Did you recently rush to buy a new vehicle before tariff-related price hikes? A reporter is looking to speak with shoppers who felt pressure to act quickly due to expected cost increases; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com for more details by 4/24.

Subaru Impreza WRX Wagon

11516182021115

Comments

  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    What, are you nuts asking a VTD question? ;-)
    Maybe it's cost. I'm sure I've seen an STi manual or two with VTD. Maybe the Japanese RA versions. I'll do some searching or someone else will post info. Even the 276 h.p. UK P1 only has the simple viscous coupling.

    -Dennis
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    How did your Saturday drive go? How was the wagon optioned: MT/AT, goodies?

    Ed
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Ed, thanks for the directions you gave me. I took 12W to 523?(??) made a left at the next circle). Only problem was at 12:00 p.m. on a Saturday there was a lot of traffic.

    It was a silver auto sedan with about 40 miles on it. It felt a little more responsive than the previous auto I tested. The other auto had a few hundred miles on it and probably saw some hard test drives.

    Although it felt more responsive than the previous test car, my biggest complaint is off-boost in the curves. 0-60 doesn't matter as much to me, but keeping on-boost in curves does. Keeping it in "3" helped a lot though. I even dropped it down to "2" a couple of times. This is where the sport-shift would shine. Oh, and brake stands are FUN!

    I didn't drive it as hard as I did the previous tester. Maybe because a couple that drove it before me were seriously considering buying it. There was also a ton of traffic. There are a couple of side roads off 31 north of the dealer that's better for quick surges of speed.

    I think they prefer to give autos for test drives because there's less of a chance of messing up the tranny. Sorry my thoughts are so scattered, I'm in a hurry. You have to go give it a drive!

    -Dennis
  • cinosweivecinosweive Member Posts: 166
    A Subaru salesman told me the VTD was an integral part of the AT and so was not available separately.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    The AWD systems are part of the transmissions on all subies. In the AT models the transmission is the hub where the power is distributed front-rear, and side-side for the front axle. I'm not sure how it is done on the MTs but I'd imagine that it's similar but they just haven't built an MT with the VTD system in it and hence the VTD system isn't available on MTs. It's not a simple bolt on proceedure due to the fact that the MTs use a viscous coupled center differential and the ATs use electronically controlled clutchplates to control the torque split.

    -mike
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Yeah, I guess it would be difficult to get an electronically controlled hydraulic transfer clutch and planetary gear center diff on a manual. :-D

    -Dennis
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    you're right dennis, but you were also right before too. any STi old or new, with the driver-adjustable center differential, has a planetary gear center diff instead of a viscous coupler.

    it's a little knob near the handbrake, selects from 35/65 to 50/50 to 50/50 LOCKED.

    -Colin
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    That is what I have on my XT6 MT :) An Air-locker on the center diffy! Of course the XT6 was a $20K car in '88 so I'm not sure what that would translate to in today's money, probably somewhere over $30K easily.

    -mike
  • balserbalser Member Posts: 90
    man - if I could lock the center diff on the WRX, I'd be in hog heaven. I don't own a WRX yet, but am seriously looking at one. We have a Chevy Suburban with the AutoTrac, and once in a while, usually when it snows real hard, we go to 4 Hi. Just more predictable in some circumstances.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Here's some pics of the knob Colin is talking about. They're from the i-club 22B meet:
    http://i-club.com/gallery/22b_meet/16.jpg

    http://i-club.com/gallery/22b_meet/17.jpg

    -Dennis
  • jimmyp1jimmyp1 Member Posts: 640
    Take a look at this video set to music (about 4 minutes long, but my DSL handled it fine). It contains some footage I've seen before, but some I haven't, most notably an apparently factory sponsored/set-up rally wagon!!! Sweet. Nice drifting, etc. Enjoy! Click on the New>Cars 2001 link that this link takes you to.

    http://www.rrunracing.com

    Jim
  • stevesr0stevesr0 Member Posts: 24
    I am interested in buying the WRX wagon. My biggest concern is to really like the handling.

    Many years ago, we fell in love with an '87 Camry after driving a Honda, Subaru and the Toyota in rapid succession.

    The thing we really liked about that vehicle was the sense of absolute "tracking" that we experienced driving the vehicle. We could take our hands off the steering wheel and drive down a straight highway for hundreds and hundreds of feet without any wander. We immediately bought it and enjoyed it for 280K miles before handing it over to our son. A subsequent 98 Camry (and also a Celica and currently a Focus) have not produced this sense of wonderful sureness.

    I am not sure what combination of traits caused that performance or if it was the only Camry that ever felt like that, but I was hopeful that a "performance" car like the WRX would give me the same satisfaction.

    Unfortunately, I have driven (timidly) two WRX AT wagons at separate dealerships a couple of weeks apart, without experiencing this,

    I like the specs and the reviews, but I am not sure what I should do to confirm that this will give me the joy I seek.

    I don't envisage any rally driving, but would like to drive in bad weather (on road) with maximum confidence that I won't get stuck.

    Is the sense that I need to adjust the steering all the time to keep the cars on course expected and normal (and necessary) for this car or a trip of my own nervous nervous system.

    We got so far as to put a deposit down on one vehicle, before realizing that they were asking significantly more than van Bortel or Fitgerald. They were nice enough to accept my request to withdraw my offer. Right now, I am planning to order one 'built' through Fitzgerald, but before I do that I want to get some input from you folks.

    Thanks in advance.

    Steve
  • francophilefrancophile Member Posts: 667
    Any car can have its alignment adjusted to allow for hands-off driving. Toeing the wheels in does the trick, and toeing them in a little more than usual really does it. It also causes the car to wear out tires faster and handle funny in the turns :-(

    Front wheel drive will "track" differently than AWD. Subarus tend to have almost dead-ahead alignment, which does not make them the best cars for driving down the road without having your hand on the wheel. However they should not pull; you should not have to, for example, constantly keep a little bit of pressure on the steering wheel to the left to keep the car going straight. Road crowns, slants, and surfaces play a role too, and Subies are sensitive to these things; you'll know that the road surface changed sooner in a Subie than in a Camry.

    It's the nature of the beast. I happen to like it. In trade, every Subie I've ever driven has felt very solid, very substantial, and very well planted on the road. The Nissan Sentra rent-a-car I'm driving now feels like a feather in the wind by comparison. I might be able to drive it without my hand on the wheel, but that does not inspire any confidence whatsoever. YMMV.

    Cheers,
    -wdb
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    i have a mt 5 WRX wagon. Tracks ok with hands off if you want to but what I like is the very solid feel of steering at speed (even up to 100). Find a sportier SW......
    TWRX
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    I don't think you should have "timidly" driven the WRXs during your test drive. You will never appreciate the car unless you absolutely tax it. The more tougher your test, the more the car digs in and challenges you for more. I have been driving this Auto-WRX-Sportwagon for the past several thousand miles and it gets better by the day. In the mountains, it is an absolute blast. When other cars are braking in curves and crawling along at their mechanical limits, the Auto-WRX just blasts along with total confidence and composure and is nowhere near its true limits. Additionally, this car is not bothered in the least bit by snow, rain or whatever else nature throws at it. I am a guy who goes for "value for money" and I am absolutely delighted that I bought the Auto-WRX. It may not have the best of interiors or the best tactile feel for the instruments on the dash, but is well worth every penny that one spends to purchase it, since a couple of tough drives would convince us about where the design dollars of this car went - right into its driver-train, chassis and structure.

    My other car, which is an Acura 3.2TL (with Navigation) is fabulous and is a total contrast to the Subaru. It does not have the kick or the "riding on rails feel" of the WRX but is wonderful during looooong trips, which I do pretty frequently. I think both our cars compliment each other. The Acura was supposed to be my car and the WRX was supposed to belong to my wife. Now my wife hardly gets to see the WRX, and the Acura has become her daily ride. Driving this vehicle is intoxicating to say the least.

    Like my earlier Toyota Camry (donated at 288K miles), my WRX and also the Acura should last for at least 250K miles, before I am ready to buy a new car.

    Later...AH
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Tracked straight. Heck I could turn the wheel 1/2 a turn and still go straight!

    I think you are looking for a Caddy or Lincoln, not a WRX! :)

    -mike
  • mikenkmikenk Member Posts: 281
    I am still in the break in period; it seems to be taking forever to get to 1000 miles. Even so, the driving experience has been great with just a hint of things to come. I got 23mpg on my first tank.

    For you detailers out there, make sure you clay the car before you detail it. The ride over from Japan must have really added some kind of contaminant. My 01 Outback (from Indiana) just needed a good washing.

    I opted for the stock stereo. I didn't think the upgraded speakers and sub were much better based on my testing. For my personal tastes, I have attenuated the bass to -2 and have boosted the treble by 1. It seems to now give a fairly accurate sound so I won't be upgrading any time soon. I wish the McIntosh on the VDC was an option; I have become spoiled.

    My car was delivered with 40psi in all tires for some dumb reason.

    Just my first impressions
    Mike
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    My car was delivered with 40psi in all tires for some dumb reason.

    The cars are generally filled with a lot of air from the factory, during the long trip from the factory to the showrooms. In case of the Impreza, they arrive from Japan, which is a pretty long trip, especially by ship.

    However, the vehicle prep group at your dealership should have taken care of this excess pressure during their prepping. They get paid by the Auto-maker for doing so, which includes a wash, inspection of components, topping off fluids etc.

    Later...AH
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    So they wouldn't go flat on the trip over. :-) They should have adjusted it though during the PDI.

    -Dennis
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    quote: Tracked straight. Heck I could turn the wheel 1/2 a turn and still go straight!

    Gotta love a worn out recirculating ball...

    Speaking of which, any of the camrys I've driven have always had a very numb steering feel but I'm not sure I could absolutely say I've driven an '87. The WRX is no BMW, but it has pretty darned good steering feel.

    Besides alignment, tires will also play a huge role in 'tracking'. High performance summer tires usually will follow grooves in the road, which is called tramlining or oddly enough 'tracking'. (you're the first person I've seen that called going in a straight line that. the term usually refers to the tires and thus the car following ruts, grooves and other road surfaces.)

    Anyway, the WRX doesn't come with tires that track but the tires that many owners will put on them tend to.

    -Colin
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Basically, the OEM Subaru tire/wheel combo with the 205/55R16 tires have an overall diameter of 631.90mm while the optional 215/45R17 tires have an overall diameter of 625.3mm. Thus the OEM tire/wheel combo is taller than the Optional tire/wheel combo by 6.6mm.

    What this means is that with the OEM tires when the odometer says it has 50,000 miles, with a car fitted with the 215/45R17 tires, it would show an additional 530 miles (phantom miles). The speedometer would also be "off" when compared to the OEM tires/wheel combo. Anyone knows why Subaru has provided such a disparity in its 2 tire/wheel combos ?

    Also, the OEM tire/wheel combo has a load rating of 89 (1279 lbs), while the Optional 215/45R17s has a load rating of only 87 (1201 lbs).

    The nearest size which would maintain the same load rating and the overall height/diameter is 225/55R17, which is not the size of the OEM optional tires. Anyone know why ?

    Later...AH
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    first--
    1% is not significant in terms of speedometer or odometer error.

    second, subaru isn't providing any tires, just wheels. they do recommend 215/45-17 and my comments on that are above. many WRX owners choose 225/45-17 instead, which is 0.4% larger; again, insignificant. (I think that's the size you meant but you put 55 instead of 45.)

    the load rating on either tire, is perfectly fine. it's only on very tiny tires that you should worry, such as autocrossers choosing a 205/45-16.

    -Colin
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    Additionally, TireRack recommends the 225/45 size for those (yours truly) that are upgrading to a 17" tire size.

    Stephen
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    Every tire has "recommended" rim width. I think a 215 tire would work best on a 7x17 wheel while a 7.5 inch rim would be best served by a 225 (but check your specific tire for the recommended rim width). Running tires that are on the limits of the recommended rim range is not really recommended (say, putting 195's on a 7" inch rim)
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Yes, I meant 225/45R17....


    1% is not much of a difference...true but when there was a combination with a smaller difference (225/45R17), why recommend the combo with a larger difference (215/45R17) ??


    I saw Tirerack's recommendations too, where they recommend 225/45R17...


    I was planning on maybe going for the UK-spec 17x7 wheels (that look exactly like the OEM 16s)..not that expensive too, as per the site below:


    http://www.vividracing.com/prod_wheeloemuk.php


    Later...AH

  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    At last we agree... just ribbin' ya. I'm thinking about the same 17" UK OEM wheels. They are offered at vividracing.com. I like the looks and the fact that they are fairly light weight and have the 53mm offset. With all these factors, the price is hard to beat.

    Stephen
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    AH,

    I don't pretend to know Subaru's motivations but if I had to guess I would say that due to the slightly smaller size a 215/45-17 should never rub on the rear fenders... whereas in some situations the bigger 225 might. You know, full tank of gas, 4 adults in the WRX wagon, Mulholland Drive... ;-)

    Warpdrive,

    Actually a 225 tire would benefit from an 8" rim, but most folks don't have those so 7.5" is better than 7".

    -Colin
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Actually, I have been driving with 225/55ZR16 Michelin Pilot XGT-Z4 tires on my OEM 16x6.5 Acura 3.2TL wheels for the past 20,000 miles. Absolutely no problems whatsoever. Gobs of grip in the most aggressive moves. In fact, Michelin recommends a range of 6.0 - 8.0 inch rim-width for a 225 wide tire, and 6.5 barely falls in the range. Ideally, it should be 7.5" or so but 7.0 should do perfectly fine too.

    Also, the Acura MDX comes with 235mm wide tires fitted onto 16x6.5 rims. That is right out of the factory. But the aspect ratio is pretty large however.

    Later...AH
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    On the 225 tires I looked at (e.g. Toyo T1-S), the specs recommended 7.5 inch wide rims (with a range from 7.0 to 8.5). 8.0 inches would not be a problem. And 7.0 is the recommended width for 215.

    I'm hoping to buy the Superleggeras and that would mean 215's would work fine. 225's are too wide for a 7.0 inch rim (it would work but it's on the edge of their recommendation). Might as well go with what they suggest.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I run 275-70-16s on 16x7 rims on the trooper, stock was 245-70-16 on the same rims.

    -mike
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    AH,

    I've driven the Pilot XGT. Gobs of grip eh?

    Driven any summer tires?

    -Colin
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    I don't have summer tires on any of my cars...but the Pilot XGT-Z4s are a reasonable Ultra-high performance All-season compromise. Of course Max performance tires would be better as far as grip in dry weather is concerned. But then I prefer staying away from tires that are not drivable in all kinds of weather. I have driven with the Pilot XGT-Z4s in snow, rain, and dry weather and they have performed very well in all conditions.

    Also the Pilot XGTs are available as XGT-Z4, XGT-V4 and XGT-H4s with varying levels of grip and capability. Did you drive with the XGT-Z4s ? Another point is that Michelin had come out earlier with a model called XGT-V4 (which was miserable in all kinds of weather, based on owner opinions)....but it has nothing whatsoever to do with the Pilot XGT-V4 however.

    Later...AH
  • stevesr0stevesr0 Member Posts: 24
    Thanks for helpful comments to my question about "tracking". (To paisan, I never liked american 'boats'; are you referring to "performance" caddy or lincoln?)

    I get the impression that most people enamoured of the WRX (who correspond on this board) are auto performance 'mavens'. How did you guys/ladies test the car to satisfy yourself that it delighted you?

    Second question - I have heard that it is/is not a good all round car (commuting, long miles on highway, curvy-twisties, ice and snow, altitude, rallying) while others have said it isn't for the non-rally enthusiast. I could see its benefits in rain, ice and snow and driving to upstate NY and into the hills of NJ, but certainly most of my usage would be short commuter mileage or crowded highway traffic to 'offsite' meetings 40-90 miles away. How much of the time do you use this for 'everyday' driving and is it good for that in your opinions?

    Thanks in advance.

    Steve
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    I think I can answer your question about the WRX suitability for short and/or crowded commuter trips. I live and work in Seattle. My commute is stop n'go, bumper to bumper traffic w/the occasional opportunity to spurt ahead to the next traffic opening, etc. My total commute is 7.5 miles each way. On my commute I never get about 45mph (unless I'm not paying attention..). I encounter grated draw bridges, San Fran type of hills, railroad tracks, various states of pavement deterioration, and lots of rain. The WRX has been great. I had reservations about getting the 5spd manual because of my commute. My heart said go w/the manual to get the most out of the turbo band and more flexibility. I did and have not regretted it. The clutch takeup on the WRX is nice and progressive. I can stay in 1st gear w/o sputtering down to about 7mph (not going uphill). The WRX is truly an around car not just a one trick pony. Those that have said otherwise have made excuses to quell their disappointment at not purchasing, IHMO. :-) I know that last comment sounds a bit self-serving and arrogant but that's how impressed I am w/the WRX. BTW, I tapped the many talents of the WRX by going w/the wagon over the sedan. You'll find a lot more WRX wagon buyers than Subaru had ever intended. Hope this lengthy post helps.

    Stephen
  • philwang66philwang66 Member Posts: 61
    Agree with Stephen on most of his points...

    While the WRX is certainly performance oriented, to say that it "isn't for the non-rally enthusiast" would be quite unfair IMHO. Performance aside, the WRX (particularly in wagon form) has tremendous utility. It is quite comfortable and reasonably roomy for a compact car, and the ride is certainly more compliant than the Acura Integra I was driving before. What the WRX is not is a luxury car, so if you MUST have leather, sunroof, real wood trim, etc... the WRX is probably not for you.

    I would say that driving a stick shift in a WRX is no more difficult than driving one in any other compact car. Whether you want to deal with a manual for daily commuting is something that you can only answer yourself. There's alway the automatic, though I think the fun factor goes down a notch or two without the stick. The only reason I don't drive mine daily is that I don't want to park my baby at the train station all day...

    In conclusion, I think the WRX does a LOT of things well (but I'm probably biased). I do think you should test drive one and see how it suits you in every way you feel a car should (performance, space, comfort, styling, price, etc...). It may or may not turn out to be your cup of tea, but to dismiss it because someone thinks it's not for the non-enthusiast would be a big mistake!

    good luck,
    Phil
  • richletorichleto Member Posts: 1
    Just wondering if paint chips are a problem for anyone? I read the earlier messages and some people thought that the red is easier to chip. anu comments? I'm thinking about the blue or black. thanks
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    I drive around 50 miles round trip pretty frequently to our nearby plant, at times taking my Acura 3.2TL and at times doing the trip in my Auto-WRX Sport-wagon. Of late, it has been the Subaru all the time, since the drive in the Subaru is intoxicating to say the least. The Acura has leather, heated seats/mirrors, HID lights, climate control, Navigation, turbine smooth and powerful engine, 5-speed Automatic transmission (now coming out with a Six-speed manual) and what not but the Subaru WRX is what I really prefer for the trip.

    Initially I had a feeling that on long trips the WRX might be tiresome but I can honestly report that the WRX is comparatively quiet on the hwy (2900 rpm at 70mph) and is a real pleasure on long trips (after doing a 400mile round trip in the WRX to DC and back). Its all-weather capabilities and other mechanical abilities are a big plus (especially since they are not even available in other cars) but it is the car and the ride itself that I really love. I would estimate the WRX to be a bargain at which it is being sold for. Calling it a car only for rally-enthusiasts is a disservice to the car (from ill-informed folks, who probably have not even driven the car... IMHO).

    Later...AH
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    Good summations. I'd have to agree about the luxury thing. I made the decision that the driving "fun factor" outweighed a lack of luxury features (not many though), like moonroof, leather, auto-temp, etc. I'm sure many of us weighed the pros and cons in the same fashion. :-)

    Stephen
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    I now have 9000 miles on my 5 speed wrx wagon.
    I live in a small city (120,000) and commute 10 miles to work from a suburb each day.

    City: I don't deal with bumper to bumper, just stoplights and some open stretches. Of the 3 stick shifted Subarus that my wife and I have owned I can honestly say that this has the smoothest clutch and shift. I have only owned 5 speeds so I can't say how you would like one in the city but mine is really easy to drive. With the low torque at low RPM it's not like this thing is an uncontrolled monster that will get away from you when you drive it in traffic. It is an extremely easy car to drive. Very practical in the wagon format. Just packed it to ceiling the other day when moving all of my science supplies from one school I taught at to another. Had 5 large boxes of rocks, 3 fifty lb. tubs of sand, a stream table, 3 computers and numerous other smaller items.

    Highway: again one of the reasons for getting the wagon was room on the road. I like to do round trips to Colorado in the summer from here in Indiana. Married with no children so a wagon this size is great for 2 weeks or more luggage and gear for the 1000 mile trip each direction. AWD in Cclorado, what a blast my Forester was out there. Longest trip so far in the WRX has been to Indianapolis and back (about 350 round trip.) The sport seats are great. I have serious back problems and the lumbar in my previous Forester was great but the firm support of these seats is just as good. Also at 6 foot I fit into this car with about 3" of head room to spare. Tall cars are in vogue right now but don't tell Subaru that because low roof lines have not been in the cards for them for years (funny, after the lower sleeker Camry and Civic, their new body styles in the "taller" fashon look clunky where as Subarus look well proportioned) Also, leg room on passenger side is vastly improved from Forester I owned and RS my wife owns. Also WRX has the best back seat room of the three. The best and most unexpected aspect of travel in one of these is the quiet and low wind noise. That together with the rock stable handling of the wrx makes it way too easy to cruise effortlessly at 80+ (Gas mileage plummets to 22 or 23 hwy that way. 65 does yield 27 mpg) My one complaint about WRX wagon and travel is the lack of three useful features that my Forester had (rubber bumper cover to protect as items are loaded in and out, rubber mat to keep cargo area clean, and rear power outlet.) All of these are standard in the less expensive Forester L and Outback Sport and all Subie wagons should have them. The first two are availabe as low cost options which I bought but no rear outlet without doing your own wiring modifications I guess. That electric cooler in the back for long trips was just too nice in the Forester.

    TWRX
  • stevesr0stevesr0 Member Posts: 24
    (1) Thanks to all respondents; that really addressed my area of concern.

    (2) I saw the note in the brochure that for a limited time, WRX sedans could be ordered in "BLAZE YELLOW". Is there a way to order a WRX station wagon in this color (or another sensible way of getting a yellow paint job for a brand new vehicle)?

    Steve
  • philwang66philwang66 Member Posts: 61
    Steve,

    As far as I know, the "Blaze Yellow" is a limited-edition sedan-only color. Don't know if you've seen the color in person, but it's a rather pale yellow. It's not the bright canary yellow one might associate with Porsches and Vettes. If you like to be seen, then the blue is likely the color for you, the silver is probably the stealthiest.

    Phil
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    It was only produced in the hundreds (450 ?). The yellow is a very dull/dirty yellow, kind of like a stick of butter/margarine.
  • crazy1crazy1 Member Posts: 10
    I am looking to upgrade the factory fog lights to
    driving lights for better distance illumination at night. I think Hella Inc. may have what I want but I could be barking up the wrong tree.
    One of the WRXes in Sport Compact Mag. had after market lights in place of the factory fog lights. Does anyone know of sources.
    E mail me at sch8988@aol.com
    Thanks in advance.
  • philwang66philwang66 Member Posts: 61
    If you don't get a response here, try i-club. You're more likely to get an answer there as the folks there tend to be modding their WRXs more aggresively there.

    The factory fog lights are mounted pretty low... to get a lot of distance from that angle, you'd likely be shining those lights into oncoming traffic or the guy in front of you. Just a thought...

    Most driving lights for off-roading are mounted on top of the car (or at least fairly high) if I'm not mistaken.

    Hmm... that wasn't much help, was it? Hope you find what you're looking for.

    Phil
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    best term I've seen for it is Blase' Yellow. (that's blah-zay)

    -Colin
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Looks more pastel to me, sort of what you would expect to see on a T-bird or Beetle. Not that I like it.

    But look at the yellow Porsche used on the Boxster, it's almost identical.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    but then again I haven't met a yellow I didn't like... I believe Audi has a very similar yellow too.

    Bob
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Audi's yellow is much brighter, but juice is right, there's a New Beetle color much like it.

    It's not a new color for Subaru. JDM Imprezas have been available in that color for a long time, but I didn't like those either. ;)

    -Colin
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    You want to see a nice yellow? Look no further than Mazda. The Protoge5 comes in a real head-turning yellow color, just beautiful. The yellow on some earlier Miatas was also quite nice.

    Honestly? Subaru's yellow almost looks like a primer. Did they forget to paint it? ;-)

    -juice
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    The WRX Blaze Yellow reminds me a lot of the pale yellow Ford offered on '64 1/2-'66 Mustangs. I almost bought a '66 convertible in that color as my first car but instead settled on a more mechanically sound '66 hardtop in black. Looking back over the years I have to scratch my head over buying a black-on-black car without air conditioning but I was 16 and that wasn;t a priority.

    I personally like the lighter yellow a/o/t the other yellows on the market - never wanted to drive a taxi.

    Ed
This discussion has been closed.