Volkswagen Passat 2005 and earlier

16465676970162

Comments

  • pkraddpkradd Member Posts: 358
    It's impossible because everybody has a different idea of what "perfect" is. It depends on ones needs, how a person drives and the money he or she wants to spend. Have fun.
  • frapzoidfrapzoid Member Posts: 127
    I have bought 4 VW's thus far...Bought my most recent one back in November of 2001. It's a Passat Wagon. Still have my 1991 GTI with over 211,000 miles on it. Heck I don't even take care of it and it still won't die...Also have a 3 series BMW but won't buy another one of those because of dealer attitude problems...
  • imprtlvrimprtlvr Member Posts: 38
    Well, I guess I should have said the Passat would be more perfect if it had more power. I know I'm not alone, I don't understand how people out there can drive cars with no power, even family cars. You know 170hp in a 3300lb car with an automatic is way too sluggish, to me anyway. Of course the W8 is coming, but for 40k I'd rather get a BMW or Lexus.

    Seems to me like automakers leave one or two things out or don't get right that alot of people want...for instance Honda not offering a manual with the V6 Accord Coupe,the new Altima with its cheap looking plastic dashboard, the Maxima's odd looking rear end..etc. Oh well...
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Have you tried the Passat with the automatic and 1.8T? I was just wondering, because it doesn't weigh much more than my Jetta 1.8T Tiptronic (maybe 1-200 lbs. more in that form), and my car has plenty of power.
  • pkraddpkradd Member Posts: 358
    I drive my Passat mostly in city conditions... not too much stop and go, but several miles between lights. I have plenty of power and on the infrequent freeway drives the turbo gives all the boost I need. I don't have the desire to have a car overpowered to the extent that I burn rubber or beat the guy next to me to the next light. Just my needs. I don't believe any review of the new Passat complains about lack of power. Customers seem to agree what with sales year over year being up. My opinion anyway.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I personally like to have a little power for playing around sometimes from light to light, but the 1.8T Tiptronic Jetta I have has plenty of power for just about anything. I went over a mountain a couple weeks ago in Maryland, and it didn't even stress the car. I hardly had to push the gas down a little more to get up the side of it. I was surprised.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    As a matter of fact, they said in the Edmunds' review of the 2001.5 model that there was hardly a need for the V6 engine over the 1.8T.
  • caw103caw103 Member Posts: 63
    I wouldn't mind some more power either. I have no real qualms about it when accelerating from say 40mph to 80mph, but from 0-40 there's a lot of room for improvement.

    pkradd,
    What city do you drive in where the distance between lights is measured in miles?
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    You could always put the chip in it for more power. The 1.8T is one of the most easily chipped engines on the market.
  • imprtlvrimprtlvr Member Posts: 38
    Yea, at lower speeds that's where it's slower b/c of the only 166 ft/lbs of torque. I guess I'm just somebody who has to have the rush of power in any car, the 0-60 in the 4 cylinder with automatic is about 8.5, a little quicker with the manual. That's pretty bad compared to the 3.5 Altima, which is 6.2 (Mustang GT fast).
    The Passat with 1.8T and tiptronic is what's slowest when it's in pure automatic mode.
    I posted the chip question several weeks back and on other VW sites, some people said it's worth it, others said that it takes more than just the chip, you have to get the whole electronic module it plugs into also, all told it's over $1500. That's because supposedly the dealer can detect the boost difference and thus void your warranty if you only have the chip without the new control module. Plus chipping it adds heat and wear to the engine.
  • barkasy1barkasy1 Member Posts: 44
  • barkasy1barkasy1 Member Posts: 44
    Hi All,
    Oops...Can anyone tell me what the Tiptronic Passat 2.8L V6's RPM's are at 80 mph? That is my normal highway speed here in Florida (posted speed limits here are 70 mph). The 1.8T seems to be at around 4,000 RPM's at 80 mph which I think may annoy me after a while on the frequent long trips I take. I need a good highway driver.

    Thax, Dave ;^)
  • subzero206subzero206 Member Posts: 111
    hey i have a camry right now considering the passat. i want to hear from owners who went from honda/toyota to the passat did your insurance go higher or lower or stay the same? thanks
  • cary7cary7 Member Posts: 2
    I am buying a Passat within the next few days. Test drove the 1.8T...will test the V6 tomorrow. Anybody have any advice on which to get?
    Cary
  • merckxmerckx Member Posts: 565
    I chose the 5spd. 1.8t,and it's a 2001 with 20 less hp,supossedly. The six seems to have a slightly more problematic reputation. I can't stand all the interior wood that comes with it(I think it dates an otherwise very modern design).It's a little pricey.
    On the other hand,it does rather transform the car. Smoother,doesn't throb at idle,etc.
    The only time power(torque)is an issue is at take off,before the turbo spools up.
    The lighter engine lends a sprightly feel to cornering-it's very nimble.
    Overall,I'd say go with the 4 cylinder.
  • pkraddpkradd Member Posts: 358
    You'll also get better mileage.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    The Altima does have more power, but it's more sporty than the Passat as well. It also has an interior made of cheap plastic trash. They spent all the money on the engine, where VW dispursed their money more evenly on the Passat to make the whole car good.

    Insurance: I got a 2002 Jetta 1.8T to replace my 2001 Mazda Protege ES. My insurance went up by $20 a month or something like that. The Passat will probably be more expensive to insure, because replacement parts for it are more expensive.
  • charles15charles15 Member Posts: 57
    Remember that the Passat is a European sedan. I lived in Germany and drove the autobahn for 6 years. Over there they want a car that can stay out in the fast lane and cruise all day above 100mph. The Passat would do that easily. Germans really don't care about going ligh to light - if you did that in a city there they would take your car driving liscence and make you drive a moped -same as for DWI. I test drove the Maxima and layed rubber out of the dealership- scaring the hell out of my wife. Could not get by the rear appearance of that car or the interior of its new sibling the Altima. For me the Passat is the total package if the long term reliability remains above average. I have had six VWs and have had my share of problems. We will see if they finally have it right.
  • txguy67txguy67 Member Posts: 31
    Hello All! I just bought my first Passat (Sage Green/Grey leater) and from the postings I've read so far...IT'S A GREAT VEHICLE!!
    The only problem I'm having is programming my homelink system to recognize my "rolling code" garage door opener.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks
    JJR
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Know what you mean about the appearances of the Maxima and Altima. The cheap interior of the Altima turned me as well. The Passat looks like a much more expensive vehicle inside.

    I had a Maxima rental when my Jetta was in the shop (a 2002 SE), and didn't like it that much. The driver's seat was uncomfortable to me for some reason, and the amount of engine power was not "controlled" right. The wheels spun too easily, I wanted traction control and thought it should be standard.

    I am taking my Jetta in again and this time they said I might get a Passat loaner. If I do, I will give my opinion of it tomorrow. I hope so, because I have loved these cars since the 1998 redesign. But prefer the 1998-00 styling to the current. It's growing on me though. :)
  • georgek44georgek44 Member Posts: 81
    The reason German cars ride and handle the way they do is that the people who design them may well drive at 125-150mph each day during their morning and evening commutes.

    At those speeds, on roads which are not any better than a newly-paved Interstate here in the USA, you do not drink coffee, put on makeup, read the newspaper or shave while driving. That probably explains why German car designers "just don't get it" when it comes to providing decent cupholders.

    I can recall being relegated to the middle lane on autobahns, keeping my 3 Series BMW flat out at 120 mph or so, and watching 7 Series', big Mercs and 911's zip past me as though I were stnding still. The slow lane would be clogged with 900cc cars straining to maintain 95 mph.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    One thing I want to do before I die is to drive on the Autobahn just ONE time! :) I have had my Jetta up to 120mph on an empty interstate road once. It handled great too. The Protege (before the Jetta) would start feeling unsafe and unstable at around 100mph. The Jetta was ready for more. :)
  • pkraddpkradd Member Posts: 358
    They did get it right in the new Passat though!
  • yakovshapyakovshap Member Posts: 1
    I don't know about 2.8 V6, but I have on my 1.8T with auto RPM 2800-3000 at speed 80-85 miles.
  • iamwhoamiamwhoam Member Posts: 23
    I think that the Audi versus VW branding by manipulating what is available on either line is by the book correct but fails the real world test.

    If VW and Audi were the only brands, or the dominant brands, then it could work. They are both competing against BMW, and VW competes against the Toyotas and Nissans also. VW reluctance to put 5speed manuals in the high end Passats, or a better engine than the current 2.8L V-6 is rather short sighted. A Nissan Altima has 255hp, heck I think Camary's have more power than the Passat now. VW should be looking at taking people out of Japanese cars, and not worry about the canabalization from Audi.

    If Audi is going to be performance and VW is going to be "prestige" I think that plan throws away the large public perception of Golfs and Jettas.

    The people who are really going to buy an Audi, versus the people who say they are going to buy and Audi are not going to be influenced by VW to a large degree.

    Let the brands fight it out, and try to disguise the difference between them when you can. Bring on the Passat 3.0 4-motion 5 speeds, the 4motion blown VR6 jettas, and the rumored 400hp GTIs.

    Don't look at the car market as a zero sum game between Audi and VW, but the opportunity to do a differentiated sales versus the Japanese and missing American sports sedans.

    Of course this is my $0.02 versus Piech's billions invested.
  • hoodornamenthoodornament Member Posts: 114
    I think we are dramatizing a bit here on this board, I drove on the Autobahn from Dusseldorf en route to Amsterdam 3 times, The slow lane does not travel at avg 95mph, Driving a Jetta at 125mph??? Yikes,
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Member Posts: 5,343
    I couldn't agree more -- even though I "appreciate" what Audi and VW (of America, at least) are trying to do with the image of their cars.

    The Passat W8 "ought" to blow away the competition it is so "cheap" -- but that does mean that some Audi shoppers will drive off the lot, NOT in their new A4 3.0's (for $38,000) but in their new Passat W8's for about the same money.

    I have driven Passats and Audi's (2001 models). The Passat was a GLX 4Motion -- what a nice car -- and it was, from a POWER standpoint, underwhelming. Next, I drove a 1.8T A4 manual with sport package (about the same price had fewer amenities and creature comforts) the 1.8T was the winner -- although I wonder if the 2.8 Passat had had a sport suspension and a manual transmission (and at cost would have probably not required any change to the MSRP on the Passat) if it would not have been the prefered ride? Not given the choice, my friend (who I was helping to evaluate cars with) bought the Audi. In this case, VW was hurt by Audi.

    The W8 will, I think, hurt Audi this time around -- but like you said it is only my $.02 worth.
  • georgek44georgek44 Member Posts: 81
    which autobahn and when. It is not uncommon for the "slow lane" to be moving along at 100 mph under conditions of light traffic and few tourists. At other times it is creep and crawl, stop and go as on any other road in heavy traffic. In July and August, when families of four and all their camping supplies squeeze into the family car, traffic can slow down a great deal, particularly when many of the family cars are under-one liter econoboxes.
  • caw103caw103 Member Posts: 63
    Went from a Camry LE (4cyl) to the Passat GLS loaded and insurance increased by $50 per 6 mo period. All my other choices Maxima, Avalon, Accord V6, Camry V6 and 300M were all about $100 higher for the same period. That's not why I chose the Passat, but I was surprised. I assume the others were all higher because they have V6's.
  • caw103caw103 Member Posts: 63
    I'll jump in and agree that the new W8 Passat will hurt Audi. I'm willing to bet that the entire allotment of W8's will sell in the US but I don't think the customers will be people who weren't already inclined to buy a VW/Audi. A W8 sale will come at the expense of Audi's and V6 Passats more than other brands. VW/Audi loyalists can't even be counted on to buy the $70K Phaeton, not when Audi can't even convince them to buy their A8's and S8's.

    The dealerships would have to be completely overhauled. The difference between the Infiniti dealership and the VW dealerships I frequent are night and day. I don't expect much from the VW service because the Passat, although it's very nice, is not a luxury car. For over $35K I want more. Like the free repairs to small dings and hand car washes available anytime I choose, the free loaners when car is serviced, the ice cream and coffee bar when I'm waiting (especially the ice cream). Basically all the convenience and pampering associated with luxury autos is not present in the VW experience. If VW wants to compete with Mercedes they have to do more than design a competent vehicle. That's why I wouldn't buy a $35K plus VW ... at least not now.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    The VW dealer I go to has free coffee, the waiting area has cable TV and magazines, and they will give you a free loaner car as well. They also do car washes (not by hand though). This is a remodeled VW dealership though, so maybe that's where they are heading in the future.
  • hoodornamenthoodornament Member Posts: 114
    Wondering if any Passat owners that have the rear sunshade (I think leather owners get it) have a problem keeping it fastened to the ceiling above the rear headrests. Mine will slam shut when I go over a big bump. There is a little clip in the center of the sunshade, but the clip looks like it is intended to keep the sunshade from folding into the roof's cloth (a guess). The poles that fasten the sunshade just dont seem long enough, and it doesnt appear that they are adjustable.

    Thanks in advance
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Since it slams shut when you go over a bump, maybe it's that the clips holding it aren't bent enough or something. Worth looking into.
  • hoodornamenthoodornament Member Posts: 114
    Just wondering why anyone would care if Audi loses marketshare to a higher end VW auto. In the end, the money all goes into the same bucket anyway no ?? I dont know the organizational structure of the 2 companies, but I would think if they have separate design/engineering teams, wouldnt increased competition be good for every consumer whether it be within the company or other auto makers ?? As I understand it, Audi's have minor differences to VW, whether it be better suspensions, minor style differences, etc. But arent people paying a premium for a "hood ornament" when they are buying an Audi, or put another way, is the $5-7k extra you pay for a loaded A4 over something between a Jetta and Passat largely for this hood ornament ? An extra $5-7k doesn't enter the value equation when all I get extra is free ice cream, a loaner car, and 3 circles on my front grille. Maybe I need to drive an Audi for more than 5 minutes to see the big difference.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I never looked at Audi until the other weekend at the NYIAS. I sat in an A4 3.0 Quattro, and did not like it. It felt tight inside, where my Jetta is roomy. And it cost like $40K as well! That's TOO much for that size of car.

    And I don't know the big deal about free loaner cars. My VW dealership (2 of them, actually) always gave/give me a free loaner, except for scheduled maintenance.
  • iamwhoamiamwhoam Member Posts: 23
    Thanks for everyones responses. I think in a nut shell what I was trying to say is that VW can't hold back just because they don't want to hurt Audi. That is kind of an arogant view to have considering it seems like Toyota, Infinity (G35 260hp), Lexus (IS300) and Acura (TL type S) swing for the fences with every car they bring out. If management thinks they can dumb down VW and still compete, I think they are wrong.

    I wanted a Passat BAD two years ago and but I bought a Jeep Grand Cherokee. Why? A VW dealer that made the word "sleazy" blush (and I'm in sales), and the lack of a manual tranny on an underpowered (190hp) 4motion GLX. They had me baby, and I never even looked at Audi's. They just weren't able to close the deal. Heck I read this forum because I still like the cars.

    VW, swing for the fences or go for the tall May pole or whatever you guys do.
  • pkraddpkradd Member Posts: 358
    It comes with the lux package on the GLS. Make sure the right and left ends are positioned to hook on to the clips. I think there is some leeway there. The dealer should be able to adjust it for you if you can't I'm sure. (Also try not to go over bumps!)
  • cary7cary7 Member Posts: 2
    Anyone have the 1.8T and wished they'd gotten the V6? Do you have to change the oil more often with the turbo?
  • lkuav8rlkuav8r Member Posts: 16
    are they offering a sport package for '03. In comparing the jetta sport luxury with the passat, the jetta seems to have more ...something...
  • pkraddpkradd Member Posts: 358
    Manual says every 5000 miles on the 1.8T. Since I don't drive the car too harshly, that's what I do. No problems with 2 oil changes so far.
  • lkuav8rlkuav8r Member Posts: 16
    i know i'm asking for it! thoughts on 1.8T vs 352i?
  • robby818robby818 Member Posts: 1
    Does anyone know the name of tle light metallic green color I've seen on a number of Passats? It resembles a light metallic grey w/ a touch of green. I hope that it is still offered on the 2003 models.
  • lkuav8rlkuav8r Member Posts: 16
    is fresno green i believe
  • frapzoidfrapzoid Member Posts: 127
    I know the question you asked was about owners of the 1.8T wishing they had bought the V6. I originally had intended to buy the 1.8. I test drove all the different tranny/engine combinations and fell in love with the V6 with stick. V6/stick and 1.8 stick are the best combinations. Tip/V6 is ok but the one I really didn't like at all was the Tip/1.8 combination. Besides that combination weighs more than my Passat does. V6 is so quiet and smooth compared to the 1.8. But I love that 1.8 engine too. Try them both out and decide. The 1.8 has zip but the V6 has torque and having the stick with the V6 is just what I wanted.
  • frapzoidfrapzoid Member Posts: 127
    I have not regretted getting the V6...
  • vwguildvwguild Member Posts: 1,620
    color is actually FRESCO GREEN...
  • pkraddpkradd Member Posts: 358
    It's all a matter of preference. Get what YOU want, not what others say. For every supporter of the V6 there are just as many who like the 1.8. I have the 1.8T. It suits my needs perfectly.
  • vbi4vbi4 Member Posts: 29
    I will be taking delivery of my GLX in a day or two as soon as I get the insurance coverage and the dealer completes the DMV formalities. Meanwhile, can some of you suggest the things I should look for at the time of taking delivery. I know there is a PDI checklist and though the dealer would have checked most of them, I plan to confirm those once again anyway. I have read some posts about 4 character codes /keys that are located in the trunk and that they are required for changing tires, etc. Do I need to specifically "check" anything with those codes, if at all I can. Also, the MSRP sticker. Is it supposed to be given to the buyer? Should it be on the car at the time of taking delivery? What is the significance of it being there or implications of it not being there?

    Thank you for taking the time to share the information.
  • lkuav8rlkuav8r Member Posts: 16
    Hi,

    I recently test drove a jetta, and brought my infant's child seat. The fit was too tight in the back center. It looked like I would have to move the front seat everytime I took the baby in/out. Comparing notes on the jetta board showed that owners backed this up (too tight). So, I started looking at the passat. Looks more roomy, but after doing the comparison is only 1.7" more legroom. Anybody use this car with a child seat?

    Thanks!
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I had promised a Passat review today if I got one as a loaner. My 2002 Jetta 1.8T is in the shop for a repair, and they gave me a 2001 (old style) Passat GLS V6 Tiptronic.

    The car is very nicely appointed inside, looks more expensive than it is. Seats very comfortable, but I prefer leather to cloth (just me). Found the perfect position within seconds behind the wheel. Only thing is the old cupholder, they SUCK! That's taken care of in the 2001.5-2 models though. And also, I couldn't find anywhere to stash my cell phone (ended up putting it in the storage box under the radio because there is no CD player). (That's another thing, no CD player, but I know they come with one now.) Controls much the same as my Jetta, except everything's a little higher up in the center stack. Love the gained interior room though. Went out with a friend and her kids, and it was much easier loading them into the Passat than my car.

    Power: The engine has good power, even with the AC on, but the thorttle isn't as "touchy" as mine is. One little tap on mine, and it's OFF! Not so with the Passat, which I can understand, seeing as it's a family car. Acceleration is good from the V6 though, but I don't see a huge difference from it vs. the turbo, except for fuel eocnomy. The trip computer says I am averaging like 20mpg or something (I usually get 24 or so with my 1.8T Jetta). Handling is pretty good, except for the body roll (still not that bad though). The tires (this one has 15" tires and wheel covers) SUCK! They squeal in every little turn. I advise Passat buyers to upgrade to a larger tire than standard, definitely. The ride is VERY nice, alot softer than my Sport Pkg. Jetta is. I like it alot.

    If this is how the "old" model drove, how is the new model? Has anyone driven both, and can compare the two for me? Just wondering. The Passat will more than likely be my next car, when the Jetta is retired (not for awhile though, like 06 or something).
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.