2005 and Earlier Chevrolet Impala

194959799100265

Comments

  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    Impala sales are up over last year. The impala is the #7 selling car in America right now.
    as of July sales are up 10,000 units over last year.
    Impala 117,670
    Grand Prix 72,956
    Regal 29,881
    Intrigue 25,438

    Regal and Intrigue sales are going in the dumper.
    Grand Prix is way off from last year.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Thanks for your great article on how to repair the rear roof trim. I think your approach is a lot cleaner and easier than having the dealer's grease monkeys mess around with the car.

    One interesting thing is that this roof trim problem seems to be exclusively showing up with 2001 model year production cars. My ex-2000 Impala LS never exhibited any room trim problems. The trim was flush fitted properly at the factory and the glue/backing tape never gave up. I suspect that they did change the quality and the supplier of the roof trim pieces from the ones installed on earlier production cars.

    I have the problem, slightly, only on the left side. The right side roof trim is perfect along with the rear window rubber seal. Now with your instructions I should be able to take care of it in the weekend.... thanks again!!. Saturday I saw a brand new white 2001 Impala base and the left roof trim had completely popped out...it seems that no one at the dealer's showroom had noticed this..

    B4z: It seems that even with the heavy duty rebates/finance/lease deales and the 5 year/60K mile basic warranty still no one wants GM's ultimate driving machine, the Olds Intrigue. Only 25K units sold is a total embarrasement, ditto for the Buick Regal. I still don't buy the piece of putting the entire blame on Oldsmobile's failure on poor marketing....Also poor quality, high prices and so-so product mix were also responsible for the mess.

    At 100K + units per year the Impala is clearly outselling its corporate W Body and H Body cousins...something must have been done right.

    Ok, 9899, let's hear your rant as to why the Intrigue is the best GM car...
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
  • Personally, I prefer lower sales numbers for the car I drive. That's one of the reasons I chose the Impala. I didn't see one at every intersection. That appears to be changing, though. :-(

    Thank God there are three Mustangs at every intersection. That's how I talked my wife out of a Mustang and into the CL. (Plus, they're ugly, compared to the previous generation ponies, which helped.) We'd also have to worry about exploding gas tanks, improperly placed ignition coils that stall on the highway, defective seat belt buckles, or tire treads unraveling. "Quality is job 2. Avoiding lawsuits is job 1."
  • There's really not that much difference between the GM divisions in terms of quality and engineering. Many cars from different divisions that share the same platform are made in the same plant on the same line by the same people with most of the same parts.

    Marketing did play a big part in Olds demise. GM had decided in the early 90's that, after years of universal criticism that all their cars looked exactly the same, they needed distinct brand identity for each division. (Just take a look at the entire 1989 line of all divisions).

    Olds was to be the division that competed directly with Japanese imports. Unfortunately, their engineering didn't seem to go all the way to achieve that goal. That, plus the lack of quality, which plagues all GM divisions, including Chevy, doomed that plan to failure.

    Saturn would have been the obvious choice for such a plan, due to its unique and separate brand identity. But nooooo. Saturn should just keep producing well made, but butt ugly cars that haven't changed styling for over 10 years.

    Captains of Industry! I wish I got million dollar paychecks for making such stupid decisions. I certainly make enough of them for free!
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    Lots of cars that have poor quality and still sell well. Because it fills a need.
    The ford explorer is a prime example.
  • mcdillmcdill Member Posts: 180
    Nice pics !
  • sim3sim3 Member Posts: 66
    Took a 3000+-mile road trip last week around Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, Massachusetts and the Toronto/Niagara area in my Impala. Have to say the car performed beautifully. Up to 600 miles a day was no problem, the seats are extremely comfortable. Even had to sleep one night in the car - not exactly a great bed, but surprisingly good anyway.

    Now I'm looking forward to seeing the service guys face when I bring the car in for a 12k-maintenance 10 days after I had it in for 9ks.. ;-)
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Wife & I are planning to visit Canada next year. We'll be in Toronto for a few days and then we plan to drive to Niagara Falls. I have never ever been to Canada before so we are excited about visiting. My wife has been to Canada (Ontario and Quebec) but she was a child so she doesn't remember that many details about the road trips she made with her parents. Neither one of us haven't been to the Niagara area. The Canadian side of the falls is better than the US side according to what we have been told by friends and family that have travelled there.

    Unfortunately we can't take our Impala as we will be flying there (Time constraints), but we are planning on renting a car (Hopefully and Impala)and head on our own way.

    Glad to hear you had a great time behind the wheel of your car. The Imp is one amazing road trip machine!

    Question for the Canuck friends... How long those it take to get from Toronto to Niagara by car?

    How About Toronto-Ottawa and Toronto-Montreal?
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    According to the 2002 Impala brochure, the Impala has the complete LATCH child car seat restraint system in the rear seat. In addition to the three anchors or hooks located behind each headrest in the rear seat shelf, the 2002's will also include the lower seat back bottom anchors or hooks as well for each seating position.

    My sister and brother in law have finally decided to purchase a new base Impala but the model year selection depends on the following:

    They will buy a new 2001 Impala Base, get the $1000.00 rebate, if the lower seat back LATCH anchors can be retrofitted.

    If not, then they will go for a 2002 Impala Base and let go of the $1000.00 rebate on the 2001.

    The safety of my 1 year old nephew is paramount to them so if you or anyone can give me some insight into the LATCH child car seat restraint system, I would certainly appreciate it.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Nice pics of your cruiser!

    Any likes/dislikes about it?
  • hvan3hvan3 Member Posts: 630
    Could the 6 digit volume on the 2001 Impala be attributed to government agencies and taxi companies buying Impala, (or fleet sales)?
  • It was bound to take the place of the Lumina in rental car fleets.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Was officially discontinued on April 27th, 2001. The 2000 and 2001 Luminas were strictly fleet market vehicles. The last Luminas were sold to the public until the 1999 model year.

    I don't doubt that part of the 6 digit sales volume could have gone to cover fleet sales. Still the Impala is selling very well with almost no incentives in comparison to other GM corporate siblings.
  • roderacerroderacer Member Posts: 311
    Almost broadsided a lady in a Toyo Camry yesterday. Wow, I knew the blind spot on the Impala was bad but I guess I have to start sticking my head out the window before changing lanes - OR - get some of those concave mirrors to stick to the side views. BLAH!

    Gonna be fun in the Winter for sure.

    Check those blind spots!!

    Later!
    RR
  • etcarrolletcarroll Member Posts: 87
    Once again, thanks for the timely update. I was just showing the roof trim repair to a guy who does some restore work, he asked me the question, "that's all well and good, but what makes you think you can do a better job than the factory"? I was at a loss for words, wonder how you'd answer the question.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Use the little triangular rear windows, they do help minimize tremendously any blind spots. Never had a problem changing lanes here in Miami.

    Do you have tints by any chance?

    I am under the impression that some tints may hinder visibility at night, but I could be wrong.

    Driving basics 101: In driver's ed they teach you that the best way to avoid an accident while changing lanes is to turn your head quickly to make sure that you are not about to hit another car not being registered in the side or rear view mirror. Unless you are driving a panel van or a big truck, is never a good idea to rely on the side mirrors to make lane changes. Those concave little mirrors are useless IMHO as they just make it more difficult to measure distances between you and other cars/obstacles in the road. They are best used when towing trailers.

    TEO
  • 9899olds9899olds Member Posts: 202
    I don't remember saying the Intrigue was GM's best car..Let's start from the guideline; you don't know cat-poop about an Intrigue. A 15 min demo drive is not a final test..

    Intrigue and Impala are totally different modes of transportation. I buy cars to drive, not cuddle or polish..These are business related purchases and are treated as such.. I don't pussyfoot around when it comes to driving or dealer contact..I don't spend time screwing around on itty-bitty problems..

    The Intrigue is not a Grand Prix or Regal..The volume of 25k is not bad for a car that is being killed and dealers didn't order any because they were stunned; walking around in shock.

    The Intrigue 3.5 is a fun engine and the suspension is harsh; but great for the high end..I am not looking for a family car with cuddly features..

    Frankly, Frank I don't really like the two Intrigues of present and past; but I got an excellent deal.. I haven't suffered one bit..
  • RR- Personally, I've never had a blind spot from the side view mirrors. I do, however, have a big one from the rear view mirror. Unfortunately, it's when I'm trying to look out the windshield at objects IN FRONT OF ME.

    Does anyone else find the rear view mirror to obstruct their forward vision? Or am I crazy? (C. All of the above)

    On a related note: I also had a little run in with a small fire hydrant at work. The rear end of the car is so high, I didn't see it. I blame myself, though. I should have checked more thoroughly. I hope I can fix it with bondo, primer, and touchup. A new rear bumper cover is around $250, plus paint and labor. OUCH.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Not you are not crazy. The rear view mirror housing on Impalas equipped with the Electrochromic option or OnStar is a good sized device attached to the windshield. While I appreciate the fact that It allows me a good field of view to whatever is behind me, the mirror is installed too low and interferes in foward aft vision.

    I noticed that the higher you adjust the height adjustment in your seat the worst it gets. If you lower the seat height it helps some.

    I am already used to it, but at first it was a bit uncomfortable when making fast right hand turns.

    On the Impala base model, if you get inside one with the basic non-self dimming mirror, you'll notice that it is installed higher in the windshield and it is not as bulky.

    The overhead DIC is the reason why they installed the mirror so low in the windshield in the first place.

    Sorry about your bumper cover, I am sure you can get it repaired at a good body shop for much less than $250.00.
  • vcjumpervcjumper Member Posts: 1,110
    Toronto -> Niagara 1.5hrs Make sure you check out Niagara-on-the-Lake
    Toronto -> Ottawa 5-6hrs
    Toronto -> Montreal 6-7hrs (just past Ottawa) If you can swing it, see Quebec city too, very European but less English spoken.
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Thanks!

    Quebec City would be a nice stop. Would love to hear some French spoken again. I am already missing it and we were back in France just 3 months ago.
  • Thanks. I hope I can find one willing to repair it. Usually with (rubber baby buggy) bumper covers, they recommend complete replacement. Even if they can patch it, they'll probably want to paint the entire thing for a color match.

    For now, I will try and use filler, sand paper, primer, touch up paint, and crossed fingers. If that doesn't work, I'll try duct tape. It's silver, isn't it? :-D

    Enjoy Toronto. It's the cleanest city I've ever seen.
  • 9899olds9899olds Member Posts: 202
    In your state of Flordia during the winter; just spend a little time in Lantana up the coast line for there are a few folks from Quebec..In fact, there are lots of them folks..

    Sometime when I am not so rushed I will explain to you and some of your forum buddies how bad the car division of Chevrolet has gotten in the last 15 yrs.. The Geo Tracker is an absolute pile of junk..The joint venture project in Ingersoll, Ontario between GM and Suzuki pumps out nothing but little pieces of c--p, daily.. Over the years I have quoted on some of the suspension items and I think you could find better quality at your local hardware store.

    The amazing thing is that GM allows Chevy dealers to keep the Corvette line because it is so far removed from the normal Chevy product line that it is criminal..The vette line should be moved to an upscale dealer envirnoment..

    the camaro line is suffering from no sales and suspect quality, so it is headed south..

    Chevy survives on trucks only, for 100k Impalas/yr is peanuts volume..Dealer lots are loaded with them in the Motor City..
  • night_owl1night_owl1 Member Posts: 760
    LATCH stands for Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren. You need a car seat that is equipped for the LATCH system. I don't know if you can retrofit a vehicle, but since the 2002 Impala should be almost the same as the '00 and '01 I would assume there will be some sort of kit.


    The most common problem with child seats is improper installation. The LATCH system is supposed to make it easier to install. However, not too many seat manufactures have seats that can take advantage of the LATCH system.


    I may look into a retrofit kit, but until that time, I'll install my seat following the directions. From time to time the fire department/police department sponser a child seat check up where they check the installation. I'll take my car there and have them check it out.


    Go to this link for more information:


    http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/childps/csr2001/csrhtml/LATCH.html

  • night_owl1night_owl1 Member Posts: 760
    Because the I own the car. I use a torque wrench to bolt the wheels back on my car. The tire guys will use a impact driver. And they are supposedly the "professionals."

    If he is talking about the manufacturing side, I would have finished off the roof rather than cover the weld with a piece of trim stuck on with double stick tape.

    Actually, I don't like this tape stuck to tape thing. I might pull the end off again and use silicone adhesive. It looks like they didn't bend the trim to follow the roof line before they stuck it to the car.
  • hunter39hunter39 Member Posts: 375
    Had the Impala in to the dealer this morning to get the oil changed and brakes inspected... seems I have 30% pads on the front and 55% on the rear, odd since I'm very easy on brakes and I have only 23.5k. Are brake pads covered under warranty? I wouldn't think so, however 23k + is not very good. I am also having problems with my turn signals and four ways not working intermittenly, while I was on my way to the dealer they stopped working, I thought, great! Finally something that is not working and I can show them... I swear I turned into the service line and they started working! ArrgggH! They believe me though and I will have to make an appointment since they say it is an all day deal to switch out the turn signal harness, cripes if they provide the car they can keep it til it's fixed. Forgot to mention the seat rails too, I knew I forgot something...

    Oh, cleanest city I was ever in... Singapore, by far...
  • fathertyriciusfathertyricius Member Posts: 116
    I also had to get use to the rear view mirrow, but I am so use to it now that any other car I drive, the first thing I notice is the difference of mirrors and its benefit. My big complaint is the blind spot on the passenger side windshield pillar. A full size car can hide in that pillar if you are not careful. Before I enter the intersection making a left I do a triple check to see that all is clear before I move. I had several close calls with that blind spot. Great Brakes on the Impala LS.
  • etcarrolletcarroll Member Posts: 87
    1- All vehicles have blind spots,

    2- The human eye has a blind spot looking straight ahead, but your brain fills in the view. It's a simple parlor trick to prove, you may have done it in psych 101.

    3- I've driven numerous cars and Class II trucks, Impala is no better or worse than any other,

    4- As a motorcyclist of 20 years standing, I learned NEVER CHANGE LANES WITHOUT A QUICK PEEK OVER YOUR SHOULDER. Even a vehicle without any blindspots at all will get slammed into if the other driver isn't looking.
  • etcarrolletcarroll Member Posts: 87
    Silicone adhesive, now you're talking.

    My point was, I'm not the handiest guy around, so why would I do a better job blah, blah, blah....

    Guess I should have gotten that disclaimer in first.

    Just had my tires rotated at 12k miles by the dealer, wondering what I'm torqued at, probably at whatever the air hammer cinched 'em down at.

    Still, loving this car.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    My dealer has the roof trim waiting for me. I just don't want to give up the car to have them match the paint then install it. I might never get it fixed.
    All the impalas i saw on the dealer's lot had this problem. None of the intrigues i have seen have this problem.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    Major league blind spot in the impala. C pillar is huge and the little window doesn't help.
    The intrigue is the only car i have ever owned that didn't have a blind spot.
    I will put up with some visibility problems to get a car that is not always in the shop.
  • norbnancynorbnancy Member Posts: 118
    Thanks for the link to the SSR. Hope it is still a go for production. I'll have one if it sits and feels good. I like the looks. Reminds me of the 50's pick ups and El Camino. Since El Camino hasn't been produced since mid 80's, there is a nich market. Can't see mother motors getting rich on the SSR but it would be a dealer traffic builder. Enjoy the ride.
  • daveleckdaveleck Member Posts: 16
    Hey gang - I ran by my dealer today and got the new Impala brochure. If you're aching to see the new taillight treatment (and other goodies), here are some scans:

    http://www.mindspring.com/~daveleck/sport.html


    I personally think the taillights are hideous. Looks cheap/ricey to me... (I wonder if it would look better if you only installed the center portion...)

    Dave
  • renonevadarenonevada Member Posts: 69
    Funny, they don't look like Jerry Rice to me...but I agree with you, garypen, the taillights look Kewl...big improvement over current generation.
  • No. He must have meant Jim Rice, the Red Sox outfielder. But wait...it doesn't look like him either. Rice pudding? Rice Krispies? Rice a Roni?

    The tail light treatment looks good,though. Much better than the giant red boomerang, which I think looks much cheaper, IMHO.
  • mcdillmcdill Member Posts: 180
    I went to the chevy dealer tonight and saw four ,, 2002 ls's , One thing I visually noticed ( teo you will remember this from a while back ) that the mufflers and tailpipe on the LS's are now the bright aluminum color , like the base with 3.4's , and not black like all LS's and base 3.8's used to be, 2000 to 2001 all cars with the 3.8 v6 had a black muffler and tailpipe , and all 3.4's had the bright aluminum tailpipe and muffler , so that was a way I could figure out which motor it had , if it was a base model , well now you cant do that . thanks------------mattmcdill
  • hvan3hvan3 Member Posts: 630
    I think I like it! Perhaps, I'll keep the 2 rear corner lights from the 2000 and change the middle piece.

    By the way, I think it's dumb to have a Sports edition without the added horsepower.
  • spider717spider717 Member Posts: 106
    Your comment about how the fact that there aren't many Impalas on the road made me laugh. That is ALSO a reason I bought my car. I like having something that noone else has. I was looking into a Malibu, but once I saw about 10+ in a short trip to the store, I decided I didn't want one.
  • You're right. It probably would have been relatively easy for Chevy to slap on a supercharger a la the GTP or Regal. The engines are most likely made in the same plant, anyway.

    I'm gonna check the prices of the tail parts before I decide how much I'll replace. It would be nice if they came painted, but they probably won't, so painting will add to the cost.

    I wish the bumper cover came painted. I'd be able to replace it myself, then. A fire hydrant snuck up on me when I wasn't looking, and left a wee hole.
  • roderacerroderacer Member Posts: 311
    teo: nope, no tint whatsoever. Actually my previous car (Ford T-bird) had some of the darkest tints I have ever had. And I had no problem with blind spots even with the tiny mirrors on the Tbird!

    I am with b4z. The triangle windows help a little, but I shouldn't have to conciously focus through a little window to make sure I and others don't get killed! Maybe I just have to get used to the car.

    garypen: haven't had any difficulty with forward vision. I sit rather low in the seat. Some 'elders' even say I "lay down" while driving. Hey I'm only 23!! :)

    etcarrol: THANKS for the driving lesson. I am aware that all vehicles (not just cars) have blind spots. My comment was just isolated to the car I currently drive 30 miles one way to work 5 days a week.

    I know all to well the quick check over the shoulder while driving. Motorcycle - those 2 wheel things?? yep - owned one of those two. Hated that too, since I was forced to take my eyes of what is coming toward me at 60mph and take an extra hard glance over my shoulder and through the helmet. I'll stick to 4 wheels on the road and 2 on the track.

    Do all of you have to "find" a clear area while checking the blind spot? Maybe I can train my eyes to look through the 5"x8" window in the rear. Thank goodness for new contacts!

    Later!
    RR
  • roderacerroderacer Member Posts: 311
    I like it!! Nice wheels. Look like the ones on the current Monte's. Like the chrome exhaust tip as well... the rear. I must admit the corners do look like an Import jobbie aka Rice Burner; the middle piece looks SHARP! I wonder if the black color would be as cool looking.

    How many are looking into the replacement of the rear assemblies? I think garypen and bh0001 are the two that stand out so far.

    But my favorite addition? The Impala logo on the inside of the doors above the rests! SWEET!!!!

    Later!
    RR
  • bh0001bh0001 Member Posts: 340
    Thanks for the pics. I agree with several others here - middle middle piece looks good, outside looks cheap.

    However, I REALLY like the logos on the doors and the graphite trim. I can't stand the fake wood trim. I definitely plan to find out if it can be switched.

    Crashed my mountain bike this evening. The doctors gave me a clean bill of health, but man am I SORE! This is the first time someone else drove my Impala (the ambulance took me). I don't know which was more traumatic - the pain of the crash or someone else driving my baby!
    Brad
  • impalanatorimpalanator Member Posts: 37
    I agree, the overall effect on the rear end is better. Question though? Did anyone else notice that the backup lenses were red? Check your own. The two inside lights have the center of the lenses clear. I wonder if this is just a marketing photo or if it will actually end up like that. It does make a subtle difference in the overall effect.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    Thanks for the pics. I am sure edmunds will erase since it is copyrighted material. HaHa.
    Huhh. I am not sure how i fel about the taillight treatment. It is a little Donna Rice or maybe Rice-a-Roni.
    need to get rid of the spoiler still.
    Wheels are from the Monte.
    Interior treatment is the most successful of all the changes.
    How about some 17" wheels Chevy? And lets get rid of the black body side mouldings.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Using "rice" terms in this manner is offensive to a number of our members. Please refrain from this in future posts, or they will need to be removed.

    Thanks.

    Pat
    Host
    Sedans Message Board
  • teoteo Member Posts: 2,508
    Check out this comparison between the new Ford Explorer and the Chevy TrailBlazer...


    http://cnniw.yellowbrix.com/pages/cnniw/Story.nsp?story_id=22893296&ID=cnniw&scategory=Auto&

  • Sit up straight young man!
  • You da man.
  • cookie01cookie01 Member Posts: 369
    I just imagined it was a woman. But sorta like on Saturday Night Live I guess you really can't tell.

    I like the new taillight treatment. And I like the look of the interior. But yes, if you're going to charge more for a SPORT edition, soup it up a bit with some horsepower and maybe extra chrome and tinting.

    Well, you can dream...
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.