Subaru Impreza WRX

1156157159161162224

Comments

  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Does the WRX have the throttle lag associated with most turbos? I was wondering, because I would more than likely choose an automatic, and wondered if it would significantly affect performance. Thanks. :)
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    Don't buy an automatic. I test drove both and the difference in terms of performance is considerable.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Go for a test drive and see if you could live with the lag! :-)

    -Dennis
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    is not bad at all with 5-spd, don't know about autos but assume it is noticeably worse.

    Craig
  • qualityguyqualityguy Member Posts: 101
    Year ago (or even more) I wrote, that Subaru should build Turbo H6 Impreza. I've heard a lot on this forum that this will not happen 'cuz of this and that, etc. Guess what: read Autonews.com or http://www.autogazeta.com/index--n-396-r-27-a-10611.html, http://www.lenta.ru/auto/2003/01/29/impreza/ for those who can read some other languages or http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/?http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/ae_news_story.php?id=33562 who doesn't (for whatever reason, the last link doesn't come up blue from beginning to the end, but you should copy and paste it in the address bar from the first h to 562 including) .
  • mjc440mjc440 Member Posts: 76
    Kenoka mentions a Winter Package with heated seats - will the heated seats be with the cloth interior? The WRX isn't going to get leather??? I've never seem heated seats with cloth interior - always with leather.
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    But I've seen cloth heated seats. A friend of mine drives a GTI with cloth, heated seats. Very comfortable.

    DjB
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I know VW offers heated seats with cloth, never sat on them though. Heat can help with back aches though, whether the upholstery is cloth or leather.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I seem to remember reading a test here on Edmunds of the auto WRX wagon. They said they got something like 8.? 0-60 with brake torqueing, and I know the 5-speed can do 6.4s 0-60. That does seem like a considerable loss.

    My current car (Jetta) is turbocharged, and there is hardly any lag, even with automatic. There is some, but I am used to it now (got 30K on it). Also, I have heard you have to rev the WRX to about 3000rpm for "life", is that true? I am used to it kicking in at 1950rpm, but that's because the torque curve is flat from 1950-5000rpm in the 1.8T.
  • mgreene1mgreene1 Member Posts: 116
    That's per Subaru's Australian website and their specs are very close to US specs. They also say the wagon is only .10 seconds slower 0-100 km vs. the sedan.
    http://subaru.com.au/explore/impreza/specifications.asp?item=1159- 1
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    Apart from the engine, the biggest contributor to the difference in dash performance between manual and automatic transmission is gear ratio. On that Subuar specs page, the manual's gearing is much shorter, especially 1 and 2nd gears. That allows the manual to get greater mechanical advantage at those lower speeds/engine revs, where the turbo hasn't yet switched on. The manual will "get rolling" faster and get on-boost more quickly.

    I'd like to see a comparison of 5-60mph times (ie "rolling start") between the auto and manual, and predict the difference to be less than 1.2 seconds.

    DjB
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    Edmund's torque-braked a slushbox WRX wagon to 3,000RPM and got a 6.8 0-60 run. Also commented that the tranny took well to that type of launch.
  • declansdaddeclansdad Member Posts: 120
    Subaru does offer heated cloth seats...I've got them in my Forester. Maybe you won't have to get leather after all.

    Michael
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    R&T tested an auto wagon WRX and got 6.7 for 0-60, also with the torquebraking method. Their manual wagon WRX was 5.8 for 0-60 (Clutch drop). Just for your information.

    Also, a difference of about a second is common between manual and autos. For example, a 2002 Maxima SE in manual - 6 seconds 0-60 and 6.9 0-60 for the auto - Car&Driver.
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Right, I remember hearing high 6 second range for the auto (0-60), and high 5 second range for the manual. Personally, I feel like the manual is plenty gutsy down low. The lag is not bad at all. I have driven a few VW 1.8T models, and the WRX definitely pulls stronger off the line.

    Craig
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Try one out, vocus, because the numbers can't tell how it feels while it's doing the 0-60.

    If you think the lag is bad, you may want to try a Forester turbo if it gets the rumored 2.5l light-pressure turbo. In fact that would feel a lot more like your 1.8T, sort of.

    It's not confirmed, though. Forester could even get the 217hp 2.0lT from Japan.

    Subaru has a major announcement coming on Wednesday, so I bet we'll know for sure in 2 days!

    -juice
  • sonya4sonya4 Member Posts: 92
    OK, I don't know much (anything) about the cat converter, but my check engine light came on again over the weekend and I took my car in to the dealership. They scanned the computer and said that now something was up with the cat and restricting airflow (is that right?).

    They said I would have to leave the car for probably a couple of days, so I'm taking it in next week, since this week is kinda hectic for me.

    Anyway, is this something that can happen any time? What are the causes? I know I can still drive the car (although there's a bit of hesitation during strong acceleration) but should I drive carefully--not get the rpms up too high, for example?

    Note: As usual, because the fiance was with me, the service technician started talking to him instead of me...why is that?? My fiance had to tell him, "It's her car--talk to her."

    --sonya
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    If it really is a cat problem, personally, I would not drive the car at all. If the cat restricts exhaust flow it could be bad for the engine (especially with a turbo motor). In addition, the cat can overheat and this can be dangerous. I have seen them glow red hot when this happens.

    An engine that runs too lean can cause the cat to overheat and gradually deteriorate the catalyst honeycomb, which may lead to it getting plugged up. An engine that runs too rich or has a weak spark can plug up the cat (with soot basically). So it could be several possible issues. Can you think of anything that would have precipitated this? An engine mod? A questionable tank of gas? Has the exhaust looked OK?

    Craig
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That used to happen when people put regular gas in when unleaded was required. Now you don't see much regular gas around, so it's no longer an issue.

    I would take it in as soon as you can. It's basically choking the engine.

    -juice
  • nano317nano317 Member Posts: 7
    I apologize again if I am at the wrong section. I am interested in purchasing a 2003 WRX wagon Auto, and was wondering what people are paying for theirs? especially in the NYC area. I went to carsdirect.com and the price was $22,608. And it seems there is a special going on with 0.0% financing with dealer incentives. and I went to www.car-prices-costs.com and saw the invoice prices for the 2002.

    2002 Subaru Impreza prices:
    SubaruMod BaseMSRP BaseInvoice Holdback BaseCost
    WRX wagon $23,495 $21,523 $706 $20817

    Holdback: 3% of the Total MSRP
    Example: Base Invoice - Holdback = Base Cost
    Base Cost (above) - Rebate/Incentive = True Cost
     
    So just wondering what is a good price. thank you all.
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I recently got an 03 sedan for about $800 under invoice (after the $500 incentive), which seems typical as they close out the 03 models. On the WRX, you can get the dealer cash back ($500) or the special financing, but not both. Best bet is to get the cash back and try to line up your own financing. I got 4.4%APR/60months from a local bank, which compares favorably to Subaru's 3.9%/60 deal (especially with another $500 knocked off the principle).

    Craig
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    I've been quoted, for the sedan with I5B and I5J, $23,424, with the $500 cash back. That's ~300 over invoice, according to Edmunds. How do I get them to drop, say to $23,000 even? Simply tell the dealer "I will pay 23 even or no deal?"

    Forgive me if my tone is a bit plaintive, but I've never been very good at this kind of face/face negotiation. I know all about "you're the customer, make them earn the sale" etc, but never seem able to put it into practice. My brother-in-law got a Liberty at a major under-invoice deal (so big that the dealer wrote in the paperwork a trade-in value of $7000, when in fact it was only $3500) but he wasn't able to tell me how beyond "I just haggled him down."

    DjB
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    is to go to someplace like www.fitzmall.com, price out a Subaru similar to the model you want, and ask your dealer to meet or beat that price (print it out and bring it with you). It's good leverage, and makes life easy if they are serious about selling you a car. It's how I bought my LL Bean.

    On my wife's Forester, we had to haggle a little, but they eventually came within a few hundred dollars of the Fitzgerald price and I was happy with that. The deal involved a trade, which always complicates matters, but we did OK.

    On my WRX, the dealer was advertising for $3000 off MSRP on any WRX in stock, which made life real easy. Zero negotiations. I didn't even complain about the processing fee! I would have tipped somebody if I had cash!

    I had to haggle long and hard when I bought my Prelude in 1997. This was at the end of the model year, and they had about 6 of them on the lot. Only one was equipped they way I wanted, but I didn't tell them that. Of course, they acted like they would sell all the cars imminently, but I could tell some of the cars had been on the lot for a while (in VA, you can look at the inspection sticker to see when the dealership receives the car).

    The dealer started way above MSRP. After a few weeks of negotiation, they eventually came down to the price I wanted (close to invoice). I think the key was to let them know that I was interested in the car, but basically to wait them out until the price was right. Even if you want the car really really bad, you have to keep cool and stick to your guns. Go to a different dealer if necessary.

    The same dealership also sells Subarus a few blocks down the road, but they have never even bothered to follow up after the initial contact (they sell for MSRP+, even when Subaru offers incentives). I have bought 4 Subarus from a dealer 50 miles away, after starting at the local place first and then moving on. So I guess a lot of it depends on how badly they want the sale. Obviously, the Honda store wanted the Prelude sale more than the Subaru dealer wants my business!

    I guess my only real advice is to be prepared (I bring my laptop in with all the info I could possibly ever need), and be willing to wait them out until the price is to your liking. Time can be a valuable weapon against a desperate sales staff! Also, be prepared to deal with the manager directly. Often times, the sales guy is helpless, but you can play hardball with the manager.

    Craig
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    Most places have a fleet/net manager who is paid on volume. If you email, or call, and ask to talk to such a person, asking for the price and letting them know you're serious about buying, often you'll get pretty good prices.

    The way I use this is to begin with dealers about 100 or more miles away. After Ihave 5 or 6 decent bids, I call the locals and, if their price is higher, tell them I have one X-dollars less. They usually jump at it.

    JW
  • thedog4thedog4 Member Posts: 14
    I am a brand new follower of the WRX wagon crew. I went through a fleet guy on the internet (thanks Edmunds!) and got a low price quote right off the bat. The MSRP: $24,708 My price: $22,678. According to the research, this was $100 over invoice. I did not have to haggle and hassle with a salesman. I told him the type, color, and options. That day he found the car, the color, and most of the options (the alarm will be installed later). The next day I went to the dealorship, test drive the machine, inspected it, filled out the paperwork (with the 3.9 financing), and left with the new car in less than an hour. Most important, I don't feel like I got the shaft.
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    nano317 Feb 12, 2003 12:17pm

    Alan-
    I'm going to sound off, I know mike [paisan] will soon :)

    Get in touch with Mark Jerrick @ Staten Island Subaru 718 979 9595. He's a good friend of mike and ever ready to work a deal favorable with you.

    I think he still has a 4EAT Black WRX wagon that was supposedly be for me. ;-) From a mix-up.

    -Dave
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    What I don't much care for in my 1.8T is the turbo lag, and it's pretty minimal. My engine comes "alive" at 1950rpm. I would hate if it it didn't "wake up" until 3000rpm, like Edmunds said the WRX automatic wagon did.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Yep, what Hypov said. Dave and I were out to dinner with him last night. Great guy, and one of the most knowledgeable salesmen in the business. Nicest part is that he gives you the full and complete price. The only thing you need to add to his price is your 2nd tank of gas!

    -mike
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    I have a non turbo non variable timing engine, and I don't think it "comes alive" until 2500rpm or so. To get much response below 2000, I think you might need a 6 or 8 cylinder.

    do yourself a favor and drive it, and see if you like the response. I would think that as long as you stay in the gas pedal, you can stay in the 3k+ range while accelerating.
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    there's no easy way to find prices on a vehicle as-configured, and I received 3 separate responses in 24 hours, 1 giving a price on a different vehicle, 1 saying "it's in stock at our website" and 1 saying "call me to yada yada."

    Seems to be some confusion/redudancy within their sales department. Doesn't inspire a high degree of confidence.

    DjB
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    What I hate about mine is that sometimes, it feels flat. But the torque curve is 1950-5000rpm, flat all the way across. So it definitely comes alive at 1950, and it's a 4cyl.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    DjB: we bought our 2002 Legacy L from them for the exact price on the net, with the exact equipment they listed. It was the best buying experience of our lives, without a doubt.

    I think for instant response, even a V6 (or H6) might not be enough. No replacement for displacement. The Nissan VQ V6 might please you, or a V8, or maybe even a diesel. Especially the new diesels being offered in Europe, like the Touareg's V10 turbo. :-)

    -juice
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I drove a TDI before getting my 1.8T, and I decided I didn't want that. A diesel would please me now, with these gas prices and the fact that I commute about 80 miles daily. :( I loved the VQ in the 03 Alima I test drove this past weekend. Now that's an engine! Unfortunately, I know from renting an 02 Maxima for a day that this engine sucks gas like no tomorrow as well.

    I think getting away from smaller displacement engines definitely helps response. I don't find the 1.8T too bad, once you get used to the mild lag. That's something I don't think I wanna deal with on my next car though.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Yeah, those are kind of the opposite. Great torque down low, but they run out of breath and get wheezy at higher speeds.

    I drove an Altima, too - torque steer was awful. A little stiff, too, plus a vague shifter, some cheapness inside. Maybe add a limited slip - but that's the Maxima's job.

    -juice
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    The torque steer wasn't worse than the Jetta's is. Happens when you send large amounts of torque to 2 wheels. :) The ASR on the Jetta helps, and the model I drove was auto with traction control (I can't drive stick yet).

    The interior was upgraded a little for 03, and didn't look too bad. What surprised me was a general lack of headroom (this car did have a sunroof) compared to my VW. Also, the engine seemed to transmit some vibration through the frame of the car upon idle (3.5), something I really don't care for.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Boxers do that, in fact you'll have to get used to the distinct growl they provide too.

    It's funny, as different as VW and Subaru are, owners are similarly loyal to the brand.

    -juice
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    But Subaru owners are loyal to their cars, VW owners (older ones, anyway) are loyal to their mechanics... :)
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    After a test drive, my impression of the Altima was that it was way overpowered for a mass-market FWD 4 door sedan. And the sales pitch from Nissan and the dealer focuses on power (never mind the crappy interior and other corners that were cut in the name of HP). No doubt they are appealing to people that have been missing power in their previous vehicles. More bang for the buck. It is fine in the hands of qualified and responsible drivers, but I shudder to think about V6 Altimas in the hands of the general public! Could be as bad as the people who drive large SUVs aggressively, if you ask me.

    I haven't driven a new V6 Accord, but it seems like it would be overpowerd in concept. I am sure Honda did not cut as many corners as Nissan, but still, that seems like overkill to me. My parents have a previous generation 4-cyl Accord, and the car is damn near perfectly balanced in my opinion. Nice engine, great handling, and more than adequate power with a 5-spd. Why that car needs another 80 HP is beyond me. I can see how the refinement of a V6 is appealing, especially with an auto trans, but the extra power seems like a ludicrous overkill. In a sports car or sports sedan aimed at enthusiasts, fine. But as a family car? No way.

    Craig
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I am a power hungry driver, currently with a 1.8T Jetta. I am just finding that adequate now, after driving it for over a year.

    The Accord was very quiet, Lexus like almost, and a little vanilla. Also, I found it to be a surprise that the Accord doesn't have heated mirrors in any trim level. $29K and no heated mirrors?!?! Even a $15K Jetta GL has those standard! With the Altima, I felt a little vibration of the engine through the frame of the car during idle. I didn't like that, and also the head room was a little tight for me (I am 6'3 and must have a sunroof).

    I think many cars are trying to wear 2 hats basically. Have room for the family, and handling/power to satisfy a driver when he/she wants it. A perfect combo, IMO.
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    Vocus,

    If a little vibration bothers you, you're not going to like the WRX then. The WRX has a very lumpy idle.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Craig: you may have a point. I think what we're talking about is "balance". Those might have too much power for their chassis.

    What I mean is, are the brakes upgraded to stop as quickly as they go? What about the suspension?

    The Accord tested by C&D was quicker than all the near-luxury cars tested in the same issue a couple of months ago, yet it's braking distance was the worst, and handling was also sub-par.

    Scary thought, no?

    -juice
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    Some people think just going fast in a straight line is all that matters. Not so. I like the Mazda6 alot, it handles wonderfully. It just doesn't have enough go for me.

    Also, the Altima SE is a good deal more athletic than the Accord EX V6. I drove both back to back over the same roads..
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I went to test drive a WRX last week, because I have never been inside one. They were all covered with snow though, so I didn't get to drive one. I might go back when I have time to do so.
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    If engine lag, headroom, and, NVH are issues, what about the Mazda 6? Even though the ride is harsher than all the cars mentioned (according to reports).

    In terms of torque steer, unless you get LSD and/or equal shafts in the front, you will get torque steer.

    I had it in my old V6 Camry.

    You might also like the Maxima, but with a sunroof, I think it has less headroom than the Altima. Also, can not get LSD with it unless you get the manual.
  • vocusvocus Member Posts: 7,777
    I tried the 6, and head room was tight. I wasn't touching, but my hair was rubbing the roof, and it's buzz-cut.

    I rented an 02 Maxima SE for a day, hated the driver's seat. Hurt my back like hell. I did, however, like the Toyota RAV4. I don't need any size of SUV though, just liked the way it felt.

    Also, I don't want stick because my car is primarily used for commuting purposes. I was also just checking out my options, my car is a little more than a year old. No new car anytime soon for me.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Everything I've read says the Accord handles very well. There's no torque-steer like that found on the Altima, even with the V6.

    Bob
  • kenokakenoka Member Posts: 218
    Now that it's been confirmed, maybe you'll want to hold out for the new Subaru Forester 2.5XT (T for Turbo). 210hp/235lb-ft and headroom galore.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I doubt the Accord is tuned as sporty as the Altima or Mazda 6. It probably rides better than those, and behaves well in 6/10ths driving, but at 9/10ths the other two will handle better.

    I realize this is the previous generation, but Ed ran autocross and was quicker than the V6 Accords and Maximas that were there. In his Forester. Sans turbo. On his rookie run. That says a lot.

    -juice
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    back to our regularly scheduled discussion on the Rex....

    :-)
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Not to put down ed or anything or detract from the Forester, but the Accords and Maximas running weren't driven by anyone with much experience. I'd like to see a Forester with an experienced driver like Ed :) v. Accord or Maxima driven by an experienced driver and see how they shake out.

    -mike
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.