Subaru Impreza WRX Wagon

11617192122115

Comments

  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Steve -
    Another word of advice is to go to a dealer that doesn't go on test drives with you.
    I've been on 3 test drives already and I'm still several months away from a purchase. :-)

    -Dennis
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I test drive any car the same as the way I would normally drive it. I've scared many a car dealer! My local subie dealer who I was friends with actually prohibited me from taking any more test drives because I was also friends with the manager and the manager had been in the car with me before! :) If you don't test drive it the way you would normally drive it, would it really be a test drive? Usually I try to rent a car I want to buy either from a dealer or a rental place because a whole weekend with a car will give you a better feel for it than just a 10 or 15 minute test drive.

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The rental idea is a good one, if it's available in the model you want.

    -juice
  • xcskierxcskier Member Posts: 34
    I am only a couple weeks away from taking delivery on a 5spd wagon... can't wait for the fun to begin.

    I have had one dealer make a very interesting comment to me about break-in. He claimed that keeping RPM's below 4000 for the first 1K miles was not necessary and actually limited the long-term performance of the vehicle.

    In his experience, he said to keep below 4000 RPM for the first 300 miles, then to occasionally redline it after that. His rationale was that he had personally had 3 WRXs as demos, and the cars felt "faster" after a harder break-in.

    I'm wondering if anyone has similar experience? Also, even if this approach actually helped with pickup, might it also hurt longevity? I plan to keep this thing for many years and miles, so I don't want to cause myself a problem later on due to impatience the first month!

    Thanks.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Some people firmly believe in driving a car hard before 1,000 miles. Personally, I would do exactly as the owner's manual says.

    IMO, you can't really base longetivity on short term break-in "feel" of a demo.

    -Dennis
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I bet it was just a coincidence, i.e. sample variatnce. It's not like he had a scientific sample, anyway.

    -juice
  • armac13armac13 Member Posts: 1,129
    I think that the dealer was HALF right. A hard break-in will free up the engine more producing freer revving and higher out-put in the SHORT TERM. You have, in effect, put on 10-20,000 miles on the engine in the first 1000. Think of it as ripping off the high spots on the cylinder wall rather than slowly polishing it off. The long term effect is that oil consumption, etc will be increased significantly at 100k+.

    I am a strong believer in a gentle break-in, not just for the engine, but even more importantly for the brakes!

    My VW Golf was a good example. At 60,000 miles and six years it was getting very used. The clutch was on it's last legs (2 kids learned to drive on it!), the exhaust system needed work, the brakes were nearing their limit yet again, etc, but the engine was significantly BETTER than new. It got better gas mileage, ran smoother, was faster and used less oil than at 20,000.

    Ross
  • silhouette2silhouette2 Member Posts: 7
    The latest edition of Subaru's "Drive" magazine arrived the other day. Pictured in the WRX accessory section are front end covers. I bought the hood cover a few months back. The fit was perfect. It looked great. I had plans of buying the full cover, too. That is, until I took my second ride with the hood cover. That day the temperature started off around 70 degrees and heated up into the 80's by the time I drove home from work. The cover was tight and quiet on the way to work. The ride home was a different story. At 65 mph the cover fluttered so hard the front of the car vibrated. I assume that the warm temperatures loosened up the vinyl allowing it to beat against the hood at highway speeds. If you own the car you've probably noticed the leading edge of the hood is curved to conform to the headlights. The dealership had no problem with a return. They had sold only two but I was the first to complain. I assume the full cover is the same hood cover with a bumper cover. I can't imagine the hood cover fitting any better. The gaps caused by the curves in the hood are unavoidable. Anyone else had the same experience?
    In answer to Richleto's earlier question about which paint might be the most chip resistant; my blue paint scratches very, very easily. The other day I lightly rubbed a little glob of "who knows what" with the tip of my index finger... and I do mean lightly! It took three or four doses of Meguire's clear coat polish to get rid of most of the fine rub mark. If the paint swirls and scratches that easily, I doubt it is going to be very chip resistant.
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    They absolutely kill your paint. I went to www.xpel.com and got the 3M Stoneguard paint and headlight protection kits for my Prelude. The stuff looks & works great. Well worth the $$.
  • ltcolumboltcolumbo Member Posts: 40
    I have written to them 3 times in the last 2 weeks with some questions and not received an answer from them. Anyone else have this problem? In my last note to them I said, "Remind me again why I would order from you."
  • rochcomrochcom Member Posts: 247
    The only car I ever owned that was yellow was a VW Dasher. It came from the factory with defective rear brakes and went downhill from there, needing more than I paid for it worth of repairs, including some for rather serious safety problems, until I junked it at only 86,000 miles. Now, I am not saying that it was a LEMON just because of the color, but if you are the least bit superstitious...

    As for a test drive, you can do what I did. I always take at least two test drives. On my second one with a Forester and without a salesperson present, I got a bit carried away and had it out for an hour. When I got back, the salesman joked that he was just about to call the police because they had just made a deal to trade it to another dealer for a car they needed. I left quickly before they saw that I put over 50 miles on it. The next day, I ended up buying the one I had previously driven.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Same problem here with subaruparts.com. It took a total of 7 weeks to actually buy something from them. Try a phone call instead of e-mail.

    -juice
  • bkaiser1bkaiser1 Member Posts: 464
    I ordered a set of rubber mats from subaruparts.com that never arrived...for a month the "canned" response from the website tracking page was that the mats would be shipped soon. Phone calls and emails were not returned so I finally got nervous and sent a cancellation letter via email. An obviously pissed employee called me at work to explain that the mats were backordered, but at that point I didn't care. I went to subaru-parts.com and ordered them, and they arrived about 4 days later. Very impressed!

    As a side note regarding a bra for the car: I have installed bras on all of my cars over the years and have never had any negative effects (scratching, hazing, etc). I'm REALLY retentive about paint, too. I take it off about once a week to clean underneath and the paint looks great. About the flapping: last week I installed the bra but forgot to insert the plastic tabs between the grill and the body; as soon as I got on the freeway it began flapping around so bad that I immediately pulled over to check it...tabs in, no flap now.
  • silhouette2silhouette2 Member Posts: 7
    I assume the car you were writing about in your last messages is a WRX Wagon? I don't recall seeing any plastic tabs with my hood cover. Can you describe them in more detail? Where between the grill and body were they placed?
    Thanks.
  • bkaiser1bkaiser1 Member Posts: 464
    Aaagh...sorry. I forgot that I wasn't on the other board...I have an 01 Outback wagon, but the WRx may have a similar-type bra since they're both 'roo products. On the leading edge of the bra (where the bra meets the grill) there are 2 long plastic strips sewn into the seam...they are about 1cm wide and several inces long. If these strips are not shoved into the tiny gap between the grill and the hood, the bra will flap wildly from 50mph on up. Again, yours may be of a different design, but double check to see if that was the problem. I know the bra stays put up to 110mph, beyond that is WRX territory!
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    on a WRX. I've read more than one post over in the i-club that it can affect the over-the-hood airflow enough to cause less airflow into the intercooler, therefore affecting the car's performance. Beyond this though (this is where I interject my opinion, for what it's worth), a bra will cause the paint to not age the same as the paint that is not covered and render either a total repaint or keeping the bra on for the life of the car. Moisture build-up under the bra can be a factor as well. I would recommend something along the lines of clear 3m adhesive that is cut specifically for the WRX. I have seen the application on a friend's WRX wagon and it is much more flattering than the bra and allows the paint to age the same. Airflow is unaffected. Just something to think about. :-)

    Stephen
  • 4apexs4apexs Member Posts: 36
    I'm shopping for new car - interested in WRX wagon - sales job in upper midwest is 40k a year, 90% interstate, 70-75mph. Currently have offical midwest salesrepmobile - Taurus. Looking at dull Impala, Camry. I need more room for products, therefore wagon. As my neck/back is not what it used to be, comfort is #1, dependability #2, milage #3. How is driver comfort for long (200-400mi)drives? Highway milage? Auto vs 5spd?
    Thanks in advance for comments....
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    Driver comfort is very good. I find the seats supportive enough. They are on the firm side if that matters. For very very long trips, I use a seat cushion for my sensitive butt.

    Dependability of the Subaru *should* be good. Past Subarus have rated very well. I haven't heard of anybody being stranded yet. There were some minor issues with earlier models but they are resolved with current production.

    Gas mileage is a bit on the weak side. With a full tank, I get 250 miles in the city. So figure gas mileage around 19-25 mpg for city and highway mileage. My combined mileage (mostly city) is around 22 mpg. Of course, this is what I'm getting on winter formulated gas and colder temps. Some people may be doing better than I am though. Other people seem to be reporting around 24-26 mpg for the highway.

    As for auto vs manual, go with what makes you comfortable. The 4 speed automatic makes the car feel much slower to me, but you get the advanced VTD AWD system. If you like manuals, go with the manual just because it's more fun to row your own gears.
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Following are comments on my Auto-WRX-Sportwagon:

    1) Comfort: Is very good. I did not think initially, that the comfort over long distances would be good. But I regularly make 50 mile round trips and the car is fantastic. Recently made a 400 mile round trip, which to my pleasant surprise was really comfortable.

    2) Dependability: Subarus have traditionally been very reliable, as per consumer reports' long-term reliability statistics. I have been driving mine for the past several thousand miles and it has been perfect till date.

    3) Mileage - Been getting about 290-375 miles for a tank (till it reaches near empty - as per the gauge) and the gas tank fills upto a little over 12 gallons. So the mileage is approx 25-30 depending on the city/highway mix (and how aggressive I am with the throttle) which is usually 25%city/75%hwy. The mileage mostly hovers around 290-300 (with more city in the mix than normal) rather than the normal high of 375 (with more highway in the mix). During a recent trip to DC and back (approx 400 miles), I did not need to fill her up till right before I reached back(392 miles/12.3 gallons), which takes the mileage to about 32mpg during the trip, with speeds ranging from 60-105mph (mostly around 75mph) during the entire trip.

    Also, I keep my car running for at least a minute every time at start-up and while coming to a stop after a hard drive, which should be contributing to reducing mileage. So mileage is much better than what I see around in these forums. Does the Automatic, which traditionally should be getting worser mileage than the stick-shift, be contributing to this mileage ???

    Later...AH
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I think the seats are fantastic. Car & Driver rated them better than the seats in the Audi S4 and BMW 330xi. You have all sort of adjustments to play with on long trips, and cloth is breatheable.

    Dependability should be good. All Subies are better than average, and so is the 5/60 powertrain warranty. I know that will only last you 1.5 years, but a Honda would not even last one year.

    Mileage: ah, the catch. You need premium. Don't mess with 87 octane on such a high powered turbo, so fuel costs will be higher than an Outback Sport, for example. That actually may be a good alternative for you.

    Auto vs. manual: if you drive 90% freeway, and it's not bumper to bumper, I say manual. The auto is better for city commutes and crawling in traffic.

    -juice
  • 4apexs4apexs Member Posts: 36
    Thank you all for your comments - I'll plan a test drive - hopefully if we have some snow around here (Chicago).
  • xcskierxcskier Member Posts: 34
    Move me from the "shopper" to "owner" category. I picked up my silver 5 speed wagon this weekend. It was driven to my area from a dealer 300 miles away, so it's 30% to break-in.

    No problems yet, but I haven't had it long enough to do any damage.

    My Nokian Hakkapelitta NRW snow tires are on order. I plan to run these in winter only (Utah mountains) and keep the RE's for summer.

    I will report good/bad impressions if anything noteworthy happens.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Congrats, and yes I am very envious!

    -juice
  • jfhseajfhsea Member Posts: 10
    Welcome to the silver wagon club! As long-term research has shown, silver wagon owners are serious studs and/or babes. It's a fact.

    (Oh, and the car's pretty cool).

    Jim
  • dsm6dsm6 Member Posts: 813
    Anyone know offhand the US EPA emission status of the WRX (eg. standard, LEV, ULEV, etc.)? Thanks for any info.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    It is an LEV.

    -Dennis
  • nowakj66nowakj66 Member Posts: 709
    Hey all WRX owners --

    How long of a trip is the WRX wagon comfortable in?

    Highway Noise? Get out of car after long trip refereshed or aching?

    My main drive - 8 miles to and from work - intra-city 2 lane.

    Dare I ask it? Auto or manual? Wife wants Auto -- is there a point in getting the car like this?

    Other uses -- camping, biking day trips with rack.

    Would you take a WRX on a 4 day trip of 2000 miles? A 500 mile day trip?

    Want performance and utility.

    Deciding between Maxima 02 and WRX Wagon.

    I am 35, married, kids will be in picture in next 12 months god willing.

    Maxima feels like a 42 year olds car.

    WRX feels like a 25 year olds car.

    Where to go when one is in between?

    Really torn between 2 neat cars.

    Love the comfort of the max but like the sporty, utility and value of the WRX -- plus AWD for upper midwest driving.

    Thx.

    PS - bonus question -- magic 8 ball -- will new Forrester fit 6 foot 4 guys? :-)
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    Noise and ride are not issues with me. The suspension is stiff, but I would have no problem with taking a 2000 mile drive with it.
  • nowakj66nowakj66 Member Posts: 709
    Thanks warp drive. That helps.

    Drive what you like is the best motto! And I like the WRX.

    Am I off in my assessment that a WRX is a car that appeals to a younger driver?

    I say this because at the 2001 auto show a Subaru rep explained the demographic they designed the car for as a 25 year old male. Single or married no kids.

    At 35 that I am way off the demographic for this car.

    But sometimes they get it wrong and a car has a broad appeal.

    My Buick driving father in law would never consider such a car, for example. Mid 70s his tastes are set.

    I would have loved to have this car when I was shopping for small 2 door Honda Civics and Preludes in the early 90s. You get so much car!

    Any other folks mid 30s or older buy the car?
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    This car does seem to attract a younger crowd.

    I bought an Audi A4 in my twenties and I got bored with that, so the WRX is its replacement.

    I say buy what you like. I have two cars at the opposite ends of the spectrum: a Miata which is mostly owned by empty nester older males and the WRX which is owned by twenty somethings. The WRX is a performance car designed for drivers. That's the demographic that I fit into.
  • philwang66philwang66 Member Posts: 61
    I'm 35, married with a 4 month old...

    I've taken a 4-day, 2000 mile road trips with no problems. Took a short break every 2-3 hours, no backaches. It's no Lexus LS, but the ride's is much less jolting than my previous Integra. Highway noise is pretty good for a compact, a tick under 3k rpms at 70 mph.

    The car does seem to attract attention from the younger guys - every kid in his hopped up Civic wants to race.

    I suspect the WRX wagon is better in the snow than the Max. The Maxima's a nice car, but I would trade it for my silver wagon.

    good luck with your decision,
    Phil
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    I have both an Acura 3.2TL (more comparable to the Maxima) and the Auto-WRX-sportwagon. I always prefer the WRX for any driving trips I make. I regularly drive 50 miles roundtrip to our nearby plant. The drive is intoxicating to say the least, especially since a good portion of the trip is through winding mountain roads.

    For longer trips (>500 miles in unfamiliar regions), I prefer the Acura just because it has the superb Navigation system. If the WRX had a Navigation system, I would hands-down have preferred the WRX-sport-wagon for those trips.

    The longest trip I made in the WRX was a 400mile round trip and I felt as refreshed in it as when I undertook the same trip in my Acura. Made no difference in stress/strain to me. In fact, the WRX is surprisingly quiet and pleasantly refined on the highway - maybe not as quiet as the Acura but definitely quieter than many other cars I have driven. Also, in any speed other than right off idle, the WRX is a beast. On the highway, it is a literal kamikaze, going from 60-105mph in an instant, when needed.

    I am 32, married and hence may have skipped the demographic by a bit.

    You could even consider the VDC-Outback Wagon, which has the same AWD as the Auto-WRX (no other Subarus have it) has a 6-cyl engine and provides a similar ambience to the Maxima. Maybe that is an option you may want to consider ??

    Later...AH
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    I'm in the same boat. I'm 42 and was thinking about the sedan. If they'd made it just a little more conservative I would have bought one. My freinds and co-workers kind of chuckled when I showed them what I was interesetd in. The wagon however, is a little more conservative so it's easier for an older driver to get away with. As far as the added weight of the wagon and it's affect on performance, an old hot rod adage suggests that evry 100 pounds of weight costs a tenth of a second. I'm not sure how accurate that is though.
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    I will be 50 this year and love my WRX wagon. I have taken it on a couple of all day 300+ mile round trips. The seats are very comfortable. It is very quiet, more so than the Forester I owned prior or the 2.5 RS that my wife owns. The only car quieter and smoother for long trips that I have had was a '91 Accord wagon. I plan to drive the WRX to Colorado this summer. That is 2000+ miles round trip. Oh well first mid life crisis sports car was CRX when I was 30, then there was my Delsol at age 40 and now the WRX.

    TWRX
  • armac13armac13 Member Posts: 1,129
    Congratulations on qualifying for the Old Fogey Club this year. You and your REX can really show those young whipper-snappers, eh?
    :~)

    Ross
  • taos2taos2 Member Posts: 31
    I'm begining my 55th year next month. I bought
    my WRX wagon because it was the best combination
    of performance and value in an AWD on the market
    today. Didn't think about the "demo" the car
    was aimed at. Just said no to Audi, BMW, and
    Volvo.

    SKIREX
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    hunter001 Jan 26, 2002 6:00am


    Get a Garmin StreetPilot III for the WRX and you could leave the Acura behind for those unfamiliar trips. :-D


    http://www.garmin.com/products/spIII/


    It's portable too.


    -Dave

  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    Thanks for the link.

    Sounds interesting. Actually, I did test a few of these systems, including the "neverlost" system from Hertz, but found them wanting. Also, I did own one of these but had it attached to my laptop (using Rand-McNally maps) but left it at home after the initial enthusiasm had worn off. When the satellite signals (based on which these systems work), grow weak or non-existent like when going through a forest or thick clump of trees or big buildings/tunnels etc., these systems are well-nigh useless, and certainly not comforting on long trips nor can they be relied on like I rely on my Acura Navigator.

    High-end systems like the Acura Navigation system, works through Gyro-sensors (7 gyro-sensors present in the frame of the car) and dead-reckoning technology and work even in an underground parking lot. Thick forests, big buildings etc make absolutely no difference to the Acura Navigation system. They work everywhere including in thick fog, pitch darkness etc., which is especially comforting when you are 500 miles from home, in the boonies. In addition to that, the Acura system (which is considered the best system by any automaker), works on a single DVD for the entire continental US. When on trips, my wife and I have the freedom to change our route and maybe go to an entirely different place (off from our current route) on a whim, since we know that the Navigator would get us to our final destination, regardless of where we decide to go en-route. The Garmin system would need us to change CDs as soon as one covers a geographical area and moves into the next one, and needs about 10 cds to cover the US, which does not make it terribly convenient while making long trips (the Acura does more coverage than all 10 CDs combined on one single DVD disc). Also, it restricts you to the specific route that you plot, before undertaking the trip. I prize flexibility during trips, especially after being assured of it when using the Acura Navigator.

    In such things, you get exactly what you pay for; and after experiencing the very best, like the Acura DVD Navigator, it is tough to go back and use these other ones. Portability of the low-end systems does not assure anywhere near the functions, capability or the utility of the high-end ones. Systems like the Garmin are neat Toys while the Acura Navigator is a professional setup. Hopefully, within a few years, systems like the Garmin will be technologically advanced like the Acura system of today. Someone on the VDC wagons board had fitted an Alpine DVD Navigation system (same as the Acura OEM one) but it costed him 3500 dollars, which is a bit too steep for my taste.

    Later...AH
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    I got the StreetPilot to use between the OB and OBS, and rental cars when I'm away. Pretty pretty expensive to get an indash for both cars. It's portability also came in handy while touring sights on foot when visiting Maryland and Arizona (like mark where you parked the car).
    I do agree that the StreetPilot does not do everything the Acura Navigator does. Tall buildings does pose some problem but, I have gotten lost yet. I haven't venture into thick forest - moderate foliage seems fine. With the Garmin, you'll actually have to plan ahead (where you're going and will be) and then load up the street level details (from one CD) into the memory card (they come in 32mb ->128mb). 64mb memory card, which I have, is enough to load up street details for all of NYC; NJ; CT; and part NYS/PA/DE. You could plot your route in advance on the PC if you want to, otherwise, just indicate your destination and let it guide you there.

    I think it'll still be a worthwhile investment for the WRX. :-D

    -Dave
  • porcodinciporcodinci Member Posts: 14
    I am interested in hearing what people have to say about comparing these two vehicles. I currently own a VW GTI, and love it, but I have the same problem that someone else in here was having. I'd like four doors, and the same exhilarating driving experience. My car is only a year old, so that plays a factor, as dealers love to bend you over in these situations. My son is 19 months so he will have to fit back there in a car seat. I test drove one today, and liked it, although the motor seemed to strain around 80MPH. Is the car just too heavy?

    Anyway, any input on this purcahse will be appreciated. I was also quoted 23800 on a car that msrpd at 25117. It still seems high to me, maybe I am wrong...
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    You could chip the 1.8T, but two doors is a real bummer with little kids (mine is 2 1/2).

    Subaru carries the reliability advantage, while VW pampers you with upscale materials. But forget practical comparisons and pick the one that is most fun to you.

    -juice
  • porcodinciporcodinci Member Posts: 14
    It is chipped!!! I liked the handling of the WRX. I am happy to hear that there is a strong reliability factor with the Subaru. My VW has been in for a few minor things, but nothing to worry about, really. The two doors really hruts some days.

    I love my GTI, I am just trying to figure out if the WRX will be more practical for me and still be as fun!! The interior dimensions are very similar, except for the WRX having a lot more space available when the seats are down. There isn't a true advantage in leg room in the rear seat...
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    How much does it cost ? If it is not much, then I might think of going for it.

    Thanks in advance,

    Later...AH
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    AH

    Here's where I bought it from http://www.selectzone.com/cgi-bin/shopper.exe?preadd=action&key=GPAM0101030600

    I Paid......Now*

    $920.00....$899.00 StreetPilot III - 64mb

    $199.00....$175.00 City Nav. N. Amer. Cert (ALL)**

    $ 16.40.................Bean Bag Mount***

    $ 37.55.................Shipping/Handling (Next Day)

      * could shop around for better price.

     ** good for two units... wanna share ;-)

    *** not too great, the newer bean bag mount should be better.


    Things that bugged me:

    -Software not MAC OS compatible.

    -Direct load (maps only) to memory card via USB under 4mins, but full load direct to unit at least 4 hours!!!

    -The temporary/permanent adhesive melts in the sun and make a mess of the dashboard!!! Good thing it was a rental car. :-D

    -Starting engine with GPS 'ON' and connected to power outlet crashes the unit.


    Hope you have better luck with price.


    -Dave

  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    is a good place to get Garmin GPS's. I'm using the eMap which is good for tracking nice routes when I do tours with my car club.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    My delorme Street atlas on my laptop with 15" display works great. I've taken it through the densest of forestest and through tunnels, It does loose connection momentarily in a tunnel, but you don't really have any choice where to drive through a tunnel, once out on the other side it picks up where it left off. I've never had problems in the dead of night, snow, fog, etc. I can also watch DVDs on the laptop too :)

    I like it cause it doesn't need to be loaded with any maps for an area, is fully upgradeable in-expensively. I'm sure the Acura system is nice, but how much is it to upgrade it ever 2-3 years? Does it have every nook and cranny of the country in it? And can you watch DVDs on it? :)

    -mike
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    About the aftermarket Garmin Nav....

    All I do in the Acura is key in the destination address and go. Takes less than a minute for an address. I can also save all my previous destinations and all I need to do is to choose from the saved destination list. If I need to go to more than one destination in a trip, all I do is to order all those destinations and the car would go to one destination after another till I finish my trip. No downloading, no CD/DVD changing, nothing !! If I need to reach a hotel in some Ramada in CA, (from VA), all I do is key in the telephone number of the Ramada, and hey presto ! the car guides me to Ramada's doorstep (in CA) from my doorstep (in VA) through verbal instructions and picture maps with turn by turn instructions. It is so easy. If the route it plots, takes me through Cincinnati, OH, and while nearing Cincinnati, if I decide (on the spur of the moment) that I need to visit some place in Columbus, OH or somewhere else, all I do is to re-route my trip through Columbus through the touch of a button. No map checking, no down-loading nothing !! Takes the planning and worries out of the trip. Also, provides a lot of flexibility during the trip.

    Before exits approach, it gives a warning 5 miles away, warns again at 2 miles, warns again at 0.5 mile and just before the turn it does a countdown from 1000ft...800ft...600ft...400ft...etc. You just cannot miss your turn. If I miss an exit (inspite of all these instructions), it instantly re-calculates my position from my new position and guides me to my destination. I could maybe give other options like avoiding a hwy/street, take a direct route, easy route or minimise toll-roads, minimise freeways etc (default is "Direct Route"). But otherwise nothing else. If I find a traffic jam en-route, I just hit the "detour" button and the car guides me through a different route to my destination. No hassles, nothing ! Simple, fool-proof, idiot-proof !! When verbal instructions come along, it dims the cars audio so that the navigator's (sweet voiced Japanese lady) verbal instructions are heard clearly and then resumes the full volume of the car audio as soon as the instructions are completed !!

    Paisan:

    I had the laptop based system before I bought my Acura. After having used both systems, let me tell you, if you use the Acura kind of Navigation system, you would junk your laptop based system in a hurry. The difference between the laptop based systems and high-end systems like the Acura Navigator is like the difference between a Chevy Cavalier and an Mercedes Benz S55. Both are cars and will get you from point A to B. But they do it kind of differently !

    The Acura system is upgradeable for $150 for every upgrade. I don't think we need to upgrade every year or anything like that. How many roads/streets change that frequently ??! The upgrade is optional and you could do it maybe every 3-4 years or so.

    It may not have every single minor road in every nook and cranny of the country in it, even though every single major road in every nook and cranny of the country are present in it. Most cities have every nook and cranny of it covered, including micro roads that wind through apartment complexes !!! Every upgrade covers more micro-roads in every nook and cranny of the country, and hence within a couple of years, there would not be any nook or cranny left un-covered !!

    Also, due to liability concerns, Acura does not allow DVDs to be played on the Navigation system since it can be viewed directly by the driver. But a lot of people in the AcuraTL forum have the conversion done (place in NJ does it), so that they could watch DVDs on the high quality screen and through a switch, can move from navigating to viewing a DVD film.

    Later...AH
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    what the StreetPilot does:

    *Key in the destination address and go*
    -A little crude, but it does it. Or you could point at a spot on the map and it'll route you there.

    *Takes less than a minute for an address*
    -Maybe a little over a minute.

    *Save all previous destinations and choose from the saved destination list*
    -You could do that too.

    *More than one destination in a trip, order all those destinations and the car would go to one destination after another till I finish my trip*
    -Need to plot out on PC then upload into unit as a save route. Don't know if it could be plotted directly from the unit - haven't tried that.

    *To reach a hotel in some Ramada in CA, (from VA), key in the telephone number of the Ramada*
    -Not that sophisticated, but it'll find the hotel.

    *Doorstep to doorstep with verbal instructions and picture maps with turn by turn instructions*
    Does that.

    *Before the exit approaches, it gives a warning*
    -Available @ ~1.8 miles, warns again at ~0.8 mile, quarter mile and then 500ft...etc.

    *If I miss an exit, it instantly re-calculates position and guides to destination*
    -Does that.

    *Other options like avoiding a hwy/street, take a direct route, easy route or minimise toll-roads, minimise freeways etc*
    Does that.

    *Traffic jam en-route, I just hit the "detour" button and the car guides me through a different route to my destination*
    -Does that - up to 15 miles detour.

    *Simple and fool/idiot proof*
    -Quite.

    *Nook and crannies*
    -Not everything is there. Found that out in Arizona and during the "Covered Bridge Sunday Drive" led by Ed (lark6). But the popcorn trail it leaves helped when backtracking to where you came from.

    *System software upgrades*
    -Available on-line for free.

    *Map upgrades/updates*
    -A different story haven't found anywhere on their sight that this is offered.

    -Dave
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    My whole laptop only cost $1500, and it does every single thing the in-dash does to the level (and better) that it does. Every feature you listed above (voice directions, re-route, hotel lists, etc. etc. are all in the delorme software)

    The only downsides:

    1) It's not in-dash

    Upsides:
    1) Whole laptop it far cheaper than the acura unit probably about $500 less and that's for a whole PC!
    2) I don't own an acura, so it's not really an option for me.
    3) It won't get stolen, unless they come in my house
    4) If i change cars I can bring it with me.
    5) Screen is bigger, brighter, clearer.
    6) Finds address in 5 seconds or less.

    -mike
  • handyman1146handyman1146 Member Posts: 1
    Hey people, I'm 55yrs old and I can't wait to get my WXR wagon. I test drove a 5 speed and wow, I could not believe I was driving a four cylinder car. I plan on doing alot of up grading, so any hints will be appreciated.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.