By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Hey, if they, the Congress, drag this out long enough, my "Beach Week" this year is the second week in August down your way at the OBX. Might have to put ol' Bessie on a trailer and bring 'er by your place before we put up the beach umbrella and slap on the lotion. You could then say you've had your 51st clunker of the month stop by for a test drive...
Keep 'em comin' ya'll. The banter here is entertaining if nothing else.
AMERICANS WANT GOVT HEALTH CARE
Back on topic here....
While C4C detractors are quite justified in their concerns, I do agree that there might also be spin-off benefits here that aren't so clear as the dollar calculations. For one thing, automakers needs profits to plough back into "green technology".
One of my biggest concerns is that the USA will drag its feet on green tech, giving Europe and Asia a competitive edge that we will never regain--thereby ending up buying one MORE thing from them.
The number of distortions in this brief paragraph is truly astounding. I assume you pay as much attention to your facts as you do to your grammar.
The poll reveals, however, the obstacles that remain in the way of the public option and broader reform efforts. Many Americans are concerned that their own health care may be compromised if the government is involved, and while they are generally willing to pay more in taxes for universal coverage, that support drops when dollar amounts are mentioned.
I think your fears on C4C are well founded. I would be surprised if 20% of the sales generated are from the D3. With Ford having the best chance selling their made in Mexico Fusion.
On Shiftright link to "Americans want govt health care", 2 points:
- Poll/study by CBS/NY Times. Can we trust them to poll correctly and without bias?
- Anyone knowing of friends, relatives, neighbors who are US military vets from WWII, Nam, etc should ask them about the quality of medical care they get from VA, a US govt agency. Do Americans want VA level of care?
I suspect the Kia and Hyundai are going to enjoy this incentive plan.
No, but we'd like to have the same level of health insurance coverage that government employees (including members of Congress) have.
I'd expect Kia, Hyundai, Ford and Nissan to be in the best position to take advantage of it, as they all offer reasonably economical and reliable vehicles at low "price per pound."
I also suspect the biggest sales boost to be in the area of four-cylinder midsize sedans, rather than at the very bottom of the market.
I have a better question.
Know anyone on Medicare? Ask them how much a health care policy with coverage similar to what they have through Medicare would cost from a private insurer like BCBS on the open market.
Anyway if the government does pass universal health insurance, I think I'd benefit from that, even though my health coverage might decrease. If I have government paid health care, I'll retire early - no need to hold down a full-time job for the benefits. I'll get in a much lower tax bracket, and put less $ into this ridiculous government system.
The government seems intent to increase spending and increasing taxes in various ways, and that is spurring me and many others to play the Game, and get around this system.
If I'm not allowed to keep my $, and instead start supporting everyone else who has screwed-up somehow, then I'm dropping out of supporting the system. I'm going to become one of the people who need the freebies and bailouts! :P
This statement reveals a fundamental flaw in your argument--the assumption that only those who have "screwed up" are suffering from the current economic downturn.
Anyone else planning to cash in on their clunker?
The Savvy Shopper: Cash for Clunkers -- Is it for You? (Edmunds Daily)
The point is that there will be more and more people resenting working hard and the end of the day not having anything to show for it, because their taxes are going to support others.
I am not in favor of giving $ to people for these clunkers, or to buy houses, or whatever else the giveaway-of-the-day is.
One has to look at these incentives, aid, etc. as *very* temporary measures. They aren't going to be permanent because they are utterly unsustainable anyway.
It seems to me that even with a booming economy, the typical U.S. citizen was not saving, was going deeper in-debt, and was investing in bubble-markets. The trade imbalance was very large. "Doing" stuff like spending trillions of $'s to try and return to that doesn't seem to be the solution. It is a political solution, that our politicians will try and promise an ever-increasing lifestyle.
The last 20 years has been like the sailor on shore-leave. The more the sailor spent and drank, the worse the hangar and the wallet is after the party. As a society we may have get back to basics, working hard, being innovative, saving, and rebuilding. The party's over - no more trading every 3 years and putting 20K on shuttling your 3 kids who each have a cell-phone to their next event.
I agree the spending is unsustainable. I believe the spending will simply make things worse, when it ends.
But you may be pleased to know that some very red blooded white American males also want to take advantage of the program as soon as it goes into effect. In fact the one pressing me the most to dump his clunker is a university professor ... paying cash.
Maybe that will quell some of your hatred.
Your fears for the poor souls venturing into dealerships to buy vehicles are noted but very unfounded. The lenders are the gate keepers now. Buyers are being turned down left and right with all kinds of impeccable credentials ( couples with double 750 FICO scores and family incomes of over $200,000; a buyer with $12000 equity on a $24000 vehicle; a buyer with 800+ FICO score ).
The unqualified? God help them. They won't even be considered voucher or no voucher.
$950,000,000 available for this program
$4,000 average rebate claimed
237,500 rebates available
U.S population is 300million I'm guessing there will be more than 238,000 people wanting to trade there clunker in on july 1st.
How will dealers and the government handle this?
How will they keep track of the funds left and what happens to completed orders based on the idea that they can get the rebate?
Cash For Clunkers Bill Passed By Congress (AOL Autos)
Consider the $1 billion "start up" money.
If you like the odds that more money will be added to the program in October, you may want to take your time kicking tires. My guess is that the dealers aren't going to be willing to deal much when the first wave of vouchers hit. ADM anyone?
How are we going to afford this very bad idea?
How have all the collectivist experiments worked out in the 20th century?
Does anyone in Washington care about the unseen consequences of these policies?
EPA page on C4C
The subtlety is that these decisions rest with the buyers. The Feds are neutral in the matter, the customer decides.
Explorer to Escape
Tundra to RAV
Tahoe to Cobalt
F150 to Insight II
Scoring something good or bad has to be based on its own merits and results, not solely upon its not having been tried before.
Here's another one:
www.cars.gov.
From their FAQ:
"About 10 days later, NHTSA will issue a financial credit to the dealer—assuming all program requirements have been met."
That's 10 days after the dealer submits the paperwork. The NHTSA is supposed to ensure that your purchase meets the requirements on the day you buy the car, but I can just imagine some "spot delivery" kind of situations and some interesting phone calls from your dealer.
I just have to find the right car. The lease is up on my wife's '07 X3 NEXT July. so I plan on buying something for her now since we're going to be over the X3's miles. We're looking for something that has the same passenger room, but with a bigger cargo area. Of course it HAS to get at least 22 mpg (city/highway average). I really wanted an E60 5 series BMW. Between the clunker cash, factory rebates, my $1000 BMWCCA discount... I could get a screaming deal on a beautiful driving car. But the 535i gets 20 combined & the 528i gets 21 combined :mad:
So I'm going to go take a look at Jetta sedans & wagons (TDI & GLI) & an Accord EXL-V6 NAV (snoozer, but utterly indestructible).
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
//////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
I think you are confusing normal 7 year cyclical recessions with failure by stating "free market capitalism get to fail miserably 10 or more times". If you don't like what comes with free market capitalism then you are free to try to turn our 230 year old system into a different system and that's what makes this country great - freedom. The voters spoke last November and what they said was "We want change".
Liberal ideas "for the common good" are, in principle, very sound. In practice they have had limited success. Be that as it may, we are well on our way down this path. Some say liberalism is a nature progression as a culture and geo-political system matures. I tend to agree.
So, like it or not this is where we are headed as a nation. Some of my core beliefs are still conservative but I am willing to be open-minded and give Big Gov't a chance and after what we've been through this past year, I believe many of my fellow Americans agree.
Now back to your regularly scheduled programming. This Cash For Clunkers dealie will generate some traffic on new car dealer's lots and that is bound to help the entire auto industry and create a few spin off jobs as well. With easy credit a thing of the past, the traffic generated will sell some cars with GOOD loans and get people thinking about America's true love affair with the automobile again. I gotta like that because I'm a car guy at heart and want to see this industry and this country strong again.
It will get better and prosperity will return. Be patient and be thankful and I'm convinced we will rise once again.
If it is run anything like Medicare it will be several months and re-submits of paperwork to the NHTSA. There may be some dealerships not so enthused about the program after dealing with the Feds on getting their money. They will also be paying interest on that $4500 for at least 10 days and if my guess is correct, as long as several months.
Then add the fact, many salesmen doing the negotiations are playing with less than a full load of bricks. "Sorry boss I thought his was the 3.5L V6 that only got 18 MPG". How many of these desparate dealers will have cut staff during the recession? "We had to let our used car appraiser go". Should be fun to watch. Heck I may strip the good stuff off my 99 Ranger and trade for something just to get in on the fun.
Has anyone heard how many new workers this bill allows the NHTSA to hire - to process the paperwork? Are they temporaries? Because if they don't hire new workers and they expect a handful of NHTSA employees to process the initial flood of applications, then it will be months before the dealers get checks.
No problem. Every trade-in appraisal form I've ever seen has included a place for the VIN, and the VIN will tell the F&I guy which engine the vehicle came with.
The F&I people are sometimes crooks, but they're not idiots. The sales people working the floor, on the other hand. . . well, that's another matter.
That should be one of the very last category of citizens to get "full" rebate/voucher for trading in a clunker for a new car. What happened to the 3-t's bandied about in previous months re stimulus - timely, temporary, targetted. The "targetted" part of the program should have included some kind of means test of potential car/suv buyers such as threshhold of personal income using say 2008 1040 gross income data. Could use that with some kind of sliding scale table so that those under a certain amount of gross income would get full $4500 rebate and as income goes up, rebate diminishes to nothing.
Right now, credit is still tight. Instituting a sliding scale will rally hamper the already questionable effectiveness of this bill. Why penalize someone because of how much they make or because they have the ability to pay cash. If someone can afford to pay cash, God bless them. We should all be lucky enough to be able to do this.
I know, it's HARD to think that way about economics, because sometimes when you run the numbers, and they look good, the "values" don't look good on the other hand.
The "common good" means that thousands of your fellow American autoworkers might keep their jobs. Does this benefit to people in Ohio really help us out in a direct way? No, not at all. Will the government intervene to save YOUR job? Maybe, maybe not. It's not "fair". It might offend our "values".
But you gotta have faith, give these things a try, because the alternative is too grim to contemplate.
Well a lot of people wouldn't want to take their income tax return down to a car dealer for 1 thing. And how would the car-dealer know this was your real 1040 that you filed? Does the car-dealer need to contact the IRS, and if so how?
This bill will be full of problems, delays, and fraud.
I think last year's stimulus bill was much better, in giving most people $ that they can spend or pay off debt as they want. But then that doesn't make the environmentalists happy does it?
This is debatable but not in this forum. the only people that benefited from that bill was the oil companies as we all used the money to pay for $4 gas. Not sure just handing a check to anyone is good for the economy.
I guess that would be a good slogan for committing political suicide in America, that's true. Even the moose wouldn't clap.
I think most Americans in fact lie between the extremes of growing grass on your roof and building nuclear power plants next to kindergartens, don't you?. :P
It's easier to sell the idea of saving gas than it is of drilling for it I think...much easier.
Not down here in Jawjah, Shifty. This is the land of the Tahoe-driving soccer mom, running 85 in a 55 zone. She won't trade because she's afraid that a smaller vehicle would be "unsafe."
She'd love the money, but thinks she ought to be able to spend it on whatever car she thinks is best. In other words, a new gas-guzzling monstrosity.
And for the record, no, GA hasn't any oil fields (unless you mean peanut oil), but Cousin Jake out in Texas might be able to set you up with a steady supply.