Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
It had only been happening in the mornings, after the car sat for the evening but this evening on the way home it also happened.
Only have 17k miles, so warranty should cover it but was wondering if some else could give some input.
Thanks,
Jack
I havent posted here since early in 2000 when i got my 5-speed ZX3. It has now just passed 90k miles. I have to say that the car has really come into its own in its old age. Early on I had a whole slew of problems with the car, recalls, bad bearings, bad ignition cylcinder, clutch replacement. But after about 23k its been humming. Had another ingnition cylnder go at 66k, but other than that it just keeps goin (knock on wood). I hated the car in the begining because of the problems, but now I am at the point where I could consider a new one (PZEV!!). I did replace the fuel pump myself at 70k, as to hopefully keep from breaking down. Was a tough job. I used to run an AEM short ram air intake but I took it off. You just cant beat the driving dynamics of this car. I will be gradding college soon, and have taken the car many places and given it a fair sharwe of abuse, but I think I may get rid of it soon. I am thinking of getting maybe another Focus or maybe a Hyundai Elantra or a Suzuki Aerio or one of a plethora of other cars...definetly not sure...but who knows I may just see if I can get this car to 150k with reasonable reliability...overall this car has been good to me...
Service Campaigns are voluntary programs in which the manufacturer agrees to replace or repair a defect beyond the terms of the express warranty and may provide for reimbursement for prior repairs.
Unlike a safety recall, the program may be limited in time beyond which the consumer receives no assistance.
Sometimes the NHTSA accepts a Service Campaign in lieu of a safety recalls which means manufacturers and/or dealers are not subject to the enforcement provisions of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act.
When NHTSA accepts a Service Campaign in lieu of the more consumer protective Safety Recall, NHTSA lists the Campaign on its website.
Tires cupping? Have you rotated them?
Also, recently I had 2 problems. The thermostat housing cracked, causing a large leak of anit freeze, costing me $230 to fix (didnt have time to do it myself), and the valve cover gasjet started leaking. $30 part, I did it myself, but I still catch an wiff of oil every so often. Ford...they whipped me into shape and made me realize what I already knew...always buy import!
I am in the middle of decision choosing an automatic 2004 Civic LX and ZX3. Can you post some suggestions? Thanks.
Luke
Basiacally this is a 2.3L engine good for 144 horses and comes standard on the ZX3 Premium. This engine is required & standard in Green states of CA, MA, NY, VT & ME. I believe it can be optioned on other models as well. Otherwise you get the usual 2.0L ZETEC motor (130hp/135ft-lbs).
The civic doesn't have as high a green rating, but makes up for it with a huge turning radius (almost 35ft) and bad interior lighting (neon red/pink).
Is the 2002 & 2003 ZX3 really that bad? Like snakerbill said, I hope the 04 ZX3 is different and more improving.
Once a car gets a bad rap, people get very vocal about everything - it becomes sort of like a hypochondriac (read some of the NHTSA complaints - anyone can write anything, you don't have to substantiate).
Consumer Reports _recommends_ the Focus this year, because of the _past_ couple of years quality has improved significantly. CR doesn't recommend cars lightly. They always liked the Focus, but the 2000 was a well known deadbeat due to rushing the car into US production without normal "graduated" assembly line ramp up.
In Europe, quality ratings, by consumers, of the Focus are higher than Benz and VW.
Trust your instincts and negotiate for a good price. Ford's poor, poor introduction means deals still abound.
DON'T get the 2.0 liter engine. The difference with the 2.3 liter is VAST. I've had the 2.0 liter with a stick and auto, and while it is good, it is not even within a country mile of the "next gen," designed by Mazda, 2.3. This motor is so smooth and quiet you won't even realize how fast you are accelerating. I believe it tests at 0-60 in 7.5-8.2 seconds, versus an anemic 10+ seconds for the 2.0 ZETEC (which I couldn't understand, given the similarly powered Neon is a sub 9 second car).
If you can't afford the "Premium" model to get the PZEV 2.3 now, wait until later in the year when 2.3 liter production is ramped up and it becomes the "stock" ZX engine.
The 2.3 won't smoke an SVT, but it will force the SVT to really wring out their motor to beat it. While you are in a much quieter vehicle.
I had a 2002 Neon I was driving cross country, had earplugs in 'cause its a little noisy, and on a lonely stretch shocked myself to look down and see 110 on the speedo when I thought I was running 85-90. Got off the pedal fast...
And the Neon only had t-rated tires.
106 is embarrassing. The mini is governor limited at 115 or so.
http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=17010&ma- ke_id=trust
(link provided by user-pzev on other Focus board. Thanks pzev!)
The four door ST model sounds really great. But the suspension and other design improvements to the "ordinary" ZX3/5 also sound interesting. Given that the basic mechanicals will be well-proven by then, this may be a good alternative to the new Golf V also coming out in 2005. I can see the wisdom of not adopting the new Mazda3/VolvoS40 platform - it would reintroduce quality control issues. Now that Ford has a handle on the American quality control issues, I think it is wise to stand pat.
I am not sure I like the new cabin layout. I sort of like the "futuristic" present layout in the ZX3. Functionally it is heads above the Civic/VW layouts. It gives me a lot of side to side leg room. However I will keep an open mind on the new design.
Reverting to the 2.0 liter engine in the ZX3/ZX5 WILL NOT SIT WELL with the budget sport compact crowd. Come on, Ford, what are you thinking about (you read these threads, don't you)?
The old regime of 2.0 110 hp, 2.0 130 hp in the premium sedans, stock in the ZX3...STOCK IN THE ZX3... are what makes the ZX3 so popular with me and others. You pay LESS than for a sedan but get MORE power.
Now I think it is fine to upgrade the stodgy base sedans to at least 2.0 130 hp (I guess 136 now). But why limit the 2.3 145 (150 now) hp engine to the ST? It belongs back in the ZX3 and ZX5...and don't play games and put the 2.0 in the base models, the 2.3 in the upgraded models. People buying performance don't always want the frills. In fact, the 2003 policy of offering the 2.3 with stick only in the base model (in California) is exactly why I bought one ... I am not a sport compact tuner, but I want the most DRIVING experience for the dollar (something Mazda doesn't understand - the performance to value ratio; they got the performance, but not the value).
While Ford is at it, they need to put the 160 hp Mazda version of the 2.3 in the ST - they can reserve the 150 hp, regular (not variable) valve timing version for the ZX3/5.
Anyway, overall the news sounds good, some major "tuner" oriented changes.
But tell me - surely the tachometers will be on ALL ZX3/5 models, not just the "frills" models?
Finally, maybe I am reading too much into it, but look at this excerpt from the press release (the part I highlight):
"A 150-horsepower 2.3-liter Duratec 23 DOHC I-4 engine will power the new Focus ST performance sedan, which will be available in all 50 states. This free-revving engine _is derived from the same family as the Duratec 20_ but its larger displacement and performance-tuned exhaust help it produce 10 percent more horsepower. Torque is 153 foot-pounds, a 16 percent increase for exceptionally strong off-the-line and mid range acceleration."
Sounds like the 2.0 is NOT the old Zetec 2.0, but some new derivative of the PZEV 2.3 (now called the Duratec 23). If that is the case, maybe the 136 hp are "real" hp instead of the 130 "underwhelming" hp of the original ZX3. People who are test driving Mazda3's now, say the 2.0 in the M3 is actually quite strong.
Looks like my 2003 will be getting traded in on a 2005...I'll tough it out without the aircon until then!
Not really. Mazda is using this as the base engine in the new Mazda3. Most people who have driven one are impressed with it's refinement. It's definitely a step up from the old Mazda 2.0 and Ford's 2.0 Zetec (FYI - Not the same engine).
I still have my ZX3 which was also manufactured in 12/99. The car has been incredibly reliable and a joy to drive. The only problem was a clutch spring which had to be replaced after about 18 months of ownership.
The ZX3 with the 2.3L engine would be a blast to drive and a great deal at present. I plan to keep my Focus for another two years. When it comes time to replace it, I hope that a 2.3L ZX3 is an option. There are many good cars in this segment. I'm also following the development of the Mazda 3, Subaru Impezza wagon, and Golf GTI.
Also, when did the Autumn Orange color go away?
http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=17010&ma- - - ke_id=trust
2. Orange Autumn has been discontinued after the '00 year model.
Silver, yes I'm still checking this thread.
My car has been affected by many of the early model problems.
Fortunately I was able to convince my local dealers to fix the most of them before my car run out of warranty.
Yes, that was a really big hassle. Now it's running pretty good and I would buy another Focus again, especially considering all the improvements and the major advancement in the reliability ratings (but NEVER the first year model regardless of the brand).
* 2.3-liter DOHC four-cylinder engine available in all states
* ZX3 now available with leather seating surfaces
* New steering knuckles and struts for improved ride and handling
* New exterior color on ZX3 and ZX5: Light Tundra
http://downsford.com/order_guides/2004%20Focus%20Order%20Guide.pd- f
On the other hand it is entirely possible the only reason the green states got the 2.3, is to meet fleet emissions requirements, and the only reason the 2.3 goes national 2004 ONLY is because they haven't had time to come out with the 2.0 Duratec (as opposed to ZETEC). But, why didn't they roll out the 2.0 PZEV first?
Surely they can't be "taking back" the greatest thing to every happen to the Focus line? It can't be gas mileage - the 2.3 PZEV beats the 2.0 Zetec....
around.I echo your sentiments regarding the hatchling.
Although i have sworn off any purchase of a Ford product,
i am still intrigued by this vehicle.I guess it is the price/
performance factor. Has the quality improved dramatically
overall? I also was an owner of a 1999 build year which was
a 2000.It was most definitely a fun to drive experience,
soured by the recalls. I am gald to hear that others have
had a positive experience and wish you continued good
luck with your purchase.
Job 1 quality is still a myth.
The spouse has her eye on that upcoming Mustang.
You are right, it will be hard to resist. Can you believe
4 years has passed so quickly ? It is cool to see a lot of
the old gang revisiting here to post. I actually had forgotten about the SVT Contour. It still amazes me how Ford dropped the ball on the Focus launch. Incredible design
and engineering coupled with a very weak parts supply.
I stiil can't believe that something as simple as a clutch return spring end breaking. How cheap is that? The reason i say that is because i have driven 30 years without that happening. Sure, anything could go with a vehicle but this was a clear indicator to me that smelled of bad things to
come. Unfortunately, that was case and i gave up the beast.
It is a shame because there are good qualities about the
vehicle that they got right. If only that myth you had mentioned actually becomes a reality. Maybe i will change my mind.
"FORD FOCUS PZEV: The Focus's initial promise was undone by quality and mechanical glitches. With those problems presumably behind it, the Focus family is again one of Ford's bright lights; the high-performance Focus SVT is one of the best cars ever to wear the blue oval. This year, Ford earned some green stripes by offering partial-zero-emission versions of the Focus nationwide, proof that environmentally friendlier cars can also be peppy and economical, at a cost barely higher than much more polluting versions."
The dealer suggested to use recycled air and that would clear the windows (in addition to defrogging ,heat, etc).
Yesterday it started snowing - not much - but enough to have the windshield frieze up again. The problem with recycled air is that you can only use that setting when the airflow is NOT directed to the windshield. I was ready to pass out with all the heat, could hardly see anything. On the passenger's site the view is slightly better but if I can't drive this car when it's snowing I am a shut-in in winter.. (Live in Maine).
The windshieldwipers are really bad - this a a new car - and are not clearing the windows at all. Anyone else had this problem?
I have called the dealer and I think they will put in better wipers but it's a shame that they started out with poor quality.
Rumor has it the 2.3's will be much scarcer than in 2004, so for once it may be better "not" to wait. (I am in that dilemma considering a wagon.)