Subaru Impreza WRX

11314161819224

Comments

  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    $3000? (& no tires) Someone @ SOA is smoking crack! (Sorry, Patti, no offense). Maybe if you're trying to offer them on a Mercedes as an option one might not flinch at the price. As Juice said, go aftermarket for better prices and more choices.

    IMHO (right?!)
    Stephen
  • jacklockjacklock Member Posts: 5
    I was wondering if anyone out there was able to haggle with the dealers for this car. I'm currently working with 2 dealerships trying to get my Silver WRX manual trans w/ spoiler. Are most people paying MSRP or more? According to my calculations, MSRP means there making $2650 for each car!!! I don't wanna give the guy more than $800 above invoice. Think thats impossible? I know it's limited and all but they still wanna sell them right?

    Also, whats the general concensus on options? Air Filtration system? Carbon Fiber kit? Armrest extension? should I spring for these?
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    Just to clarify: Yes, the WRX is popular and the dealers are having no troubles selling them at MSRP, supply and demand you know. So your comment about "they want to sell them right?" is true but they will at full retail because they can. I've heard of a few getting them for less and if you are lucky enough to be one of those then "good for ya". My personal opinion is that these cars are priced fair from the get-go and if I want one now (I DO!) then I have no problem paying MSRP. The only stipulation I had when ordering mine was that if I was to pay MSRP then I expected full trade in value for my 2000 OB Ltd, which I got.

    Stephen
  • jacklockjacklock Member Posts: 5
    Is the demand for this car really that great right now? If I make an offer of only 800 above invoice, is the dealer gonna laugh at my face? I know the MSRP is still a good deal for this car but I just don't wanna feel taken advantage of. Having them make over $2000 on me is just a little unsettling.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,769
    Don't you think the car is worth it? Stop worrying about what the dealer is getting. If you want the car that bad, then you have to pay for it. If you're only goal is to get a car by letting the dealer make as little as possible, then maybe you should either wait until there are more of these on the market, or go for a different car.

    If you think its worth the money, then pay for it. Personally, I agree that, even at MSRP, this is a good deal.

    And, no, I'm not a dealer of subarus or any other cars.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • jacklockjacklock Member Posts: 5
    OK, I thought it was every car buyers goal to pay less than MSRP. Isn't that what Edmunds is teaching us? I mean, of course there are exceptions for highly demanded cars.. But it's not like we're talking about a Honda S2000 here. Is it really unreasonable to expect to get a good deal on this car? I know I know.. some of you are probably thinking, quit your wining. I just want to walk out of that dealership knowing both parties got a fair deal, instead of the dealers laughing it up after I leave.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,769
    That is usually the case. You don't want to pay MSRP. Believe me, I'm with ya. But, I believe this is an exception to the rule. If you want something that is brand new to the market, then you have to pay that little extra bit to get it. These supposedly won't be limited production cars, so if you wait a while, I'm sure you'll be able to get the deal you want. But, right now, if you don't want to pay MSRP, someone else will. Its that simple.

    I also believe this is one of those rare cases where the car is WORTH the MSRP. So, yeah, quit yer whinin'. :-)

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Jack: on most cars that is true, but the WRX is special. Look at Edmunds TMV on the Toyota MR2 Spyder - it's $2000 ABOVE MSRP!

    The MR2 is cute, but I'd take the WRX any day! Even at MSRP it's a bargain. Some people that ordered in advance negotiated a little, and some dealers haggle a bit even now, but not all.

    Get the air filtration if you have allergies or asthma. I have it (and asthma).

    The armrest extension is the same height as the armrest on the door. I love it.

    Ask for the diffy protector if you plan on rallying with it. I'd also get skid plates, but that's aftermarket.

    -juice
  • jacklockjacklock Member Posts: 5
    Anyone know when Edmunds is gonna post more info on the WRX?

    Also, has anyone seen the WRX with the carbon fiber kit? What's included? From what I've seen, its the center stereo console, hand brake and shift knob. Anything else?
  • silver_bulletsilver_bullet Member Posts: 1,339
    It is my understanding that this is "carbon look" trim, not genuine carbon fiber. I've seen a photo that showed carbon look trim around the power window switches on the doors as well, so I'd guess you'll get that along with the center console, shift knob and hand brake lever.
  • vadpvadp Member Posts: 1,025
    Carbon Fiber patterned trim kit $350


    Carbon Fiber parking brake handle.

    list price $295 plus installation.


    Carbon Fiber shift knob (manual only).

    list price $175 plus installation.


    http://www.cars101.com/impreza.html#2002 Impreza


    I wonder what they included in the trim kit. Anybody knows for sure?

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I saw the stuff on a dash and it looks convincing.

    -juice
  • tisbe2tisbe2 Member Posts: 6
    The WRX I test drove had the carbon fiber look trim. I thought it looked so-so. Not bad, but not great. The black handbreak and black leather shift-knob were non-carbon, they looked good. I wouldn't pay the extra $$ for the carbon look trim, but if you really like it, get it.

    BTW, www.kbb.com has info on the 2002 WRX (including invoice prices for base car and options).
  • francophilefrancophile Member Posts: 667
    March 19, 2001 issue, the one with a bright red Porsche on the cover. Two full pages of text! Unfortunately they stretched a photo to make it fit the page and in so doing they seriously misrepresent the little Impreza, wide-track style ;-) They like the car a lot. They think the brakes are mushy. They've requested one for their long-term fleet, which should make for some v-e-r-y interesting reading.

    Cheers,
    -wdb
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    Here we go again! C & D commented specifically how firm and linear the pedal feel was in their WRX vs past Subaru experiences. I was hoping this would be the case, but it seems it may dependent upon vehicle.

    Patti: What's up w/this. Any ideas?

    Stephen
  • intrigue3intrigue3 Member Posts: 15
    Just picked mine up- Silver 5 speed sedan- no spoiler, no upgrades- just AWD and power.

    Indeed, there is a turbo lag, similar to any 2.0 L turbo; however, just keep the gear lower and the RPM a smidge higher, and then you're taking off. I have an MR2 turbo. This WRX is faster, even with only 7 miles on it.

    It's not fancy, for the Audi-BMW-even VW-philes. But it appears solid, handles well, and serves it's purpose in spades.

    2 hours into this purchase, things are looking great.
  • hersbirdhersbird Member Posts: 323
    You probably need to worry more about the sales people and lot staff more then customers off the street on a pre sold car. I doubt many dealers would let a presold car be test driven by a potential customer but I'm sure they have no problem driving it around the block a few times. The dealer here has to go a few miles through town to get to thier detail/PDI shop. They just got in a few 2002 2.5 RS's, TS's and one WRX. The kid that takes them over to the detail shop and fills them up was nice enough to point out the one that was, "really, really fast!" as he excitedly put it, you can't tell me that one didn't see redline on a cold engine and then immediately shut down after a couple of max boost runs. If I were only keeping a car for the duration of the warranty then I really wouldn't care, but if I planned on going 7 years or more with the car I think this would make a difference.
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    Would envy be too strong a word? :-) My WRX sportwagon (silver 5spd) should be in anyday.

    How is the brake feel? C & D said it was firm and linear but Autoweek said somewhat mushy. I have already experienced the infamous mushy feel in my 00' OB Ltd and don't want the feel in a car that can hit 140mph!

    Let us know other impressions too. We live vicariouly through you for a time. :-)

    Stephen
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    It wast fast as could be and handles AMAZINGLY. That AWD just keeps you planted and pulls you through the turns. And that's with all-season tires. Put on some summer rubber and it'll be even better. Almost no punch below 3000 rpm. But above 3000, look out. It comes on very strong until I shifted (around 5k - I'm not gonna redline someone else's car). Very impressive.

    Now I've got a decision to make. WRX or A4 1.8T Quattro. The Subie is faster, the Audi is nicer. Decisions, decisions. I guess it could be worse :)
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    If anyone here is planning on leasing, think again. I just called my dealer. He said the money factor is .0043 (equal to 10.32%!) and the residual is 53%. It will cost just as much to lease it as it will to buy it - right about $500 per month. On a $25k car!

    Looks like it will be an A4 for me. I can get it (MSRP $29k) for $400 per month, zero down.
  • jgts1jgts1 Member Posts: 32
    My 99 2.5RS lease was awful and that car was $20k....I traded it for a 01 Acura CL-S, and considered going into the new WRX (yes, trading the Acura), but I figured that the car was going to be $375+ a month....at $500/month- thats just ridiculous. My buddy just leased a 01 Audi TT 225Q coupe for $460/month, 39months, 12k miles/year, $2500 total out of pocket ($40k MSRP).

    WRX is a neat car though.

    JG
    00 Viper GTS
    01 Acura CL-S
  • klkrauseklkrause Member Posts: 96
    Well, I was lucky enough to drive a WRX today (Silver, 5-spd Wagon). I left the car quite impressed and wondering more about when I'll buy the car as opposed to what car I'm going to buy. For $25,000 or so, there's nothing else out there that's comparable.

    When I first sat in the vehicle I immediately noticed the high-bolstered seats. I found them extremely comfortable and supportive. I'm not quite as impressed with the cloth material as a few other seem to be, but it's all personal preference. My dealership mentioned getting aftermarket leather (with heated seats) and it's something I may consider.

    Once I got in and closed the door I moved the seat around a little to get into a comfortable driving position. I'm about 6'4" and didn't have a problem getting comfortable. There is a ton of headroom for such a small car and I actually had the seat at least one or two clicks forward of the furthest back position.

    When I got it onto the road my first impressions were that it was solid and more quiet than I would have thought. Also, I liked the thick Momo steering wheel (I have big hands, so it's nice to have a thick wheel!).

    Initially, I ran through the gears without revving the engine too much just to see how the clutch was. I liked it more than a few other people who posted earlier seemed to. Overall, I like the clutch and shifting better than my Acura Integra.

    When the engine was warm I finally revved it up a little. Although it didn't feel as quick as I thought it would be, the car's speed definitely hit the 60 mph mark very quickly. It felt very solid and stable during acceleration and at speed. Again, I have to stress how much faster the car was going than it felt ... I think this car will be easy to get a speeding ticket in. The trubo-lag was definitely noticeable, but once the engine reached higher RPM's it definitely rocketed off.

    I unfortunately didn't play with the brakes or the handling too much, but I'll look into those items more seriously later this year when I'm ready to buy mine. Nor did I play with the stereo, climate controls, etc.

    I happened to drive a wagon, and I think I'll probably end up with one. The wagon provides a lot of headroom for rear occupants, though the legroom still isn't spectacular ... it wouldn't be bad for kids or shorter adults, though.

    Finally, the dealership had a Blaze Yellow sedan, and I have to admit I was a little disappointed. I thought the yellow was going to be brighter ... it was almost a pastel yellow. Personally, I liked the sedan in blue and the wagon in silver.
  • intrigue3intrigue3 Member Posts: 15
    Stephen-

    Thanks. As the weekend nears, I'll push it a bit on our very winding and hilly roads.

    I've never had an AWD, but already I feel safer and more secure. I actually considered a 4.2L A6), but right now, it's not my style. This WRX wreaks of simplicity and determination. I look forward to reading your impression, and the thoughts of all you who know much more about Subarus, AWD, and cars in general than I do.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I trust Autoweek over C&D, or "Nutcase Militia Monthly", as Loosh called it.

    Long-termer? Sweet. We can read about it for months to come. They do tid-bits on those all the time.

    Congrats, Intrigue.

    I's buy a Subie instead of leasing. They tend to last a long time, so why let the next owner benefit from that? Plus I could not imagine being tired of a WRX - even then I'd mod it.

    krause: so, you buyin'?

    -juice
  • hersbirdhersbird Member Posts: 323
    Using number provided above, and basing it on a $25,000 MSRP and $24,000 sale price (some what common, even $23,000 would be possible). The WRX would lease for $459/month for 36 months with zero down and no taxes. I have a really hard time believing you can lease a A4 Quattro for $400/month for 36 months with zero down. The money factor is based on who you lease through, not the car unless you are using dealer financing. I find the TT lease even harder to believe, anything with a $40,000+ price tag is going to be hell to lease as you have to pay intrest based on that number regardless of how high the residual is. Even using a .0035 money factor and a very high 60% residual on a 39 month lease the TT would be $634/month with no money down and $570/month with $2500 down. Maybe your friend has another $4000 from a trade in or something. I would be interested in the details of the A4 lease, is it 36 months? what is the mileage allowed? Is it for a loaded Quattro or a base model? It would be a good deal if its the normal 36 month-0 down on a nice quattro.
  • jgts1jgts1 Member Posts: 32
    the car is $469/month, 12k miles/year, 39 months, $2500 out of pocket (total)....its Denim Blue/Denim blue, the lease is through UBVL. He got the idea to get one from the guy below.

    I have another friend with an 01 Aviator Gray/black 225Q coupe- lease is $600/month, 48 months, 12k miles/year, $2000 out of pocket, and rolled $4k worth of negative equity out of a 99 M3 into the lease.

    These are the numbers, no BS.....my friend with the Denim Blue car couldn't swing a $500/month payment.
  • kostamojen2kostamojen2 Member Posts: 284
    I got to go for a test drive in one today... Wooo! This car is sooo composed and rather quiet, but when you get up in the revs, VOOOOOOM!!! The Wagon is a little tail happy, dont know about the sedan though... I think thats cool actually, happy tail = Drifts :D
    The breaks are great IMO, and the shifter is really good. The person who was driving it (ex-rally driver drove it for me cause I cant drive stick yet :P) did a nice drift around a 15mph corner...
    The stock RE92 tires suck guys, get new ones ASAP.
    Man, those seats are COMFY! and I really like the interior! Theres WAY more space than an A4 (with the seat all the way back, I can still fit my knees behind the seat in the Impreza. In the A4, I have to bend my legs around the seat...)

    But, I also got to see 2 2002 RS's today... Man these are sleepers! They have THE SAME suspension as the WRX, and almost IDENTICLE interiors minus the steering wheel... But the blue center seat material is Black/gray instead, and I actually like it better! The WRX is out of my price range, but the RS is my #1 choice! I even liked it without the scoop or foglights!
  • SporinSporin Member Posts: 1,066
    Were the seats in the RS as snug as those in the WRX? I won't know for sure until tomorrow, but I expect that the WRX seats will be tight on my big body.
  • klkrauseklkrause Member Posts: 96
    I probably will be buying one, but I'm going to have to wait until later this year. If I get a company car this year it will nix the whole thing, though!
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    WRX lease (dealers here selling for full MSRP):

    WRX lease

    MSRP - $25,036
    Cap cost - $25,036
    Residual - $13,269
    Depreciation/mo. - $327
    Interest/mo. - $165
    Taxes/mo. - $19 (and my taxes are only 3.8%)
    Total payment/mo. - $511

    A4 lease (for 2001 A4 1.8T Quattro almost fully loaded)

    MSRP - $29,100
    Cap Cost - $27,500
    Residual - $16,878
    Depreciation/mo. - $295
    Interest/mo. - $107
    Taxes/mo. - $15
    Total lease payment - $417, including taxes, $402 w/o taxes.

    The A4's have a much higher residual (58%) and very low money factors right now through Audi Financial (.0024 = 5.76%), not to mention that they can be had for $1,500-2,000 less than MSRP, that's why they are cheaper to lease. The TT's have residuals somewhere near 70% on 3 year leases, that's why they can be had so cheap.
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    The A4 I want has Celebration package (moonroof, Homelink), Quattro, xenons, Bose stereo and Cold Weather Package (heated seats, heated mirrors, ski bag), so it's equipped better than the WRX, too (except for the performance thing which the WRX has lots).
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    You've got the WRX at full retail price. Friends I know are getting at least $1000 off that price. Some get $1600 lower than that.

    -juice
  • SporinSporin Member Posts: 1,066
    True, but I think that the number of Subaru dealers selling below MSRP is quite low... at least right now. The greatest number of below MSRP deals you hear about are coming from the same couple of dealerships... people are traveling ot save some money.

    Subaru is bringing in 12k WRX's this year... that is a BIG number for Subaru. They didn't bring in that many 2.5RS's over the last 3 years combined.

    It also remains to be seen the long-term sales numbers for WRX's. Sure they are going like hotcakes right now, but what about the long run? Subaru is testing the market right now, for themseves and others. How quickly will it be saturated? How many WRX buyers are there out there ultimately?

    I'd be willing to bet that after the initial excitement dies down, you will be able to easily find $500-$750 over invoice deals just about everywhere on WRX.

    Just my guesses and opinions. :-)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Well, more than a couple. A friend went to www.fitzmall.com and got a quote on-line (about $1000 over invoice), then his dealer matched it without putting up much of a fight. I think a resourceful shopper can certainly replicate that deal.

    I agree that eventually prices will cool down, just like with every other new car. Plus, low finance rates usually come at the end of each model year (but don't expect that until fall of 2002 I'd guess).

    -juice

    PS One more important point - the A4 is about the be redesigned. Even if you like the current bodystyle more, it'll still be seen as "the old A4" by all your friends. That's why the low finance rates exist - it's an outgoing model.
  • SporinSporin Member Posts: 1,066
    juice,

    Good point about the "old A4" but in my circle, it wouls still be fly (if I really cared about that sort of thing.) ;-) I like the compact dimensions and especially the lower prices and sweet deals on the current A4.

    NMy freinds gawk at my 12-year old Volvo. I mean, it's in really ncie shape, but c'mon!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm the same way. I've seen spy photos and I think I like the old one better. The styling was break-through. I also prefer the old Passat, without all the chrome - yuck!

    But still, it is a factor. You fork out cash for a new car, and you want to get complements. Not, "Is that used?"

    -juice
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    True about price, but I don't have the time or energy to shop all over for the lowest price. The dealers around me are all at MSRP, so if I get one, that's what it would cost me. As for the A4, I really don't care what my friends (or others) think. That is the car I want, so I'll be happy with it. If I cared what they thought, I wouldn't even consider the WRX. It's not real pretty and the interior is so-so at best. But boy, does it perform.
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    The WRX looks much better in person, not Audi wow but nice nonetheless. It also looks like it has some personality...like come and play w/me and I'll show how to kick some serious a_ _ !! I can't say the same for the Audi, not a bad thing, just not the same.

    Stephen
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    I'll agree with that. The WRX looks more serious, the Audi more luxurious. But the Audi's interior is one of the best, IMO. I wasn't real fond of the cloth in the Subie.
  • soon2bsubeesoon2bsubee Member Posts: 137
    I too am hoping that prices will drop by the end of the year. I feel that there will be plenty of automatics (so Susan can drive it if necessary) left over, so I will get to pick what I want at an invoice + situation as opposed to MSRP. I am currently leaning towards the wagon*blue)...I sometimes do toy shows and have to carry all my goodies, Juice, that blue auto wagon at Fitz's is mighty tempting :)
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    Yeah, the blue color looks good, in fact, much better in person. I originally thought that I wouldn't want to live w/the color, nice at first and all. This is why I went w/the more conservative silver. I'd be happy w/the blue or black (bluish metallic to it) as well.

    Stephen
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    You have to be the first person I've heard say they did not love the seats! Man, I would kill to have those in my car!

    -juice
  • jimsxnjimsxn Member Posts: 108
    If insurance is double that of other cars, it would add another couple of hundred to the monthly payment. What do you think? Thanks
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Well, at least one friend's rates were only slightly higher than for a 4 door Camry it replaced.

    Thing is, if we start getting that specific, we should compare the WRX to an Audi that offers similar performance (which insurance companies hate), and that would put you in an S4.

    -juice
  • mmcbride1mmcbride1 Member Posts: 861
    I loved the way the seats felt. I hated the way they looked.

    As for comparisions to the S4, I don't think you can make a rational comparison. People compare cars by how much they cost first, then they find what they like in that price range (at least that's how I do it). I doubt anyone getting a $40k S4 would even look at the WRX. The WRX is a great car for the money, but it's not in the same class as an S4. I think the only Audi you can really compare the WRX to is the A4 1.8T.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.