Volkswagen Jetta 2005 and earlier

1115116118120121248

Comments

  • anonymous02anonymous02 Member Posts: 1,538
    I'd say 10 years is not REAL old for a car. Maybe just old, but not REAL old.

    Most turbos probably last just under that. The motor might (should) last longer if well maintained, but you might need to have the turbo rebuilt.

    The trick is to change your oil often. Synthetics are fine, but a waste if you are changing at regular 3000 intervals.
  • fish8fish8 Member Posts: 2,282
    Thanks for the advise anonymous :-/
  • msealsmseals Member Posts: 257
    I agree, oil changes will make a big difference with a turbo. The reason is that the turbo uses the same oil to lubricate itself as the engine. If that oil is dirty and loses its viscosity, then it will be no good for the turbo. On the other hand, synthetics might actually help a turbo where anonymous is right, will do nothing for an engine that is chagned every 3k miles. I do my oil changes currently at 7500 but my friend just thinks that is tragic. I tell him that I check my oil all the time and eve still looks good when I take it in the get changed. Now that I am up there, I think I will switch to every 5000 though. I have 52k on it now, well, almost. I bought the car in Jan, 2002
  • fish8fish8 Member Posts: 2,282
    Speaking of oil changes. I looked at the oil in my loaner(I know I'm weird) and it was completely black. I would bet $ that they had never changed the oil in that thing. It had 8500 miles on it.
  • fish8fish8 Member Posts: 2,282
    52K on a brand new car?
  • anonymous02anonymous02 Member Posts: 1,538
    That is but one reason to never buy a lease or rental car.
  • fish8fish8 Member Posts: 2,282
    ??????????

    I am leasing my Jetta. Most people do not drive 50K miles per year.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Airbags, smairbags, the true safety of the Jetta lies in the great design of the car's crumple zones. The Jetta gets the highest crash ratings due to some insanely great chassis design. I was t-boned by big truck doing 40 while I rode in a 2001 Golf 1.8T. The car's superb safety design translated the energy of the impact around the passenger compartment, not into it. That's impressive. I don't feel safe in most cars after that experience...save for those German/Swede cars.
  • fish8fish8 Member Posts: 2,282
    ??????????

    I am leasing my Jetta. Most people do not drive 50K miles per year.
  • protege_fanprotege_fan Member Posts: 2,405
    Ummm...Didn't the Civic and the Impreza get 5-star ratings too? They just happen to not be German/Swede makes.
  • msealsmseals Member Posts: 257
    Fish, my car is a 2000 Civic Si right now. I am trying to sell it to get a new Jetta. I don't want a leased car or a used car either, I am too afraid to get a lemon.

    Secondly that reminds me of a funny story. I have a coworker who leases nothing but Fords because her husband works for them and they get A Plan. Well she had a Taurus as her last car and one day when we were talking she told me that she was getting something like 14-16 miles to the gallon. I said no way and then I decided to recalculate it for her. She was right! Then I asked her how she maintains her car, I said she probably needed an oil change and a tune up. I asked her when was the last time she got an oil change. She said NEVER!!! I said well, how long have you had the car? And she said its lease is almost up, she had had it for 21 months on a 24 month lease and never changed the oil. She said she never has time for that stuff and that she would do it before she turned it in. After than, I decided to never get a car off lease.
  • newcar31newcar31 Member Posts: 3,711
    You wouldn't believe how people treat leased cars. I used to work at Jiffy Lube and I saw severe neglect of leased vehicles EVERY day. I would NEVER buy an off-lease vehicle unless it was mine.
  • msealsmseals Member Posts: 257
    I would never buy a lease car even if it was mine. The whole reason I don't lease is because I drive too much. I take pride in taking car f my car, I do some stuff myself, but big stuff I have done. I could do it all myself but I don't have the time or the patience to do that. I am not a teen any more who has all weekend ot work on my car. I really want to see what the new couple and sedan look like though.
  • sarah233sarah233 Member Posts: 161
    i lease, and i treat my car really well. it's not very difficult at all, and i feel better knowing i do. i look at it like this car is going to get me through the next 3 years, so i should be nice to it. it would be a shame to treat a nice car like my jetta like crap. kind of a waste, no?
  • protege_fanprotege_fan Member Posts: 2,405
    It's a shame to treat ANY car like crap. :D
  • anonymous02anonymous02 Member Posts: 1,538
    "??????????

    I am leasing my Jetta. Most people do not drive 50K miles per year."

    I wasn't talking about the mileage, I was talking about the lack of proper care and maintenance.

    Of course, if you buy YOUR OWN car off lease, that's a different story.

    As far as not taking care of a car because you lease it and who cares...I think that is a waste of natural resources and one should be ashamed of that behavior. I am not always environmentalist, but when it comes to simple, easy, commonsense things, I guess I am.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Ah, yes the new civic and impreza both get high crash scores. Not sure about the side impact rating on them though. I know from experience the golf/jetta holds up splendidly.

    As for leases...I beat the hell out of my car. Why lie? I do. I shift at 5k RPM all the time, I enter each corner as if I'm chased and treat every driving situation as an excuse to have fun. My father always comments that I drive cars like I stole them. I do. And I'm not ashamed to admit it. Of course, I get service done on time, wait a minute before shutting off (most of the time), keep the car pretty spanking clean.

    I know I'll be rid of the 1.8T by 2004 (hopefully sooner if things work out) and I don't care what the next bum has to replace as even abused parts are going to last 45k miles I need. As long as the Jettas runs and looks good VW will take it at the end of the lease no prob. As for buyers, I know people will take it too. I just sold my 1991 Stanza beater for almost a grand more than Edmunds claims it is worth. I thrashed that car (though it looked fine and the interior/engine appeared fine), running it through all manner of strain. I do the same to the Jetta. I'm just renting it. :)
  • alyssazmomalyssazmom Member Posts: 142
    The Honda Civic (2001/2002) Sedan was given the highest marks possible for front AND side crash tests.

    As for how you drive... I'm glad I own a 5 star car in case I ever get hit by a driver like you.

    Carrie
  • fish8fish8 Member Posts: 2,282
    The true test came this morning on my drive to work. There were no rattles at all for the first half of the trip. Then I heard the infamous rattle from my dash. IT's BACK!!!

    I will try and live with it for now. It's funny......it seems as though this rattle has a life of its own. I did not hear it going home yesterday and part of this morning. It seems to come and go at will.

    I am kind of bummed!!
  • drmillhousdrmillhous Member Posts: 16
    I brought my 1.8 in for the ABS recall last week and since then, the engine feels like it has lost some power. It chugs to do what it did before. I don't think it should have anything to do with the ABS. Also I put in 91 octane last week instead of the usual 89. Could this be causing it? I would have thought the better gas would make the engine better?
  • fish8fish8 Member Posts: 2,282
    Doesn't the 1.8 require high octane?
  • protege_fanprotege_fan Member Posts: 2,405
    For the 1.8T, IIRC.
  • fish8fish8 Member Posts: 2,282
    I was on the VW site and looking at the maintenance recommendations for the 2.0 engine. They recommend oil change intervals of 5k, 10k and every 10K thereafter. Does anyone actually obide by that? I feel like every 5K is stretching it for me.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I do mine every 5K. If you keep all the papers, and them something happens to your car, VW has to pay for it anyway.

    As far as your rattle, that really sucks. Too bad it's back. If you take the car back to them, they might be able to fix it better. Or, it might be like mine and sit in the shop for weeks on end, with no one there knowing what to do with it. :(
  • protege_fanprotege_fan Member Posts: 2,405
    Doesn't the 2.0L engine have a "quirk" where it is known to use up a lot of oil? If you're not checking regualarly, you could end up in big trouble. 5K isn't bad. Isn't your engine worth it?

    I change my oil every 5000km....which is about 3000 miles. I don't think it's excessive as I want to keep my car for a long time and I'm willing to take steps necessary to ensure that I can keep it in great condition.

    Sure people say you can go longer....but there's NO harm in doing it sooner than later. Doing it later than sooner, COULD have adverse affects though.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Have you started running the AC or something? The AC does sap a little power (normal), but not alot. The ABS recall would have nothing to do with the performance of the engine. And the 91 octane should not make that much of a differece either. I always run 87 in mine, with no loss in economy or performance problems.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Actually, doing it sooner than later is a total waste of money. There was this big story in Consumer Reports magazine about people who were getting their oil changed every 3000 miles. It's a total waste of money. With the technology in engines today, they can go as far as nearly 20K without oil changes (the ones with the sensors in them). So 3K is too much of a waste to do, I think.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I noticed the other day when I drove my car in city traffic (for the first time in a long time), it really is uncomfortable. When you are in stop and go traffic, the turbo is peaking and peaking. It's really annoying. You can't get the engine in its powerband, unless you get going fast enough. With light throttle, the automatic shifts into the higher gears then hesitates in downshifting. The Tiptronic helps a little, but I still find this trait very annoying.
  • fish8fish8 Member Posts: 2,282
    I have almost 1100 miles on my 2.0 and have not experienced and oil consumption. It may be a little early to notice, but I will continue to check during my weekly car washing.
  • drmillhousdrmillhous Member Posts: 16
    The cap says 89/91. The dealer told me they had some problems early on with higher octane and not to put the 91 in. I decided to ignore that this last fill up. The problem is all the time though. On streets and on highway. The acceleration is just gone along with the smooth ride. It was enough to make me ignore the rattles and vibrations this morning. Its not the a/c either. Nothing else is running.
  • kyleknickskyleknicks Member Posts: 433
    first thing I wanna say is... this board sure gets a lot of postings... there's 300 post since the beginning of June...wow!!

    my question to you jetta folks are....

    1. there's a ABS recall on the Jetta? my gf has a 01 wolvie, does this apply to all Jettas ?? and if she never got a letter from VW, can she bring in to get the recall done?

    2. she claims that she doesn't rev the engine up when she drives so that the turbo hardly ever kicks in...therefore she doesn't have to idle for a min before turning off her car? is that not true.....and that the turbo is always on? sorry, but I don't know much about turbo's..... I have a 2k Maxima GLE...which I love. if I didn't have my Max, I would probably have bought a wolvie....actually, she likes my max better than her jetta..but there was a 5G difference.... that 5G's made her love her jetta more than a max...
  • fish8fish8 Member Posts: 2,282
    Not all Jettas are affected by the ABS recall. If your GF's car is affected she will get a notice from VW. If not, your GF's car is fine.

    Re: the Turbo. I just had a 1.8t loaner for 3 days and there is no way that the turbo is not being used while driving normally. I felt the turbo kick in between 2-3 RPM. I'm sure she goes above 2500 rpm. To me there was a lot of turbo lag until it finally kicked in, so I can't imagine the turbo not getting use.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    "I always run 87 in mine, with no loss in economy or performance problems. "

    You base that little stat on what? Sorry, just find that a tad hard to believe when it's pretty well known that if you use low octane gas high performance engines just dial back the power.

    Kyle, officially you don't need to let the 1.8T idle for a minute - the intercooler and such takes care of the engine. I only do so because I run the car hard. If she's doing normal shifting there's not much call for her to let it "cool" down.
  • protege_fanprotege_fan Member Posts: 2,405
    I never said changing oil earlier wasn't a waste of money...what I said was that it DOESN't hurt the car whereas chaning too late may.

    Doesn't matter for me...I get free oil changes for the life of my car so I don't pay anymore.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I have calculated my economy since the day I got the car, and the figures don't show a significant drop in the economy with 93 vs. 87 octane. There is some difference in the city mileage (about 2mpg I guess) it seems, but not highway. But premium gas is like 25 cents more than regular, so I use 87.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    The turbo kicks in at 1950rpm, so I know your girlfriend uses it when she drives. She might just not know it.

    If the car is still hot when you turn it off, the cooling fan will fun. I heard it doing that in mine one time. They still say, just to be safe, to let the car run 30-60 seconds before turning it off. But Blueguy is right, you usually only have to do this after running the car hard.
  • protege_fanprotege_fan Member Posts: 2,405
    If the car is still hot when you turn it off, the cooling fan will fun.
  • justinjustin Member Posts: 1,918
    not again! vocus, this time, is 100% correct. any gas over 87 octane is a waste of money, unless you are driving an Acura NSX or something. this is a VW engine. i LOVE my Jetta, as everyone knows, but it is not that high-tech. it is simple math, like Vocus says. do a test for yourself everyone :)

    cool down for turbos is not required anymore either. actually, it never really was. but the old chrysler 2.2 turbos wanted you to in the 80's for some lame reason. cool down....who ever heard of such a thing....
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    "The cap says 89/91. The dealer told me they had some problems early on with higher octane and not to put the 91 in"

    thanks for confirming what I heard from my dealer last april. not that i was told there were any problems using the 91, just that you'll get a little more peak hp at higher rpms. and that in the winter time the engine would be better off with the lower octane fuel. but doesn't your cap say 87/91, not 89/91? did wv update the gas cap sticker again?

    please, no quotes from the owner's manual. this will not be updated until the 2003 model year.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Sorry, but my manual and gas cap on my 01 admonish owners to use 91 or higher. That's what I do. The 02's are different.

    As for performance penalites, everything I've read shows that cars that requires premium fuel (such as my 01 1.8T) will in fact have retarded power when using lower octane gas. You may not agree, but the facts speak clearly. The 02's may have different flow control that allows the 1.8T to compensate for cheap fuel but I know the 01s and below don't and when an owner cheaps out, he gets decreased performance from his 1.8T.

    As for cool down, what crack are you on with this stuff about older turbos not needing a cool down? Not all turbos had intercoolers. The watercooled engines of the 1.8T help keep the engine temps in a reasonable state, but through the years companies have released turbo-charged cars without intercoolers or too small of intercoolers, thus requiring the cool down. Talk to a mechanic if you don't believe me.

    I guess it's just me but spending only $3 more per fill up each week for premium fuel seems like a small price to pay for peak HP out of the engine. A measly $156 a year.

    Lastly, when it comes to trusting who to believe...the factory or the dealer, I'll take the factory every day and twice on sunday. Dealerships are run by idiots, penny-pinchers and snakes. They know very little about the cars and can't be trusted to ever give reliable information. How often have you asked a simple question at a dealership and been given the wrong answer? I visit lots often (I was on one last night looking at a Protege5) and 95% of the time the dealership's personnel has incorrect information (or none at all).
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    you make a good point about dealers. in the case of the octane situation, the dealers supposedly received a bulletin from wv with the new guidelines. the incompetence in this case would be for the dealers not to mention the new guidelines and not point out why the gas cap sticker is different from the manual when someone drives of with their jetta. heck, my salesman didn't even notice the new sticker on the gas cap until i pointed it out to them.

    the days are starting to get in hot in wisconsin and i'm using the ac of course. sometimes when i turn the car off i get this deep hmmmmm sound that gradually disappears (4 second duration). does this have anything to do with the turbo?
  • Kirstie_HKirstie_H Administrator Posts: 11,248
    I've deleted a few off-topic and inappropriate posts.

    Cut out the generalized hyperbole & personal attacks and keep on track. Thanks.

    kirstie_h
    Roving Host
    Edmunds.com

    MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
    Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
    2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
    Review your vehicle

  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    I'm not sure why he doesn't just drag some cat with a JD to his next VW pow-wow. Guys with "esq" following their names tend to strike fear into the cold, dead hearts of corporations.

    BTW, I still can't figure out how a car company would accept a vehicle is a lemon if its only fault is rattling. In CA, from my understanding of the lemon laws, we need more than irritating noises.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I know what you mean about incompetent dealers. Don't laugh, but I just really found out my car had a trunk lock the other day. I always use the remote, and when I bought the car anyway the dealer told me there was no outside trunk lock. What a moron. I did read the owner's manual, but I must have forgotten about it, because (like I said) I always use the remote anyway. :)

    And with the hmmmmm, it's the engine fan running to cool off the engine. Mine does it sometimes too when it's pretty hot outside. Don't worry, it's normal.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Our lemon law here in MD is different. The problem has to EITHER:
    1) keep the car off the road for 30 consecutive days (mine had already done this)
    2) severely affect the value of the vehicle (what would you think about a car in the shop 8 times in 7 months when being sold???)
    3) be something that would make it fail MD inspection (which is not really that difficult).

    So I am under 2 of the 3 criteria. I just mailed a certified letter to VWoA in Michigan not more than 2 hours ago. I put everything in there about how many times the car has been in the shop, the rep's visit, his recommendations, and all that. It was like 4 pages long by the time I got one. And to think, this car is only 7 MONTHS old now. What's going to happen when it's 7 YEARS old?

    I am really thinking about talking to my lawyer about this situation. I wanna all see how long they are going to keep my car this time as well.

    Oh, also, the MD lemon law says they have to give me another "replacement vehicle" or my refund. After this experience, I will take the cash, thank you. No more VWs for me. They are comfortable, stylish, safe cars. Well assembled, they are NOT.
  • 8u6hfd8u6hfd Member Posts: 1,391
    octane
    The 1.8T, according to the manual says it requires premium (91 AKI or higher).

    But it also has knock sensors in case you put lower octane gas. This retards the timing, giving you less power, and maybe less fuel economy.

    Turbo Cool-Down
    Under normal driving (normal being light careful, somewhat granny like), a turbo cool down period is not really necessary.

    When you drive it hard, requires one. It even says it in the manual. THe harder to work the turbo, the hotter it gets. Shut the engine off, no circulating oil means the oil that is in the hot turbo will be taking all the heat punishment. This, depending on the oil, will coke the bearing, decreasing turbo performance and life. Idling the car before shutting, allows the circulating oil to cool down the turbo down to the engine operating temperature, then you shut it off.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    If you just sit with the car running for 30 seconds, like stopping then gathering your things to take with you or something, that's enough time. It's worth it to save a costly turbo rebuild down the road.
  • drmillhousdrmillhous Member Posts: 16
    "in the case of the octane situation, the dealers supposedly received a bulletin from wv with the new guidelines"

    So there is a dealer bulletin that says not to use the higher octane? Despite the gas cap?
  • target3target3 Member Posts: 155
    I called my dealer (talked to a technician in service). He was not aware of any bulletin issued relating to use of lower octane. He merely reiterated that premium (91 Octane or higher) was RECOMMENDED for peak performance.

    Interesting that the official VW site indicates the same as well, and mentions nothing of using lower octane fuel.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    >>Our lemon law here in MD is different. The problem has to EITHER:
    1) keep the car off the road for 30 consecutive days (mine had already done this)<<

    This is by your choice though...as there was nothing mechanically wrong with the car to keep it from operating.

    >>2) severely affect the value of the vehicle (what would you think about a car in the shop 8 times in 7 months when being sold???)<<

    How many times it was in the shop would have zero bearing on the resale as the buyer would not be privy to such information.

    >>3) be something that would make it fail MD inspection (which is not really that difficult).<<

    Again, there's nothing mechanically wrong with the car. Rattles may annoy you but they do not hinder the car's performance or make it unsafe to drive.

    I imagine VW will buckle when they get a letter from a lawyer but if I were them, I'd fight you the whole way. There's nothing mechanically wrong with the car and certainly nothing that would keep you from re-selling it.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.