We have temporarily turned off the ability to post while we deal with a massive spam attack. Thank you for your patience.

Saab 9-5 Sedan

1151618202144

Comments

  • rwinston2rwinston2 Member Posts: 6
    I can understand that everyone here loves their saab, and any criticism will be met with strict rebuke. But really, when someone points out facts involving a bad experience, can't some just let it lie without attacking the person? I guess not, at least on this board. I have seen the archives, and I now realize that no criticism goes unchallenged. That is all for me here.

    PS to the last poster, I serviced my car every 3-4k miles at jiffy lube because I did not want to give my car up for the entire day without a loaner. It was just on a day when I could give up my car that I thought that I would go to the dealer to claim my 20k dealer voucher. I learned my lesson for the future to go to jiffy lube for a 30 minute $25 job rather than use a dealer who charges $160 for "free service."
  • godeacsgodeacs Member Posts: 481
    I was not attacking you personally, just your blaming the dealer. Btw, mentioning the dealer by name and using the word "scam" sounds like a personal attack to me. In many cases on this forum, the dealer deserves to be criticized but not in this case. Think it's more an issue of personal responsibility....

    FTR, I owned Volvos (never owned a Saab, though almost bought one last year) for 19 yrs and never had a problem getting an oil change (though a tad more expensive...lol) from them while I waited. I wouldn't leave my car all day either for that....

    Anyway, enjoy your Saab and keep it maintained..... -)
  • bretfrazbretfraz Member Posts: 2,021
    Thanks for nothing. Your posts here helped no one except maybe the ignorant. But us more enlightened folks saw right thru your little tantrum.

    Instead of randomly dissing car dealers and other Town Hall members, maybe you should spend a little time getting to know a few regulars around here. If you had two clues to rub together you would know who here has ties to Saab and who doesn't. For the record, I have no ties whatsoever to anything Saab except for my lease payment to SFSC. Then again, you would not have made your ignorant assumptions if you knew me.

    BTW, if you don't like it here, you certainly won't like it over at Saabnet. They are much more serious.

    Yours in 9-5 love, I remain.
  • david1812david1812 Member Posts: 17
    I've owned three Saabs but never ran into a service dept. that refused service like that. I would suggest trying another dealer. I doubt that free maintenance is good at only one dealer.
  • trecchuititrecchuiti Member Posts: 8
    Whether or not you have been on this board for long or not, let's stop the personal stuff please.

    I am surprised that the Saab dealer did not do something for you when you finally brought your car in Winston. In a service industry, when you get a client, you want to keep them. Everyone has different experiences so I will share mine.

    When I got my car, it had 17k on it, a 00 9-5. I was lucky enough to ask if I should get the 20k at 20k or at 27k since, I thought they would thoroughly overhaul the car thus lengthening out the time before the next service. I was told to bring it in at 20k for the maintenance. When I asked if I had brought it in at 27k for the next service they said they would have honored the 20k at that time.

    In addition, I have received a loaner when in for service but had to ask for it.

    If it is a lesser car, I believe most of the honus belongs on the buyer. In the class of Saabs, I believe it is a symbiotic relationship and both sides need to resolve with a desire of what is fair and reasonable. If it was a top BMW or Mercedes, they better hold my hand, call me to remind me of service and have a loaner without question.

    One thing I learned while owning a 900 back in 1993 is that buying a Saab is not that expensive but the service will make up for it. A friend of mine once said that if you need to ask how much getting your Saab serviced will cost, you should not own one!

    Have a good day all and let's give each other the benefit of the doubt please?
  • peterson33peterson33 Member Posts: 24
    I am leasing a 9.3 and generally like it but I'm not sure if I want to pay $16,500 for it when the lease is up - should be under the 36,000 miles.

    I am considering a 9.5 since I find the 9.3 narrow. Not small but too cozy.

    Are 1999-2000 9.5s realiable?

    At the risk of being run off of this post I have to say that my last lube job on the 9.3 at 20,000 miles was $175. Please don't tell me that is reasonable. I only went to the dealer so that they don't kill me with fees if I trade it in.

    I'm with you rwinston2. Free or not, $175 for an oil change is NOT resonable. And my dealer never has a loaner available.
  • bmwjoebmwjoe Member Posts: 136
    I have been reading this and other boards on the 9-5 since late 1999. I have learned that the 1999 models had some issues wity the ECU and SID, but once they are replaced they seem to be reliable. The 2000 and later models did not have these problems. As far as I can read.

    I have a 2000 9-5 wagon. We love the car and it has bee reliable. Our biggest problem is an intermittent radio, which is being replaced for free.

    I don't go to the dealer for oil changes.

    Drive Safe,

    Joe
  • grandbabe28grandbabe28 Member Posts: 4
    Hello,
    I don't own a saab but am interested in buying or leasing one in the next year or so. I like the 9-5 sedan arc w/v-6. I've noticed several posts here where people have leased there car instead of buying it...what is the main reason for this? Just doing my DD.
  • smu1976smu1976 Member Posts: 110
    I have owned three Saabs, and why its best to lease is simple. Saab supplements their lease prices tremendously. You can get a Nine Five for about what it cost to lease a Maxima. My 99 9-5 SE V6 Loaded, stickered for over 37K, now is worth about 15K on Ebay. Now you have to remember, Saab discounts pretty heavy off MSRP too, so you could have bought a new 99 9-5 SE for 33K, so the depreciation is all relevant. I just don't like owning them without the bumper to bumper warranty (a 92 Saab 9000 probably put off retirement by 2 years), and three years is long enough for me in a car. My 9-5 has been my favorite car so far at age 44 though. Probably moving up to the Aero 94 (4th Saab). The new Infiniti G35 (Skyline) is creating some interest at 30K.
  • mstsscmstssc Member Posts: 89
    The Saabs are heavy depreciaters and this is probably the biggest reason for leasing. Of course you pay for this depreciation as well when leasing but when you throw in the incentives and interest rates it comes out competitive with other brands that don't depreciate as much. At least this is what happened in my case. Also, as mentioned, some people don't want to own these cars off warranty.

    The costs for oil changes published on this board puzzle me. I just had mine done at the dealer for about $80 cdn (<$50 US). Why so expensive elsewhere?
  • subbourbon91subbourbon91 Member Posts: 2
    "a 92 Saab 9000 probably put off retirement by 2 years"

    Fascinating...ours has been cheap to own, Saab was doing 0% financing w/40% down, at 137K the motorized throttle body has just croaked, in time to find a used one listed on eBay, $158, hope it's as good as claimed.
  • dskidski Member Posts: 414
    I've been away for too long I suppose.

    What's all this complaining about NOT getting a loaner car automatically? You have to be realistic in your expectations. I always get a loaner if I'm going to need it but I KNOW that I have to schedule it. Dealers can't keep an unlimited supply of loaner cars for our Every conveinence. If I failed to plan ahead on a scheduled service for a loaner.. I can't realistically expect they will have one available. If they Do.. Great.

    Plan ahead more! and if you wait until 26K for a 20K service.. accept some responsibility. We've all made similar mistakes but we don't all pass on the blame and responsibilty to someone else. As to why the service wasn't part of the "Free" package.. I can't really speak to that. If I were the dealer, I probably would have tried harder to find a middle ground if the program was not followed. But... you still have to accept some level of responsibility.

    If I were unhappy with the Dealer servic, I'd probably have an independant shop perform these services. I don't see the need to always pay for some of these service intervals that include charges for lubricating the Ash Tray and Glove Box hinges.

    So... I do have mixed emotions on the subject.
    drew
  • godeacsgodeacs Member Posts: 481
    Anyone paying that much is either getting ripped off bigtime (sorry!) or is not admitting that the dealer is doing more than just changing the oil for $160 (suspect it's the latter). Even the cost of synthetic oil (which many Saab dealers recommend) would not bring the cost up that much.

    dski - concur wholeheartedly! Personal responsibility is what it is called....
  • mstsscmstssc Member Posts: 89
    But what about the dealers that don't have loaner cars? My Saab dealer doesn't. My Volvo dealer has them but as suggested you must book ahead. I don't think any dealer will have these cars available on a moments notice.

    All I would ask of my dealer is to have the same level of service (regarding loaners) that comparable premium brands offer (ie Volvo, Lexus, BMW). Having owned a BMW before and a Volvo and Saab now, Saab service in my area is not comparable.
  • godeacsgodeacs Member Posts: 481
    from dealer to dealer. Owned Volvos for 19 yrs and could always get a loaner with prior booking (7-10 days before) at every dealer I used. Local Saab dealer provides loaners too (or will pick you up/take you back to your house). Joint Saab/Cadillac dealer so maybe that has something to do with it.

    I agree - if you're forking out that kind of money on a luxury car, a loaner SHOULD be a given...problem is Saab delaers are few and far between so if your local one doesn't have loaners , you're kind out of luck....
  • louisjamesclouisjamesc Member Posts: 3
    Couple of Thoughts

    Loaner Cars: Dealer never has them unless you book in advance. My dealer in Florida ALWAYS put me in the rental, even for an oil change. Just moved to Atlanta, they are a little tighter on giving out the loaner car. My service guy in Florida(Francis @ Lehman SAAB in Miami) told me Saab gave them up to $40 a day for rental on Warranty work. Does an oil change qualify? I don't know. Also in Miami, I only paid $30 for an oil change on a '98 9-3 and that included putting me in a loaner/rental. That was convient.
    I am taking in my wife's 2000 9-5 for the "free" oil change this week here in Atlanta, well see what happens on the loaner/rental. I'll be sure to ask for one and check their "policy"

    Leasing vs. Buying: Noticed that the Atlanta dealer here was advertising some 2001's for almost 8-9k off MSRP. Made me interested in Buying at that price, but I am in the middle of two leases. Leases are the best way to go in my opinion, they are heavily "subsidized" by Saab.
    My thought was to possibly use swaplease.com to get out of lease to buy one at that much of a discount. Has anyone used swaplease.com?

    Has anyone bought at the end of their lease? Does Saab Financial negotiate much. When I ended the lease on the '98 chase credit was negotiating hard to have me buy the car much undered the contracted lease end value.

    Random though: Love my Saab, but drove a 2002 maxima the other day, as I hit the gas pedal to dart in and out of Atlanta traffic I found my self leaning forward anticipating the kick in I was used to on my turbo. No such situitation on the v-6 Maxima, very smooth exceleration.
  • jracinejracine Member Posts: 28
    Hi,

    My 3-year lease is about to end and I am planning to simply go with the 9-5 Aero Wagon.

    Although I have yet to test drive it, I drove a 94 Aero years ago and was very impressed (I had at the time a '92 9000 SPG).

    Did any of you get the chance yet to upgrade from a 99-00 model to a '02?
  • bretfrazbretfraz Member Posts: 2,021
    Welcome to Hotlanta (which is pretty chilly right now.....)

    I'm sure you've found out that both Saab stores in town are owned by Jim Ellis. I bought mine at the Marietta store and had it serviced there a few times but am now using the Chamblee store since its so much closer to me.

    Both service depts have done a good job and both had loaners, but not huge fleets. Make sure you tell them you need a loaner when you make the appt, just in case. Chamblee had a good number of new 9-3 cabrio's to use which are a great change of pace from a 9-5 sedan. Ask for one.

    Oil Changes: After being charged $45 for a dealer oil change I've decided to do them myself. I'm using Mobil One 10W-30 and Purolater Pure One oil filters. Cost to me was under $20. Easy to do with the V6 since the filter is front and center. The V6 uses *exactly* 4.6 quarts. Only PITA was where to recycle the used oil (Advance Auto Parts and AutoZone).
  • jrosasmcjrosasmc Member Posts: 1,711
    Would it be safe to say that today's Saabs, the ones made '99 and up, are way better than the ones from the '80s? I've had many experiences with older 900s from that decade, and I can say that they were not the best-built cars of the Reagan era. I say this because Saab is a premium brand of GM now, and I've noted that their build quality and reliability beats even Cadillac these days. My mom's thinking about buying a 3-year-old 9-5 sedan.
  • peterson33peterson33 Member Posts: 24
    Why do people feel a need to preach to others when they don't know ANY of the facts. My dealer has made it clear that they would rather people take their complementary shuttle bus than give them a loaner. I brought the car in 1000 miles early and scheduled the service 10 days in advance.

    Ok, I looked closer - the 20,000 mile service is much more than an oil change. They "check" and "inspect" about a dozen different things. The only thing of any real value is that they rotate the tires.

    $172.82 for oil, air filter, rotate the tires. You guys are right that's a deal. Oh yeah, I get a cool stamp in my service booklet. What a treasure.
  • mstsscmstssc Member Posts: 89
    get the stamp if you ask nicely ;).
  • trecchuititrecchuiti Member Posts: 8
    You mean it does not get done by the dealer automatically? Just kidding!

    I would welcome a shuttle versus a loaner. Be like using Enterprise car rental.

    jros - Saabs are better than the early 90's and 80's but the service costs do kill you if you do not know what you are getting into. You need to really look into that prior to buying versus complaining afterwards.

    Like someone else said, Saabnet is a great place to get help. The people there are usually helpful and while you will have the snob respond it is usually followed by a helpful reply.

    Pete33 - I have several friends with many miles on their 9-5's from 99 and 00 with no problems at all. This is why I bought one. But lemons come in all shapes and sizes so there is no sure thing. Plus the service costs are higher than for a Geo Metro and have been that way since I can remember.
  • dskidski Member Posts: 414
    >>I brought the car in 1000 miles early and scheduled the service 10 days in advance.<<

    I'm confused. I was responding to the person who brought their car in several thousand miles PAST 20K for the 20K service and was upset that it wasn't free under the Free Service program.. Perhapse i read it wrong.

    As far as the loaner situation goes. My point was that if your dealer has loaners, you still have to expect to schedule the service at a time when there are cars available. The fact that they offer a Shuttle is an additional benefit. If I need a service quickly, it's nice to know they will provide transportation if there are no cars available. FWIW.. my dealer seems to be out about 2-3 weeks on loaner cars. It seems to me the time used to be shorter on average so I'm sure they've had to cut back on the Loaner Fleet.

    Drew
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    A major newspaper is looking to interview folks who learned how to drive stick in their adulthood, and either fell in love or hated it. Also welcome is any input on why people love to drive stick, and any unusual anecdotes about how you learned etc.

    Hope to hear from you before Feb 22 via the Talk to the Press discussion or at jfallon@edmunds.com with your thoughts and contact information.

    Thanks as always,

    Jeannine Fallon
    PR Director, Edmunds.com
  • gcederwallgcederwall Member Posts: 5
    I just bought a Saab 9-5 V6 1999 for 12 grand. I'm taking it to a dealer to have it checked out. Anything I should have them take a closer look at??? What are the biggest problems wih the high mileage 9-5's???
  • rickpctrickpct Member Posts: 71
    go to www.saabnet.com - check out the 9-5 bulletin board. biggest problem with the 99 9-5 was the "ECU" module - which was replaced under warranty.

    Other than that it's a trouble free car for most people. Be sure to do a carfax - ALSO - go to your local saab dealer and ask them to do a lookup on the vin to check the car's service/warranty history.

    for what its worth - i have a 2001 9-5 4cyl w/10K miles. Runs flawlessly. Comfortable and great on long road trips - 32mpg at an average speed of 70mph.
  • aggie76aggie76 Member Posts: 266
    Just took home a '02 9-5 Aero for extended test drive and was shocked at great performance and comfort. Had one issue with poor AM reception & ticking at low band stations on radio. Noticed that the steering wheel controls change between CD, Tape and the active AM/FM band but not between all three radio bands (FM1,FM2 and AM) - is that normal? Also wished selection for scan vs volume were reversed on the wheel, I tend to drive with left hand on wheel more than right and thumb hits those buttons easier - just realized how insignificant this sounds -- aaagh. Would like seat memory to work with key fob or at least with one-touch but think I can understand Saab's concern with safety of seat moving unintentially - would be easier with the buttons up on the door instead of on seat where us older big guys have to lean way down to hold them down.

    Love the choice to switch to recirculating air at low speeds, wife is very sensitive to smog/odors. She felt that suspension was too tight when hitting speed bumps, etc. and wants to look at Arc but I can't stand that new light wood color on the dash. Anyone with concerns/problems out there on 9-5's I should look into? What about Aero's in snow areas with standard tires, do they perform or do I need to plan on switching to snow tires in winter time?

    Any advice on pricing I should expect at dealer with the visibility package? I've heard that depreciation is real concern with Saab's and have experienced it real life with a Volvo V70 XC unless going back to the manufacturer for next vehicle.

    I was all ready to make final choice between '02 ES300 or 3.2TL-type S when I parked next to an 9-5 at the mall and decided to look closer. BTW, dealer just got an Aero with both heated and ventilated seats with the vented leather. Looks like a mid-year change in equipment.

    Anyway, I think that I just created a decision tree that added one stronger choice to the mix so advice and counsel is welcome.
  • godeacsgodeacs Member Posts: 481
    the Saab's horrific depreciation does not make it a good candidate for buying UNLESS you're gonna drive into the ground! I looked at the 9-5, Acura TL and Lexus ES too a few months back. ES is not as "sporty" but a great car. With the 2003 TLs coming out, I understand there are great deals on remaining 2002s....I'd def make that my 1st option.

    Good luck......
  • mstsscmstssc Member Posts: 89
    I guess the first question is what you would be looking for in a new car. Once the Aero comes into the comparison why not look at the other Europeans as well? The Aero is really a class above the cars you are comparing. In price too I think. I compared these cars in 2001 and went with a base 9.5. If an Aero was in my leasing budget I wouldn't even have looked at the TL-S or ES300.

    With Saab you need to buy into their different design philosophies like the ones you have mentioned, but there are many more. An example is some like the key in the middle some detest it. Will it prevent you from going with Saab, who knows. There are certainly some things I don't like but overall am very happy with my car. Yes the suspension is tight as is the steering. Some think the steering is heavy. The fact that this car is designed around the driver sold me on it.

    The Saab will definately depreciate faster than the Acura and Lexus. The Acura and Lexus would be the more conservative choice but for out and out driving the car every day the Aero will keep the smile on your face longer.
  • aggie76aggie76 Member Posts: 266
    Thanks for the response. Only reason I even looked at Aero/Arc was it caught my eye. This will be a company car so I can be flexible but have to come up with extra cash over a certain dollar point. My dollar search indicated that ES300 "market" price is around $36,000 with options I want and the 9-5 is around $37,000 with discounts so they aren't that different pricing or features/space except engine in Aero. You are right though, once driving the Aero I was hooked. Now just negotiating with spouse and will take her in today for some direct comparison of Arc to Aero to my current GS300.

    When I returned Aero yesterday the dealer had a couple new Arc's on lot with darker panel wood that the original one I saw which may be livable afterall. Interesting note, I found that Arc is rated much worse, "Worse than Average", by Intellichoice than Aero, "Average", on their Intellichoice Value Rating. I definitely am using this in my campaign with spouse. Unfortunately, ES300 is shown as "Excellent" in same rating.

    Re: Loaners - I inspected service area yesterday and discussed with service mgr, in Austin they use Saabs in demo service exclusively and with appointment will provide loaner or shuttle.
  • mstsscmstssc Member Posts: 89
    Being in Canada I don't know what Intellichoice is. My experience is that you will rarely see a recommendation from any agency, car magazine tests, consumer reports etc to go with the Saab. They just don't win 'value' ratings contests. I doubt most Saab drivers purchased/leased their Saab based on 'value'.
  • aggie76aggie76 Member Posts: 266
    Mstssc - thanks for the feedback and help. Spent yesterday a.m. at dealer looking at both Aero and Arc. Found out that there is some limited quantity of the dark wood panels that can bought to replace that lighter wood on the new Arc - may be one solution for me.

    Drove Arc but unfortunately was in the middle of heavy traffic most of the time. Would like to hear someone's experiences with the 3.0t versus the 2.4t on the Areo. Really like the look of Aero with the ventilated seats in it but ride definitely softer in Arc.

    Still would like to hear from anyone using Aero's in snowbelt with delivered tires - any issues getting around or did you replace with winter tires?

    Went over to drive ES300 right after - no comparison and boy were spouse and I disappointed. Even our '98 GS was only equal to them, not better. Would do another GS but $5-6k difference for equalizing equipment is too steep.
  • mstsscmstssc Member Posts: 89
    From what I have heard the stock tires on the Aero are not that good in snow. Should probably budget a separate set of rims and good ice radials. aggie76, I am going to direct you over to saabnet.com. Very knowledgeable Saab enthusiasts here who can help out.

    Steve
  • aerokingaeroking Member Posts: 12
    I have a 2001 Aero and can tell you I really love the car. The 2002 are much much better, both in ride and handling. The Aero comes standard with summer performance tires which are not good in the snow at all! These will need to be changed period. However I would never get any 9-5 with the v6. It is a GM sourced engine, has less power, less fuel economy,no track record for durability and is weaker and lower tech than all the competition. The Arc may have a softer suspension, but the AERO handles better and is a better car overall. The Aero is in fact a better car than most in its class if you understand the SAAB philosophy.
  • redirectorredirector Member Posts: 27
    Having just come through the decision you are making, I'll give my reasons for choosing the 2002 Arc instead.

    - Inventory & selection yielded a better overall negotiation & price. (ie, the Depreciation is 'already in' the price I paid).

    - V6 performance "at speed" -- this engine is extremely versaitile and "strong enough", and can go from 40 to 100mph in one strong, fast push. It's also 0-60 in under 8 secs, which is no slouch. The new 5sp automatic, in Sport mode, really improves response vs the 01 models.

    - Suspension on the 2002 Arc is greatly improved over the 01 9-5, much more taut and firm, but still very nice overall ride. Aero is firmer still.

    - Tires -- the all-season Michelins are rated at 400 treadwear, seemed to be a little quieter and better ride quality for my tastes. The hi-perf Aero tires, new for 2002 are still very good, are rated at 275 and are much more costly to replace, and will likely require more $$ for snow if winter traction is a high requirement. So you have an upcoming $600-1000 expense here.

    - I suppose you get this back with improved mileage, but that difference is pretty slight. It's hard to lay off the wonderful Aero throttle, so I probably would not count on much of a mpg difference, happily spending it on driving satisfaction!

    - Seats -- I loved the ventilated seats and was sorry to see them disappear from the Aero. Not sure whether they are optional now, they may in fact be. If they were an option, I might've gone with an Aero despite the above.

    - Dash -- I prefer a wood dash to the aluminum look. Just my personal taste.

    I can't speak to Aeroking's panning (actually, strong preference for the 4cyl, which is OK by me)of the V6. Many on Saabnet.com are happy with the V6 performance and quality, and I have no reason to dispute it at this point.

    Aero is the top of the food chain, Arc is for a different mission, but still very strong performance, and is probably $2-4k less at acquisition. Both are excellent choices. Good luck.
  • redirectorredirector Member Posts: 27
    By the way, Aggie..., pricing for a 9-5, worked thoroughly through negotiation, can be as low as "invoice, minus dealer cash". i think you'll do better than $37k by several thousand. I did. In december, there was a 2002 Preview promo, and they took $4k off invoice. I was one of the first 2002 buyers, so perhaps I got lucky. In Jan, the deal was $3k, not sure where it stands now.

    Also, like you, I was not a "light wood" fan, and opted for darker wood, adding a wood wheel and shifter.

    If Saab is now shipping Aeros with vented seats and Arcs with darker wood, that's very good -- shows they're being very responsive to customer feedback.

    Bottom line -- get EXACTLY what you want. You can afford it and you won't regret it.
  • aerokingaeroking Member Posts: 12
    From the perspective you expressed, I can see good reasons for someone choosing the ARC. With the improvements made to the suspension on the 2002 models, the ARC with its V6 could be a excellent, cost effective car for the person who sees the value and advantages of the 9-5. The v6 engines bad rep comes mostly from its use the the 9000 series. It may indeed turn out now to be durable. Time will tell. Your correct, many owners are happy with the v6 on SAABNET. I am somewhat of a purist, but I understand the need for Saab to produce a v6 engine. The market demands it.
  • aggie76aggie76 Member Posts: 266
    Many thanks for all the feedback. Got another curve thrown at me. Seems while I am traveling on business today my spouse went to lunch with a girlfriend in an '02 Audi A6 with fwd and came away very impressed today. Anyone dealt with comparison shopping of A6 3.0 FWD vs 9-5's recently??? Comments, suggestions. I'm doing my research tonight from the hotel but seems to be very similar on space, engine still is best in Aero.
  • gbriankgbriank Member Posts: 220
    If you live in Texas, don't worry about changing the tires out. I had a set of the performance tires on my 9-3 SE and did just fine here in Dallas. Seeing as we get very little snow and ice, it just doesn't pay to change out the tires.

    As for resale, get you car via a Smart Buy. There are extra incentives to be had if you purchase this way, not to mention if you do fall in love with the car and want to keep it you can negotiate with Chase on the buyout and get a lower interest rate!

    Glenn
  • redirectorredirector Member Posts: 27
    The 2002 A6 3.0 CVT would definitely be in the running for me. Some have not had good luck with Audi, but I owned an A4 from 98-00 and had very good luck with it in terms of reliability. Now, I had a terrible dealer service experience, and ultimately that put me off Audi in this market, and moved me to other brands (switched to MB, then to Saab).

    If I trusted the dealer, I would be inclined to look at the new A6. the upgraded engine and that Continuously Variable Transmission would be a strong combination, and I think they can price out in the mid $30's.

    Of course, Audi at its best means Quattro, but that would forego the new CVT which, in my estimation, is the Tranny of everybody's future -- better mpg, quieter, and faster than the Tiptronic and the manual, I believe. I think the CVT, while new in the US, has some in-market experience in Germany, so it might not suffer from "First year intro blues".

    And A6 was one of the first luxury vehicles to begin to build "coach quality" interiors, in 1998, at mid-lux prices.

    However, Saab does exist, and I have had outstanding value, service and performance from vehicle and dealer, so my decision is easy. Aero vs A6 3.0 FWD, to me is a no brainer -- Aero, irrespective of price. Arc vs A6, I would definitely leverage the A6 in the negotiation to ensure you get your price for the Arc, as I think you should be $2-3k less (or greater difference, depending on how many expensive Audi options you select).

    Saab also includes maintenance, like Audi, and OnStar (which, i believe audi is working to offer). Finally, in TX, Saabs are unique and distinctive, and there is something to be said for originality, too.

    So the stars shine bright in TX, and you have good choices ahead.
  • aerokingaeroking Member Posts: 12
    I had a similar decision when I got my AERO. I was torn between the Audi S4, BMW 330i, and the AERO. I felt the Audi was nice but had a heavy feel to it that was off putting. Even the new A4 has this feel. The car is very capable but does not feel lively compared to the AERO. The A6 even in FWD with the 3.0litre V6 is still a bit lethargic in its personality. The final straw was the number of nightmare experiences I found out about from recent AUDI owners, both on the net and personal friends. Saab has had its share of owners with nightmare stories to tell, but the company seems to be more focused on working these issues out than AUDI which seems arrogant and denies the existance of problems. My AERO has been virtually flawless through 12,000 miles. Drive them both and if the AUDI really blows you away, go for it. Resale value will be a little better than the 9-5 I think. But SAAB deals heavily on the 9-5 so resale may not be a big factor. Let us know what you decide. Curious
  • Kirstie_HKirstie_H Administrator Posts: 11,242
    We are looking for lawyers (any age, sex, kind of car) who are car nuts.

    Please respond by March 9 to lordusky@aol.com

    Any questions? Contact Edmunds.com PR at jfallon@edmunds.com

    Thanks!
    kirstie_h
    Roving Host
    Edmunds.com

    MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
    Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
    2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
    Review your vehicle

  • aggie76aggie76 Member Posts: 266
    Still trying to make heads or tails of 3 choices. GS300 still strong due to familiarity since I own one now but concern on rwd up north has us hesitating plus wanting something different. Audi A6 CVT or quattro has some good points but dealer attitude last week was really poor when I stopped by. Regular salesguy was out due to personal emergency and alternate acted very put-upon to show car to me. Saab 9-5 is between Arc and Aero but since vented seats are in Aero it seems the right choice for now and then change tires when weather dictates it.
  • aerokingaeroking Member Posts: 12
    In 2002, the AERO has the new sport seats with heat but not ventilation fans. The vented seats are offered only on the ARC. That's what I remember.
  • aggie76aggie76 Member Posts: 266
    You are right in that was true. However, dealer in Austin got at least two 2002 Aero's in the last two weeks with the vented seats from the Arc in them. They aren't the bolstered ones that are in the Aero but rather the perforated leather with fans. Maybe a unique deal due to heat down here but I've sat in them with my own tush so I know they came that way.

    I'm going to take Arc for extended drive today and will verify the seats again and see if I can get more info on why the Aero's came in that way.
  • aggie76aggie76 Member Posts: 266
    Well, to clarify the seating discussion. Just spent last two hours driving both Aero and Arc and have the Arc in my driveway for an overnight test with family.

    I am sold on Aero even with what is supposedly rougher ride, engine is wonderfully quick and responsive vs. the Arc. Both cars have the same ventilated seats in them. Dealer said they are now ordering all their Aero's with the vented seats unless a customer requests the spec seats due to summer heat in Texas. Being a big guy I like the unbolstered seats and the vents will be handy so I am pleased.
  • 9sunset9sunset Member Posts: 23
    Interested in pricing of this car in Toronto area.
    Anybody know any special deal or lease deal for this
    car. I am currently driving a 99 Maxima ES model, how
    will it compair?
  • im_brentwoodim_brentwood Member Posts: 4,883
    I've seen seen a few 02s at the local SAAB dealer in orlando, FL with them.

    Im a dealer and sell a lot of used SAABs so Im always in and out of their parts dept (Sick what the get for a remote...sigh..) etc.

    Maybe its a regional thing.. Even in Central FL temps in the 80s are typical even in January.

    Bill
  • aggie76aggie76 Member Posts: 266
    Well, after driving the Arc for the last 24 hours I've decided it certainly isn't the model for me. So it looks like the Aero has hit the final list for us. I couldn't find that much difference in ride, maybe its all the internal padding I carry around. I certainly could tell the difference in acceleration and "fun-to-drive" factor. Also confirmed the halogens are not available in US for flashing as brights - sort of a strange way to do it but thats our legal system so I understand.

    So final three some is down to A6, GS300 and Aero.
  • k_chuik_chui Member Posts: 20
    This car is brand new from Infiniti, the "useable" space is smaller than the Aero, but bigger than the A6 and GS300. It had been reported that it drives extremely well and MSRP at about 35k fully loaded (no ventilation seat though).
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.