Subaru Impreza WRX Wagon

13536384041115

Comments

  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Same reason we have air-bags, seatbelt laws, cell-phone while driving laws, etc. etc. Cause Americans are slackers and lazy and hate to be responsible for anything, especially anything on their vehicles.

    -mike
  • asthecrowflysasthecrowflys Member Posts: 4
    Anyone had any experience with Sumitomo tires? I have been looking at summer tire options on tirerack and the feedback for the Sumitomo looks positive. The price is right as well :) My biggest concern is road noise and wear.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    For what car, and what size?

    I have Nitto NT460 touring tires on my Forester, though they are a 60 series profile. They are very quiet and the 460 in this case is the treadwear rating. They have 18k miles on them now and still look brand new.

    So for your criteria, road noise and wear, I would give them an A+. They are not good in snow, but wet and dry drip is good for a touring tire of its size (225/60R16).

    -juice
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    On our Outback, having the vent setting on floor/defrost does NOT turn on the compressor. It only comes on when on full defrost (selector all the way right). You may want to try that setting on the Impreza and see if that helps. FWIW, I believe it will not run if the temp is below 35 degrees.

    Having said that, I don't mind it coming on when I turn on the defrost. It does help clear the windows quicker. I also try to crack a window open a bit too when the windows start to fog up.

    -Brian
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    I bought a set of Sumitomo all-season "performance" tires and they were the noisiest tires I've ever had....as noisy as the noisiest winter tire. However, the model I had is discontinued now. The problem with some of the tirerack ratings is that people seem to factor in price too much in how much they like a particular tire. For example, the Kumho 712's are very highly rated (as they should be for the price), but there are **definitely** better tires out there if you're willing to spend more. If you are looking for quiet tires, try the Yokohama AVS dB, one of the quietest (all-season) tires out there, period. And above average wear rating for a high performance tire. The Dunlop SP Sport A2 (which I hear are being replaced by one called FM something) are a good cheap all-season performance-oriented tire that is also quiet and relatively long wearing. For a summer tires, the Dunlop SP9000 is a good bet (but quicker wearing) and still pretty quiet.

    Ray
  • asthecrowflysasthecrowflys Member Posts: 4
    Juice-
    Tires are for my blue WRX wagon Im picking up on Saturday! Its been the longest 10 weeks of my life waiting for it to be delivered :)

    Im looking at 17" wheels and 225/45-17 tires. I was considering the Bridgstone SO3 and Michelin Pilot Sports also. BUT, price is a factor...

    -steve
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    While not the cheapest tires out there (less than the two choices you mentioned though), I stand firmly behind the Toyo Proxes T1-S. I have them in the 225/45x17 size. They are quiet, great wet/dry performance, light weight (one of the lightest in fact), and have a long treadware rating for a summer performance tire. They are about $160 per tire.

    Stephen
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    You can also try the Firestone SZ50 EP. I only had them for about 3,000 miles before I sold my Impreza, but I really liked them. Incomparably better dry and wet grip, and much lower noise too than the Dunlop W-10s my current car has. That's probably why the W-10 is discontinued now?

    -Colin
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I know 3 WRX owners that swear by them. The HZR II or something like that. I plan on getting them for my XT6 when I burn up the RE92 Blowtenzas.

    -mike
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    HTRZ II is a good but somewhat noisy tire. Not as loud as a Kumho 712 or god forbid, Yokohama A520.

    They wear fairly good and have decent grip, decent water evacuation. Good tire for the money but not in the same league of pricey tires.

    -Colin
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    There I go again, passing on bad information :) I knew an owner of several Festivas a while back. I was told ten or so years ago that the festiva was the North America version of the Fiesta, but apparently there was not much mechanical similarity to the cars, only the large size and timeless looks:)

    Aspire is one of the world's worst car names, in my opinion, also. do people really aspire to own that car?

    back on topic - Blue is probably the most popular WRX color where I am followed very closely by Silver. hardly any black, red, white, etc.

    Which one looks the best dirty? That's often how my cars are, since I don't wash them 2x a week (or even 1x a week) and I'd like it to look good most of the time.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Most people compared em to the 712s and IMHO the 712 suck. The few times I've driven on em, I was wishing for my Yoko AVS intermediates.

    -mike
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    The WRX deserves great tires as there is almost no such thing as too much grip. If money was tight, I'd rather get good 16 inch tires than budget tires on 17 inch wheels.

    I do put in a vote for the Toyo T1-S also. A tad bit louder than RE92's but a great all-around road tire.
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    Stuart-
    I would have to agree with mike paisan May 14, 2002 7:18am, well, I won't as far as blanketing all Americans =D but it's pretty accurate to say that the irresponsible many gave rise to regulations that erks the responsible few.
    I've gotten used to the locking system, but there are one of those days I forget and leave an imprint of my side profile on the window. :-)

    -Dave
  • ponmponm Member Posts: 139
    While I was washing my car today(this always happens when I am washing my car), a older woman, probably in her early 70's was taking her evening walk around the neighborhood as she stopped in front of my car to rant how "neat" looking my car is.
    "IS THAT A STATION WAGON, WAIT NO, THAT'S TO SHORT TO BE A WAGON"
    I explained to her it is considered to be a sport wagon by subaru.
    "DOES IT HAVE A 4 CYLINDER IN IT?"
    THis is when the challenge came, I told her it had a 4 cylinder in it with a turbo. I don't know if any of you have ever tried to explain to a 70 year old lady what a turbo is, but it's like teaching a dog latin. None the less, she was very nice, and ended the conversation by saying she drove the gray grand marquis down the road, the same gray as her hair color as she pointed to her head. What a funny woman.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
  • krzysskrzyss Member Posts: 849
    You should have offer her a ride. This would save you many words you used to explain the turbo.

    Krzys
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Yeah, LOL. Bet she would have said it didn't feel like just 4 cylinders!

    -juice
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    You would have scared her out of Subarus for life with the speed!

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    you might have to get your passenger seat professionally cleaned! LOL!

    Stephen
  • heatherbeanheatherbean Member Posts: 82
    Hi I am thinking of buying a WRX wagon this weekend. Only problem is they only have Blue with the short shifter which feels too mechanical. Does anyone like the short shifter? How does the WR Blue holds up? My 1999 OBS was Aspen White and I loved it. We traded it in for a L.L. Bean 6 weeks ago. Not liking the automatic hence the WRX. How are you all liking your WRX wagons so far?
    Heather
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    I love my Platinum silver 5spd wagon. I traded my 12k 2000 OB Ltd wagon for the WRX wagon, sight unseen. I ordered on 2/3/01 and received on 3/26/01. It was part of the first allocation to WA State. This car is really a dual personality vehicle. Below 3k on the tach it's a 2 liter 4-banger but as the needle climbs past 3k it becomes a road rocket. I like the versatility and looks of the wagon over the WRX sedan, plus it's $500 less expensive. The front seats are extremely comfortable and the stock shifter is great as it is IMHO. The only options I got at the time of purchase were auto dimming mirrow/compass, security pkg, and console armrest/storage extension. Here's a current pic less my foglight covers:

    image

    Stephen
  • heatherbeanheatherbean Member Posts: 82
    I keep reading that the silver paint chips easily. We had a Wintergreen metallic Legacy L for 3 years. After 3 years it look like a teen with the worse case of ache ever! So many rock chips on the hood, like hundreds! I keep reading the same thing at the i-club about the metallic silvers in Subarus so I am afraid- very afraid of silver. My 1999 OBS after 3 years, 3 months adn 3 days, never had ANY rock chips on her hood at all! I love that.
    Heather
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    couldn't take care of. It's a clear plastic 3m film cut specifically to fit one's car. I'll be getting at least the partial kit covering part of the hood and front bumper. I don't like Bra's and they are not recommended for the WRX because they can impede some of the air flow into the hoodscoop which, in turn, affect the degree at which the intercooler will function.

    Stephen
  • heatherbeanheatherbean Member Posts: 82
    I did do a Dealer Search. All WRX's around here have the short throw shifter. I don't care for the harder to shift mechanical feel myself. I fould 3 in Albany (where ever that is!) without the short shifters. 2 in white and 1 in silver- all MANUAL wagons of course!
    Wish me luck.
    Heather
  • ponmponm Member Posts: 139
    Good luck Heather, and no matter what color you choose, you're getting a great car.

    -scott
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    Hi, I'm just wondering if anyone has a performance comparison between the wagon and sedan? Last month's Road and Track got significantly worse skidpad numbers than their previous test of the sedan, and both were on stock wheels and tires. Does the extra inch of sedan width make this much difference, or were the performance numbers dumbed down for the comparo test?

    I'd like the extra utility of the wagon, but wouldn't want to sacrifice a significant amount of performance to get it. I was under the impression that there wasn't much of a difference.

    I'd love to be able to post this message on I-club, but I haven't received a confirmation email yet. It's been almost a week.
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    The wagon is known to understeer a bit more and that could easily affect the skidpad numbers. A common solution is to fit the sedan's rear swaybar to the wagon for under $100.00 which should allow the car to rotate a bit more easily and balance out the handling a bit.

    The difference between the wagon and sedan in subjective differences are minimal, they do seem to be measurable (say .1 to .2 seconds slower to 60) and a slight decrease in skidpad. For most of us, this is not "significant" as the packaging of the wagon is so much more desirable than the sedan. Not to mention that the sedan's rear end styling is not my favorite feature.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Heather: the Acadia Green Metallic on my Forester has held up quite well. The only paint chip was caused by a major collision (I was hit from behind in the rain).

    -juice
  • heatherbeanheatherbean Member Posts: 82
    Hi,
    I am sure you all know my story. Here's a summary: Traded OBS in for L.L. Bean 7 weeks ago. Feeling very sad over loss. Want Impreza BAD! WRX wagon in manual. I tried reading through the 1,800 past posts but I kept getting disconnected and with a 20 month old running around and getting into everything I have no time to read them. Wish I could, fun reading!

    O.K. now the questions:
    We'd be trading in a 2001 Outback manual with 6,000 miles on it. It is not as fun as the Impreza.
    1) So the i-club mentions that the WRX engine is not as reliable as the 2.5. Is this true and if so, where is the data to back it up?

    2) Worried about gas mileage. Bean gets 19 - 20 around town with preminum fuel. I know I need preminum in the WRX also but does it at least get 20 around town if I hold back just a little?
    Anyone have engine trouble at all?

    3) Are you all still inlove with your Impreza's after a year or so? I was inlove with my OBS and did not realize I still was after 3 years 3 months and 3 days when I traded her in. My heart hurts from it and the L.L. Bean does not heal that pain, although it is a practical nice car. I WANT FUN!!!!!!

    4)Is it selfish of me to trade-in a more practical car (2001 Outback) for a less practical car for my family because I feel I need it to enjoy life? If an OBS makes my heart beat faster and causes me huge smiles, then just imagine what the WRX will do for me...

    5) Anything I left out? Any comments or concerns about your WRX wagons in manual?

    6) Any options I should get? I found a White Wagon in Manual with Security system, Preminum sound, and Compass mirror. I don't like the short shifter- I found lots of those around. Does anyone love their short shifter?

    Please don't hold back. I want graphic details!
    Thank you so much, Heather
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    1) IMHO both are reliable, not a big concern to me.

    2) If gas costs are a big concern, stick with the OBS. You don't want to cut corners here, stick with premium, and of course you'll be tempted to drive fast (and get 18mpg in hard city driving).

    3) Wish I had one to be in love with!

    4) No, if the car still gets the job done

    5) Not that I can think of

    6) I have the STi shifter in my Forester. It feels more direct, more metallic, less rubbery. But you do give up some rubber insulation, so it will shake/vibrate more. That's the trade off for the better feel.

    -juice
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    See my post a few posts back. I've had my WRX wagon for over a year now and love it. I find that I get about 18 to 19mpg in all city driving if I stay off the turbo more than not. I've never done an all-city tank w/o at least getting into the turbo a bit (it's a wicked influence I tell ya'!)but, in theory, I could say 20mpg in city is entirely possible...maybe a bit more.

    Take what you read on i-club with a big grain o'salt! The 2.0 engine is every bit as reliable as the 2.5. Remember, the 2.0 has been around worldwide for quite a while, it's only new to N.America.

    I will list a few negatives just to be "real".
    First off, I have a couple of buzzes (or maybe 1 that just moves, LOL) in the center stack. Quite a few folks have experienced the same. This buzzing happened fairly early on but is intermittent.

    First gear can be a bit notchy and difficult to get into when shifting down from 2nd...like when I'm pulling into my driveway.

    The ABS is very sensitive to uneven road surfaces. I've had a few scary moments at low speeds and bumpy roads where I had "no brakes" for a moment. This is or isn't normal depending on whom you talk to. I found that after I upgraded to 17"tires/wheels this only happened once and I was driving very spirited! BTW, the WRX was designed for 17"wheels/tires and comes std as such in every other market except N.America.

    The outside mirrors whistle a bit. Only noticeable when the windows are opened.

    The a/c can be a bit weak at times. I have to remember that even though the WRX has oodles of HP, it's still only a 2 liter motor.

    My passenger seat developed a bit of creaking when a passenger sits there. I keep meaning for the dealer to check this out. It may just be a bit loose.

    The windshield really seems to crack easy. I have to have mine replaced after last winter.

    The visors seem a bit cheap.

    You have to be careful not to slam or rest anything heavy on the hood as it's aluminum and will dent fairly easy. It's aluminum because it dissipates heat better.

    Well, this is all I can think of at the moment. :-)

    Stephen
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    I think the hood's aluminum chiefly because it's lighter than steel. Probably saved 20-30 pounds on a hood that size.

    -Colin
  • lilbluewgn02lilbluewgn02 Member Posts: 1,089
    <<The outside mirrors whistle a bit. Only noticeable when the windows are opened.>>

    My mirrors used to whistle also; if you fold them, look for inspection stickers and remove those. The whistling should stop
    S.................
  • barresa62barresa62 Member Posts: 1,379
    I'll try that. Now, could you take care of the buzzin' in the center stack? :-)

    Stephen
  • lilbluewgn02lilbluewgn02 Member Posts: 1,089
    sorry, got an auto (AH, no comments please)
  • cptpltcptplt Member Posts: 1,075
    I have been getting 22-23 mpg for my WRX wagon manual consistently in suburbs. Better than my 98 Legacy auto! In the first 2 tankfuls since I got 17 in wheels, mileage has been same though circumference is smaller!
  • philwang66philwang66 Member Posts: 61
    1) So the i-club mentions that the WRX engine is not as reliable as the 2.5. Is this true and if so, where is the data to back it up?

    I think i-clubbers are more prone to modding their cars and pushing their cars performance wise than most.

    2) Worried about gas mileage. Bean gets 19 - 20 around town with preminum fuel. Anyone have engine trouble at all?

    I average about 21-22 mpg in mixed driving, about 19 in stop and go. Most I've gotten on a tank was 25.5 - all highway with A/C on. It's pretty darn difficult to lay off the throttle when you know the rewards of doing so. The only thing I've had to bring the car in for was a CE light reset.

    3) Are you all still inlove with your Impreza's after a year or so?

    YES! Got the car last May. My wife thinks I'm nuts. Can't wait for a decent weekend, I think the car needs a new coat of wax.

    4)Is it selfish of me to trade-in a more practical car (2001 Outback) for a less practical car for my family because I feel I need it to enjoy life?

    Perhaps... but the WRX wagon is pretty practical for a performance oriented car. You'll probably take a beating on the trade-in.

    5) Any comments or concerns about your WRX wagons in manual?

    Manuals are fun! I don't have the short shifter, but I did notice that the shifter action became a bit less notchy after a few thousand miles.

    6) Any options I should get?

    I got the security upgrade and the cabin air filter from the factory, then ordered the rubber floormats and cargo tray from subaruparts.com. Most accessories are cheaper via mail order.

    best of luck in your decision,
    Phil
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    If you order OE parts, be sure to e-mail parts@libertysubaru.com. I did and their prices were lower than 1stsubaruparts.com or subaru-parts.com.

    Though all three were much lower than retail, even with shipping. In fact, they were more than 10% lower than retail (I had a coupon and comparison shopped all those places).

    -juice
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Yep, still in love with my Impreza. I'll likely replace it with a WRX, so I'll still have an Impreza and won't miss it *too* much.

    Yes, take things on the i-club with a big grain of salt. I rarely visit the Warranty Forum any more because I always got into fights with people.

    One moron wanted everyone to complain to the NHTSA about Subaru's weak transmission. I did a search with his name and all of his other posts were about racing, constantly going above 4000 rpms during break-in, high rpm clutch drops, you get the picture. He since went back and edited every one of his posts! There is some excellent info there though. Just be wary of the whiners.

    -Dennis
  • stoner420stoner420 Member Posts: 165
    ok, I'm dying to get a WRX, I've been thinking of waiting for the 2003s, maybe to avoid some of the "issues" that some ppl seem to have, but then I went to the dealer today and they say they are not expecting 2003s until Aug/Sept. (which seems to be inline with the rumors on i-club too). also, there were apparently some mods made on cars built after Sept. 2001 anyhow. plus he tells me for a base 5spd wagon "about $22k would be in the right ballpark" which seems like a pretty good deal to me...

    Well I took a test drive (sedan, close enough) and I tried to see what I could tell about some of the various issues people have spoken about (though the car had only 50 miles on it, so I tried not to beat it up too much)...
    - engine was super smooth and yummy growl. has more power on the low-end even w/o the turbo than my honda accord (150hp)
    - acceleration is awesome :-) (even w/o pushing rpms too high)
    - transmission felt quite reasonably smooth -- some care is needed shifting into 2nd because of the power, but then I'm just not used to that kind of power compared to my accord. did not notice anything but smooth transition shifting 3rd to 2nd.
    - shifter (stock) was very smooth, better than I remembered from the last time I took a test drive even. no problems at all shifting into 1st from 2nd when slowing down (smoother than my honda even).
    - clutch take-up is really nice, smoother than my honda
    - brakes: braking action was markedly stronger than the accord, nice pedal feel. tried to elicit the abs jiggle on bumpy surfaces, of course wouldn't you know when you bumps, you can't find them. Well I still did hit the brakes a few times going over some bumps and didn't notice anything out of the ordinary. I guess that doesn't mean it's not necessarily a factor, but at least it didn't happen to me this time (or I would certainly stay away from the car). The salesman said he never heard of that problem, but then who can believe a car salesman anyhow...

    -overall: I came away more impressed with the car than I was the first time I tested it, and even more so given all the stuff I have read on the internet. Of course I have no way of knowing how it will hold up over time, but it sure seemed smooth and sturdy enough to start.

    Anyone want to buy a 2yr old Honda?...

    Hillel
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    Hi, I don't want to beat this topic to death, but I looked at the article again last night and the skidpad number for the wagon was around .76 and the sedan was .84. The Saturn wagon was around .74, and the Jetta wagon was around .78, If I remember correctly.

    The slalom mph numbers were very similar between wagon and sedan, so I'm not sure how important the skidpad number really is. Does this mean the wagon enters a controlled drift earlier?

    I've driven the wrx sedan, and liked it very much. I will certainly test drive the wagon before buying, but I'm sure it doesn't handle like a saturn wagon :)

    I'm very glad to have this tough decision, though. Subaru got it right by offering the new wrx in 4 door sedan and 4 door wagon, in my opinion.
  • cinosweivecinosweive Member Posts: 166
    Are you sure the tested sedan didn't have the 17in wheels?
  • cinosweivecinosweive Member Posts: 166
    I think the shifter is pretty smooth. It was notchy for the first 1 or 2K mi, but by 3k it was real nice. Although you do have to take it easy downshifting to first, even that is getting smoother over time.
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    They weren't listed in the "as tested" or in the article. this was the first road and track test of the sedan that I'm referring to.
  • brekkebrekke Member Posts: 304
    Was that a rumor that Subaru hired someone to redesign the Impreza, and if not, when is it expected?
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    will receive a major facelift for MY04 (here in North America). Reportedly it will be shown at the Paris Auto show this September, and will be on sale in the UK next January. I think it's safe to assume we'll get it shortly thereafter, probably next spring, and at the latest that summer. Here's the link:

    http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/?news/ae_news_story.php?id=26677

    Bob
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    It's still a rumour until Subaru confirms it and it's unveiled. The rumour has been floating around for a few months now and it was also reported in Ward's Automotive a short time ago.

    -Dennis
  • gotwrxgotwrx Member Posts: 52
    1) engine? The WRX is turbo charged and therefore less long lived and potentially less reliable than the non turbocharged RS engine. However, we are probably talking 100,000 miles plus before this is a factor (I hope).

    2) mileage? I got 27 on a long trip. Don't think I've ever got under 20. Hear it can be bad at first and gets better as the engine breaks in and the ECU learns. Seems bad to me since my '84 civic was still getting 30 at 300,000 miles (it got 40 new) but you can hardly buy a car that gets more than 30 these days.

    3) In love? Had mine 2 months. 4000 miles of fun. I am obsessed. Never been so excited about a car. Previously I was a "reliable a to b car" person. Now I'm looking into autoX, reading about modding, posting online. Probably early male menopause.

    4) Selfish? No sense being unhappy if money can fix it and you can afford it.

    5) transmission? I have found the WRX transmission takes a bit more work to drive it well than I'm used to. It much prefers shifting above 3500rpm particular from 1 thru 3, which is fine when you are "driving" but can be a bit wearing if your tired and you just want to get home. 1st has a high ratio that does not like hill starts. Requires lots of revs and slipping the clutch to make this work. Reverse is similar. Its getting better now the clutch has seated but took me a few stalls to figure it out. Now I find 1st is getting finicky if I'm even the slightest bit lazy on the clutch (ie not pressed to the floor) and for some reason the clutch pedal seems a bit more resistent for the last half inch this week. Maybe I'm just getting weak as I approach my dotage. Not sure if any of this is "normal" since I've not owned any sporty cars before or a Subaru.

    6) Options? I think the cargo net and cargo tray would be useful to you. The cargo box looks to fussy to me. The center console box provides a extra space for do-dads but it is a bit small (and costly) and some people find it gets in the way when shifting (try before you buy). If you like gravel roads the diff protector might be good idea but don't bother otherwise. The stock radio/tape/cd player is plenty adequate imo. The cross rails are useful if you need to get bits of wood from Home depot occasionally. If you rack stuff like bikes you may want to consider Yakima of Thule instead. The OE cross rails are quiet and look nice tho.

    But don't be too concerned about options since you can buy them online at a discount afterwards. Just try not to pay for options you don't want. On the short shifter, you could always get it swapped out if your really don't like it. Can't imagine it would cost that much to do.

    7) Other things.
    Interior fabric. attracts lint. Pet hair is difficult to get out. Probably will not take to scrubbing well. Suggest splatter mats for 2yr olds. Hairless pets are probably a good idea too

    Blind spots. Really needs larger side mirrors. Merging requires too much head bobbing for my taste.

    Tim
  • keithllb1keithllb1 Member Posts: 30
    I am going to a SCCA practice Event, and I was wondering if there is anything I should do to my car before I go? It will be completely stock and I haven't modified it at all. What is the preferred tire pressure for the stock 16 inch "Blowtenzas"? Thanks for the advice all.
    Keith.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.