Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

A Mechanic's Life - Tales From Under the Hood

1132133135137138180

Comments

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited September 2016
    I've heard that the margin on new cars is around 2% - pretty low, relatively speaking.

    Everything is going to the subscription model, software, groceries (Amazon's "buttons"), you name it.

    It's already here with cars - just look at how fast leasing is growing. The next big thing will be used car leases (CPOs for the payment buyers who want even lower payments).

    Durable goods like washers and refrigerators used to last an easy 20 years and they were repairable without breaking your wallet. Makes good economic sense for the consumer but I bet even Dave Ramsey likes getting the newest shiny stainless steel French door stuff and pedestal washers every 6 or 8 years now. Next up will be "self-driving" washers and we'll all want to upgrade anyway so our frig can remind us to grab milk on the commute home (I joke - actually the frig will call Safeway and a gallon will be delivered....).

    The average age of cars on the road is 11 years. Place your bets - my guess is that the sales bubble of the last two years, together with the high cost of repair that will make it too expensive to fix the old ones, will combine to take a couple of years off that average.
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    stever said:

    I've heard that the margin on new cars is around 2% - pretty low, relatively speaking.

    If that is the case, why would that dealer be mining his service traffic for sales?
    How can dealers offer end of year discounts that are 10-20% off of MSRP? (on top of factory assistance)
    stever said:


    It's already here with cars - just look at how fast leasing is growing. The next big thing will be used car leases (CPOs for the payment buyers who want even lower payments).

    Tell them good luck with that without techs that can repair the turn-ins.
    stever said:



    Durable goods like washers and refrigerators used to last an easy 20 years and they were repairable without breaking your wallet. Makes good economic sense for the consumer but I bet even Dave Ramsey likes getting the newest shiny stainless steel French door stuff and pedestal washers every 6 or 8 years now.

    Try five years for a Whirlpool Duet front loader. Bearing failure that requires all of the drums to be replaced since the bearing that fails isn't supposed to be serviceable separately. The washer cost just short of $800, the estimate to repair it is just over $1000. I'm fortunate that it's easily within my reach to get the parts and fix it if I choose to, but that's still over $300. Just wait until $30,000(+) cars are treated the same way.
    stever said:


    The average age of cars on the road is 11 years. Place your bets - my guess is that the sales bubble of the last two years, together with the high cost of repair that will make it too expensive to fix the old ones, will combine to take a couple of years off that average.

    High cost of repair? As compared to what? A washing machine that at five years old costs more to repair a bearing failure than the machine cost? Imagine a $60,000 Tesla needing an $80,000 repair when it's five years old. No warranty, no help from the manufacturer or the dealer, no recalls, no trade-in, just throw it away and figure out how you are going to pay for the next one.

    BTW, you keep ignoring the fact that leasing doesn't solve any problems unless there is a viable resale market to absorb the rest of the vehicle cost. If that doesn't exist then the first lease has to pay for 100% of all of the vehicle's inherent costs, and future leasing prices will reflect those costs.

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    >If that is the case, why would that dealer be mining his service traffic for sales?

    Because they make a bundle selling the clean, late model used ones. Who goes to the dealer for service? Owners of cars under warranty. Those cars are easy to CPO.

    >How can dealers offer end of year discounts that are 10-20% off of MSRP? (on top of factory assistance)

    Invoice is pretty much a meaningless number these days - MSRP always has been.

    >Tell them good luck with that without techs that can repair the turn-ins.

    There will be no resale market after ten years - the "old" cars will be recycled. When I was growing up, a running ten year old car was an anomaly, so we're just going full circle. A $30,000 car that last ten years is going to cost $3,000 a year for the capital expense. The cheapest leases typically go for $199 a month or $2,400 a year, and that's for a $18,000 car. So we're there. The five year old Tesla will get CPO'ed with a software refresh and maybe some new battery cells (probably not though). And that's how you absorb the "rest" of the vehicle cost.



  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited September 2016
    Oh, here's a good link posted just now by @driver100 for people who do like to mess with old stuff.

    Be right down your alley Doc, since you enjoy messing with Whirlpool bearings as much as cars. ;)
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    stever said:

    Invoice is pretty much a meaningless number these days - MSRP always has been.

    On that we agree. The dealers aren't building those Taj Mahal's that they sell cars out of on just 2% over the cost of a new car and the parts and service department revenues, (although those can generate some amazing GP).
    stever said:




    There will be no resale market after ten years - the "old" cars will be recycled. When I was growing up, a running ten year old car was an anomaly, so we're just going full circle. A $30,000 car that last ten years is going to cost $3,000 a year for the capital expense. The cheapest leases typically go for $199 a month or $2,400 a year, and that's for a $18,000 car.

    Woah, time out. What about the $3000 (approx.) down plus the taxes and license? So it's NOT $7200 to rent an $18,000 car for three years, it's closer to $12K. Here are some local examples.
    http://www.baierlford.com/hot-list/new.htm?tcdkwid=106140214&tcdcmpid=438681&tcdadid=118890139768

    10,500 miles a year. Yea right, I'd need to have six cars to not have the mileage exceed the limits. The Fusion is only $1995 down plus tax etc. The F150 is $4495 down plus tax etc,
    stever said:


    So we're there. The five year old Tesla will get CPO'ed with a software refresh and maybe some new battery cells (probably not though). And that's how you absorb the "rest" of the vehicle cost.

    So you "walk" down to the dealer and have a choice between a CPO lease and a new car lease. The difference is negligible when you get to the bottom line. Do you really think there would be a market for the CPO?

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited September 2016
    You have taxes and fees on used cars too - there's no free lunch.

    Yeah, I do think there will be a market for a leased CPO. The CPO will be attractive since it should be more car for the money vs a new one at the same payment, since the depreciation hit is partially eaten up. And even though it's used it'll have an extended warranty and maybe free loaners or free service.

    And the CPO gives you that all important, infallible 184 point inspection that you just can't get on a used Craigslist car :D (not that you can lease a FSBO car any way. Not yet anyway, bet that's coming too).
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    You can't have a viable CPO program without qualified technicians. You don't deserve to have qualified techs when every other breath is all about denigrating the people who are trying to be good techs on top of the fact that people who would be capable of being great techs can't make an equivalent living at it when compared to almost any other career they could choose.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Well, the smart alec response to that is that the CPO programs aren't hurting right now, and reading some of the horror stories, the dealers aren't letting the tech do their jobs anyway (or they are handing off the checklists to the porters).

    Maybe you don't agree that buyers should get a PPI before buying a CPO car, just like any other used car, but I often recommend that as cheap insurance.

    The trick of course, is finding a good mechanic and then trying to schedule something on short notice.
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    stever said:

    Well, the smart alec response to that is that the CPO programs aren't hurting right now, and reading some of the horror stories, the dealers aren't letting the tech do their jobs anyway (or they are handing off the checklists to the porters).

    If there are horror stories then CPO isn't perfect and hurting in some places.
    stever said:


    Maybe you don't agree that buyers should get a PPI before buying a CPO car, just like any other used car, but I often recommend that as cheap insurance.

    Lets see. A tech is assigned to service a car and do a PMI, (Preventive Maintenance Inspection) or whatever someone wants to call it. The shop presses them to find work that needs done and most don't even pay the tech to do the PMI as the "reward" is supposed to be gravy work that might get sold. Meanwhile the practice is portrayed as unethical by consumers and "consumer experts". BTW doing PMI's allows techs to polish their inspection skills and that makes them more efficient and effective at inspecting the cars. So then the tech is assigned a CPO inspection and the roles reverse. The consumer now expects everything to be found and the shop will frown on the car possibly being picked apart. No matter what the tech does, someone will be, and someone else won't be happy.
    stever said:


    The trick of course, is finding a good mechanic and then trying to schedule something on short notice.

    Maybe that wouldn't be that hard if the members of the trade had stood up decades ago and not accepted being treated the way that they were. (still are)

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited September 2016
    I haven't equated a Pre Purchase Inspection with at PMI but in a perfect world, they would be the same thing wouldn't they?

    There's one exceptional home inspector I'm acquainted with. He's a journeyman with a license but likes the inspection business better. Depending on the size of your house and the number of issues found, you'll wind up with a 50 to 150 page report that's really a checklist of what's right, what's wrong, what needs to be address immediately and what would be good to have done, but something that's not a health or safety issue.

    The nice thing about his job is that he's not selling his own construction business and he's not finding stuff wrong and recommending that his friends work on your house.

    I don't see the same separation happening with car inspections, always seems to be a conflict of interest.

    Now you, you could start a trend.
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    PPI, PMI are absolutely the same from a techs perspective, then politics of who's going to pay take over and things that are right on one day are wrong on the next. Likewise the PPI would be a paid operation, and the PMI usually isn't.

    As far as the home inspector goes, how much does it cost him for the tools of his trade? How much does he get to charge to do one inspection? That's just two questions and the answers reveal there is no comparison when it comes to the cost to do the work in tools and schools and there is really no comparison as to the rewards for doing it.

    Think of this comparison one more way. Which of these two jobs can really be learned in a week, and which one isn't finished being learned after forty years?
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    More from AutoNews.... How to boost profits in the service bay.
    http://www.autonews.com/article/20160905/RETAIL07/160909952/1147

    Read everything, especially Coker's Tips...

    ON RETENTION
    Be creative to retain valuable, qualified technicians. Consider flexible hours or unusual shifts, like four 10-hour days a week. “We have got to find ways to put some handcuffs on these people.”


    That's an odd way to try and keep the best techs from leaving the dealership, let alone the trade.

    Ways to do that include having lower-paid employees keep the service area clean and deliver parts to technicians from the parts department, Coker said. Junior technicians also could handle routine maintenance while “A”-level technicians concentrate on more profitable and more highly skilled jobs.

    “How can we keep him in the stall, doing $110 in gross profit-per-hour stuff?” Coker said. He said dealerships also should consider hiring retired A-level technicians part time, to work with and train entry-level technicians, instead of having full-time senior technicians do it.


    Routine maintenance performed by junior technicians, that makes sense. Too bad that a viable career path doesn't really exist to take those junior techs and grow them to be the next generation of top techs which he does try to address with the next comment.

    Coker said an average figure for productivity is 59 percent. “It’s never 100 percent,” he said, because of bathroom breaks, meals, etc. However, dealerships should minimize avoidable downtime — for instance, the time technicians spend getting parts from the parts department, he said.

    Efficiency is the number of so-called flat-rate hours a technician produces, divided by the hours spent working. That ratio can and should be more than 100 percent, Coker said.


    By now you should realize that with the discrepancy between customer pay hours and warranty rate hours, being more than 100% efficient can be an extreme challenge for all but the most elite of technicians, and even they have to deal with challenges that come with newer vehicle designs and technology. You can't learn what they need to know in a classroom. Only by getting first hand experience with each vehicle and system can one gain true comprehension of the work.
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    edited September 2016
    Forgot this little gem from the above article.

    Automakers pay dealerships a fixed number of flat-rate hours per job for work done under warranty. If the technician finishes faster than the allotted time, the dealership keeps the difference — and the technician can end up working more than 24 flat-rate hours a day, Coker explained. He said average efficiency is about 180 percent.

    He clearly doesn't know how poorly warranty hours pay as compared to customer pay and even then his math is a little fuzzy. If "average" efficiency is 180%, then the techs would be turning 14.4 hours. A tech would have to hit 300% efficiency to break 24 hours. The facts are, there is "some" work that can generate that kind of efficiency, but it isn't anything that is done under warranty. Then when there are demands made,such as PMI's for free which are lost time against the productivity part of the equation, even hitting just 100% means pushing ones-self to the max, all day long.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited September 2016

    Think of this comparison one more way. Which of these two jobs can really be learned in a week, and which one isn't finished being learned after forty years?

    My guy charges $340 for a report, which usually comes out to $150 an hour on site, plus time at home tweaking the report (on "easy" houses, his software lets him do most of it as he goes). His wife runs the office.

    His tools are his smartphone (for scheduling and pics to document issues) and his laptop and he belongs to a certification organization. He has a proggie for doing the inspection ($1,000?) and the usual office tools, ISP, etc. Work tools include a temp sniffer for the HVAC vents, a simple short/neutral/ground tester, good ladder, and a few hand tools. And the obligatory pickup of course.

    He's not one of the fly-by-nights who takes a short course and hangs out a shingle. He had at least decade of experience with construction and pulling wire. He's knowledgeable and his skill set is a lot different from the "tech" who takes a day of training to learn how to change someone's oil. On the flip side, house tech doesn't change much from decade to decade.

    I take the "handcuff" comment to mean that the dealer or shop owner should make a tech's working conditions and pay so lucrative that the tech never seriously considers hunting for another job somewhere else. A good thing, in other words.
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    Having lived through it, the handcuff line holds a completely different meaning. It's a lot closer to slavery than anything else.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited September 2016
    Most people handcuff themselves by getting a job and immediately running out and getting a new car (or two), and a house. That need for a steady paycheck really limits your options and ability to walk away. Get your rent and expenses under control and you have a lot more freedom.

    My wife had 10 jobs in 30 years. A good sneeze could cause her to walk out. She might be stuck driving an '82 Tercel but she could walk. :D

    How many guys do you know who can't quit because they still owe Snap-On three more years of payments?
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    Snap-On, Matco, Mac, Cornwell...... I can't count how many times I saw shop owners tell techs, "You have to live within your means" when their standard of living allotted them food stamps.

    Here is another quote from that article.
    ON RECRUITING
    Fish for technicians wherever the fish are. That includes quick-service franchises, vocational schools and wherever recreational vehicles and boats are serviced. “A lot of RV dealerships, their technicians are not inside. Their technicians are working outside, and in Southern California and Florida, obviously in the months we're in now, it's an uncomfortable situation. They're not in a climate-controlled situation.”


    Only a few techs are in "climate controlled situations". There are more now than there was in the past, but the old line of "The heat is in the tools" still applies to many shops that don't even heat the repair bays in the winter, let alone consider putting AC in the shop.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    The percentage of auto loans that are sub prime is about 34% right now. For the moment, most borrowers are paying their bills, but the potential for a bursting bubble is certainly there.

  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    The part I never understood is when that bubble bursts and consumers can't buy another car, and they haven't maintained the one that they have correctly and are experiencing failures with it, that it is somehow our fault.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I'd be quicker to blame the lack of transportation alternatives and affordable housing close to jobs. Your ride to work should not be as big a monthly expense as your rent. The bandaid solutions of employers providing bus rides isn't going to cut it either.
  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,331
    The problem is that the majority of consumers don't live on a budget and don't even have a basic understanding of financial issues. It's all about immediate gratification.

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Perhaps THIS GUY has the solution?

    PS: I don't think so....
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Looks like LinkedIn has gone to registration to see group stuff.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    GRRRRR...let me see if I can work around that:

    See if THIS WORKS for you.

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited September 2016
    Better link, thanks!

    Best learn coding so you can fix autonomous cars.
  • guitarzanguitarzan Member Posts: 873

    Perhaps THIS GUY has the solution?

    PS: I don't think so....

    With the government's position that they can stop every single incident of harm to human beings, and that they have the right to implement legislation to do so, the autonomous vehicle is in fact an inevitability. The comments there have it correct that the government and insurance companies will regulate human driving out of existence, or at least make it prohibitively expensive for almost all of the population.

    The dichotomy is having zero accidents, but who would want to live in such a world where there is no driving, and no appreciation of the character of cars?

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    You aren't going to see fully autonomous cars anytime soon, but you might see semi-autonomous cars running on "smart roads" here and there.

    What dealers need to worry about in addition to semi-autonomous cars, is how people will buy cars in the future.

    I wonder who is going to repair all these "autonomous" cars? They can't even fix Stabilitrak :)
  • fushigifushigi Member Posts: 1,459
    I keep thinking of edge cases that can trip up an autonomous car. Construction zones (where lanes will shift & may not be well-marked, also lots of workers and the person holding the slow/stop sign to allow construction vehicles in the zone), accident scenes (even if there aren't any auto accidents there will still be debris in the road from fallen trees, rocks, etc.), spotting black ice/winter hazards, Arizona sand storms, single lane bridges, places navi doesn't reach (tunnels, deep parking garages), and so on.
    2017 Infiniti QX60 (me), 2012 Hyundai Elantra (wife)
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    stever said:


    Best learn coding so you can fix autonomous cars.

    Actually if you want to have even a fraction of a chance, you need to learn the stuff that I have been demonstrating. The software will take care of itself, the inherent weaknesses of the hardware is going to take the complexity of the modern car and raise it to the Nth power.
  • guitarzanguitarzan Member Posts: 873
    fushigi said:

    I keep thinking of edge cases that can trip up an autonomous car. Construction zones (where lanes will shift & may not be well-marked, also lots of workers and the person holding the slow/stop sign to allow construction vehicles in the zone), accident scenes (even if there aren't any auto accidents there will still be debris in the road from fallen trees, rocks, etc.), spotting black ice/winter hazards, Arizona sand storms, single lane bridges, places navi doesn't reach (tunnels, deep parking garages), and so on.

    Everything that you listed can be handled programatically. These scenarios just have not been programmed yet, but that is different from a technical challenge preventing it from happening. Infra red can detect humans, existing slip control detects slippery conditions, existing sensors can detect debris, etc.

    A much more serious challenge is that the autonomous car will be programmed on the "careful" side, and humans will not let it merge, just like they try not to let other humans merge. So occasionally the car will have to sit there all day. You can't fix obnoxious.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Unless this all happens on "smart roads", I don't see this happening. You reach a point with technology where you are cutting a stick of butter with a chain saw, just because you can.
  • fushigifushigi Member Posts: 1,459
    Sorry, but detecting icy conditions once your on them (slip control) is way, way different from seeing that patch of ice 200 yards ahead & either slowing to have control when you hit it or avoiding it altogether. It'll take some interesting software & sensors to see less obvious (non-obstruction) threats and take countermeasures.
    2017 Infiniti QX60 (me), 2012 Hyundai Elantra (wife)
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    On sheer ice there's not much technology can do for you.
  • fushigifushigi Member Posts: 1,459
    Yes, but a human can see the ice up ahead & react to avoid it; the car systems are going to have much greater difficulty determining the difference between black asphalt & black ice without driving onto it - basically too late.
    2017 Infiniti QX60 (me), 2012 Hyundai Elantra (wife)
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,688
    Oh, I don't know about that. The refractive index of the materials is significantly different, so I'm sure the engineers could build sensors to "watch" for that sort of thing. When set up properly, I suspect that a car could "see" black ice conditions far better than a person (not that I'm advocating for this - I'll drive for myself, thank you!). People *can* see other indicators, such as what is happening with other vehicles on the road, better, but, God forbid, if we get to the point where most or all vehicles are wired to communicate with one another, that benefit will be a thing of the past, too.
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,934
    guitarzan said:

    fushigi said:

    I keep thinking of edge cases that can trip up an autonomous car. Construction zones (where lanes will shift & may not be well-marked, also lots of workers and the person holding the slow/stop sign to allow construction vehicles in the zone), accident scenes (even if there aren't any auto accidents there will still be debris in the road from fallen trees, rocks, etc.), spotting black ice/winter hazards, Arizona sand storms, single lane bridges, places navi doesn't reach (tunnels, deep parking garages), and so on.

    Everything that you listed can be handled programatically. These scenarios just have not been programmed yet, but that is different from a technical challenge preventing it from happening. Infra red can detect humans, existing slip control detects slippery conditions, existing sensors can detect debris, etc.

    A much more serious challenge is that the autonomous car will be programmed on the "careful" side, and humans will not let it merge, just like they try not to let other humans merge. So occasionally the car will have to sit there all day. You can't fix obnoxious.
    In video games, that is called exploiting a weakness in the AI of the computer for the player's benefit. It's always done.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    My theory is that an autonomous car will make a bad driver better and a good driver worse. Reason?

    There is no computer on earth that can out think a human brain, chess games notwithstanding. If one's brain is pretty much dimmed down anyway (bad driver), the autonomous car might pick up things that this lazy brain wouldn't even notice, or perform functions that the lazy brain is really no good at.

    Conversely, the attuned brain (attunded to driving) is going to handle complex, multi-directional, multi-dimensional situations much better.

    Cases in point are plentiful---consider what sometimes happens to airplanes that attempt to land on auto-pilot; or split second decisions made by pilots that computers could never calculate.
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,934

    My theory is that an autonomous car will make a bad driver better and a good driver worse. Reason?

    There is no computer on earth that can out think a human brain, chess games notwithstanding. If one's brain is pretty much dimmed down anyway (bad driver), the autonomous car might pick up things that this lazy brain wouldn't even notice, or perform functions that the lazy brain is really no good at.

    Conversely, the attuned brain (attunded to driving) is going to handle complex, multi-directional, multi-dimensional situations much better.

    Cases in point are plentiful---consider what sometimes happens to airplanes that attempt to land on auto-pilot; or split second decisions made by pilots that computers could never calculate.

    Agreed! The computer has no personal motivation to keep you alive or perform well for instance. Training, skills, experience, and good instincts go a long way in an emergency situation.

    In HPDE events they teach you to look where you want to go, your hands and steering wheel and car will naturally get you there if you use your eyes as a direction.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited September 2016
    Right. Like "autoland" used by jetliners...in some instances, it works great, but there's a lot that the computer cannot do (like handle crosswinds, reverse thrust, turn off a runway etc). In other words, airplanes operate in an open system environment like automobiles do, and they will NEVER be fully autonomous---nor will any car that operates in an open system. So in my opinion, you will NEVER see fully autonomous cars on open roadways---well at least not for decades under our entire infrastructure is overhauled.

    You will always need driver input--so, given the variance in driver skills at the get-go, bad drivers will drive autonomous cars better than they did with their old cars, because they were clueless to begin with, and good drivers will get lazy with autonomous cars and lose their "edge" in emergencies.
  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848
    Yelp called today. They have assigned a nice young lady to oversee my shop's page. Her first question was how long has it been since I visited it. That was easy, it's well over two years (maybe like three or four). She told me that they get some fifty inquiries a week for auto repair in our county and a few of them land on my shop's page. Gee that's nice I suppose but she also said that it didn't appear that they turned into calls. One thing she noticed but didn't understand was the limited hours that we show that we are open. With me teaching most of the time these days we just don't have that much time for regular consumer work. Plus when I am in the shop I am usually doing a lot more sublet work for other shops, or for first time customers who have been directed to me by someone else to figure out some type of oddball issue. Even then the physical side of the work really runs me down so when classes are slow and I am home we only schedule half days.

    The main reason that she called was to sell me some of the advertising programs which supposedly would get more of the inquiries they are tracking to turn into calls. Funny thing is while for a number of the vehicle owners it probably is just what they need, me being the one to take car of their car, but I'm just not looking to do more work, and if I was I'm definitely not looking for it to be sent to me from their site. I don't agree with a number of their policies and how they are more in a position to do things to us, than they are for us and to pay them for that just doesn't make any sense. Do you know what the worst thing that would happen if I did advertise with them and grew some business that way? I would legitimize their operation in spite of its inherent risks. Saying no to spending money on them is the only real protest of them that is available to me. Well, other than writing this that is. In a way, its kind of like AAA. They didn't earn their reputation as an automobile authority themselves, it was the shops that actually provided the services they contracted that deserved the credit they claimed. Yelp is little more than a variation of the same old song just in a different setting. If consumers found me through Yelp, then they would get to reap the benefits of the work that I do and for that they should pay me, not the other way around.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited September 2016
    Since you didn't buy an ad package, I wonder if you'll get any more "good" reviews. Yelp used to a certain unsavory reputation that way that still makes people wonder just how legit their reviews really are.

    AAA made their reputation with me by opposing bike paths. No one needs their maps anymore and it's faster just to call for a tow yourself or call a cab if you need a jump (wonder if Uber drivers offer that service too).

    I pay $10 a year extra on my car insurance btw, and I'm way up on the game with my towing reimbursements on my last van.
  • fushigifushigi Member Posts: 1,459
    AAA lost me back in the '90s after they wouldn't come out to give my car a jump. It was during/after a winter storm and I'm sure they were swamped but they weren't even running a list to, you know, serve their customers. I never looked back and also just pay a couple bucks extra to my insurer for their plan, which I've not had to use so far.
    2017 Infiniti QX60 (me), 2012 Hyundai Elantra (wife)
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I do very little advertising for my appraisal business, nor have I for the last 20 years, and most of the advertising I do is freebies. If you do good work, treat people professionally and not compromise your integrity, you will prosper well enough.

    One reason I do not automatically admire a wealthy person is because I want to know how he got there beforehand. Making money off other people's backs does not elicit my respect.

    My local BMW dealer is richer than my friend who runs his own Porsche-Audi shop, but the way my friend treats his customers and his techs is, IMO, far superior.

    I still have in my files an invoice from BMW given to a friend's wife. Her phone quit working in her car's integraqted system, and being a pediatrician, she drove right to the BMW dealer.

    An hour later she got her bill, and it says:

    Diagnosis:

    Phone inoperative

    $108



  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,331
    edited September 2016

    I do very little advertising for my appraisal business, nor have I for the last 20 years, and most of the advertising I do is freebies. If you do good work, treat people professionally and not compromise your integrity, you will prosper well enough.

    One reason I do not automatically admire a wealthy person is because I want to know how he got there beforehand. Making money off other people's backs does not elicit my respect.

    My local BMW dealer is richer than my friend who runs his own Porsche-Audi shop, but the way my friend treats his customers and his techs is, IMO, far superior.

    I still have in my files an invoice from BMW given to a friend's wife. Her phone quit working in her car's integraqted system, and being a pediatrician, she drove right to the BMW dealer.

    An hour later she got her bill, and it says:

    Diagnosis:

    Phone inoperative

    $108



    That's a textbook example of being penny wise and pound foolish- when our service advisors run into a communications or telematics issue they call me; if I can fix it or isolate the problem there is no charge to the client.

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Exactly. She was so livid she never bought BMW again, far as I know. Part of the problem is that they refused to give her either a refund or credit. She felt that she got (I wasn't there, so can't verify), as she called it -- "the dumb broad" treatment.
  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,331
    The main reason my wife is extremely hesitant to stray from the BMW fold is because she has always been treated with respect when she brings her car in for service

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    It's a dealer problem, not a car problem.
  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,331
    Precisely.

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • thecardoc3thecardoc3 Member Posts: 5,848


    That's a textbook example of being penny wise and pound foolish- when our service advisors run into a communications or telematics issue they call me; if I can fix it or isolate the problem there is no charge to the client.

    Do you get paid while you do that whether you fix it or not?

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I presume as a salaried employee that he does. Surely having someone "try" to fix it is a lot better than getting a bill for $108 shoved in your face.
Sign In or Register to comment.