By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Onyx Black
Lapis Blue Metallic
Glacier Silver Metallic
Steel Gray Metallic
Blazing Copper Metallic
Volcanic Red (exclusive to the 5-door)
The Squall Blue is only available on the wagon. Too bad, as it would look great on the 5-door and the sedan.
The only change I know of is the addition of satellite-compatible radio. I forget if it's XM or Sirius.
Here are some facts to peak your interest. 274 hp, 2.3 liter direct injection turbo engine. The car is 50% stiffer than the already solid as a vault Mazda6. Awd, 6sp stick.
The Mazdausa site doesn't have a lot of info. Search for Mazda info from the Paris autoshow to learn more.
PF Flyer
Host
Pickups & News & Views Message Boards
Mazda and Hybrid Vehicle chats are on TONIGHT. Check out the schedule
THAT'S HOT!!!! 274 hp and AWD. Mmm hmmm.
thanks.
Now it is only estimated at this point but yeah, 274 hp, 280 lb-ft of torque (like that torque!) looks nice. Here's the webpage that they sent in the email mail. Looks nice on paper so far!
http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/displayPage.action?pageParameter=- mazdaSpeed6
I already have an 03s AT with just over 18,000 miles on it. I have absolutely no problem with it... well, one. When I had the tires rotated, one of the wheel studs in the rear left got all rusted out, so they couldn't put the nut back on. Anybody with that problem?
When this MazdaSpeed6 comes out, I can really use it. The yellow 6 will be relegated to my son at that time; and he is gonna be one lucky dude! Wonder what colors the Speed comes in...
vudini (licking my chops)
You can tell a factory roof by the lack of the frame on outside of the car and the "cleaner" roll of the sheetmetal around the opening. You can't replicate a true factory installed sunroof. Not even ASC has gotten that good yet.
However, after seeing these messages it makes me reluctant to have one cut into the top due to the structural changes to the car.
Hoowever, I am not sure how much of an impact it will have. Can someone please inform me of what the negative impact would be? specifically around the reinforcement.
Thanks
Also, it will decrease the value of the car if you decide to sell or trade it.
This is why the sedan bodystyle was chosen and not the hatch or wagon - because Mazda wanted maximum structural strength to handle all of the new horsepower and torque.
MazdaSpeed models are no-compromise, performance oriented vehicles. If not having a sunroof is a deal-breaker then go buy an Accord Coupe.
Early reports indicate that the Mazda will have more HP and more TQ than the Legacy and will likely be much more performance oriented in terms of its handling capabilities.
Plus, they are only making 4000 of them for North America. People looking for AWD and a sunroof can, and probably will, buy a Subaru. People looking for more of a pure performance sedan will probably look more seriously at the MazdaSpeed 6
Between buying a new house last year and all the hurricanes in Florida this year it has taken me almost two years to make a decision about how to replace my '92 Maxima SE, a car that I really liked.
I thought all along that the MZ6 was the closest thing to my old Maxima in terms of "four-door sports car excitement."
My reservations were the relatively small size rear seat compared to the Accord, Camry and Altima, and I'm still not a big fan of the whole faux aluminum center stack.
But, the car is bolted together well, handles about as good as my old RX-7 (if I can accurately remember that far back!) and is a real looker. The Pebble Ash adds a touch of elegance to the teriffic-looking sports package.
Since I just clocked 50 on the birthday gauge I was a little concerned about driving a "boy racer" car, but in reality this is just a darn good looking vehicle.
I'm glad I decided to choose the MZ6 over the Accord, even though the Accord is a tremendous car and outstanding value. I never could warm to the out-of-proportion rear of that car. It just doesn't have any sizzle, IMHO.
I may be seeking advice from you experienced MZ6 pros in the near future.
The wife and I both like the 6, and when we replace her '01 Altima next year, we've narrowed it down to the 6 or the Accord LX. Having owned Nissans and Toyotas, we're most anxious to try another Japanese brand.
She really likes the size and lines of the 6...it looks a bit smaller than the Accord. Maybe it's our imagination.
The Sandman :-)
Out of curiosity, I checked tirerack yesterday and the 215/50 17s on my 6s go for between 95 up to about 170 per tire, depending on the brand. The Michelins I have on my car go for about $147. A recommended Continental brand tire runs just about $100 per. You then have to locate a dealer to install them for about another $20 per tire.
You can probably do better at a wholesale club if you aren't fussy about the tire brand. Figure at least $500 after mounting. The alignment will run you another $50 or so, but you can check local shops for that.
It's the price you gotta pay for lookin' good, I guess :^)
As you read my previous post you know that my final choices came down to the Accord, Camry and 6.
The Accord and Camry are bigger and have better quality interior materials. Their engines are a notch above the Mazda in power and gas mileage, especially the 4-cylinders. They also have better resale. Can't go wrong with either car.
If you are a family man (like me, two kids), all practical reasons will point you to those brands if you are looking for a midsize sedan.
But, if you are a family man who still likes a few grins during the carpool trips, who appreciates kick-butt styling, and who can make do with a little less interior room, then the 6 is the way to go. The 6 separates you a little from the mainstream. If my past experience with Mazda holds true (owned a 626 and RX-7), you sacrifice nothing in reliability.
Also, the 6 has a four-year, 50,000 bumper to bumper warranty. The Honda is 3/36,000.
It's a tough decision. What happened with me was that I did everything except write the Honda people a check before I realized I couldn't spend so much money on a car that, though infinitely practical, I simply did not like to look at very much. Pure emotion. I don't think I'll regret my decision.
Since we've never owned a Honda or Mazda, will push for either the 6 or the LX. Showed her the new 6 tonight also, she liked it alot!
With 3 kids, I think either will work for us, as we're all hardly in the car at one time anyways. As they get older, they spend less time with us...unless they need something...lol!
The Sandman :-)
I've driven both the 6i and 6s with the manual and automatic. If you REALLY want the extra 2-3 MPG with the 4-cyl, get the manual. If you REALLY want an automatic, get the 6-cyl. I'm sure the new 6-speed auto for 2005 is great! If you REALLY want the best performance, do what I did and get the 6-cyl with manual! I still grin from ear to ear every time I blow away some pimple-faced teenager in his "souped up" Mustang!
Of the 4-cyl cars that I've driven, my gas mileage is always worse than what the EPA gets. I freely admit that I'm a bit of a led-foot, and I have to work 4-cyl engines a little harder, hence the poorer gas mileage. For example, my 6 with the 6-cyl gets BETTER gas mileage than my old '99 Grand Am with the 4-cyl, and it's all highway miles!
Again, this is all based on my driving style and conditions, and I'm sure it's different with everyone.
The Mazda6 is a fine vehicle as well - near the top of its class - but I don't consider it a homerun. More like a stand-up triple. The addition of the 5-door and the wagon to the model range helps, as will the upcoming Mazdaspeed version due next spring - but it simply isn't quite good enough to break through to the truly top tier of the most competitive segment in automobiledom.
So, based on what I know about Mazda's upcoming product, and bearing in mind that I live in Canada with our surprisingly different taste in cars, here's a little advice to Mazda to keep the heat on the competition.
1) Evolve Mazdaspeed into a something similar to BMW's M division. In other words, make a Mazdaspeed version of just about everything you make and make them available all the time. This one model at a time thing, with ridiculously limited production runs misses the boat. With the rise of Japanese tuner cars, Mazda has the opportunity to corner the market on no-compromise performance vehicles that are still tasteful and covered by a manufacturers warranty.
So built the Mazdaspeed 6 and keep building them. Keep building the Mazdaspeed Miata. Build and AWD 240HP Mazdaspeed 3. And finally, do something wild with the Tribute, which would help differentiate it from its twin brother, the Escape and make it stand out in another increasingly competitive segement, the compact SUV.
2) Move quickly to update the Mazda6 and fix the things that keep it from selling in bigger numbers. I.e. get on your hands and knees and beg for an allotment of the new Duratec 3.5 and do a number on it like you did on the Duratec 3.0 (I know Mazda, big V6's equal torque steer and less than ideal handling, but sometimes you have to give the people what they want even when they want something they shouldn't - plus you can always offer an AWD model if you can make your silly AWD system work with a V6 engine)
Also, update the interior right away. The base cloth upholstery is bush and too many people dislike the centre console. You get an A+ for the Mazda3 interior Mazda, so we know you can do it.
Also - and I hate to give you this advice Mazda because I DO NOT LIKE big cars, but stretch out the Mazda6 platform and make the car bigger. The back seat is simply too cramped for the North American market. Do the engine fix and the interior fix for 2006 and the bigger platform for 2007.
3) Now that you are bringing the Mazda5 to Canada and the US (Good move Mazda - and brave too! Hats off) build an MPV that is big enough for North American tastes. That means - you guessed it - stretching the Mazda6 platform and once again going to big daddy at Ford and begging and pleading for that Duratec 35. I only hope that you can continue to work your magic and still make the ting fun to drive. The MPV is a really great package, just make it bigger and get rid of the goddam column shifter.
4) Completely ignore all of the crazies out there that tell you to put a rotary engine or - give me a break - a V6 in the Miata. The new corporate 2.3L will do just fine in the 2006 re-design. What you do need to do is return the car to its more purist roots, not try and compete with the Audi TT's and BMW Z3's of the world. Light, simple, tossable. That's the formula.
5) I understand that the 2006 Tribute will be built entirely in Japan for the North American market. Not many others know this yet, I think, but I believe this information to be pretty reliable. Good news.
Here, Mazda is what you need to do with the Tribute. Build it on the Mazda6 platform, vastly improve the quality of the interior, make it even a little more biased towards performance, and - like I said above - make a wild, Mazdaspeed edition.
6) Your upcoming luxury SUV will be based on the Aviator. My only advice on this one - since I don't know very much about it - is to move heaven and earth to differentiate the exterior and interior design as much as you possibly can from the Ford. I don't think people will care if the mechanics are essentially the same (Ford makes good trucks and SUVs) but it has to look and feel like a Mazda.
7) The Mazda3 is a truly great car. All you need to do in the short term is to pair the 2.3L engine with a five speed automatic transmission. That should improve highway comfort and help take care of fuel economy concerns.
Other than that, my only advice is to find a way to do more with this platform. Its too good not to be used more. I know that Mazda5 is coming, but how about a nifty coupe or even a convertible on this platform.
8) Ahhh, the RX-8 and the Renesis. Its finicky, but its good. Use your wizardry to find a way to put some extra ponies into the thing. If you could get it up to 275-280 HP, the horsepower freaks would have little or nothing to complain about. What about that electric turbo thingy we keep hearing about. That sounds cool. Oh yah, build the RX-7.
Some general advice
1) Bite the bullet and make all the safety stuff standard in all of your cars, especially in the US where the whining about this is incessant.
2) Mazda, its time to either build or source a truly decent five speed automatic transmission for your cars, minivan and SUVs. Too many complaints about what you have in your vehicles now.
3) The AWD thing is getting big. You've got two great platforms that are AWD compatible. Don't be afraid to jump on this. Up here in Canada, it would make people very happy.
4) Continue to focus on improving the interior quality and design in your products. Good start, keep it up.
That's about all I can think of for now. Keep up the good work.
That's interesting because I've heard that the next Escape will be based off of the European Focus platform (Mazda3, Volvo S40/V50). It once was rumored to be based off of the Mazda6 platform but apparently Ford has something up their sleeves to put another car based SUV right between the Escape and the Explorer that may or may not be based off of the Mazda6.
This is the first I've heard of the Tribute being produced in Japan and separated from the Escape/Mariner, but then again, none of the Escape news ever actually included the Tribute so I'm not doubting your info.
I guess since the Mazda3 is produced in Japan it would make sense to produce the lower volume Tribute there too. If in fact it will be based on the Mazda3.
It almost seems like Ford has bigger plans for the Mazda6 platform than Mazda does. They need to get cracking!
I like the smaller size. One of the reasons we chose the Mazda6 is we wanted a more compact car. We already have a big, roomy sedan. There are lots of them out there. Mazda does this well. Ditto for the MPV. It appeals to people who don't want a big honking minivan.
My suggestions for improvement would be: better mpg!! (nowhere listed for you). With gas prices rising over $2 a gallon, Mazda could capitalize on its compact size by getting better mpg -- especially developing a hybrid vehicle. AWD gets worse gas mileage than regular front wheel drive.
Agree safety package should be standard. Split on the center console. My 2 cents.
'24 Chevy Blazer EV 2LT
They don't have to make it as big as an Avalon, but they do need to stretch and widen the platform to open up more interior space.
Agree on your MPG comment. Mazda lags well behind the competition in this regard with the exception of the new 2.0L engine which is close to best in class.
Their V6's are both thirsty and underpowered compared to the competition. Not a good combo.
But, the main reason a consumer will choose the MZ6 over the Accord-Camry combo is because it is not an Accord-Camry.
I'm looking now at my Pebble-Ash 6s with the sport package, and I can say with some certainty that it will be a long time before I see another one like it.
It isn't as economical or roomy as an Accord-Camry, it won't have the same resale, and it is slightly smaller, but it serves every purpose I need from a midsize sedan (I have two kids, plenty of room for them). It is as smooth and well constructed as the Accord-Camry (except for interior materials, where it lags a little).
The best part, though, is that none of this matters the moment you put on your seat belt. This car is so much fun to drive that all of its blemishes disappear the moment you turn the key.
And did I tell you how great it looks? It makes the Accord-Camry look like a couple of plowhorses (I like both of those cars, but they have completely different personalities).
Mazda doesn't have to do much with this car. It is already excellent.
I'm looking at my Steel Grey MZ6 (sport, moonroof, BOSE) next to a colleague's new Honda Accord, and smiling, knowing I got the better car.
Mazda (with imput from Ford, of course) decided to defy the mainstream and build cars that are fun to DRIVE, not cart around the wife/husband and the 2.3 kids. My MZ6 is not an Accord-Camry, and I'm proud of that. I drove the Accord, and thought it was good, but not exciting. I wasn't going near the Camry for fear of being bored asleep, as well as seeing 25 more of them on my commute to work everyday!
The 6 has plenty of room for my family, looks unique in a world of copycats, and gets decent gas mileage, without sacrificing it's performance and it's nimbleness.
Trust me, I'd rather arrive at work with a smile on my face and a spring in my step from driving my 6, rather than yawning and reaching for the coffee from driving the "AcCamry".
Ramped is right. The Mazda 6 is "already excellent".
We have 2 large teenagers (one a 6-footer) and 2 large dogs, and I don't think there's anything out there that could haul them as comfortably and be as much fun and as sexy looking as this wagon is. AND at this price ($23.5 out the door). I LOVE IT!
How do I make this modification? Is is an easy mod?
Thanks
I too drove all the others including a tier above. The only other car I liked as much from an overall handling perspective was the Infiniti G35 (RWD) and I couldn't justify spending the difference. Besides front drive is more practical for those of us who have to deal with snow for what seems like half the year. The Altima 3.5 SE is just too much brute force on the torque steer and simply does not handle as well (doesn't feel quite as solid). In addition I am tall and could not for the life of me fit into an Altima with leather and sunroof. Funny, because on paper the Altima has more headroom. It was the only serious contender in the price range. Honda and Camry - you said it all.
Mazda is going for a niche, and I think they found it. My other car is a Passat Wagon. I love it, but had the Mazda Wagon been available I think I would have two Mazdas now. For sure its going to be cheaper to maintain.