By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Now the big question - what would you be willing to pay for all of the "features" (not the design stuff) in a Subaru?
Thanks for the post. I can tell you really wanted to get all of your thoughts out there and they are appreciated.
Patti
So, I'd say you should research the lubrication angle. Could be the column shaft, or somewhere else in the steering mechanism.
Craig
Thank you! Gee, I hadn't thought of an itemized price structure or anything. With all due respect, I think Subaru's basic cars are incredible values, but, the after market stuff is way over priced. If we're talking about a package on an STi wagon, off the top of my head, perhaps $2-3K extra.
That would be nice if the wheel well isn't in the way.
-Dave
The Saab will be a 5-door.
-mike
BTW, the cargo cover does fit under the floor when not in use. Check out the recessed spot under there.
-Dennis
Thanks, I hadn't tried that. I was thinking that it would be nice if the roof rack cross bars could fit into pre-measured holes in the rack and could be mounted with wing nuts or dials so that one wouldn't have to measure and use a second tool. BTW, my cross bars came delivered spaced differently than suggested in the owners manual. I'd also like to see some kind of boot over the windshield wiper mounts, I have a hard time keeping leaf debris from getting clogged in there. My suggestions were made with the premise that they could be offered as a an optional package. It was not my intention to unnecessarily squeeze people out from a price point.
I still don't have a sound system in mine and I'm not it a hurry to put one in - it's like driving a video game anyway - all the entertainment I need is already there :-)
Look at Mitsubishi - they did the opposite, and came out with the EVO RS. They deleted sound insulation and vanity lights to save weight!
Perhaps you could have two models, a lighter sport-oriented model, and a luxurious one. But yeah, I agree, that's what the Saab 9-2 should be.
-juice
Craig
Thanks!
Patti
As far as the weight of my suggestions goes for the lighting etc - I wonder how many pounds the 3 things I mentioned would weigh - I wouldn't think more than two or three pounds for some extra lighting hardware, that's probably a high estimate.
hunter - thanks for the dynamat placement advice.
Just display All Subaru Discussion and you'll find it.
-Dennis
You ought to check out the list of discussions in your Owners Club (where that one resides). An easy way to get to the Owners Club is follow the link in the header of this discussion.
Should I bring it back to the dealer? Thanks
With his nits, and the comment:
"Match those with the price and I'm really surprised the car is as popular as it is. "
- he would have been run out of other boards on this website. Instead he just leaves in a huss because we all do not agree with him that the 6 is a superior car to the WRX!
I thought the people gave intelligent and rational responses to his issues, and to the reasoning as to why we purchased a WRX over other cars.
I would say the reason the majority bought a WRX over other vehicles in its price range is due to the superior drivetrain of the WRX.
One last comment, there are car company reps that frequent these boards, and post on these boards (including Mazda). I wonder if Lackofdave was one of them? His responses and line of questioning would fit this mold.
Opinions vary and we can all be grateful we have so many choices available. And we can all be thrilled that we have chosen the right vehicle for ourselves, right?
Thanks.
John
If white is a color option then why not have it in stock?
Call me just curious. Why? I'm looking at the WRX again (maybe this means something, that I keep coming back to this car) and the two colors I would go for are WR Blue and White (of which there are none). Black is too hard to clean. Silver - too many. Red - I like it but is it too "flashy"?
I'm going to test drive one in the next week - I've only driven an auto version (about a year ago) and wasn't too impressed. The addition of the prem pkg (htd seats,mirrors, sunroof) addressed the lack of features I really wanted
Curious what gas mileage is for you all - about 50/50 driving? (I did search mpg, but it hasn't been discussed for awhile so thought I'd ask.)
I want the WRX+prem.pkg. and no other options... unless there is one (or more) that you guys think are a "must". ??
Thanks for reading this long msg
Wayde
While the armrest is definitely a plus for extra storage, I rarely use it for resting my arm. I usually keep both hands on the wheel. :-)
Love the auto-dimming mirror, mainly for it's compass.
-Dennis
Thanks for the advice, but I have searched every subie dealers within 400 miles of me.
Oh well, blue is my 2nd choice.
Feedback on the short throw shifter? pros/cons?
White looks excellent in a WRX, but is more rare. I saw a white STi with silver rims and it was hot.
Craig
If you add the momo knob, you can shorten the shifter length even more and get the throws even shorter.
http://members.cox.net/craig.hunter/shifter.jpg
And if you like tinkering, you can buy Kartboy bushings for about $30 and crawl under the car for 10-15 minutes to install them. It really improves shifter feel.
Craig
White/ Gold was my #1 choice when I got my STi, I ended up with Blue/ Gold - I'm happy with it.
I want an STi and lean toward blue/gold, white/silver or silver/silver. The blue is the color it should be but with Houston heat the lighter colors have appeal. Now if I'd just win that lotto....
-mike
I love my black and it's not "hard to clean," dirt is just more visible on it! Saw a white one once. Most of the ones on the street are blue or silver. Haven't seen red that often either.
Come to think of it, have seen only one STi on the street so far, and it was blue and gold.
--sonya
Any chance of posting a photo?
-mike
Thanks.
-juice
The Latch system was poor in most of the sporty vehicles tested. The STi had complaints for the rear-head restraints/rests not being able to protect the head in an accident.
Also, the 350Z received negative points for not being able to manually turn off the side air-bag if a child is sitting in the passenger seat.
:-) It takes CR to notice these, I sure would not!
-juice
- Nope, virtually all the cars rated (of the STi, Evo, RX8, 350Z, and Crossfire ) were criticised in this area.
-juice
Also, with car mags, it is who is giving them the most money to promote which.
I read them for practical information.
And I do agree, now at least they have begun to understand sports cars, and many are highly rated. The STi is "excellent" and is their top recommendation for its class.
Years ago they would have whined about the stiff ride, summer tires, view-blocking spoiler, yada yada yada.
-juice
The important thing is to read between the lines also because no matter what they say one big factor to them is price. There's no way an SVT would come out ahead of a WRX otherwise.
I like CR and read it every now and then. I appreciate the breadth of information they provide and value a lot of their data and statistics more then the stuff in the car mags. I do like knowing performance info as well but I need to know about the real world since my time is spent there, not unfortunately on the track and having fun all the time.