By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I didn't know that OnStar was available on most other cars - my bad! I do not need OnStar, I do not need NavTraffic, hence these monthly cable style fees are a nusance. My point is that the RLs technological claim to fame is cable TV style monthly service fees that I do not need.
PS: I am also aware of the RLs SH-AWD technology.
No, I do not use NavTraffic in DC - my commute is such that I don't need it. I probably won't renew OnStar, though the emergency features (automatically sending help if your airbags deploy and stolen car trace) make it somewhat attractive. I will definitely renew XM radio. If you haven't given OnStar or XM a credit card number, it won't automatically renew.
Then do not renew them. They're there for those who want or need them.
I don't think they're "RLs technological claim to fame". They're simply features the RL offers, which many other cars also offer. These days, if a car doesn't offer many of those features, they'll get left out of the competition. I, for example, wouldn't consider a car without XM. A friend loves OnStar and wouldn't consider a car without it.
Another note about XM - a friend bought an Accord with XM and thought it ridiculous to spend money for a radio service, so he let the service lapse. Two months later, he renewed, he missed it so much.
I guess its a matter of perspective - EVERY review, brochure, advertisement, etc intentially points out the SH-AWD and the AcuraLink to NavTraffic feature. Other than these two features I am unaware of any technology that the Acura RL can brag on that is a true advancement over the competition.
In your initial posting, you didn't mention any of the above features, except NavTraffic, and none, except NavTraffic are relevant to your initial posting which complained about all the "service" fees associated, and that was what I was responding to. In my opinion, SH-AWD is a great feature, and is worth bragging about. AcuraLink is a nice feature, but not one on which I'd base a buying decision.
There is no relationship betweent the two. Per Acura's webpage - "AcuraLink™ satellite communication system--a new, state-of-the-art service that provides you with the latest car-related and diagnostic information via satellite. Utilizing XM® Satellite Radio, AcuraLink works in conjunction with your vehicle's navigation, HandsFreeLink™ (HFL), and audio systems to send and receive messages." You need XM radio for AcuraLink to work, but not NavTraffic.
"I used to own an '02 TL-S and almost traded it for an '04 or '05 TL. We've also owned two MDXs (old '01 and currently an '04); I have always viewed Acura as a "best-bang-for-the-buck" manufacturer. I have test driven the TL several times and have gotten them as loaner cars during MDX servicing. I've also test driven the RL several times and am currrently debating a new car purchase - either an RL or an M35."
Did you drive the M35 and what do you think of it today compared to the RL?
Thats what I said.
Because my Acura dealer shafted me on my '02 TL-S trade-in for an '04 TL I ended up getting an '04 FX35 last September. I took the MDX in for an oil change in December and saw the RL for the first time and was instantly smitten (I should point out that I somewhat regret not getting another sedan). This past March I was again at the dealership getting an MDX oil change and had the opportunity to talk to my sales rep (cautiously after the TL fiasco); he informed me that they were very disappointed in RL sales and that he could get me a great price. I must say that I was "completely" sold on the RL at that point.
Thus began research and test drives that continues to this day. One can not help but read about the M-class while researching the RL. I was particularly struck by the M's performance in virtally all professional reviews. I first saw the M in late March when I took the FX in for an oil change. My first impression, although positive, was that it fell short of the RL. The more I read and researched the more the pendulum began to shift. I must say that the more I sit in and drive the RL the less impressed I am (it is not nearly as quiet as I had hoped for); it has several QC issues, an ignition switch design flaw, and integral technology that I can do without. And my biggest issue is that it is way overpriced (its not a "best-bang-for-the-buck" Acura like my MDX is).
I have had the RL and the M35 Sport on several test drives and overall I rate them equal as far as ride, handling and noise goes. I want to do more test drives in both as well as the M35 non-sport. As I said first impressions are more or less equal as far a driving - but I want to nit-pick each on subsequant test drives.
Even though I haven't bought yet, I am strongly leaning toward avoiding an '05 RL period. If I wait until the fall (M35 prices should be better by then), I'll take a look at the '06 RL. But if I had to buy today I'd get the M35.
No, you said NavTraffic and as far as I can tell, there's no relationship between NavTraffic and AcuraLink.
Guess I have to quote myself
Anyone with XM radio can subscribe to Traffic Radio (hence non-unique) - Acura (thru its AcuraLink technology) has tied it to their Navigation system (which is unique).
Since your arguments keep morphing, it's no wonder you don't understand my disagreement with you. You've gone from complaining about all the "service" fees on the RL to arguing that nothing the RL has, except SH-AWD, is unique. Each time I respond, you disagree by arguing about a different point. So, to quote you - let's just agree to disagree (though about what, I'm not quite sure).
I posted a message five minutes ago and it did not appear!
Is that unusual? Can it be resurrected?
Acuraphile
I'm sorry that happened to you.
George
My quad surgery has healed sufficiently to enable me to drive for short periods. Having been away from the RL for three months, I had forgotten the one reservation I had about my purchase: the jittery, hyper-active suspension. I was soon reminded of it this past weekend when my wife drove us to our place in Amagansett, roughly 100 miles, to the eastern end of Long Island. Having been enthralled with the RL and all of its componenets, I was distraught by the consistent jouncing which was even evident on fairly smooth roads.
Yesterday, before having written the post that vanished mysteriously, I had gone to a dealer in Valley Stream and test drove an RL demo, with the same result. I believe that this characteristic had been the subject of some discussion when the first deliveries took place. At that time, I was so thrilled with the RL that my critical faculties must have gone to sleep, although I did permit some dissatisfaction to filter through my delight, and then let it slip away while I enjoyed the electronics and great engine performance. Now, however, after our 200 mile round trip, having been shaken to and fro, I have deep, deep regrets.With tax and extras, this purchase came to $54K and I'd be hard pressed to get $45K for it now as I know the car is being generously discounted. So, I'll stick with it for a year or two as it's not intolerable - just uncomfortable.Bottom line: I didn't drive my '96 RL for nine years, waiting, for a disappointment such as this.
Is anyone out there supressing dissatisfaction with the problem, as I've described it? Our Acura loyalty sometimes takes on the role of an anodyne and seals our lips.
The RL's ride is definitely a little rougher than I'd like, though I wouldn't describe it anything like you did. However, I do like the sporty handling and I'm not sure you can have both a smooth ride and sporty handling. If I had to pick between the two, I'd pick sporty handling.
I know what you are saying about acura's suspension as they have been mooving toward stiffer suspension on all their models. I believe they are moving their design criteria toward more performance and hence a stiffer ride goes with it. Having said that though, I like the suspension in my 2005 RL, but I did get rid of my 2004 TL (traded it in on my 2005 RL) because it was too stiff to suite my tastes. The 2004/2005 TL almost jars your teeth when you hit a bump, by contrast I feel the 2005 RL is really smooth!! Yes it is firm, but not really too stiff.
Just my humble opinion.
dennis :confuse:
Absolutely not true and I don't get why you'd make that claim :confuse: I have always admitted TWO technologies that are unique to the RL; SH-AWD and AcuraLinked NavTraffic (how can you deny that ???). Now I have questioned the value of the AcuraLinked NavTraffic. But I do thank you for clarifying that it is these TWO and only these TWO technologies that the RL can claim to uniquely offer something the competition cannot.
BMW seems to have a recipe for this.
Its no secret that after an earlier infatuation with the RL my feelings are leaning toward the M35 now. I still like some things about the RL; however I think the car is way overpriced to begin with. Its a nice car and all, but SH-AWD and AcuraLinked NavTraffic alone are NOT worth the premium in my opinion. Also I too was somewhat surprised that the ride was not smoother and quiter on my test drives.
But more to the point; I took my MDX in for an oil change this morning and there were 29 RLs on the dealer's lot (6 out front, 1 in the showroom, and 22 out back). I know for a fact that I can buy a brand new one for Invoice or less; I doubt very seriously you could get anywhere near $45K on a trade :sick: Good luck. Sterling McCall in Houston had a used (8000 miles) RL on the lot last week they offered me for $44K (includes extended warranty and 18" wheels).
I am interested in either a 2002 TL Type S or 2002 RL.
I know these are two different cars. I want the power of the Type S but have heard a lot of issues with the transmission. I am looking at the RL for the reliability. I would rather go for the TL Type S (more fun to drive) but would only go to RL for reliability.
Any advise.
thanks
Surprisingly crisp inquiry, tayl.
Yes, but I was transported flat on my back on the rear seat, encased in a three foot steel brace that couldn't get by the front passenger door frame - I wasn't critiquing the ride during those moments.
Do you feel betrayed?
To some extent, we don't have the best roads in some parts of the U.S., and I suppose washboard surfaces and suspension joints on some byways can cause a bit more of a jittery ride.
There have been a handful of complaints on these boards about the RL's suspension tuning being too stiff. Can I have a show of hands from those folks...are they over/under 60 yrs old? Compared to the previous RL, the current model definitely has a tighter suspension. The new RL is nothing like the prior model, that much is for sure.
A few complaints are also being registered regarding the touring suspension on the new Avalon. I think the older generation that got used to the Buick-esque ride of the previous Avalon was a bit shocked by the tighter touring version that is available on the new '06 Avalon.
Many of us like our cars to ride like the Barcoloungers in the family room. And the more cupholders the better.
Personally, I'd rather drive and feel the road. I think the RL is just right in this regard.
If you are at all uncomfortable with the ride (which is tight though supple in my opinion), I strongly urge you to look into 18" Pirelli's. You will not be disappointed.
Of course not; only surprised.
I think the standard suspension has a bit too much roll and is a little soft but bearable from a handling performance point of view. It seems to me it is more of a drivers car than the previous RL was and I believe that was a conscious decision on their part. In the road test in Road and Track they refer to a meeting with an Acura representative who comes out and says they had moved too far into the luxury/soft ride area.
I also looked at the Infiniti M35x and BMW 530Xi but thought the Acura was the best combination of ride and performance at the price. I got a nice discount off sticker and am very happy with the car so far.
The XM NavTraffic system launched in October 2004 as a standard feature on the all-new 2005 Acura RL with resounding success to revolutionize in-car GPS navigation systems. In January 2005, General Motors added XM NavTraffic to the 2005 Cadillac CTS as a feature included on all vehicles equipped with their optional DVD-based navigation system. For the aftermarket, Pioneer has launched the AVIC-N2 and AVIC-D1 as the first aftermarket product supporting the XM NavTraffic capability. Other car company and aftermarket applications are expected in the near future.
Thanks for your comments, jj. I celebrated my 80th birthday last week. At age 72, I sold my 750 Honda, my third and last bike. I mention this so there are no misconceptions about my driving preferences - (I never had a Buick "Park Avenue" mentality!) In 1944, I flew PT-13's and had a few hours in an AT-6. Ten years ago, I was having fun, accompanied by an instructor, flying 172s on weekends out at Republic Airport.You're corrrect: I do love my RL; I just wish that I was less tuned in to the active ride. I love it's sportiness. so perhaps it's my age that's expressing its desire to be accommodated! LOL!
In retrospect, I guess I wasn't ragging on the RL's suspension, after all - maybe the years were just saying "Hello!" I'm sure you dig my meaning.
I'm still a card-carrying RL-er.
Warm regards,
George.
Well, you've finally done it - you've convinced me the RL is not at all unique and therefore, a totally terrible car. By the way, does anyone want to buy a slightly used 2005 RL? It's not at all unique in any way, except SH-AWD, but it's not a bad car overall. Actually, I think you'd like it - it's a dream to drive, it has a fantastic sound system, the best nav system of any car around, and quite a few nice gadgets, including keyless entry (though quite a few of us RL owners haven't quite got the hang of this here newfangled gadget). Hey wait just a gosh darned minute, I just reread my last sentence - it really is a pretty nice car, despite what a few naysayers on here have to say. I think I'll keep it.
:confuse:
George, I was thinking it, but wasn't going to bring it up. (Far be it for me to meddle with a man whom I know comes from Tom Brokaw's "The Greatest Generation").
Incidently with all due respect, around here motorcycles that aren't manufactured in Hog Heaven (Milwaukee) just don't get a lot of respect. (But, between you, me, and the gatepost the Honda is a better bike.) There is something very special about the Harley mystique though, not only here but across the country and in many parts of the world.
PS You'll be ready to take on the RL suspension in no time...but there is no hurry. I am reminded of a long recovery from terrible lower back spinal stenosis and excruciating left leg sciatica and many sleepless nights. (and...thoughts of never playing my sport again) A Vince Lombardi quote from the Glory Years comes to mind...."Fatigue makes cowards of us all!" ... Heck, at age 80 I probably would want to be accomodated with massages and mint juleps.
jjacura:
You were right on target, my man! We just arrived out east a few minutes ago - Amagansett, L.I. territory. The ride was fine. Anyhow, it's nice having an advocate such as yourself. Thanks.
George
Dude, I like the RL. I love Acura's Navi - I am on my third one! (Traded an '01 MDX for an '04 MDX that we still have; used to own an '02 TL-S). However, I will give any $45K+ car a very hard and critical scrutiny and evaluate ALL of its pro, cons, unique features, shortcomings, missing features, etc!!!!!!!!! The RL is on my short list.
It is my hope that I can use Edmunds as a research tool to FULLY evaluate the cars on my list, not simply touting the positives, while glossing over the negative. :shades:
Well if a negative is true...bring it on. If it's not true......what do you think? :sick:
"Well, I hit him hard right between the eyes
And he went down, but to my surprise,
He come up with a knife and cut off a piece of my ear.
But I busted a chair right across his teeth
And we crashed through the wall and into the street
Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer_
_Johnny Cash "A Boy Named Sue" 1969
Of those that have switched out of the OEM tires and have selected high (or ultra high) performance all season tires such as Michelin Pilot Sport A/S or Pirelli Zero Nero A/S, how have you liked the change and any regrets in doing so? Thanks
I would not recommend going to 18" wheels unless you want a stiffer ride. The larger wheel recuires a lower profile tire (shorter tire sidewall), and thus you end up with a stiffer ride but with better handling. Be careful, you need to maintain the 26.8" overall outside diameter of the tire no matter what size wheels you put on in order to maintain the functionality of the electronic systems that control the ShAWD and electronic traction control.
dennis
I agree with you that buying new 17" tires immediately was a hard decision, but my logic in the beginning centered around the better control issue in the winter/snow driving conditions. I know the car has ShAWD, and traction control,but steering traction and stopping is still limited by the tires ability to grip in wet and snow conditions. Not to mention I already spent almost 50K on the car, so I went ahead.
The Pilot Sport tires have a customer rating of 7.2 out of a possible 10 for capability in the snow, and the OEM HX MXM4's only rate 4.4. So I looked at it as though the diminished risk of an accident in winter would be worth it. Also the wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning numbers on the Pilot Sport A/S is 8.7 vs 5.8. So the other improvements (quiter, smoother ride, improved handling) for me were just icing on the cake. Plus I sold my old tires for $400
Others such as Post # 6505 above seem to have good experiences with the 18" wheel in terms of ride and noise quality. I think the ride is just about right with it being a bit stiff to enable good corner/handling but not so stiff as to be uncomfortable or unpleasant, at least for me. Others I know may differ.
I am certainly mindful of the need to have the wheel/tire combo fit with the functionality of the RL and not inadvertantly diminish any of its great characteristics. I am trying to even further enhance the handling without materially reducing any other function. Many seem to swear by the Pirelli Zero Nero so that is one of my motivators in considering the 18" size. I have only read good things too about the Pilot Sport a/s which is available in the 17" size. Decisions, decisions. Keep those opinions coming as they are very helpful.