Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Acura RL

11112141617141

Comments

  • l943973l943973 Member Posts: 197
    Joe,


    I ended up getting a 97 NSX-T in Spa Yellow. It had about 10k miles when I purchased it. I don't get to drive it as often as I would like. Maybe once every two weeks on some country roads with the top removed. I don't have any immediate plans on auto crossing the car.


    Here are some photos taken by the previous owner.

    http://photos.yahoo.com/l943973


    Of the models you mentioned, I think the Porsche 356 is the most striking in design. I prefer the Speedster models over the Coupe. I've only seen one 356 (convertible) on the road in my lifetime. It certainly put a big smile on my face, and I wasn't even driving it. If maintenance costs were a deciding factor, I would probably get the miata.


    I think a Miata provides just as much "fun" as an NSX. I guess I could have went with the Miata, but the NSX was something I've always wanted since it first came out in 90.


    Have fun on whatever you decide.

    William

  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    I always forget to mention my tire pressure, and important item I'm sure. I run them at 32psi. I've always meant to lower them for awhile to see if the mileage drops that much. Sorry to have left that out.

    Congrats on your NSX selection, William. I don't know many people who are not inclined to admire that car. For all the reviews that complain about "dated architecture" and so on, it's hard to believe how (relatively) cheap it can be to get a true exotic ... one that's even reliable! And very noticeable even if beige, let alone yellow:-)

    If you can grab a weekend (Sunday usually) you should really try it on the auto-x track. The NSXs that I've seen are fast, sometimes too fast and require a soft touch to time well, and anyway that's not the point. You don't even have to purchase a helmet as someone will be quick to loan you one, and when you are humbled (as I often am) no one says anything negative. Great time! Maybe I could try the RL? Not really.

    TAke care.
    Joe W.
  • vaacuradrivervaacuradriver Member Posts: 3
    What is the best tire pressure for summer driving for the RL?
  • djnmandjnman Member Posts: 4
    I read a couple of posts back there is a complete change for the 2003 RL. Is this true and does anyone have any information on that?
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    I don't know about the '03 model change. Everything I've heard was about the '04 ... to add to the puzzle, Acura has been changing models in March. What to think?

    I'm not too sure why your tire pressure should be different in summer. But the recommended tire pressure is 28 psi. I run mine at 32 all year. One guy I met used 35, but I didn't like the effect on the handling. I tried 30 for awhile but it was still a little too soft.

    I used the Red Riding Hood theory of tire pressure, I guess.

    Take care.
    Joe W.
  • prettywillyprettywilly Member Posts: 6
    I was wondering about that too. Since the Accord has a bigger engine, naturally the TL would get a bigger engine and so would the RL maybe a V8 I doubt it but, thats only my opinion.
  • coosamtncoosamtn Member Posts: 47
    Now have 861 miles on my new 02 RL. After reading all the posts on tire pressure, thought I'd check mine. Guess what, 35 lbs in all four. Funny ... I am getting 23.8 mpg on an un-broken in drive train ... 35 lbs ... and it handles and rides like a dream! My first oil change will be RedLine 5W30, and after about 7500 miles, I plan to change out the differential oil and install RedLine 75W90. What a machine!
  • prophet2prophet2 Member Posts: 372
    At service, the dealer inflates them to 32 psi - they say 28 is too low. I go to 35 psi.
  • gotothelightgotothelight Member Posts: 31
    coosamtn,
    I haven't heard of an oil called Redline. Could you elaborate . Is it synthetic? Great news about the mileage on your new RL. May I also ask what you paid. I'm hopeing to buy one this fall.

    Thanks,
    Greg
  • coosamtncoosamtn Member Posts: 47
    Hey Greg! Look back at my post on July 20, #634. I give my purchase info there. Redline Oil is the best Synthetic oil available anywhere! But you won't find it at Wal-Mart! Ha!

    It's the only Synthetic oil available that is made from polyol ester base stock, not the dyno base like Mobile 1, and it is used in all modern jet engines. It has long drain capabilities ( up to 18000 miles) and is used by most of Honda's race teams. I'll still change out at 7500 mi however. $ 8.00 a qt! But worth it! Check it out at www.redlineoil.com
  • goralgoral Member Posts: 149
    Don't mean to stir the pot, but... How do you justify spending $8/qt for Redline and not taking advantage of its' extended drain capabilities???
    The new SL oils which use hydrocracked base (Chevron or Citgo come to mind) should easily go 5K miles and cost just over $1/qt.
    Just a thought :-)
  • l943973l943973 Member Posts: 197
    I guess we all have our limits on how long oil should stay in an engine. I use Valvoline SynTech ($4/qt) in my engine and change it every 4k miles. The engine runs smoother and quieter. Because of my driving conditions, my oil gets pretty dirty by the time it hits that limit. I couldn't imagine going up to 7500 miles per change.

    I use the same oil (but different grade) in my NSX and have very happy with it.

    William
  • coosamtncoosamtn Member Posts: 47
    goral, I can't justify it, but I drive my cars, if I like them, a very long time. I currently own a 89 mazda mx6 with 176,000 miles on it that uses NO oil, a 94 Dodge Ram 1500 thats never been in the shop, along with my new 02 RL. And I plan on keeping this jewel a very long time! In addition to long drain interval capabilities, redline oil has a reputation for very high bearing and cam wear protection, high heat stability, and improved fuel economy over other synthetics. I will, however, initially adhere to Acura's warranty requirement of 7500 mile change intervals during the first 4 years, just in case. After that, I'll extend the oil change , maybe to 10,000 miles. I also like the best scotch! Can't justify that either!
  • Kirstie_HKirstie_H Administrator Posts: 11,242
    A reporter is looking for businesspeople who are drivers of the Lincoln Navigator and the Acura 3.5 RL. If you fit this description and are willing to share your story and contact information, please respond asap no later than Monday Aug. 5 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern to jfallon@edmunds.com. Thanks!

    MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
    Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
    2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
    Review your vehicle

  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Used by most of Honda's race engines ???

    Which race engines are you talking about ? I have heard of some of the NASCAR/American makes using redline but HONDA ??

    Also, I wonder why Mobil1 is the standard factory oil fill for all Mercedes AMG vehicles, All BMW M-vehicles, the Corvettes, the Porsches etc. Have these automakers not heard about "Redline" ??

    I would any day wager that Exxon-Mobil would definitely have more R&D funds than small firms like Redline. Is there a reason why Redline sells through private distributors and not through big sales channels ?

    The below is what Exxon-Mobil has mentioned about Redline within their website:


    Question:
    Red Line Oil talks about "four-ball wear," "load wear," "Falex wear" and "Timken psi load" for their synthetic oil. Are these valid tests?

    Answer: These tests are low-cost tests generally used to determine the performance properties of grease. They do not correlate with engine performance tests. For example, the use of an additive such as lead naphthenate would yield excellent results in these bench (or lab) tests, but would cause excessive oxidation of an oil in an engine and would cause a motor oil to fail the industry standard oxidation test known as the Sequence III test.

    None of the tests referenced are used by API in determining gasoline engine motor oil performance (SL is the current, most severe oil classification), nor are they used by engine manufacturers. The API approval requires the following tests:

    L-38 for bearing corrosion.
    Sequence IIIF for oxidation, deposits and wear.
    Sequence VG for sludge, wear and varnish.
    Sequence II for rust.
    This slate of tests can cost over $75,000 to run – considerably more than the simple bench tests mentioned.



    Question2: Red Line Oil claims to have 100 percent polyolester base stocks. Are these different or better than the base stocks used in Mobil 1 with SuperSyn™?

    Answer: We are very familiar with polyolesters. In fact, we manufacture them and use them in our aviation jet engine oils such as Mobil Jet Oil II® and Mobil Jet Oil 254® and in our refrigeration compressor lubricants, where the polyolesters are utilized for their compatibility with new HFC refrigerants. Polyolesters are indeed excellent at high-temperature oxidation stability and low volatility.

    However, our work on automobile engines and jet engine designs has shown that polyalphaolefins (PAOs) offer the best all-around performance for gasoline engines due to their:

    Being completely compatible with conventional oils and gasoline engine seals.
    Providing both low- and high-temperature performance.
    Providing a stable oil in the presence of water and moisture.
    Having anti-rust capabilities.


    Later...AH
  • coosamtncoosamtn Member Posts: 47
    hunter001, my case of redline has gotten lost in the mail. Fedex tracking shows they delivered it at my "side door" last thursday. I have no side door and no redline oil. Since you are Acura RL's poster # 666, did you hex my oil shipment or did the oil ferry snatch it up?
  • jmw4jmw4 Member Posts: 67
    I have a 2000 RL with 23,000 and am on schedule to end the factory warranty in 2 more years and at 50,000 miles. I can extend with ACURA for 2 more years and 25,000 for about $850 but am wondering if it is necessary given the excellent reliability of ACURA's. Does anyone have experience on repair costs for RL's post 50,000 mile warranty? I like the idea of keeping roadside assistance, loaners, and free repairs for another 2 years but unsure if I will ever see a payback.
  • l943973l943973 Member Posts: 197
    I have 90k miles on my 99 RL.

    My rear view mirror went bad after the warranty. It didn't dim in certain areas anymore. The part costs roughly $460 (If you call around, you can probably get it for $430). I replaced the mirror myself so labor wasn't an issue (its a pain though because its pretty tight and the service manual is incorrect). Labor was roughly $80 for the mirror replacement.

    An oxygen sensor could go bad before the 75k mark, but it varys from car to car. My previous Acura's oxygen sensor was replaced at 130k miles. My 99 RL was replaced at 30k miles. Not sure what the labor costs are for that.

    My right passenger door lock was sticking around 49k miles. That was fixed under warranty. Don't remember the cost but it required removing the door panel and ordering a new actuator.

    My CD changer skips sometimes now, but I think its just dirty (never been cleaned). Not sure how to clean it though short of taking it apart.

    William
  • hownowhownow Member Posts: 7
    I also have a 2000 RL, but since it's leased, I don't worry about an extended warranty.

    However, I also have a 1995 Legend, and did purchase an Acura extended warranty for it. I paid $1100 for an extra 3 years & 50,000 miles (bringing it to a total of 7 years & 100,000 miles). It has a $50 deductible.

    It's been worth it for me since I've gotten more than that amount back in repairs, all of which were in the last year or so. My feeling was that the 6th/7th year was when things would start to break down, and having the warranty protection enabled me to feel more comfortable about holding on to the car as it got older.
  • mrrogersmrrogers Member Posts: 391
    I was surfing in www.autotrader.com, and stumbled upon a 99 Acura 3.5RL at a dealer in Dallas. It is a flood car, and has 26,000 miles. He is asking $21,000 for the car. It has a salvage title. Is this a fair deal? He claims the car has light water damage in the floor area only. The car was supposedly professionally detailed and steam cleaned. All fluids have supposedly been changed and complete drive train inspections have supposedly been done. I understand the resale value will be minimal for a car with a salvage title. If I keep the car for five years, is resale a major problem?
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    I bid, ohhhh, $21.00. And that's final.

    The best thing about this deal, mrrogers, is the honesty of the dealer in telling you.

    You should be able to find a good '99 in the range of about 26-27,000 -- flood damage (my nonexpert opinion as a car buyer) should hit the value of the car by much more than $5000. My guess would be in the range of $10k at least.

    But I have some constructive suggestions, assuming your really love the car:

    *pose the same question on the "Real World Values" board here on Edmund's.
    *ask your insurance agent what s/he thinks about coverage and how it may impact that.
    *run a Carfax to see if anything else has happened to it.
    *go to an independent mechanic with the car. Ask the same question.
    *go to an independent body shop with the car. Ask the same question.

    If it were me, I'd pass if it cost any more than I'd be willing to pay for a 10 yr. old car, i.e., willing to send to salvage when done with it. If it's better, then you get some return on it that you haven't planned on. I'm not saying I'm right, but flood damage ESPECIALLY if it's saltwater, is scary.

    Good luck. Let us know what, and how, you decide.

    Joe W.
  • jmw4jmw4 Member Posts: 67
    Looks like the warranty will be worth it in the long run given some of the comments. I just extended to 7/100K for $900. My 2000 has been perfect thus far,only minor complaint is that the gas mileage could be better.
  • sburke7sburke7 Member Posts: 37
    Out of the hot blue today this light came on while driving,,,at a gas stop, while visiting a friend,,,asked him to sit in seat,,,light went off,,,got out,,,light comes back on,,,passenger side problem for sure,,,looked in manual(pg 47),,,says to re-set by sitting straight up in seat,,,did not work,,,needs a system check I am told,,,similar situation anyone??

    Thanks,

    sburke,,,
  • Kirstie_HKirstie_H Administrator Posts: 11,242
    extended deadline...

    A reporter is looking to talk with drivers of the Lincoln Navigator and the Acura 3.5 RL. If you fit this description and are willing to share your story and contact information, please respond asap no later than Friday Aug. 9 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern to jfallon@edmunds.com. Thanks!

    MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
    Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
    2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
    Review your vehicle

  • mrrogersmrrogers Member Posts: 391
    Edmund's Real World Trade-in Values to get an opinion on the water damaged 99 RL. The resale is near zero since most dealers won't touch a salvage title. Only insurance available is liability, so financing is out too. Mom used to say that if a deal sounds too good to be true, it probably isn't very good. She is still right. Thanks for your thoughtful reply!
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    Thanks for the response.

    Take care.
    Joe w.
  • goralgoral Member Posts: 149
    I generally have nothing against cars with salvage titles (owned 3 or them), but this one I probably wouldn't touch. If the price was right, maybe... But in this case, the car is way overpriced. Plus the water damage is very tricky. As far as financing goes, that's not entirely true - I've seen people get such cars financed. Also, there should not be a problem getting full coverage on these vehicles. I know this, because I had no problem with mine. As a matter of fact, one of my vehicles (Mitsu 3000GT) was stolen and the insurance (State Farm) paid it off w/o any problems (they knew up front about the title).
    As a side note - my cousin just traded in his "salvaged" '99 Lexus GS400 and got $24K for it. The dealer even signed off a release form acknowledging the fact that they knew the car was rebuilt. YMMV...
  • slhtxslhtx Member Posts: 2
    I have a 98 RL with 43k miles on it. Dealer just installed the THIRD transmission about a month ago. 4-year warranty expires Labor Day of 2002. This car has never been driven hard. Anyone else had trouble with a RL transmission, especially on a 1998?

    Any suggestions? Should I invest in an extended warranty (if so, how much will it cost), or will Acura North America take care of this given the history?

    Thanks for any advice.
  • mrrogersmrrogers Member Posts: 391
    through automatic transmissions at an alarming rate. My service advisor gave me the advice to never run in overdrive (fourth gear) unless I was on a road where I could travel above 45 miles per hour. He wanted the car in drive (third gear) to prevent the transmission from "hunting" between third and fourth gears. I realize the Acura RL is supposed to have grade logic to keep this from happening, but it might not hurt to try this. The only other thing I do is switch my cars over to synthetic ATF (automatic transmission fluid) as soon as possible. Good luck.
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    Whatever the issue is that causes the trans to self-destruct, apparently changing them out isn't going to fix it. And until they figure out where the problem is coming from, it sounds like you need to plan on a new trans every 15-20k.

    It sounds like I would certainly invest in an exteneded warranty. You don't mention, but I'd imagine that a new trans runs $1500 -- $2000 and more ... if you keep the car for 100k it could go through three more transmissions!

    Personally, I'd buy the warranty then eventually sell it, perhaps buying a new RL with the great deals being offered. Without the x-warranty, I don't think you'd get anything like a good value from buyer or dealer because of the transmission "issues."

    Again, I'd check all of this out on "REal World" here at Edmund's before doing anything.

    Good luck.
    Joe W.
  • ecarmackecarmack Member Posts: 161
    I noticed 2.9% financing on the RL and CL advertised in the paper. Does anyone know the length of the loan for this rate (I assume 36 mos)?

    Also, I have heard others mention $6,000 in dealer cash in previous years. Has this been pretty common the past couple of years at the end of the model year? I didn't know if I should expect to see the current $4,000 cash go to $6,000 shortly.
  • coosamtncoosamtn Member Posts: 47
    Joe W ... is this a tranny problem only with the 98RL, or is this a problem with all the RL's, including the 02's? Hope its not as prevalent as with the 02 TLS's.
  • l943973l943973 Member Posts: 197
    I haven't heard about a common transmission problem in the RLs. I have a 99 with roughly 90k miles on it now and its running very smoothly and I've occasionally driven it pretty hard.

    There was a recall on the 99 models for a transmission case bolt. This recall applies to 96-99 RLs and 96-98 3.2TLs. It will tell you if your car has had this fixed based on your VIN number and whats in the Acura database.

    If you haven't already, I would sign up on Acura's owners link on the acura web site. When you enter your car's VIN, it will show all recalls for your car and display maintenance schedules, car care, troubleshooting, etc. The site was recently updated and definitely worth signing up for. The old site was pretty worthless.

    -William
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    coosamtn. Never heard of it.

    Thanks, William. I forgot about that.

    Take care.
    Joe W.
  • ecarmackecarmack Member Posts: 161
    FYI..

    24 months 2.9%
    36 months 3.9%
    48 months 4.9%
  • slhtxslhtx Member Posts: 2
    Thanks for the suggestions on my 98 RL transmission. Talking with the dealer about an extended warranty. I'll also sign up on the website, although I thought I did that a couple years ago.

    Any ideas regarding what an extended warranty will cost on the 98 RL? It currently has 43k miles, and will hit 4 years in a month.
  • l943973l943973 Member Posts: 197
    sburke,

    I think I'm having the same problem with my SRS light coming on. Came on when the passenger sat down and stayed on. Going to have it checked out tomorrow morning. Did you have yours checked out yet?

    William
  • sburke7sburke7 Member Posts: 37
    William,

    Had a dealer check this,,,could not "read" the code,,,replaced the opds unit and sensor parts,,,
    part #,,,81334-sz3-a13,,,opds
    81122-sz3-a81,,,pad, r.fr.
    91566-spo-003,,,clip, back cover,,3 clips

    All covered under warranty.

    Job took most of the day,,,,I had requested a loaner for this service, I thought I would get another acura, since that is part of the purchase privilege,,,,I ended up with a chevy metro for one day,,,told me this was all they had for rental,,,that too was paid,,,I survived!

    SBurke
  • l943973l943973 Member Posts: 197
    Ok, got my car back. The code indicated a failed passenger seat belt switch. They replaced the passenger side seat belt buckle. I didn't see the SRS light until the passenger got in and put the seat belt on so it sounds right.

    I was told this was a recall item so it was covered under warranty. My 90k miles put me over the warranty but it was still free.

    They dropped me off in an MDX shuttle to my office. I had a coworker drop me off to pick up the car 3 hours later. They washed the car and vacuum the interior.
  • satiresatire Member Posts: 71
    Just traded my 99 TL for a 2002 RL (got the best deal I've ever made on a new car). I'll probably bring up other issues where the TL shines over the RL but today I've got a question. Does anyone else find the fact that you must press the close button twice to shut the moonroof as annoying as I? I realize there are far more serious problems in the world but of all the things I dislike about the RL (and they are few) this one just annoys the heck out of me. What idiot decided this was a smart idea? The manual references it as a safety issue but I defy anyone to name another car that makes you do this. I checked with the dealer and was told there was no way around it. If anyone knows differently, I will be your friend forever if you can tell me how to rid my life of this idiotic problem.

    Relentlessly,
    L
  • coosamtncoosamtn Member Posts: 47
    satire ... surely, your post is, in fact, satire. Friend, there is a way to rid your life of the moonroof problem ... trade your dull new RL back for your exciting old TL. That way you can also spare us the many other issues where your old TL outshines the RL. As information,I just traded in my 02 TLS, which I hated very much, for a beautiful new shinny shoreline mist 02 RL, and I just love it! I especially like the way the moonroof functions, and I prefer the location of its controls over the TL. I also have many other issues where the RL outshines the TL.

    Satire,It sounds like you might just be missing an old friend. So satire, since I've fixed your moonroof problem, will you now forever be MY friend?
  • 2tall4yall2tall4yall Member Posts: 3
    Following up on a question asked above: What's the chance that Acura will increase the current $4000 dealer rebate on the '02 when it expires next month? I'm not familiar with what they've done in the past, but I'd hold up on buying now if its a good bet that a bigger rebate is just around the corner.

    Anyone have the inside scoop?

    Thanks, Scott
  • mike734mike734 Member Posts: 128
    I know a guy who wants to sell me his 98 RL Navi with 130 K for $16900. I might offer him $15,500. It is in great condition with a new dealer installed transmission at 115K. He has all the records from the same dealer and I believe it will be a good car for me. I'm having trouble with the mileage and his asking price. (Kelly says it should sell for between 15.2 and 16.5) What do you think?
  • prophet2prophet2 Member Posts: 372
    That's a lot of miles for a '98, even if it might be "all-freeway." What is Edmund's TMV price as a "private party" sale, adjusted for mileage and your location? It's over $18K in my area. Prices may be lower in your region.

    Also, KBB sometimes tends to be on the high side, especially with their "Consumers Edition."
  • mike734mike734 Member Posts: 128
    For the 98 RL with 130K miles I'm looking at, Edmunds private party value is about 19K. Kelly says it should sell for 15.5K. How can there be such a dramatic difference?
  • satiresatire Member Posts: 71
    Oh just what I need coosamtn is bodacious platitudes with a large side of pabulum. I have the same RL as you and yes, I prefer it over the TL. But the TL kicked major butt on certain features. Shall I list them? Okay, here goes:

    a) previously mentioned moonroof problem (stupid, stupid, stupid sums up the RL 's moonroof)

    b) storage and power outlet instead of a cig lighter/ashtray (far more practical)

    c) six disk IN DASH CD changer would be more user friendly

    d) an alarm system that won't set itself until the trunk lid is CLOSED

    e) a smooth paint finish (big glob of paint on my hood-under the clearcoat-that I didn't notice until the next day....gonna cost Acura over $500 to repaint it)

    f) FIVE speed auto trans with better grade logic

    g) 30 more horses under the hood would certainly help and why isn't the RL a VTEC engine? I'm told it's the only engine Honda makes that isn't VTEC...true??????

    h) glove box latch farther to the left would be more convenient

    i) no in-cabin CD/CD jewel case storage (you can cram a few in the center console, but it ain't deep enough to hold more than three or four)

    j) auto headlights that actually turn themselves off (the auto on feature didn't work in the 70's and it still doesn't work right in the new RL)

    k) why does the RL need two buttons to control airflow (outside vs. recycle)

    l) "parking brake release"???? step on it to release it would be more user friendly

    m) ability to reach the power seat controls with the door closed would be a nice feature

    I admit no car is perfect. And to 90% of humanity, the above issues would mean nothing. But my point is that Honda got a lot of things right with the TL and has failed to carry them over to the RL. I have no interest whatsoever in going back to a TL as the RL is a blast and I do enjoy the fact that I'm driving a car nearly equal to the A6, 5 Series, E Class plus all the Lexus and Infinitys you want to bring up. And I got it for $36,400 (w/o navi). Throw in Honda's leasing plan and it's costing me $11 more a month than my TL. Yes, I'm happy. No, I'm not 100% happy. More like 92% happy. Fix the moonroof problem and that would increase to 96% happy.

    As for being your friend coosamtn, no thanks. In case you've missed it, I'm rather astucious.
  • kennyg5kennyg5 Member Posts: 360
    While I agree with 90% of satire's comments, I believe RL owners treasure the quality of the ride RL offers and try to ignore many of its idiosyncratic shortcomings that are not too becoming of a flagship car, not to mention the automatic tilt down feature of the passenger side rear mirror that is available on the TL but missing in the RL. Also, while the TL has undergone significant improvement in the past few years, the RL has remained rather stagnant and non-committal in transformation. For those reasons, among others, satire is now driving a mid-level luxury car that only costs $11 more per month than the luxury entry-level TL. Hey, to get 100% satisfaction, we probably will have to fork up alot more $$$. Obviously, the market and the smart consumers are pricing cars according to their attributes.
  • prophet2prophet2 Member Posts: 372
    Amen. While I'm enjoying my '96 RL, why should I open up my checkbook for a new RL unless a number of improvements are in place? Perhaps not all of the points brought up by many, but I'd like to have the following in a "flagship" sedan:

    1) 270 hp or so, whether from a V-8 or V-6;
    2) 5-speed AT (with "Manu-matic");
    3) in-dash six disc CD changer;
    4) foot-release parking brake (my Ody has it).

    I like the near-stealth ride quality, have no problem with storage (use slim CD cases), and my passengers like the rear seat room. I have no difficulty in reaching the power seat controls. The pearl white finish has been immaculate (no gobs) and other than normal wear-and-there items, I only had one oxygen sensor replaced, covered by an extended warranty purchased by the previous owner.

    The car's been a dream, not a nightmare.
  • goralgoral Member Posts: 149
    IMHO, he is asking too much for this car! 130K is 130K, no matter how you look at it. Our '96 w/ 103K is being valued @ around 10-11K (Edmunds TMV).
  • mike734mike734 Member Posts: 128
    I have agreed in principal to pay $15,200 for the 1998 RL navi with 130K miles. I think this may be a good price especially since the tranny is new. Does anybody think this is too much?
Sign In or Register to comment.