By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I have a 2000 Accord currently. Might be looking for a new car come next summer and the Mazda 6 could be in the running. I saw it and sat in it at the auto show this past winter in NYC. It's exterior styling is a knockout, and the interior is nice save for cheap plastics and what thin door panels. More info. on safety equipment and options, standard features, and trim levels would be nice to know.
Click on the Mazda6 (it is the fourth car from the left) at the top. Select specs under Interactive on the right (YOU MUST have Flash installed, else this will not work) Pull up the specifications, and then select printable version at the top right of the screen. An Adobe Acrobat file with COMPLETE specs and stats appears. What more do you want? Prices? To be announced within the week, so we have been told by Rich.
Its kind of like the comparision used on the Mazda webpage where the give themselves a bunch of "seagulls" for optional equiptment not available on the Accord LX, most of which is available with the EX.
I wonder when?
My point is a simple one: Provided that Mazda gets the 6 wagons and hatches out soon, Mazda will have quite a period of near-exclusivity...a period when price comparisons won't matter, because there is virtually no competition (Subaru is about it wagonwise, hatch wise there is NO real mid-size affordable hatch widely available).
There is a HUGE benefit to being first in a successful market. The question is, will the hatch and wagon be successful? Most of us say yes, and enthusiastically so. The better question is how many of us (and the rest of the North American car market) will put our money where our mouths are?
john cline ii, the curious one!
RPMs at 60MPH (97KPH)
6i-MT 2363
6i-AT 2361
6s-MT 2379
6s-AT 2001
RPMs at 75MPH (121KPH)
6i-MT 2954
6i-AT 2951
6s-MT 2974
6s-AT 2501
OK vcjumper, theorically at 135KPH you would have about 2800 with the 6s-AT and about 3300 with the other 3 models, but this speed is well over any Canadian or US speed limits that I know of, so should only be attempted by a "professional driver on a closed course".
Looking at the gear ratios, I think the 6i-AT is going to be a little sluggish due to the necessary compromises in the 4-speed auto. The first gear overall ratio (11.7) is just to high for a good launch with a 2.3L, 160HP engine. I think this is going to hurt sales when people are comparison shoping with the Accord LX-AT. The 6s-AT, on the other hand, has a nice low overall ratio in 1st (14.1) as well as a fairly high overall ratio in 5th (2.54) that lowers the RPMs to 2500.
If anyone wants all the gear ratios let me know and I'll post them. I snagged them off the Mazda6 site before they revised the document.
As for cheap plastics, most of the reviews I've seen applaud the fine materials used in the Mazda6 interior, EXCEPT the center console. Most of the complaints seem to question the style and not necessarily the material...
http://www.mazdaatenza.com/
jtkz13@yahoo.com
Highway rpms dont bother me. I want a 3.98 gear like my taurus, but with a nice steep 1-2-3 gearset ratio.
Thanks in advance.
6i-MT
1 - 3.307 (13.575)
2 - 1.842 (7.561)
3 - 1.233 (5.061)
4 - 0.914 (3.752)
5 - 0.733 (2.943
Final drive 4.105
6i-AT (Oops, Mazda really messed up here)
1 - 2.816 (11.678) (can you say "dog"?)
2 - 1.497 (6.208)
3 - 1.000 (4.147)
4 - 0.725 (3.007)
5 - N/A (doh!)
Final drive 4.147
6s-MT
1 - 3.153 (13.031)
2 - 1.842 (7.613)
3 - 1.258 (5.199)
4 - 0.947 (3.914)
5 - 0.733 (3.029
Final drive 4.133
6s-AT
1 - 3.801 (14.109) (Dude!)
2 - 2.131 (7.910)
3 - 1.364 (5.063)
4 - 0.935 (3.471)
5 - 0.685 (2.543)
Final drive 3.712
Dinu
If the differential gear ratio is what is important, why talk about the gearbox ratios?
all I can understand is that
1:0.9 means that the engine will run at 900rpm when the wheels are turning at 1000rpm
u take me from there.
______
3.307-|
1.842-|
1.233-|============x3.712========wheels
0.914-|
0.733-|
Ok. so is see that gearbox enables to reduce the engine RPM then the differential increases it again????
0.9 x 3.7 = 3.33 => First gear ratio
YELLOW SEDAN. I have seen it, and it is real.
To simplify, let's say you had a final drive ratio of 4.0, and a 4-speed tranny with gear ratios of 4.0, 3.0, 2.0, and 1.0. Then the overalls would be 16.0, 12.0, 8.0, and 4.0. OK, that means in 1st gear the engine is turning 16 times faster than the wheels, and in 4th gear the engine is turing 4 times for each turn of the wheels.
Now, if you want to know your RPMs at a given speed, you have to get the circumfirence (sp.) of the tire, and divide that into the length of a mile (5280 ft) to get wheel revs per mile. Then you can multiply that by the overall gear ratio to get engine revs per mile. This also happens to be the same as the engine RPMs at 60 MPH, because 60 MPH equals 1 mi/min! Amazing!
I'm waiting too!
---
"YELLOW SEDAN. I have seen it, and it is real."
Slap a label on that truck that says "SHIP TO D.C."
Of course NO price on the Mazda6, and careful on what they are comparing to.
The physical measurements should be spot on. Given that the only significant measurement difference is in rear shoulder room, I'm surprised the interior volume is so much less for the Mazda6 compared to the Accord.
Go figure...
Dinu
BTW, I think audia8q is busy driving around on his new 6.
If anyone is in So. Cal., the Mazda R&D facility's at the intersection of McGaw and Redhill, Irvine, Ca.
Saw an disguised Mazda RX8 last week