Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Oldsmobile Intrigue

15556586061238

Comments

  • wmatystiwmatysti Member Posts: 15
    I'm looking to give a new face to my black 2000 GL. I was considering anything from tints, to rain guards, to mudflaps and installing and HID Conversion kit for the headlights. Any suggestions?? I want to make it a little more youthfull looking-- it you get the idea.
  • redly_oneredly_one Member Posts: 122
    Intrigue ranked in the middle of the pack tied for 114th place out of 194 with 160 problems per 100 vehicles By Model.

    Link - http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=3671

    Frightening thing was, there were a lot of chrysler products in line ahead of it
  • wmatystiwmatysti Member Posts: 15
    I'm looking to give a new face to my black 2000 GL. I was considering anything from tints, to rain guards, to mudflaps and installing and HID Conversion kit for the headlights. Any suggestions?? I want to make it a little more youthfull looking-- it you get the idea.
  • dwgdwg Member Posts: 43
    et: You might be next to disappear with seditious comments like that. It is too bad that 1415 got banned for his excessive political commentary (I know I enjoyed it), but I'm glad to hear he is at peace with himself after another Intrigue purchase.

    As for me, nothing new to report on the '00 GLS. I still have the occasional rumbling sound coming from the front end and still notice the feed back through the steering wheel, but neither impedes the performance of the car.

    I am apparently in the minority but every time I look at my Intrigue I think it is one of the best looking mid size cars on the road -- certainly the best in GM's stable.

    I read today in Automotive News that GM is going to streamline the Buick and Pontiac offerings next. Buick is supposedly in line for a mid-lux entry in the 2005 model year. That might compare to the Intrigue but I'll have a new car before the '05 model year. Typical GM -- a day late and a dollar short. Can that company survive?

    Back to lurking.

    dwg
  • swagledswagled Member Posts: 195
    I have to admit, several times I've taken a second glance at other sharp looking cars on the road, and realized they were Intrigues of a different color than mine.

    Among the many considerations I had when I bought a car, was that I planned to use it for a decade... and didn't want something frumpy looking far into the future. (I think the best mistaken compliment I ever got was someone who asked me if I was driving a Jaguar!)

    Most $20K+ cars seem to age well. But cheap humdrum cars from the 80's like Ford Tempos and Isuzu I-Marks, look even dumpier and klutzier than they ever did.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    Did you read my post #2844? GM is forgiving the remaining lease payments if you buy a new car between June 1 and July 15th.

    This is for cars who's leases mature by March 31,2002. Mine is March 22, 2002 so i fall within the guidelines.

    My Chevy dealer is looking for an imapala for me right now.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    If you are looking to get a 3800 powered car, why not get a Grand Prix GT? The handling would be better than the Impala. Just a thought.

    etharmon : careful indeed in what you say. You could be next.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    I second that. I would definitely delete that post if i were you.
  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    It looks like "Ronnie" and the boys at GM might have learned something after all with their botch-up of Oldsmobile.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    GM will be phasing out and consolidating its mid size models. The regal and or the century may go away in favor of the grand prix. The park avenue is leaving us also.
    www.automotivenews.com
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I think the Century is toast soon. I always thought the 2 models were too close in price and size. I also think the Bonneville will also be gone soon. These moves would trim and not really effect over all sales much.
  • jgriffjgriff Member Posts: 362
    redly_one :: Is that middle of the pack the top 60% or the bottom 40% ?? Just kidding, people chill, chill.

    I'm really surprise of the vehicles that are around the 80-120 mark. For one the, MDX has the same 114 ranking as the Intrigue and one has to wait 6 months, and must pay MSRP [34-40k] or more for one of those puppies. Anyway it just goes to show everyone, that it is pretty tough to produce a perfect vehicle, day-in and day-out.

    I have never really looked too hard at Buick lineup [a bit too AARP like], but they must be doing something right cause they have got 3 in the TOP-40. Maybe I should have at least test driven a couple, the Regal might have done the trick.

    Strange I have always had a problem with car company plastering car badges on the sides of the cars, as if they needed to advertise on all 4 sides. Granted the first year Intrigue had virtually NO markings, which was TOO little, but that *clean-look* was one of its appeals of the car to me.
  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    I posted that link on the Regal forum but they didn't seem to concerned. They probably feel the Regal will live on though they do feel the Century should go. If GM stays true to form and goes through with it, I think the Grand Prix might win out if it comes down to a toss up btwn the two cars. The Regal GS is a direct competetor with the Grand Prix-- performance wise. If I had it my way, I'd keep the Regal. For the conservative group, they could still buy the LS model. For performance freaks, offer the GS and drop the Grand Prix.

    For the record, I'd get a GS over an LS everyday.
  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    I've been tossing the idea around the idea of putting HID on my Intrigue. I also got a quote for custom leather just like in the OSV from Classic Soft Trim--$1,300 to replace my cloth. And that includes installation, two-tone leather and Oldsmobile logo in the seats. And they have regional installation shops and authorized shops around the country. Don't know about locations up north.


    This is the link b4z gave us a while back: http://www.cstdi.com/Leather/Oldsmobile/Intrigue.asp#Data .


    I also want to get ground effects. Because of the mileage and the fact I purchased my Intrigue only 2 years ago, I won't be able to trade it in anywhere near a profit for two more years at best. So since I'm having no problems I figure I'll make the mods and keep it after I'm finished paying for it. Then (and maybe sooner) I want to enter it in local car shows.


    Would you believe the wife recommended keeping and modifying the Intrigue as a hobby? Hahaha! It's not all benevolent. That means there's more cash left over to get her the automotive toy she wants :-)

  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    Ain't she beautiful?
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    2002's will have two seperate two tone leather options in addition to the grey and neutral.
  • lee18lee18 Member Posts: 45
    Buick has always been the highest G.M. division, after Cadillac, for quality on J.D. Power surveys, both initial and long term quality.

    Now 3 of 4 Buick models are very close to Camry and Accord.

    Unfortunately, Buick models interest me the least of any G.M. products.

    Maybe they should send Olds designers over to Buick, instead of abandoning Buick.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    The only Buick I would consider is the new Rendezvous. I have a growing family and we will need a larger vehicle at some point. Rendezvous is apparently very good and well built. I have not seen a production model yet.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    I haven driven a new 2002 Rendezvous. The vehicle is very nice (Specially the interior layout, design and materials). It feels much more expensive of what it really is. The exterior lines are nice but from the rear three quarters angle you can tell that this 'SUV' is actually a spinoff of the GM Minivans.

    Power output is OK for the 3400 V6, but this vehicle really needs the punch of the 3800 V6 or any other livier GM powerplant.

    Really nice car, but sticker price is pretty steep IMO. For Aztek haters, the Rendezvous is the clear alternative.

    Build quality is great in and out.

    It just needs a beefier engine.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    I am 29 years old and I love the Park Avenue. Had a chance to test drive it and it was a very good handling large sedan....smooth as silk. very expensive, but a really nice luxo vehicle nevertheless.

    I drove the Regal GS and it was a fun experience.

    The Century wasn't that bad, but I will never buy one.

    I don't care for the LeSabre as I prefer the G-body sisters, the Bonneville and Aurora.

    Buick has a bad problem with their AARP image. But the quality of their products is very good. A little tweaking here and there should produce very interesting Buick vehicles in the future.

    I, however, still prefer my 2001 Impala LS. Glad to see that Chevrolet's initial quality J.D. power indexes have improved for 2001. My '01 Impala LS is a testimony of such quality control improvements.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Base price here on the Rendezvous CX is C$31K which is comparable to a high end Escape or CR-V. I figure in a few months one could be had for around C$28K with some financing deals. I think the 3.4L is ok in the Montana so I'm figuring on comparable power.
  • L8_ApexL8_Apex Member Posts: 187
    ...the discussion management are welcomed off-line.

    Thanks,

    L8_Apex
    Host
    Sedans Message Board
  • redline65redline65 Member Posts: 693
    I've seen an Intrigue on the road with ground effects. I thought it looked very sharp.

    I saw my first taxi-cab Intrigue yesterday. My apologies to teo for giving you crap about taxi-cab Impalas.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    LOL!
  • vcjumpervcjumper Member Posts: 1,110
    Check out the 2002 Sonata rear end. Those taillights looks pretty familiar, and I don't see the brand name spelled out anywhere.

    2002 Sonata
  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    Hyundai is really starting to look good these days. That 2002 Sonata looks a whole lot like the new Jag X-Type. Now if their powertrains improve, I think they'll be a heavy hitter. They've got the styling thing down.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Hyundais may look better than they used to but I would stay away. I don't know anyone who owned one who would ever buy one again. Further, while most their cars do look better they all look like knock offs of something else. Very little in the way of original designs.
  • redline65redline65 Member Posts: 693
    Hyundai and Kia both seem to enjoy ripping-off designs. The XG300 is solid proof of that. But you don't see any cars on the road that look like the Hyundai Tiburon. It's like the Aztek, original and ugly.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Boy it sure is quiet around here.

    Anyone see that GM is producing smaller variants of the GMC I-6. I wonder if one of these will end up in the next generation Grand Prix/Regal?
  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    Where did you read that? Would certainly give them a leg up in refinement over the imports.
  • vcjumpervcjumper Member Posts: 1,110
    This is the 3.7L I thought I heard about, not a larger Shortstar.
  • swagledswagled Member Posts: 195
    Depends on what RWD vehicles GM makes. Will the F-body be replaced by a RWD powertrain? I6 isn't the best configuration for FWD. (Although I think Volvo has shoehorned one into a FWD car before.)

    I'm not even bothering to accrue GM credits anymore on my card. But if GM makes an I6 RWD car, I might be interested... and start piling them up again. (Gee, does that make me fogey-sounding?)

    But, I really do think RWD is more fun to drive. One of the things I liked about the Intrigue was that it was a fairly powerful FWD car without torque steer. Even the 4 banger Alero had too much torque steer for my tastes.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I was reading about the I-6 in another forum. Of course, now I can't find where the posts were. If anyone knows more, please post. As I recall, the person talking about it said there will be 2 new smaller versions of the 4.2L I-6. If true, it's very exciting!
  • one2oneone2one Member Posts: 626
    I just read in Motor Trend (with the Jag X-Type on the cover) in the article on the Trailblazer and Explorer that GM is already working on other implementations of the I-5 and I-6. I'm assuming that means trucks but maybe not.

    From outward appearances, "real" truck buyers (not buyers of sissy-fied SUVs) are die-hard V-8 people. They don't seem overly concerned about the smoothness of an engine as much as how many buses it can tow.

    Unless GM is trying to change that mentality (which would be hard to do), I take it to mean that they're going after mainstream car buyers of which SUV owners are a part. BMW uses in-line engines. GM would score big points in refinement with an in-line. Give it the durability of drivetrains like the 3800 and we could be seeing the initial stages of the rebirth of GM.

    BTW, anyone seen spy photos of proposed replacements for the current GM mid-size segment?
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I agree, in-line engines would give GM cars a big boost. I wish I could find out more about this.

    Have not seen anything in the way of spy photos lately. The last one I saw was the 2003 CTS a couple of months ago.

    BTW.. They finally have the 2002 Bravadas in here at the local dealer. I looked at a black one and man is it beautiful. Wish I had the money to get one. Better pick up a lottery ticket on the way home.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    I have driven several impalas this week and none of them creaked like the intrigue does. I feel part of the intrigue's problem is the sportier struts. However, the real problem is in the body structure.

    The main problem is that the intrigue has an airer greenhouse with more visibility than the impala. The impala shares its roof with the grand prix. The windshield header is noticeably closer and lower to the driver than the intrigue's. I think there is also simply more metal in the pillars and roof structure than in the intrigue.

    PLus the impala has a five star crash rating. It has an aluminum beam in the cowl. It was also designed as a police car.

    By the way, the dealership sold the blue impala that i drove. They offered to sell it to me for $400 under invoice. I told them to hold it for me, but the salesman found out it had been sold the night before.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    So are you set on an Impala now?
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    Probably. I think for the money it offers a lot. I would like to try something different. The olds was my first non Chevy car.

    The intrigue is still my ideal midsize GM car, but we all know about the execution part.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    It's too bad you didn't get what I have. I love my Intrigue, best car I've ever owned. I totally understand why you wouldn't come back for another though.

    Let us know what you get.
  • focusfocus Member Posts: 225
    what would be the benefit of installing a STB in the rear? What is it?
  • vcjumpervcjumper Member Posts: 1,110
    STB or strut tower brace is a bar that bolts on between your strut towers to stiffen the chasis and improve steering response.. A good discussion about them on the GP owners forum (so the same chasis as our cars) is at..

    STB discussion
  • millienmillien Member Posts: 2
    I must buy a car within a week, but I am having a terrible time trying to decide between what's available within my price range.

    My last choices are as follows: A Buick Century, Buick Century Custom with many options, reasonably priced and my first choice is the Oldsmobile Intrigue GX with the driver's seat options. I think that both Buick offers more for the money, but the Oldsmobile is a much better looking car and, that's my predicament. I couldn't get my choice of color (Ruby Red) for the Oldsmobile, but will settle for the beige metallic like. Could you please compare these models and give me your opinion?
  • vcjumpervcjumper Member Posts: 1,110
    They drive a lot differently despite their shared chasis. The Buick will have a softer ride, the Olds will handle better and have better road feel. The Olds has a far superior motor, give it WOT on the highway for a nice surge. I'm sure you've sat in and seen the interior differences.
    Ofcourse, the olds looks better too.

    It is unfortunate you have the slim timeline. Could you rent a wreck for a week or two if it means finding a car in the colour with options you want?

    I will take the better car with less toys than the loaded lesser car every time.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    No question.. get the Intrigue!

    The Century is a soft ride with a weak 3.1L engine. The Intrigue can easily outperform it in every way. Have you test driven??
  • millienmillien Member Posts: 2
    I agree with you;I wish I would have more time to pick my color, but I'm renting right (I don't trust my car). Besides, the low interest rates, the 5 year warranty, and the 24 free maintenance offers end on May 31. Although I was inclined to buy the Intrigue, your messages have eliminated any further doubts. I needed some encouragement other than a sales pitch. All I hope now is that the beige is still available. Thanks.
  • drwilscdrwilsc Member Posts: 140
    The Buick that closely compares with the Intrigue is the Regal, not the Century. If you're looking at lesser trim lines the advantage is clearly Intrugue. Decked out versions, however, is a tougher choice. It's tough to argue that the the Regal GS's 6.6 0-60 time with the supercharged 3.8 can't be beat in this price class.
  • tpkentpken Member Posts: 1,108
    The Century is cheaper, certainly, but take a look at the Regal LS - particularly if there happens to be a demo on the lot - perhaps one without leather or sunroof wouldn't be priced too high. What you get is that wonderful 3800 V-6 and a few more creature comforts as well as a car that could easily return better resale than the Intrigue given Olds' demise.

    No reason to spurn the Intrigue - it's a great car too - but at least check out the Regal - you might find a good deal.

    Ken
  • vcjumpervcjumper Member Posts: 1,110
    Well I couldn't let this place go without a post for a full day so I figure I'd tell people I got my car looked at today for the none-starting issue (not the hard starting issue many people are having). They diagnosed it as scan test code P0608 intermittent voltage drop off from ignition switch and replaced the switch. Started it 4 times since with no problems. Said my stalling when TCS comes on is related. I guess I'll find out next time it rains hard and I get to an emty parking lot.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    I had my ignition switched replaced well over a year ago. It didn't help.

    We had a problem with my dad's chevy impala in '88. We would be driving along and the car would just turn off!!. Replaced the ignition switch and it has been fine ever since.
  • etharmonetharmon Member Posts: 399
    Haven't test driven anything yet, but did go by several dealers yesterday afternoon after they closed. First off, I think the SUV bug is starting to bite me. I absolutely love the new GMC Envoy. If I had $36K to spend, that would probably be near the top of my list. I looked at all 3 GM SUVs and the Envoy is my favorite after seeing them all in person. The Bravada is a close second and the Trailblazer brings up the rears. The Yukon Denali sure is sweet looking too and I like it better than the Escalade. Anyway, back to more serious considerations. Olds dealer is up to 5 Intrigues now. Two Forest models(GX and GL), a Ruby GL, a Sandstone GLS, and a Sterling GL. Maybe 10 Aleros and about a dozen Auroras. Next stop was a Buick dealer to look at Regals. 5 GSs and every one of them were built 06/00 which make them very early 2001s and nearly a year old physically now. Slightly better color selection than Intrigues. Buick dealer also had a Rendezvous in stock and it's not bad, although not my cup of tea. The RX300, MD-X, Axiom, and Escape crowd will love it though. GM should ditch the Aztek and let the full production go to Buick as I think they will have no problem selling them. Last stop was the Cadillac dealer which has a 98 Aurora with only 35,000 miles for $18K. Except for the color(diamond white) I'd almost go make them an offer on it tomorrow. I think I'll hold out and see if by chance Olds will drop that 60 month apr to 0.9% like they did last year on Intrigues or a better color 2-3 year old Aurora or Cadillac Eldorado Touring Coupe comes in. Or maybe I'll win some money and will just go buy one of those new Envoys.
Sign In or Register to comment.