Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
SAAB 9-3
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
If you're already longing for 3 yrs. from now and the end of your lease, what are you longing for? Something not yet built that will provide some thrills or back to Audi?
Just curious.
Compare this article with Car and Driver's subjective nonsense piece entitled "Comparison Test: Little Big Fun in which they incredulously accuse the base 9-3 of lousy braking and sloppy handling attributes. Obviously, letting a commoner review a SAAB is like letting a burger and fries guy do a review of continental cuisine. After reading this piece, I quit reading "Crap and Driver" because of the inherent bias in all of their so called reporting.
In the 'not yet built category', if BMW would make a 3 series sport wagon, I'd have to take a look. Same goes for MB and the C class. Would also consider looking at used BMW 5 series wagon or used MB E class sedan. New Audis or used A6 wagon also. And who knows what Saab will be offering in 3 years.
Of course Audi provides thrills, but since you evidently walked away from one, I assumed you were looking something different.
Oh, watch out, your hatch just locked on you :-)
I have never had vanity (personalized) license plates before. I am thinking of getting them for my new 9-3SE. Thought something like "Swede1" would be sort of cool.
Any thoughts...pro or con welcome.
In my part of the world, they cost $100, so whenever I see someone with some clever saying, I translate it to mean: "I had $100 to burn and couldn't think of anything else to do with it."
They're only one step up from bumper stickers, a half-step really.
No comments on the 3 series sport wagon or C class wagon ideas?
As far as removing brake dust, I have to agree with Swedes comment. I have my vehicles professionally detail about 4 time a year and I notice that what ever wax or sealer they use really makes the dust removal easy. Our 9-5 has not been done yet and removing the dust is very difficult. Also, I find that a natural citrus cleaner or Simple Green works very well.
Drew S.
Saab, BMW, MB, Volvo, and the like all use high carbon content pads which dissipate heat better and allow much more effective braking. They also do not "fade" under extreme use. This increased performance comes at a price, though - brake dust and shorter life span.
Also not just European cars have the problem. My Durango and old mini van had brake dust as well. It's the price we have to pay for superior braking.
Drew S.
Old compounds were notorious for dust equated with stopping power, I beg to differ with modern compounds. It just ain't so...perhaps SAAB just needs bigger rotors than they are using, instead of the current crop.
Not all performance cars, including many made here in the States, use carbon fiber in their pads. These manufacturers use various metals and some polymer compounds which do not generate much dust. The high carbon content pads are still a Euro thing although they are making a bit of a comeback here.
Swede
Cobra is a rear-wheel drive and thus the front wheels/brakes are less taxed. And I don't think the Cobra stops shorter than the 9-3.
Swede, you hit it on the nail, it's a european thing and that isn't necessarily good.
The 9-3 is no indy car and it isn't even that highly stressed, like my previous Audi, the brake dust is plain annoying and it doesn't have to be that way.
No need to be soooo defensive folks, I drive one too you know and happen to think it's a good vehicle...it just could be better.
Must be a dull experience owning a Saab these days which is not an all bad thing.
woj1- don't be put off by these guys they're a little rabid for the brand. They love their cars and mostly seem to want to talk up all the good things about Saabs, of which there are many, and stiffle any criticism. Viciously attacking criticism seems to be the Saab forum form of the day.
So guys what is there to dislike about your Saab ownership? Outside of the new Viggen and old Aero can I suggest maybe its handling!
We just feel that Saabs are generally misunderstood by the mass. Saab's shortcomings are generally well known. It's strengths are not so much a public knowledge. As far as the handling is concerned, the 9-3's reflexes are not "razor sharp" but that makes it very stable. Or should we say that it is unflappable but the feel might be a little vague.
Drew S.
I guess it's hard for a site to rack up hundreds of postings without venturing into somewhat arcane topics such as brake dust and stereos.
BTW, with what did you replace your crumpled 9-3?
$3,500 lighter in the wallet for the medical insurance company, $2k for the ambulance service alone. $26k+ lighter for my auto insurance company and 20 plus stitches between the nose and above the right eyebrow. Lacerations and a puncture wounds to the right arm.
I'm mostly healed now although I now look a bit like one of those alien characters on Deep Space 9. The car flipped over out in the Nevada/California desert when I fell asleep at the wheel. Certainly not the Saab's fault and I did actually crawl away from the accident with my life relatively in tack.
So all in all I guess I didn't come out much the worse for wear although my wife may beg to differ.
What did we get this time? Well we bought a Volvo wagon. Stiff as a board and not nearly as hairy/ fun to drive, but they do have a guaranteed known depreciation factor. My wife would have accepted a sedan but there was no way I was going to go from the hatchback compromise of the Saab to a sedan. I don't really know what the hell they make sedans for anyway. They're almost completely useless unless all you carry in your car are people.
I liked the Saab 9-3 and was amazed at its capacity to swallow everything I cared to throw into it. Great accelleration with speed ticketing ease. With the automatic this car was an ease to drive. I did not like the quality of the interior although for practicality I don't think I'd ever choose leather over cloth. If you only lease your cars this isn't so much a concern but with age the lighter Saab leathers are going to look like @#*%. The velour seats had the added benefit that they kept you in the seats when the g's hit you laterally.
I feel that Saab's price is a little dear for the unknown factor of Saab's notoriously steep depreciation. The relatively sketchy recent reliability history of Saab has clobbered older Saabs in the used car market.
When we went looking for a replacement for the totaled Saab the first place we went was Volvo. My wife considered an SUV but I wouldn't hear of it. God the last thing I need after my expereince is being stuck behind a pig of an SUV.
I like Swedish cars and if Saab some day comes out with an Aero version of its new 9-5 wagoon I'd be drooling. The new Viggen is interesting but still an unknown for the money. The ride of our Saab was definitly softer than the Volvo's but it did not have the really crisp bolted together feel of the Volvo either.
My one regret was from this whole affair is that I never did find my right foot Birchenstock I lost during the accident. That was my favorite pair too!
3700 trade
319 month
15500 residual
leather, sunroof, heated seats, tint
The Automobile Protection Assoc. offers invoices costs for Cdn. buyers but told me they don't have any Saab info.
So the purchase/lease prices a dealer gives you are the best you're going to get. The only wiggle room is a trade-in.
am i wasting my money or is it fun when driven slow as well?
The car handles great in snow and rain and is fun to drive at any speed.
Buying a car that's been driven as a rental for a year or so is a big risk. Was it a corporate lease or a basic renter? Is the warranty extended to compensate?
Good luck.
the car was a basic rental offered at airports by tilden. they say that the car, new, would retail for 35,505 plus it has leather seats (1675 option ? ) and they are offering it for 29000. the car still has three years left on the warranty.
the other cars which i am considering are another honda or a subaru.
any advice would be appreciated.
If I were you, I'd have the car checked by a mechanic somewhere other than the dealership where you're buying it.
Things like brake pads, suspension and tires are usually punished by rental car drivers, and none of them is covered by the warranty.
If, for example, an independent mechanic told you the brake pads only had 10,000 km left, you should be able to get new ones included or pay less for the car.
As for the discount, it seems a little low, given that it has almost 30,000 km on it. Hard to say though.
Which dealer are you talking to and is he taking your Honda as a trade?
Just wondering.
The 9-3 is a vast improvement over the 900. Don't be fooled by appearances. My 9-3 never fails to impress or deliver. It causes the driver to form an emotional bond with the car. I can;t say that about every care I have driven.
You should consider a Volvo (quite a variety of used available) good safety, reasonably reliable, extremely comfortable. I already own a wagon & love it.
I used to have a Subaru also, a good choice, but not in the same league.
Finally, different style of cars but consider the Acura TL: lots of car for $35K or 1999 Maxima, you will definitely get a good deal as the 2000 is now in.