By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Your observations on the new steering are, again, spot on. A huge improvement. Thanks for vindicating what I've been saying.
On the other hand, more enthusiast oriented drivers might want the handling package but I can't imagine them accepting the serious power shortage compared to the competition. Was the "Touring Sedan" model a big seller?
I think every TC should have the DOHC engine as used in the Marauder, but also focus on the quiet isolated ride that many buyers expect. Then, have a separate "Touring Sedan" model with the current firmer suspension tuning, maybe a more aggressive axle ratio, and bucket seat interior. This would be for the magazine editors to test and also for the folks who may currently have an LS or other premium midsize car but would like to move up to a larger car while still keeping some sporting flavor.
All the parts are already on the shelf. How complicated could it be?
oh not true. Lincoln listened very closely to their top customers for the T/C...They listend to livery and fleet buyers who make up the largest percentage of T/C buyers....Being around Lincoln a long time and having a medium sized fleet department, mostly limo's..they hit the nail right on target. They are very happy with the new T/C and out fleet sales show it.....
Of course, fleet buyers and retail consumers often have different needs, tastes and desires.
If I was making the decisions for Lincoln I would place the T/C into fleet only sales...like the Escort and soon to be Taurus.
I'll just stay in my SUVs, and irritate Steve & Tidester some more.......
Its a huge number.
Weren't you the dealer that stated salesman who sold a Marauder at A plan prices or under list would be in deep stuff, correct?
So, why are dealers haunting me to come on down and drive out with a Marauder for 28K+??? Why do my local dealers have 15 of them on the lot? Was it overpricing or didn't the car match the Ford claims, or both?
Told you long time ago that the magazine reviews were going to make of break that car. The reviews were good, but not great. (The new Honda will beat or stay with the Marauder 0-60.)
I've been a Mercury fan for years, and I wouldn't be caught dead driving a BMW, Asian car, or an SUV. I had great hopes for that car, based on pre announcement press. I was disappointed.
Now Infiniti claims that the M45 is the "musclecar with brains".
Will Mercury respond, or just meekly offer a new minivan, the Monterey?
We have done well with the car, We sold 10 right away at MSRP or over and have had decent sales of the car since. I only have 2 in stock and oddly enough since the incentives came out on the car we have had little interest..
We don't see very many A-plans here in CT, maybe a total of 3-6 per year and nobody has asked about A-plan on the MM...so I don't really have an opinion on that. I will not sell the car under the X-plan unless it's a friend or family of the dealership. We earn more revenue on an A-plan than an X-plan. strange huh?
I really wonder about the long term plans for Mercury. They could do so much with the brand since it really has NO image..no good or bad baggage to deal with.....But Mercury will go nowhere with rebadged Fords, INHO....I have been making alot of noise at factory meetings about making Mercury a niche sport brand. i.e. AWD sport wagons, performance stuff, etc....I don't think a $40K minivans is how Mercury will come back to life.
Anyways, I'm looking for some feedback on whether anyone thinks this is a bad idea (or a good idea for that matter). I'm lloking for something with a smooth ride, luxurious interior and good exterior styling.
However, due to the fact that I havn't won the Lotto, yet, I'm trying to find one a little bit cheaper. I was thinking of getting one from a local car/limo service (not an actual limo). Probably having somewhere between 100k and 200k on it. Is this a good idea, or should I just bite the bullet and pay the premium for the lower mileage car.
I like alot of the stuff I've read in the forum (to posting #600) and I also like the 95-97 Town Car body styling. Let me know.
I wouldn't buy any car that's been used for a rental or corporate fleet. Use CarFAX to single them out. I went through 52 CarFAX reports trying to find a G. Marquis and Town Car that hadn't been used as rentals during their life. 80% of those had been!
We got our
...smooth ride, luxurious interior and good exterior styling.
Smooth ride? It's got that in spades!
Luxurious interior? Dashboard might be the only thing holding it back. The rest is sweet!
Exterior styling? Hmmm... seen better for sure, but the ride and bang for the buck makes up for ANYTHING!
You will have to look hard to find a dissatisfied Town Car owner. Most of them are repeat buyers, car after car. They like what they offer, and usually treat their owner right. Good hunting!
A tip: For lower mileage, look rural. They're out there. Ex; Sun City AZ, Las Vegas, etc. Folks with money buy them, only drive them a little to the store and golf course, trade them in 2-3 years....
I've never considered the TC to be a great style. Can't touch a
"Jaguar XJ" for example, but it's got the better bang for the buck for sure.
My mom just saw mine for the first time yesterday. She's ready to buy one! I'll ask her what color she wants...
FWIW, I really don't go looking for Black as a color. When I go to select a car, I look at the display of what I want, and buy the one I think is most attractive. Last two times, Black won. Go figure?
SMOKE: This isn't uncommon......for a car with over 150K on the clock. At 83K, either some owner abused it, or he's got a rare problem in my experience. Is it using oil?
Anyways, I read some more about the air suspension problems, and I think I will recommend he replace it with a standard spring setup.
On the smoke issue, I don't know what the problem is. It just had a tune up at around 75K miles. I was driving the car at the time, and it seemed like they're was a leak in the exhaust. Could the catalytic converter cause discoloration of the smoke? I've drawn a blank on this one. Anymore ideas? Also, I've told him to start monitoring the oil level.
The car is currently owned by someone who has to go back to his country (Israel). His mission is finished, and he HAS to sell his car. It is immaculate - pearl white with leather and cloth interior, garage kept, and a 4.6 engine (clean). I did a carfax report, and it is positive in all categories.
He bought this car from a Rabbi that took very good care of it. The ride is very smooth, no smoke, no shaking.
This is my first post, and I guess I'm just looking for some opinions. Thanks!
Ya see, I still remember Cadillacs from 1980 up to about 1995. Had several of them. While Ford started using EFI in about 83 on most of their cars, and had multiport EFI on EVERY engine they made by 86, I had the pleasure of owning a 1983 Fleetwood with the 4.1L aluminum leaker in it, a fully modern engine, but prone to early crankshaft failure to the point the dealer had to add on a room for engine crates. I won't even talk about my 85 and 87 downsized caddys, also modern, but unreliable. But my favorite was when I went back to full sized, and bought a 1990 Fleetwood Brougham with the Chevy 350 engine, and a CARBURATOR! Ford hadn't used one on anything since 85, and here the biggest Caddy made has no fuel injection at all! And it was the car that moved me over to Lincoln, where I have happily been since 1992.
No, Ford isn't "always" bringing up the rear. They have the first large SUV's out with rack & pinion steering, Independent Suspension and they still have keypads on many of their doors, which is a lovely addition.
They need to do some work on the Town Car to please me, but it's a solid car, RWD like a big car should be, and it drives like a dream. The new Caddys are interesting, better engines now for sure, and I think they're probably better in some ways. But not "always". IMHO
The owner says that this is a process of the car "leveling out" or "balancing out", and when it is ready to drive, the humming noise will stop. And it DOES. I think he said it has something to do with the hydraulics (not sure). Anyway, is this normal? I know I had a cadillac that did the same, but it was an older cadillac bought from an auction, and I didn't have anything to compare it with.
Would appreciate some feedback today.
Thanks!
must have been designed by Torquemada. I thought it may be just me but I see Consumer Reports also says the seat is very uncomfortable.
Has anyone else had back problems with this seat?
We are about to undertake about a 3k trip but first a trip to Pep Boys is in order for a cushion or foam rubber or something. I wish I could retrofit the drivers seat from my '02 Mazda/Ranger into it and exchange the engine for the one in the new Marauder.
For example, (1) does it stain easily if it's a light color like beige? (2) if so, is it hard to clean? (3) will it be more proned to leak? (4) will it have the tendency to wear out quicker than a 1993 with a hard top?
Again, I would appreciate a quick response this evening if possible.
Thanks!
But the good news is, they can be replaced, and they don't cost all that much either. If it's a great car, don't let the top stop you.
After all doors are closed the system will vent down to trim height. One hour after key is turned off system will do a final trim (vent or fill as necessary). Nothing after that until car is keyed up to start. Then, when loaded, sensor will usually read low and command fill to ride height. These are air springs - not air shocks. The shocks are the same as on steel spring panther cars.