By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Raymond
1. Mazda6i
2. Passat GL
3. Accord EX-I4 (manual)
4. Altima 2.5s
5. Impala LS(?)
6. Camry LE
7. Intrepid SXT
8. Taurus SEL
9. Kia Optima
The Accord was a pre-production test fleet model that suffered a number of faults, including the steering wheel coming loose (maybe that explains all the pulling to the left?). It actually tied with the Passat on points, but more of the testers had given the Passat second place votes.
1) CR-V EX. Buy it for the utility. I moved a fridge with the rear seats down. This thing swallows. You can't beat the space. But if you want real 4WD ability, forget it. The realtime AWD is good for straight line starts. Any slippage during a turn and you have a big clunk from the rear when the 4WD engages. The rear end almost jumps! Those Bridgestone Duellers are useless in Winter. Spun the thing multiple times and hit a snow bank once. Lucky it was soft fresh snow. Scared the heck outta me though. If Honda can somehow allow the manual locking of the AWD, I will reconsider.
2) Accord EX - total peace of mind. Does everything it's supposed to do. Carries 5 people + luggage with ease. Never once did it hesitated. Awesome fuel consumption on long highway trips. Roof a bit low for > 6 footer drivers. Rear view mirror is obstructing some vision. Slapped on Blizzaks for Winter and blasts past SUV's. If they have Side Curtain airbags for '04, then I will trade up (this is a Canadian issue only).
Also driven 03 accord, I think it meets my requirement in term of refinement and quietness. I would pick the Accord over CRV.
Again, thanks for the update and please keep us informed as the miles roll on.
If you can get an EXV6 for $500 over invoice and the EXV6 with navigation goes for full sticker, then the real price difference is closer to $4000. It definitely is not worth that much especially after the novelty of the voice commands wear off. This is unique to the Accord only for a few months. Soon, other Hondas and Acuras will have the same system.
Anyway, the navigation is not supposed to be available until January and it is still only November. Maybe they are trickling into some dealers early so are extremely rare at the moment.
$29,000 is alot of money. It is still cheaper than a TL, but it's high enough that I would at least look at the current TL and wait to see what the new TL looks like.
The 6-speed Accord is also super rare, but if they are selling at much over sticker, it makes more sense to look at a 6-speed CL coupe.
Even the 2002 EXV6s were not going right at invoice with any regularity after selling for 5 years.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_48/b3810132.htm
remember me? The one aiming for 25,200 on the NAVI, well I've come close, 25,579, with the 3.9 financing... I'm going in this afternoon. I'll let you know the main details if the deal is closed at this price. And if I get screwed around with, well, you'll be sure to hear that too. FYI, another dealer also offered 25,673 (but just doesn't have the car in TODAY), so contacting the internet sales managers only has yeilded results so far. Wish me luck!
remember me? The one aiming for 25,200 on the NAVI, well I've come close, 25,579, with the 3.9 financing... I'm going in this afternoon. I'll let you know the main details if the deal is closed at this price. And if I get screwed around with, well, you'll be sure to hear that too. FYI, another dealer also offered 25,673 (but just doesn't have the car in TODAY), so contacting the internet sales managers only has yeilded results so far. Wish me luck!
Why can't Honda give you all the safety goodies on the 4 as well? They could restrict the full package to the EXL if necessary. Some people just don't need a 6 but still want things like the head curtain airbags and traction control.
http://www.autoemirates.com/reports/details.asp?nid=487
1) Side Curtain Airbags
2) HomeLink
3) Traction Control
Jeff
Different people have different ideas about what "should" be available. All of these "shoulds" can add up to a lot of money.
Money that a lot of people don't want to spend on things they don't want or need.
Home link would be the best example of this.
3L V6 270HP
http://menafn.com/qn_local_detail.asp?news_id=3366
Time to edge on Nissan to up the HP so honda is forced to follow. For once I don't mind saying..."Go Nissan".....
Don't confuse the occasional use of dealer incentive money with holdback - two entirely different beasts. There was indeed incentive money on the table for the '02 Accords, but of course that will not happen with the '03s for another 10 months, if at all, and certainly not in those amounts.
I test drove the new Accord and I really like
the vehicle. The V6 is a must have item for me.
This car is without a doubt going to be my next
vehicle. When the tires wear out on the Civic (another ~5k) it's gone!!
The fit, finish, legroom, comfort, and V6 power can't be beat. Audio controls on the steering wheel is a really nice feature. Side airs bags for added safety is also a big plus.
There are still a few things Honda still
didn't get right that caught my attention on the test drive:
1.) Move parking brake under the dash to make more room between seats. It takes up a lot of space and is always difficult to clean around.
Please Honda, move the parking brake....
2.) Armrest is too 'complicated'. Make a wide, easy to open compartment. The tray on top when you first open it just takes up space and gets in the way. The two-tier system makes use of the
armrest storage too cumbersome.
3.) Make the sunroof a one-touch open/close.
4.) Memory seating for power seats. Tweaking the power seat everytime you switch cars with the
otherhalf gets old.
Without these few items to complain about, the car would have everything I would want.
I'm going to take a TL for a test drive to see if I like it.
I know a few of you had a rattle in the vicinity of the drivers door. I wonder if you could tell me what was done to solve it.
I have a rattle that sounds like it is coming from the window seal area over the drivers head. Its not really a rattle but sounds more like leaf or something stuck in door waving about in the wind. No matter what it still driving me crazy.
Jeff
Under dash brake pedal is too "Buick" especially since lots of Accords are manual and need the space for clutch or footrest.
What next? Column shifter to free up even more room between the seats?
One touch moonroof would be something nice they could easily add in a couple years though.
when you accelerate and the engine rev at 3k rpm, and when you use engine brake and it rev at 3k rpm, does the engine comsume the same amount of fuel? how about engine wear and stuff?
After a few months of researching the Camry, Accord and a few others in that category, we recently bought a 2003 auto-4 Accord EXL. We had intended to replace a 96 Civic LX (not an iota of problem during six and a half years of ownership) with a larger, more comfortable car that could share long-distance trips with our 93 Lexus ES 300 (still a great car) thus extending its life.
In short, we have been highly satisfied with the Accord - pleasing styling (not too trendy nor yesterday’s leftover), wonderful interior with many desirable features, comfortable ride and much power especially for a four cylinder. After about the first six weeks of ownership with driving limited to around-town errands, we thought that the Accord is a truly fine car even though the mpg after two fillups was at the lower epa rating of 24.
Now, however, after a 2,000-mile trip over Thanksgiving which included traversing the high mountain passes (Loveland and Vail) of the Rockies from Denver to southern Utah and back to NV where we live, we think that the Accord is a truly, truly fine car (could add a few more trulys). Not to imply that it did as well going up those passes as the 6-cyl Lexus does but there was absolutely no problem keeping up with the faster, larger cars climbing those passes minus grunts and groans. The mpg through the Rockies was 34+.
An addendum: I am not a “fast” driver but MANY times during the trip to and from Denver, glances at the speedometer revealed speeds in the 80s prompting me to ask my wife if she felt as though the car was traveling at such high rates. Which is to say that the Accord has great road manners (even if the driver lacks them) - quiet, comfortable and good handling.
If the Accord is on your shortlist, go get one. Tomorrow.
Thanks in advance!
I'd like to see some real wood trim and noticably better leather in the 2004 TL this time.
The interior of a 2003 TL is only marginally better than an Accord EXV6. It should be at least as different as an ES300 is to a Camry XLE.
I welcome real wood into the new TL as well, but I hope they don't make it tacky either.
The TL has a nice interior but since it is based off of the 98-02 Accord it's understandable why people will prefer the 03 Accord's interior over the TL's.