Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Personally, I wouldn't go in that direction. I like the added power, but only if it has added handling to go along with it. My biggest gripe against the E430 is that, although it has a lot of power, it doesn't have a suspension to match. I actually haven't driven the 540iA without a sport package, but I would suspect it has an unacceptable amount of body roll for my tastes.
According to owners and dealers I've talked to, the actual difference in gas milage on the 540i with or without the sport package is fairly minimal. The EPA rating difference is related to tire tread width. By comparison there is no difference for the 530i sport/non-sport EPA ratings. Unfortunately, the 540i sport EPA rating is just low enough to trigger a $1,300 gas guzzler tax.
Nevertheless, the more I read this forum the more confused I am about which to get. Although when you think about it, I guess it's a nice problem to have.
By the way, what is the deal with the cupholders in the 5 series? My 328 has a convenient cupholder right beside me. The one in the 5 series seems to be in an awkward location in front of the shift knob. It seems like a spill waiting to happen (and all over the stereo and A/C in fact). A salesman told me it has been that way ever since '97. Is this true? Is there any improvement in '02 model?
A while back, someone on the 3-Series board ran a number of consecutive tanks of low-octane (87) fuel and then the same number of tanks with high-octane (93), trying to duplicate the driving conditions as much as possible. What he found was that the MPG with the high-octane fuel was improved just enough when compared to the MPG of the low-octane fuel to justify its extra cost.
Hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Shipo
For aftermarket solutions see:
http://cup-holders.com
http://drinkholders.com
P.S. As further evidence of actual milage, a business associate of mine (2000 540iA sport) and his brother (2000 M5 6-speed) went on a weekend trip together with thier respective wives and one 12 year old in the M5. 500 miles roundtrip, predominantly PA turnpike and through some hilly areas. Averaged 75-80 on highway. 540iA averaged 23.4 mpg, M5 averaged 22.2 mpg. Considerably closer than their EPA ratings would suggest. Also, the M5 actually beat 540 on a previous "contest" to Hilton Head this spring, where speeds averaged 85+ mph.
The manual does have a different gear ratio versus the automatic, but the auto vs step sport I am not sure.
CAR---------------FD----------TG
540iA------------2.81-------0.80 (5th gear)
540iA Sport---3.15-------0.80 (5th gear)
540iM-----------2.81-------0.83 (6th gear)
M5--------------- 3.15-------0.83 (6th gear)
Best Regards,
Shipo
Also, I am very impressed by the fuel economy of the 540iA with Sport. Interestingly, the Sport package on the 530i does not include a more aggressive final drive ratio the way the Sport package does on the 540i. It is true that this change on the 540i does improve acceleration throughout its torque range. But I guess it does not hinder fuel economy as much as BMW states.
Finally, I can get an '01 Titanium Silver 530i (Steptronic, Premium-Sport, Xenons) for $2000 over invoice AND Blue Book Value for my trade ($20,700 for '98 328i with 35K miles). Any thoughts?
It seems that with the high mileage cars there are oil leaks that are expensive to repair, failure of oil separator at the back of the intake manifold, phantom coolant leaks, oil pump bolt getting loose and causing leak.
With the transmission, it was initially thought that the sealed autobox was a bad design by manufacturers that it did not allow complete oil drain, but it turns out that it was intended since improper fluid change can potentially start a problem. Whether it is ZF or GM, autoboxes seem to fail consistently around 80,000 to 120,000 so if one is planing on keeping the car for a long time, then the manual is better way to go. Of course with the proper fluid change.
If I am leasing or trading in every 2-3 years, I guess I won't care too much, but I tend to drive well over 100,000 and keep for more than 5-6 years with each car I buy. I would hate to have to replace/rebuild a transmission (which is what I presume when it says 'fail', not explicitly stated) on a $50,000 car. My 95 Integra has 125,000 miles and I have not had to do such work, and I still rev it high often. You may or may not have these problems with your particular car, but my question was which would be better for long term, and based on the information available, it would be the 530i/5spd. Don't get me wrong, I would love to have a 540i, especially since I drive on the autobahn, but with my plan to keep it for a long time, it makes more sense for me to go with the 530i.
As a side note, I am going to test drive E320 and 530i(step). In Germany, the dealers will allow you to take the car for a day or two for a test drive, which I think is great. Surprisingly, though, BMW dealer says they do not sell many manuals on 530 or 540, hence the autobox on the 530i. If anyone is interested, I will post when I am done (next 2 Saturdays).
Well, I've been waiting since 21 August for my 2002 525i. taking ED since I'm in Spain anyway. It's my first BMW (I really wanted the 530 but I wanted all the options, and felt I could live with the lesser power). Delivery to the dealership is Nov. 7th. Titanium Silver, Premium-SPORT, STEPTRONIC, NAV SYS, Gray leather, XENONS, and 6 CD Changer (wish I'd have gotten the Premium sound sys). Price is right at 40k, is that good? The waiting is killing me. Anyway I thought I had all I wanted, but now I want to add a Spoiler, Hamann Mag wheels, Clear corner covers(front), everything. It's crazy!!
What should I do first?
I was able to drive a 98 528i for a few hours and while it had respectable power the 530i just seemed to be on another level. I was considering the 525i but know I'm sure that it wouldn't have enough power.
While it is still a few months away before winter, I would like to hear how your 530i will fare in the snow.
I have yet to see an 02 5-series. Does anyone know if there are changes (exterior/interior) for this model year.
P.S. I have priced out a 530i at $41,500 ($1,300 over ED invoice) with Sport, Premium Pachage, 5-speed, Xenon, Hi-Fi Stereo, and a few other goodies, but no Navigation. Sounds like your "about $40k" is about right, given you have steptronic and navagation.
dave
Also, has anyone seen the latest issue of Consumer Reports (the regular magazine, not an auto issue). A friend of mine who subscribes said there is a comparison test including a 530i. He tells me that they elevate our car to a new planet compared to the others. I haven't found it yet at a newsstand, but am curious.
I'm coming up on 5 months and still marvel at my car.
Cheers
tab
cheeks,
I do remember those guys talking about the fan recall being recalled.
dave
$750 for this is a very bad gamble.
dave
Dan
dave
No one crawls around in the snow to install chains and more. Even if you have a garage, you will freeze your [non-permissible content removed] off.
Go to Tirerack.com and read their tests and survey results on snow tires. They seem to like the Bridgestone Blizzaks or Dunlop M2 Winter Sports. They have good prices but you pay shipping and then your local tire shop for mounting and balancing.
I just bought a set of Blizzaks today and paid about $7 per tire more than Tirerack's price, but that included mounting and balancing, and of course, there was no shipping.
Good luck. (Chains! Oh, please!)
Test drive a GS300 before getting this; no comparison. GS was too soft, mushy (although radio was better).
Called my BMW dealer, too, to find out about their version of this...he said he'd recommend against me getting it, because the wax has to be stripped off, and might ruin the paint job...recommended me getting a regular vinyl bra instead...
thoughts, guys and gals?
1. Took them out to the same stretch of autobahn and got them to about 110-120 mph. Both very stable, slight vibrations on the 530 around 40 to 50 mph. Nice growl on the 530, and feels like it has stronger acceleration.
2. E320 has much better rear room, 530 FEELS only marginally bigger than the 3 series
3. About equal on the NAV system.
4. E320 has surprisingly small turning radius, feels better than 530
5. Had a 18 inch rim with Bridgestone SO2, great handling for a big car. Even with the bigger rim, pretty good ride on cobble stone street, and rough pavement.
6. Comfort seat with massage was great!
7. So so sound system, even with the DSP
After all this, my wife says "when do we go order the Bimmer?" Oriental Blue looks very nice on the 5.