Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Mazda MPV

14546485051159

Comments

  • pjd58pjd58 Member Posts: 366
    regret spending a little more money for their selection of their new pride and joy. Remember, price is soon forgotten, quality is lasting. How many long term MPV owners complain about the price of their van? Almost all rave about the ride, reliablity and features. We are fortunate as MPV owner's, to have a value priced van with out compromising QUALITY.

    My Wife and I enjoy the ride of a sedan, and the MPV is the most car-like handling van on the road today. We didn't want a Truck-like van to haul the family. We also didn't need a van the "monster size" of a Sedona, Ody, Windstar, Grand Caravan etc. Our family of 4 has more than enough room to haul all our cargo.

    Korea vs. Japan..........I'm sorry the Kia just isn't up to par.

    It's nice another van owner stops by and reminds me I made the right decision:)

    Java: Yes, you are harping, and you have every right to:)

    Pjd58
  • likaglovlikaglov Member Posts: 82
    OK, I know how to tether my 3 yr old's car seat which is forward facing, but what about my 6 month old who needs to be rear facing for the next 6 months? I obviously want him in one of the middle row captain seats, but there isn't a tether bolt and I can't find a place where one could be attached. Anybody know about this? There's nothing in the manual. The only way I can see to tether his seat would be to put it in the third row and use a middle row tether. But there's no way I could climb back there with him to get him into his seat. Thanks in advance.
  • excelent3excelent3 Member Posts: 197
    Hey Guys-

    I knew I was asking for debate when I initially posted, fair enough. I can say that I differ with some of the comments. Kia has posted record sales contrary to greater share of the market. Styling is conventional I grant you but entering into a brutal market such as the mini-van sector would lend itself to being conservative. Every review I have read and my own personal test drives have offered much different results as far as power and handling. Check out the torque range: peaks at 3500 rpms. Mileage. It is my understanding that Kia was very conservative in posting the mileage estimates. I have read every post on the Sedona Town Hall board and most experience a 24-25 mpg hwy range. Weight. Yes it is heavier (4907 lb) I believe due to the extensive steel unibody design mated to a full frame infastructure (very impressive considering I do alot of towing)it will bode very well in the scheduled crash test early 2002. The comments are very positive as far as quiet ride. You may want to check out this forum. The vast majority of complaints on the Sedona board are from frustrated potential buyers that can't find the vehicle they want. I personally was not impressed with the two MPVs I drove. Excessive road noise and an overriding "tinny" sound, steady vibration coming through the steering column, distinct lack of power. The center dash controls seemed to plastic and did not have a quality feel to me. But to each his own, we are blessed with many choices. I like the solid road feel of the Sedona and power, it has lots. It has a quality feel without comprimise. I agree it has slight front end roll but we all know that tires provided by manufacturers are NOT what you can buy on the shelf under the same name. I am confident a good set of Michelins or Yokohamas will cure this. The leather seats are first rate, as good as any European import I have owned. The hideaway rear seat no doubt will be addressed in the future, but for me it was not important. Time will tell, and like many I would rather have a great reliable vehicle vs. a great warranty. Someone has to get out on the dance floor first, and I'm going on due dilligence and faith. I believe the price will go up on these vans because of the huge demand for them, potentially making it's value increase to "charter" purchasers such as myself. For now I think for many the time is right to get a great value. The Mazda MPV is a great choice for many.The Sedona is simply another choice so why not give it a look? This was my basic premise to begin with.
  • pjd58pjd58 Member Posts: 366
    I'm glad your happy with your decision. Coming to the MPV board to try to convince us the Sedona is better, is kinda like spitting into the wind. Most MPV owners wouldn't consider a Sedona for the reasons stated in my last post(2353). I test drove a Sedona( after we bought our MPV) and found it harder to manuvuer than the MPV. It rode more like an SUV than a sedan. The interior seemed cheap and Plain Jane. What's with the gear shift position? WEIRD.

    I believe your on the wrong board. I noticed from the Sedona thread you intend to use your van for towing. Most Mpv owners could care less about towing. Try pleading your case to Windstar and DC owners since they don't seem to care about reliablity. Time will tell if the Sedona will be a great van, the 00 & 01 MPV's have proven their worth. As Elliot Ness once said " Here end of the lesson".
  • pjd58pjd58 Member Posts: 366
    I haven't attacked you. You have started throwing darts at me NOW. I have been on this board for alot longer than you. Most of the MPV owners here will agree with me on my opinions of the MPV, for that I'm sure of. If you can't take the heat move on. I don't go to your Sedonna board praising my MPV. In fact, I don't believe the MPV is the perfect van, it has glaring weaknesses just like most cars. But the Mpv is the right choice for us.

    You coming on this board serves no purpose, as you stated. If my tone is harsh, which I don't believe it is,it's because I will defend my MPV. Especially, when a Kia owner comes on this board trying to convince us we may have made a bad decision. That is the way you came across.

    My recommendation is go to another board....Example. Sedona vs blah blah blah. Or start your own Sedona vs MPV thread. Coming to the MPV owners board and expressing your vitures of the Kia over the MPV is stirring the pot.

    Read your post(2357) to me, YOU and only YOU have personally attacked me.
    I wish many happy and safe miles with your new Sedona.
    Pete(Pjd58).... a happy MPV owner
  • javadocjavadoc Member Posts: 1,167
    I don't mean to interrupt your lively conversation here, but you are in fact (imho) being disruptive to people interested in this thread. The MPV thread isn't here for the purpse for bashing fellow TownHall members, and PJ is correct, conversations like this are better served in a "vs" thread, so please feel free to start one and those interested will surely find their way into that thread. If you need assistance setting up a "Sedona-vs-MPV" thread, the TH hosts would be happy to assist you.

    /javadoc
  • alexv1nalexv1n Member Posts: 248
    I wanted to post my word yesterday but couldn't manage to find a minute and now what do I see today? :-)

    I kinda understand both excelent3 and pjd. First, I understand excelent3's original post and don't see it is "wrong" or anything to post something like this here. I don't think that his original intention was to convince onwers of MPV that they did a wrong choice to have bought it. He just wanted to prompt an alternative for people currently looking for a van and which might find MPV small or underpowered or too noisy or whatever else. Everyone decides on his/her own taste/set of preferences. For me personally the power wasn't an issue and I'd prefer handling, good looks and proven reliability over performance (even though the 2002 MPV will cover even the gap on the performance side).

    I also support pjd's original post attempting to voice his counter-opinion about the MPV vs Sedona. Everyone is entitled to his own opinion and we just need to show why WE chose MPV. It could be countless number of factors. So, let's be civilized and don't go low to pointless flame wars and insulting each other.

    I have always enjoyed friendliness of the MPV community and I really hate to read rude messages on numerous Edmunds forums whenever an "outsider" utters a word about "the other" van/car. I would like to encourage everyone to keep your temper to yourself and use educated words to solve all our controversy. That way we will be helping each other. Remember those recent ads: "Hate won't stop hate"?

    Take care and happy holidays.

    P.S. Excelent3, congratulations on your new purchase. I hope you'll enjoy your Sedona as much as I have our MPV.
  • pjd58pjd58 Member Posts: 366
    I agree with you 100%. I have been a part of this board for almost one year, and have never, never had a problem with anyone. I tried to counter, tongue in cheek, his valid points and he exploded with uncalled for ABUSE. If you reread my previous posts I NEVER was abusive to Fred. I feel sorry for someone who has to attack people when their opinion is questioned. I believe Fred is new to Town Hall and has no concept of the purpose of this forum. I suggest Fred take another look at the user agreement for the Town Hall community.

    This board is for MPV owners to share their knowledge and experience and for all of us to learn more. This board is not for a Kia owner trying to convince us we made a poor decision. As Java and I stated, Fred should start a vs.topic.

    Alex, thanks for your input.

    Pjd58....... I have very thick skin:)
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Member Posts: 647
    It seemed Fred did resort to name calling. While he may not agree with most MPV owners, it seems odd that he wouldn't expect some "static" for his choice of audiance for his Sedona vs MPV comments. However, it seems once he didn't get much support from others and did not take subtle (and not so subtle) hints that this might not be the best forum for his views, he did resort to name calling.

    Name calling and ad hominym comments are the last arguments of desperate people in the arena of ideas.

    This is still rather mild compared to the Odyssey vs XXX boards. It seems there were some serious Odyseey snobs who could not understand that intelligent people could drive and DISMISS the H.O. as a choice.

    I've never understood why people, once they've purchased, would start a Model X vs Model Y board. I could care less what my neighbor drives, just as long as he drives it well!

    IMNSHO, how one drives is far more important that what you drive.

    FWIW,

    TB
  • msgjvhmsgjvh Member Posts: 196
    Thank you for you inspirational post. Once again you have single handedly braught this board back to reality. In the words of Rodney King "Can't we all get along!".
  • tbaytbay Member Posts: 22
    I'm 29 months into my 36 month lease.
    What's hot:
    1) Good reliability with only 2 minor problems (Block heater cord shorted out and driver's window regulator needed replacing because of excessive noise)
    2) Good handling,ride and braking.
    3) Comfortable seating
    4) 3rd seat functionality
    5) Excellent dealer (Target Motors Thunder Bay Ontario Canada)
    What's not:
    1) Less than smooth shifting auto trans
    2) Acceleration (especially with AC on)
    3) Developing a fair number of interior squeaks and rattles

    Because of the drivetrain it goes to a new home in 7 months.
  • alexv1nalexv1n Member Posts: 248
    tbay, have you considered switching to 2002 after the end of the current lease? It should address at least concerns 1 and 2 for you. Just curious.
  • tbaytbay Member Posts: 22
    I might give the MPV with 3.0 a drive. From a practical/$$$ point of view I only rarely need all the space the MPV offers so am thinking to get something smaller. We also have a '99 Protege which is serving us well so a Protege 5 is in the list of possible ones. My wife drove the Tribute a few months back and liked it a lot but with the complaints of sudden stalling and the money problems at Ford I'm kinda leery. Even though this winter we've had very little snow (only an inch or so on the ground now) we've thought about having a 4WD or AWD so will give the 2002 CRV a looking over as well. The other problem here in Thunder Bay is that there's only one dealer for each make of vehicle and most of the dealers have a take it or leave it attitude, otherwise I'd look at Subaru/Toyota as well. Driving 7hrs+ to Sault Sainte Marie to comparison shop isn't my idea of a good time.
  • pjd58pjd58 Member Posts: 366
    I also have a Protege, 01 LX 2.0, it's a super car. Mazda is offering 0 for 48 on all 02 Protege 5's in my area.

    Alex is right on the money about the 02 MPV. The 5 speed tranny and 3.0 should help.

    Good luck, and Happy New Year!

    Pjd58
  • rutger3rutger3 Member Posts: 361
    To the Sedona owner:
    1.Don't judge a book by it's cover. Until the crash tests are actually done,there is no way to tell how it will do.
    2.The time you will most likely 'pay' is on resale,even more than the MPV owner. It is currently a fact that KIA's have terrible resale values.
    3.The KIA seems pretty nice and has a great price,but it is new and reliability is a total unknown.
    4. Good luck with your new vehicle.

    To the MPV owner:
    1.You too will pay some at resale time.
    2.This is mainly due to the 'perception'of an underpowered vehicle. And it is a fact that the V6 is the weakest of them all and should have been stronger.
    3.Reliability is it's strongest point.
    4.Good luck with your vehicle.
  • billmckinleybillmckinley Member Posts: 167
    Are you by any chance a judge? I swear, you're just about the most even-handed, dispassionate guy I've ever met.
    :)

    RJ
  • stone20stone20 Member Posts: 22
    I have been away. Seems interesting that people are actually fighting on this board. I agree with others on this matter. I'm personally not satisfied with my MPV, but like it?? I am looking for a Van that the back couch folds down and is a descent price. The MPV is the only Van at this time with those qualities. Any input on other choices? I need to get rid of my 2000 MPV. I am hoping the 2002 is better. Why you ask?

    1. tires bad 17k
    2. paint chipping( dealer painted the doors and front end) I bought mud guards and bug deflector.
    3. front end noise( dealer replaced caliper bolts) did not work.
    4. All vinyl replaced on outside of van by dealer ( faded).
    5. Now a new noise to the front end( I believe it is the struts) made appointment.

    I have had bad luck with this MPV. I am looking at all options right now!
    Its weird that I like the MPV so well, with all the problems I've had with my van in just 2yrs. but I am not giving up hope yet. Waiting on the 2002 for better luck!!!!!!
  • mscraig2mscraig2 Member Posts: 2
    I know it is probably here someplace, but how do you get the glovebox out to get to the cabin air filter? What screws need to come out, tricks, etc... Thanks!
  • javadocjavadoc Member Posts: 1,167
    You're on the right track. Here's how to remove the glove box...

    There should be some "stoppers" that you bend in on the inside of the box to get it loose. Basically, it's a matter of flexing the back-top of the compartment. Then, you pull the glove box toward you while pushing down, and remove what Mazda calls "Clip A" which is located on the left wall of the compartment I believe. Finally, you slide the glove box toward the driver's door (left) and the box should be free and in your capable hands.

    After you get the box out of the way, you just basically remove the cover from the filter box and pull the filter out. Carefull, I'd get a plastic bag ready for the filter just in case it's extra dirty.

    Hope that gets you thru it!

    /javadoc
  • bash125bash125 Member Posts: 2
    Does anyone know if Mazda dealers can hold back and not sell vehicles at S Plan pricing? (Ford employee pricing)I have never had a problem getting the car I wanted (Ford/Lincoln). I was reading over in the Protege'5 forum that some dealers will not sell certain cars at the S Plan price. I want to buy a 02 MPV soon after they are released so hopefully this is not true.

    Even if you don't work for Ford you may be eligible for X-Plan (which makes you eligible for the S-Plan) Check with your HR dept. Many Universities and business are partners.
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Member Posts: 647
    Dealers do not have to take a deal under such plans.

    I doubt a dealer will take my X-Plan for a new T-Bird. (I'd just sell it for the difference!)

    TB
  • bash125bash125 Member Posts: 2
    Looks like it is up to the dealer.

    Participating dealerships agree to comply with all of the terms outlined in this document, including the Red Carpet Lease Option provisions. Authorized Ford, Lincoln-Mercury, Jaguar, Volvo, Land Rover, and Mazda dealerships are encouraged, but not obligated, to participate in the New Vehicle Purchase Plan. Participating dealerships must sign a Dealer Agreement located on the New Vehicle Purchase Plan / Red Carpet Lease Option Customer / Dealer Agreement and Pricing Sheet (Attachment II) on each New Vehicle Purchase Plan sale or Red Carpet Lease.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I've been away too, stone20. I suppose I'll do some housekeeping, but it seems that the "comparison" posts have mostly been responded to with humor and restraint. Thanks, and Happy New Year, everyone.

    Steve
    Host
    SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
  • javadocjavadoc Member Posts: 1,167
    ...I restrained myself as best I could. ;-)

    Stone, I agree, but sometimes some disagreements do crop up (even in our happy MPV club here), and it's hard to just watch when someone comes and takes your Tonka toys out of your sandbox (repressed childhood issues, lol), whether they are an informed or ignorant character. I remember back in the *old* TH format, the MPV forum was lively with Ody-vs-MPV discussions, which, imho, where very interesting and entertaining. I think they also helped solidify some folks' decisions on what vans to buy or not. I think I've mellowed in my old age and tend to let it roll more than I used to.

    Happy motoring kiddos!

    /java
  • javadocjavadoc Member Posts: 1,167
    IIRC, if a dealer is agreeing to an S-Plan sell, they can still ding you with POI items (not at S-Plan prices) if they want...mudflaps, bug deflectors, pinstriping, under-coating, beaded seat covers (j/k). Still, I think if you can get a van at S-Plan, then that's great. Sometimes though, the incentives flying around turn out to be better than S-Plan, so look around for the best deal. Best of luck!

    /java
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Member Posts: 647
    IIRC, so they come off the S-Plan price.

    Dunno about financing, but think it is similar.

    TB
  • javadocjavadoc Member Posts: 1,167
    I wasn't sure, just going by what I thought I heard. If that's true, even better!

    /java
  • pjd58pjd58 Member Posts: 366
    a big THANK YOU!

    Pete(Pjd58)
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Member Posts: 647
    Taken from www.ford-trucks.com:

    X-Plan = A-Plan + 4%

    A-Plan = invoice - holdback + $25

    A-Plan factory order = invoice - holdback + $25 - wholesale assistance

    holdback = (invoice - freight) x 2%

    Here's Ford's description of the plan:

    Friends and Neighbors Program

    Plan Description

    The intent of the X-PLAN is to introduce our products to potential customers
    who are considering the purchase of competitive
    products, and to strengthen loyalty for Ford products among current Ford
    consumers, including former X-PLAN customers. In
    all cases, X-PLAN sales must be in the best interests of the Company and
    should not substitute for normal retail sales.
    X-PLAN requests must be approved for individuals only and not for companies
    or organizations. Active employees may
    approve their own X-PLAN requests using the X-PLAN System; no other
    approvals are required.

    Employees are encouraged to seek out competitive vehicle owners and solicit
    X-PLAN purchases; however, current Ford
    owners are also eligible. Active employees of the parent Company and certain
    subsidiary companies in the U.S. may sponsor
    up to four X-PLAN requests per calendar year.

    Eligibility

    Potential X-PLAN customers include:

    Former X-PLAN customers.

    Those individuals who would reasonably be expected to purchase a
    competitive vehicle if not offered this incentive.

    Excluded from eligibility are:

    Government employees and officials whose use of the plan may be
    construed as influencing a public official.
    Employees of Ford, Lincoln. Mercury, Jaguar, Mazda, Land Rover or
    Volvo dealerships.

    Note: Only employees and retirees who have access to the X-PLAN System
    via the Ford Intranet or the Internet
    (www.fordvehicleprograms.com) are eligible to sponsor X-PLAN customers

    Pricing

    X-PLAN pricing for Ford and Lincoln-Mercury products is 4% over
    the Ford A-PLAN price, which is the
    dealer's net price. For Land Rover, the formula is 4% of MSRP
    (excluding freight) added to the invoice price
    (freight included) and for Volvo 2% over A-PLAN.

    X-PLAN sales are also eligible for any applicable retail
    incentives.

    A-PLAN prices are available on the A-PLAN System.

    Leasing for Ford, Lincoln-Mercury and Volvo products is available
    through Ford Credit Red Carpet Leasing and Volvo
    Leasing only, no other leasing sources are allowed.

    Model Availability

    With the exception of Jaguar, all domestically marketed current
    model vehicles available on the A-PLAN may be
    purchased on the X-PLAN.

    The Company may, at its discretion, exclude certain high demand
    models from the X-PLAN.

    Mazda products are available under the S-PLAN.

    New, prior model year vehicles are also available, up to March 31 of
    the current model year.

    Retention

    Vehicles purchased under the X- PLAN must be titled in the name of the
    eligible participant and kept in their possession
    for 6 months.

    Process

    X-PLAN purchases require the employee sponsor to generate a Personal
    Identification Number (PIN) for each sale.
    PINs are available only through the X-PLAN System. To obtain a PIN, the
    customer's full legal name, address and
    Social Security Number are required.

    As soon as the system generates a PIN, the employee sponsor may give
    the PIN to the customer to take to the dealer if
    they wish; however, within 48 hours of a PIN being generated, a letter
    is automatically mailed to the customer with their
    PIN, instructions for completing the transaction and thanking them for
    their consideration of a Ford Motor Company
    product. No other action or approval is required on the part of the
    employee sponsor.

    SURVIVING SPOUSES ARE NOT ELIGIBLE TO SPONSOR X-PLAN CUSTOMERS.

    Note: Canada has its own Friends and Neighbors Program similar to, but
    exclusive of, the U.S. Program.

    This comes to a price that is ALWAYS a few hundred bucks below invoice. Not only that, these Plans also qualify for any cash/rebate/financing incentives
    (from FORD, not dealer rebates). That could be a few hundred or thousand bucks more below invoice. SVT vehicles (Lightning, Cobra, etc.) are NOT eligible.
  • cards_200cards_200 Member Posts: 44
    Unlike the Ford dealers, I found the Mazda dealers not too happy about dealing on the S-plan. Then when I did close my dealer stuck me with some last minute prep charges. The dealership insisted the plan allowed for this on Mazda's (not true). But Ford came through and forced them to refund after the fact. So you may want to clarify this ahead of time yourself.
  • javadocjavadoc Member Posts: 1,167
    ...always a fountain of knowledge!

    /javadoc
  • tboner1965tboner1965 Member Posts: 647
    But I have a pretty good index...

    TB
  • evaddaveevaddave Member Posts: 156
    We discovered an interesting little "feature" with the key fob over New Years' weekend. The key fob doesn't work when the engine is running.

    We were out in Western PA visiting my in-laws that weekend and it was really cold (unless you live in Canada or Alaska). My wife started up the van, grabbed the key fob, and went back inside to let the van warm up. For some crazy reason, she hit the power lock button on the door--I can count on one hand the number of times she's done that in the last 2 years--locking the doors so nobody could steal it. When we went out to the van and pushed the Unlock button on the key fob. Nothing. We pressed it some more. Still Nothing.

    So there we were, 6 hours from home with a locked van and the engine running. Fortunately I had my set of keys with me, though they were inside. We grabbed those and unlocked the driver door manually (another rare occurrance) and all was well.

    The moral of the story? The key fob doesn't work when the engine is running. Why? I don't know. Anyone have any ideas?
  • stone20stone20 Member Posts: 22
    I agree with you. It's hard to hold back, but just remember one quote my grandpa told me. " You cant best an idiot". I do enjoy this board. Thanks for all the input it does help. JL
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    2002 Mazda MPV

    Steve
    Host
    SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
  • ckmccoy5ckmccoy5 Member Posts: 24
    The fob not working while the engine runs is a major annoyance to me and a significant impediment to my purchasing another MPV. I found this out the hard way - stranded in a bank parking lot with no phone within a few miles (cell phone inside the van of course). The reason this is such a problem for me is when picking up my daughter from day care in these frozen climes, I'd like to leave the van running to keep it warm during the time I am inside. Thank God she wasn't in there during the bank snafu. There is no reason I can think of as to why this van works like this.
  • javadocjavadoc Member Posts: 1,167
    If I'm not mistaken, this is a common practice with car makers. The last five or so cars ('00 MPV, Volvo, MkI MPV, Saab, Ford Contour, and VW, the MIL's VW too) that I've owned w/factory keyless entry have done the same thing. The aftermarket remote starter/ alarm/ keyless on my Volvo now doesn't work w/the keys in the "on" position either, although I'm sure it can be wired that way.

    I'd imagine it's a safety issue, and might just stem from liability concerns, as far fetched as that may seem. However, I can see how it would look like the opposite of a safety item with what happened to you folks.

    Hope that helps, and sorry to hear that such an item is spoiling your experience w/ the van.

    /java
  • kkcymrukkcymru Member Posts: 48
    See post 4087 on the Oddyssey board. Poster wants to add remote starter and finds out key fob won't work with the engine running. My guess is that you may significantly reduce your choices if you limit yourself to vans that don't have this "feature."
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I just tried it with my '99 Quest. I cranked it and shut the door. My fob let me lock and unlock the van, which surprised me a bit.

    One time I *think* I unlocked a Nissan sedan with my fob, but the owner may have been nearby too. (I didn't hang around to investigate my theory). Maybe I should stand on some corner during rush hour and see if the panic button on my fob can set off someone's horn :-)

    Steve
    Host
    SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
  • javadocjavadoc Member Posts: 1,167
    We're all running out and buying Quests. lol Thx for the info Steve! I'll send you some slush.

    /java
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    The other thing I noticed is that I couldn't lock the van with the engine running with the door open, using the lock button on the door itself. This would have prevented ckmccoy5's problem at the bank I think.

    If it weren't after midnight here, I'd go redo my experiments.

    Steve
    Host
    SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
  • nextmoonnextmoon Member Posts: 386
    The fobs being inactivated is really a safety feature. Yes it does interferes with convience in a few instances but I don't think anyone wants their doors or trunk lids opening while in their vehicle is in operation. Or maybe someone opening your doors/trunk because you were too close to someone when they pressed their fob as may be possible from what the host has mentioned. Also, it's the vehicle that ignores the signals from the fobs when the key is in the ignition rather the fob being inactivated.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Someone offered a similar comment in the Honda Odyssey topic too. My fob doesn't open the doors or trunk, just unlocks the doors (I didn't test the panic alarm while the van was running).

    Steve
    Host
    SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
  • bob57bob57 Member Posts: 302
    I saw you sneaking over to that Sedona site. Traitor.
    Of course, I just heard about it - I wasn't there....
    :))
  • javadocjavadoc Member Posts: 1,167
    spreading good cheer, heheh. I've been lurking over there reading about their non-problems (read: denial), and [NOT] wanting one of those vans. Gosh, their fuel economy is crummy too. Enough...must find my chi (or chai...)

    /java
  • maltbmaltb Member Posts: 3,572
    of course your profile incriminates you elsewhere...

    :)
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Spin Around Town: 2002 Mazda MPV

    Steve
    Host
    SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
  • javadocjavadoc Member Posts: 1,167
    ...nmi

    /javadoc
  • bob57bob57 Member Posts: 302
    Well, I DO own both a Sienna and MPV.
    The Sienna puts you to sleep on long trips and the MPV's ashtray is too small.
    It's getting hard to complain anymore!
    Must run over to the Sedona site...
    :))
  • maltbmaltb Member Posts: 3,572
    My bad...I must have fallen asleep in class that day.

    carry on...lol
Sign In or Register to comment.