Subaru Impreza WRX

1158159161163164224

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Adler & Mandell does moonroofs for several dealers. They had a Toyota Camry and a Honda CR-V being done when I went there.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    If the '04 Legacy turbo (shown on that nasioc link) has a 250 HP, what are they going to do for the all-new '05 Legacy which shows up about 8 months later?

    I bet the short-life '04 model has the 210 HP Forester XT engine, and the all-new '05 Legacy turbo gets ~ 250 HP.

    Bob
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    will get the H6t :)

    Hopeful thinking I know.

    -mike
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    Well, a 210 horsepower car that weighs 3600 pounds is a big yawn. I'm not sure who would buy it when you're going to be outgunned by less expensive Foresters and WRX's. I'm just guessing, but I would hope Subaru would offer something more. Otherwise, I'll just buy a Forester for less money. Is the change for 05 Gospel ( maybe 280 HP)? Could it just be cosmetic like the new WRX?
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I would have to agree with you. 210hp is not much for a car that weighs 3600+ pounds. That's about average nowadays.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    with 210hp will outhandle a 210hp turboed Forester.

    -mike
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    I have read the H6T will crank out ~350HP in the next hot-rod Legacy. Given the output of the 2.5T, it doesn't sound out of reach.

    Looks like Subaru is getting serious about going after Audi and BMW.
  • sensei1sensei1 Member Posts: 196
    Now practice grinning a lot while driving by yourself. ;-)
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Don't forget that the Forester turbo is a similar engine that is in the STi, only in different states of tune.

    They could get anywhere from 210 over 300 h.p. from that engine.

    The AK guys were busted. :-) I guess they were contacted by the same people that keep throwing Patti in the dungeon. :-)

    -Dennis
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Don't Legacys start at about 3300 lbs?

    And don't forget, they're bigger and lots of families need the room, and would like another option besides the H6.

    Let's apply the same logic to the current 2.5l engine, do the Impreza and Forester outsell the Legacy line? Nope.

    -juice
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Congratulations! Sounds like you got a great deal. Good luck restraining yourself for the 1000 mile break-in period. I'm at ~550 miles with my WRX, and it's killing me! Though, I do try to have a little fun once or twice a drive and venture north of 4000 rpm (gently). I'm pretty sure that's OK to do.

    Enjoy!

    Craig
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    Isn't the 210 horsepower H6 available on the current Legacy anyway? It wouldn't make any sense to offer a 210 horsepower turbo replacement. I still think this going to be a very potent motor. Hopefully, they'll keep the price under the all important $30,000 figure. This would fit pretty neatly between the WRX and the STI in terms of both price and performance.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    if the '04 Legacy GT does get the 210 HP engine, it will only be for about 6 – 8 months. That's it. When the all-new '05 model debuts, I'm sure it will have a more powerful engine.

    Bob
  • dop50dop50 Member Posts: 162
    Did anyone else besides me, see the new Legacy wagon Sti?? With 350hp?

    I swear I seen it on one of those TV car programs about 2 weeks ago. It was awesome!

    Haven't heard anyone else mention it, so I'm wondering if it was just a figment of my imagination, or whether it was just someones wishful thinking.

    Just curious.

    Ken
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    Corkfish: neat spy pics; I'm interested. I wanted to see the Sportshift AT in the Forester XT but alas not to be, at least for now.

    The 165hp Forester outhandles a 165hp Legacy GT IMO; shorter wheelbase compensates for higher center of gravity. Not as good a ride but more fun to toss around on backroads. At least that's what I convinced myself of 3 years ago.

    Ed
  • subie3subie3 Member Posts: 1
    Hello, everyone.

     I am new to this board and plan to buy my first car this spring or summer. I live in snow belt, so I decided on impreza. My budget is 18K ~20K. The new wrx is a little above my budget. I shopped used wrx under 20k mile but I couldn't find any wrx with tmv(?) price posted here. I really love turbo but I am afraid I have to give it up. I heard if I can't buy WRX never buy impreza. Is RS that bad compared to its competitor not WRX?

    Nile
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Yeah I saw it. This was posted a month or two ago. I'm sure it will happen, but my guess is that it is perhaps a few years off before we see it here in the USA.

    Bob
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    The RS is still a great car. Not as fast as a WRX, but the 2.5H4 is still a nice engine (though not as willing to rev as the 2.0H4 Turbo). I'd say take the RS for a drive before you make any decisions. Other than the engine and some very minor details, it's identical to a WRX.

    Craig
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    The only real exterior clue between the two cars is the hood scoop, the silver WRX on the trunk, and fog lights. The RS has covers instead which makes it look like it has fog lights. I saw a dark blue RS at the dealer's lot when I was taking my WRX in for service, and commented to the service guy that I did not know Subaru was building WRXs in navy blue. I looked at it again, then noticed there was no hood scoop, thus an RS.

    BTW, one other difference is no rear LSD on the RS.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I'm convinced that I could pilot an outback or legacy quicker around the auto-x than with a Forester. Based on that, I'd have to say the handling on the legacy is better than the Forester given the same HP.

    -mike
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    Yeah, going around cones at the Stop & Shop parking lot at 25 mph is useful. I've said it before and I'll say it again, people rarely push their cars to their handling limits, but they push accelertion limits on a daily basis ( I take my car up to redline getting on the highway all the time). I'd hate to buy an underpowered legacy and get my doors blown off by a cheaper Forester. I guess I'd have to yell out, "yeah, but my car handles better ( at the fringe)"! LOL
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Then in that case, a muscle car is the car you want, for the $ it will out accelerate a Forester any day! Power is nothing unless it can handle.

    I guess that when a truck in front of you on the highway dumps it's load and the forester doesn't handle as well as the legacy you'll be there yelling "but I can out accelerate you"!

    -mike
  • beanboybeanboy Member Posts: 442
    The difference in handling between the Forester and Legacy is much closer than the acceleration difference between a turbo Forester and a Legacy.

    Also a bit cheaper and easier to improve the handling of the Forester versus adding signifigant power to the Legacy.

    -B
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    "I heard if I can't buy WRX never buy impreza. Is RS that bad compared to its competitor not WRX?"

    No, that's completely false. The power and some of the handling will be different, but ANY Impreza is a good car.

    I had a 97 Outback Sport before my WRX and loved it. Low on power, but high on reliability and great grip with AWD.
    An '03 WRX will be just slightly over your 20K limit. The '03's are selling for under invoice in a lot of places since the facelifted '04 comes out in the Spring.

    Go for a test drive.

    -Dennis
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    will be nearly identical, other than the sway bars I think they are the same.

    -mike
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Go to www.getauto.com and search by your state name. Also, try cars.com or autotrader.com. Good luck!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The H6 has 212hp, but that's only offered in the Outback, not the sportier-tuned Legacy.

    The Legacy could get a turbo and appeal to a different, performance-oriented crowd. I think the H6 is more luxury/utility oriented.

    In the Forester vs. Legacy debate, the key is *weight*, the Forester is hundreds of pounds lighter. In fact some Foresters are lighter than an Impreza WRX wagon.

    So yeah, Ed can easily use RS springs on his Forester for a couple of hundred. Getting a Legacy to be as quick as an XT would take several thousand.

    -juice
  • redkey1redkey1 Member Posts: 270
    One of my many dilemmas is 03 v 04 WRX. I want a roof, and an asc certified install is $1k. I assume 04 w/ factory roof and awp will run at msrp for a while and be more expensive off the bat. Plus there is 3.9 financing on 03's. Any thoughts on 04 pricing?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I dunno, Subaru's price for the Premium package on the Forester is a steal. In 2001, when it came out, you'd get side airbags plus the roof for under a grand, even less at invoice.

    I'd wait for the factory one. It won't have rebates/incentives right away, but I bet they'll be close to invoice.

    -juice
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    04 pricing will be tight at first, but should loosen up as demand drops off. Just how long that takes is unknown. Many people on NASIOC are talking about selling their 02/03 WRXs and getting an 04 STi, so I feel like there is demand for that model. Almost nobody is talking about trading up to a regular 04 WRX, so there seems to be considerably less demand there.

    So, I would hypothesize that prices will loosen up on plain-Jane 04 WRXs within a month after they hit the street. Will the prices be as good as they are on the closeout 03s? No way, but you should still be able to get down near invoice (probably above) rather than the $500 to $1200 under invoice that people are getting on the 03s.

    Even if you can't get the special Subaru financing on an 04 model, you may be able to get a competiteive rate elsewhere (I did on my 03). And be aware, the current 03 deal from Subaru offers $500 cash incentive on the WRX -OR- the special financing, but not both.

    I guess I would say to do the math. Figure on getting an 03 for $500 to $1000 under invoice, add the sunroof install price back in (and can it be included in the loan?) and see where that gets you.

    Do we even have pricing on the 04s yet? How much will the factory sunroof cost?

    Craig
  • redkey1redkey1 Member Posts: 270
    About $1k installed (ASC Professional) with 6 year parts / 3 year labor warranty.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Mine was $895 installed , ASC and lifetime warranty. Plus mine is 17"x30", and the WRX would have to get a smaller one.

    -juice
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I was talking a std. forester v. std. legacy. Not XT v. Legacy.

    I'm saying that a legacy v. Forester the legacy is going to handle better even given the increased weight.

    -mike
  • buffaloesbuffaloes Member Posts: 24
    I was looking to buy a wrx in April of 2001. I could not find a dealer who would let me test drive one. Because of that I decided to purchase a Passat, and have been riddled with problems with it. I saw the specs on the new 2004 WRX, and it seems that they are upgrading the side impact airbags from the side only ones, to ones that protect the head also, such as the ones currently only available on the Forester. Is this indeed the case? Also any ideas when the 2004 WRX's will be available?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Hmm, I'd missed that little detail. It would be nice, though, especially since Subaru has already figured out how to do it (in the Forester).

    -juice
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    What surprises me (to an extent) is the safety rating of the Impreza. When you slam the car doors, they sound a little tinny (with windows open), yet they have really good crash scores. I realize the frameless door glass is partially to blame for this though.

    Also, we have 2 WRX wagons (5-speed) in the parking lot here at work. One silver one, and one white one (the white's brand new). Looks like the car is pretty popular. I like them alot, and would definitely consider one.

    My dad's relatives have an old 80s Subaru wagon with the crap beat out of it and 210K miles from running up and down mountains in NC. It's 4WD and stick, and still runs to this day.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Don't let that bother you - the Porsche 911 and BMW M3 coupe also have frameless doors.

    -juice
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    The Toyota Camry has framed doors, yet the Lexus ES300 has frameless doors.

    Interesting that their more expensive and quieter model does without frameless doors.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    A Lexus with frameless doors? Now that IS surprising...
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    I think the previous generation ES300 had frameless doors....the current ones have framed doors.

    Also, as far as the tinny noise from the doors closing, my take is that Subaru has not spent the dollars to tune the sound of the doors closing to a solid sounding "THUNK", as opposed to many other companies that spend the dollars for that.

    Mercedes spends a lot of money to make the sound of the doors closing, sound impressive. The M-class was criticized in its introduction year, for its tinny door-closing sound and in the year after, Mercedes tuned the sound to make it sound solid. The inherent safety in the structure is a completely different aspect and has definitely not changed, regardless of the more impressive sounding "THUNK". Structural strength is all in the way it is designed, and not in the sound of the doors closing...

    Later...AH
  • mikusmikus Member Posts: 109
    The wing may look ridiculous, but it works. It helps to decrease Cd by 0.01 from 0.39 to 0.38 and it also helps to decrease the lift force on the trunk which helps at high speeds. Of course, for sharp turn-ins on 40 mph in 15 mph turn the wing is almost useless.

    Best shifter: first, you cannot compare shifter with long linkage (like Impreza) and the one which sticks directly to gearbox (BMW). The latter always would be better. Second, Honda is good, but try Focus, you'd be surprised how sleek its linkage is. And Matrix/Celica is totally out of comparison (I drove Matrix and Focus couple of days ago). Too bad, I never drove Impreza with short shifter, I only tried it on the show car at LA Auto Show.
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    Comparing the Previous Gen. ES300 (97-01) to the Previous Gen. Camry (97-01)
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    My short-shifter in my WRX is now exceptionally smooth, quick,accurate, and easy. Now that it is broken in with over 16K miles.
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    do you have a link for those wing/no wing Cd numbers?

    Thanks.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    The wing will work >110mph so how often do we usually drive at sustained 110mph? Not me.

    -mike
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    there's actually a huge debate on nasioc about how effective the wing actually is for most drivers. I'd like to find some hard numbers to do the calculations and find out what speed the added downforce becomes measurable.

    unfortunately, not everyone shares your (and my) view of the situation, and some have even suggested that removing the wing would create a _dangerous_ handling vehicle at normal speed limits. Data and facts are needed, because my opinion is no more valuable than anyone elses. (and I'm not saying it should be)
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Yeah I'd like to see some #s too. My data is totally anecdotal(sp) but I'm pretty sure I'm right.

    -mike
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Anyone have a wind tunnel in their backyard? ;-)

    -Dave
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Actually paisan, I think you do! :o)

    -juice
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I have about 20 of them within a mile radius of my office, including a full scale tunnel that tests cars! At $10000 per hour and up, I don't think we will be using them to answer the spoiler question, however.... I do have a demo wind tunnel in my office that can handle Matchbox size toy cars if that would help!

    If someone has a CAD definition of the WRX with and without spoiler, I can run a computational fluid dynamics simulation equivalent to a wind tunnel test. I'm not kidding, I would do it for the learning experience. I do this sort of thing all the time with airplanes, and cars are just a different application.

    What I could do is work up some back of the envelope numbers if anyone is interested. Would be better than nothing, I suppose. I'll have to wander over to NASIOC and see what's up.

    At the bare minimum, the rear spoiler on the WRX has credibility because it's an AWD vehicle, and the added downforce can benefit traction. Put a spoiler on a FWD car, aft of the rear axle, and any added downforce will come at the expense of traction. That's why I consider most rear spoilers on FWD cars to be a hoax.

    Craig
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.