt I mean).
A dealer knows that any iffy claim is going to have to be greenlighted by the motor co first.
Otherwise, the dealer will have to eat the claim.
Some dealers are real sticklers,esp when dealing w/ modded cars.
Others are more easygoing.
I guess with the tremendous upsurge in modding, this partial warranty scenario was inevitable.
Seems some Ford engineer figured that a few cents could be saved by not drilling oil lube holes in the connecting rods. Problems began to appear in cold climates where cold starts were causing excessive cylinder wear.
The district Ford rep examined my engine, noting that I had the car serviced regularly and had a Motorcraft oil filter installed. Out-of-warranty engine and transmission rebuilds were approved.
Lesson keep up with scheduled maintenance using approved parts.
Was the partial void something that had already been established or did that determination happen when the new owner took the car in for service?
Sounds like the new owner needed the service pretty soon after buying the car. Do you know if that was the case?
A used car re-seller isn't responsible for the manufacturers warranty.
What it covers, or what it doesn't.
All the form does is let you know that such coverage exists.
If I sell you my car, and tell you that "my mechanic rebuilt the engine", because that's what my mechanic said to me, and then you find out that in fact all that was done was a head gasket and valve job, well I'm still in the hole for misrepresenting the car to you. I wasn't defrauding you, because hell I didn't know exactly what the mechanic did...I don't even know what a rebuilt engine IS....(for the sake of argument)....but you bought the car because you were counting on a rebuilt engine for that car.
It is an interesting issue. All my questions so far focus on when the voiding of the warranty happened. Shifty's OP is a little unclear on that. The only indication is the mention of actions by the previous owner, but that is iffy. The manufacturer would only know it was actions of the previous owner if the warranty void had occurred earlier. Otherwise they would have no idea when the mod happened.
Most likely the new owner is just going to have to bite the bullet on any repairs to the fuel system, but . . .
If the partial void had happened prior to the re-sale of the car, the buyer may have some recourse with the re-seller. The buyers guide said the warranty was in effect at the time the sale was made. That was not the case. Uphill battle for the new owner, but worth pushing at least a little.
If the partial void happened when the new owner took the car in for service and the mod was discovered, then he is just SOL. Even a check on the warranty status at the time of the sale would not have made any difference. A once over by a qualified technician may have picked up on the mod, but maybe not.
Whatever that warranty is.
Since the re-seller isn't telling you exactly what that warranty does and doesn't cover, it's not misrepresentation.
Now, if you tell someone that something IS covered under a manufacturers warranty and it isn't, then you have a case.
Bottom line, if you want to be protected, buy a CPO car.
I vote for the plaintiff, if I have been given the facts straight I mean.
Actually, in the case in point, there was factory warranty remaining. Just not on a certain system.
That is a far cry from saying that NO warranty was left.
If a dealer had indicated that the factory warranty was still in effect, and it had ENTIRELY expired, either due to miles or time, then you would have a case.
There is just no way that a used car dealer,e sp one with dozens, if not hundreds of cars can determine the exact warranty status, or what coverage is actually available.
Some things a responsible buyer must do for themselves.
If the box checked "warranty" was viewed by the seller, yes, he should have asked what that means. I agree with you then. "What kind of warranty?"
But if he was told the car had "the factory warranty", and not told that it was "partial", then IMO the car was misrepresented and the dealer is wrong, whether he gave that info intentionally or not.
Actually he was told that it had the REMAINING factory warranty, which is true.
How many u/c dealers know what the Volvo warranty even is?
Prob not many.
I couldn't give you the particulars of Nissan's warranty, or BMW's.
It's very easy to say, the dealer is wrong.
But, it's not the dealers fault.
Ultimate responsibility rests w/ the buyer.
All the buyer had to do was call a local Volvo dealer w/ the VIN and get the warranty history.
Or, they could have paid a few bucks more and gone w/ a Volvo CPO car that would have guaranteed a warranty.
You'd make a great defense lawyer but that last little bit sounds weak to me.
I'm just sayin'....
How many people would know to a call a Volvo dealer to determine what the remaining warranty is? Better yet, how many people know there is such thing as partial warranty? On the other hand, the u/c manager should know how to verify this and disclose all the information.
Without AS IS, the dealer is definitely in jeopardy, IMO.
WHATEVER that warranty entails.
It is not a requirement of the u/c dealer to state what that warranty covers or doesn't cover.
The form is only to let the consumer know that there IS warranty.
You are asking WAYYYYY too much from a u/c dealer.
It ain't gonna happen.
Heck, there is a local dealer here that specializes in Lemon Law cars.
In AZ, a Lemon Law buyback doesn't have to be disclosed at all.
Guess what? This guy doesn't.
Yes, it's shady. but, that is the U/C business.
If you want to deal w/ reputable people, buy a CPO used car from a new car store.
I bought an 2008 Certified used Denali from Memering Motorplex in Indiana on 7/7/11 with 31k. On the first oil change I brought the vehicle in at 39k on 11/28/11 to Lou Fuze in St. Louis a GMC dealer. This according to the light indicator by the free oil and tire rotation per GMC deal. I informed them that the front brake was squeaking. The sales rep called me back and said the front left brake Pad needs to be replaced and it is not covered under warranty.
He informed me that there is not any brake pad left at all. The certified inspection that came with my car stats all brake pads have .8 mm. New pads are .12mm. So how could I go down from .8mm to 0 in 8,000 miles and less than 5 months.
To illustrate how this is completely wrong even farther. I bought this used Yukon because I had a leased 07 Yukon before this for 4 years and put on 70,000 miles. Never once had it in the shop for repairs or brake pads. Every person I have talked to has either said GMC will never help me or that it must be my driving habits.
So to GMC, if you say it is a certified car and inspected by a mechanic approved by GMC and there is a problem with the inspection what happens? Is GMC telling me that the inspection never fails? What did I buy a certified car for? For an inspection that has no backing to it. Also the motto today at GMC certified website that “No worries to a whole new level” Well I am worried that I paid a premium for a vehicle that was not inspected correctly. Also on the website it tells us that our car has $2,135 worth of additional value. Well that is an expensive oil change and tire rotation.
I have contacted the GMC customer service line and they said they are not covering this and that is there final decision. I think any reasonable person would see there is a mistake on the inspection. And if there wasn’t a mistake on the inspection than there is a fault part somewhere. I am not a mechanic but I know something does not add up! After 4 hours on the phone I drafted an email hoping that someone would not see this as a black and white issue rather a mistake during the inspection process. Here is GMC official response
“Again, I have reviewed your request 71-1013008707 with the GMC Customer Assistance Center and I support the decision that has been previously stated to you. I apologize that the decision was not in accordance with your wishes, however; this is the final decision of General Motors. Please feel free to contact us again with any other concerns you may have outside of this issue.”
As I stated to every customer care operator and in an email I drafted to GMC I will spend as much time telling my story as they wasted my time talking about an common sense issue.
GMC you lost a life time customer this week!!!! I expect to be refunded for the brake pads, certified reinspection at an independent dealer and to ADD 1 year bumper to bumper warranty to my Vehicle. None of this would be required if you would back your inspection!!! I have already filed complaints and will continue until this is resolved.
Thank You
Lonely customer!
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
but at this rate, you're just going to sour yourself on the truck, and it might turn out to be a good vehicle after all.
Have you contacted them? IMHO, they are the ones you should speak with.
I had the same thing happen with my Honda Ody - brake pads. Brought it in for an oil change and already the brake pads were below spec. The CPO inspection requires them to be much better but they talked circles all day and corporate Honda, who I have normally found very helpful too the position that it was between me and the dealer. I've been a long time Honda guy but I just replaced that van with a Toyota.
I am 9 months into a 3 year lease of a 2011 Saab. My dealerhship just informed me I no longer have warranty (4 years, 50k miles) coverage on any level, including the free maintainance for the duration of lease.
I am leasing through Ally Financial. Is this a breach of contract? Can I be released from a lease based on these circumastances or should/can Ally honor warranty? After all, I have contract with them, not Saab for the car
Any advice or guidance would be appreciate
Thank you
Your warranty and maintenance contract is with SAAB. Ally was just the one the provided the financing on it. Since SAAB is no more, your contract is null and void.
Yukons are VERY HEAVY vehicles and will eat up front brake pads. Even if they were originaly in certified spec, it is entirely possible you ate them up.
Lastly, as it was stated, front brake pads are inexpensive, and if you have any mechanical ability, you do them in 1 hour. Less than $35 for a set of pads, a can of brake cleaner and if the pads don't come with a little tube of disc brake quite will cost less than $40 total incl the pads.
Saab situation - ok if you bought one while GM still owned it, but otherwise hope it doesn't break until they sort this out!
Would like to then render my lease agreement null & void!
BTW, I presume you got a screaming lease deal.