Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Dodge Ram: Problems & Solutions
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
First, is it engine oil that this truck is using, or ATF?
Regards,
Dusty
Sorry about that. It is consuming engine oil.
In my opinion the automatic transmission maintenance and the point where this engine started to consume oil is coincidental. Dodge motors in general, and the "LA" series in particular, do not have a reputation for burning oil.
You could have a stuck oil ring on one or more cylinders if the oil hasn't been changed or maintained correctly. Pretty rare on a Mopar and if it were just one cylinder I'd suspect you'd have a problem with a fouled plug. Next would be valve guide seal and/or excessive valve guide wear, but I can't correlate the long drive to accerating this condition.
However, being a '99 my first suspect would be a bad intake manifold gasket. These have failed on older Magnums allowing oil to be sucked into the intake air stream. There is a dye test for this. A Dodge dealer would have experience in both the symptoms and the test.
Best regards,
Dusty
Steve
I'm looking to do this soon. The installer swears that I will be able to keep my spare tire, although Gibsons website says other wise, and the pipe that comes out on the drivers side will not be visible from the rear until it exits behind the drivers side rear tire.
I'm also looking to install a set of 33/12.5/17's.
Any input would be greatly appreciated, especially on the exhaust.
Thanks in advance
Fangster
I like the Dodge mainly due to the Cummins diesel and we have several farmers around here who will use nothing but Dodges.
My use will include towing cow trailers and such, which seems to limit things to a diesel of some manufacture. The gas engines, other than the V-10's, at one time were pretty limited in towing. I looked at a 2003 Dodge 3500 quad cab with a V-8 gas engine, and when I asked the salesman the maximum recommended towing capacity was told it was 10,000 pounds. The diesel in the same truck, with larger transmission, would tow 16,000 pounds. Now it appears the 2004's are showing a little more towing capacity.
I had a Impala with the 305 engine that did this if I pushed it hard. It would drop to just below the "add" mark and stay there...well, until I got to about 40K. Then it just used oil no matter how it was driven.
I think in some cases at high engine RPM the crankshaft turbulence throws excessive oil up onto the lower portion of the cylinder where the oil rings can't scrape it off fast enough. When the oil level drops this ceases to be a problem.
Regards,
Dusty
http://dodgeram.info/
Best regards,
Dusty
I'm not familar with this transmission. Is this a top loader?
Regards,
Dusty
No, links to other auto sites with forums is not permitted in the Town Hall. Check the Member Agreement (link in the left sidebar) for more clarification.
My first guess is the TC Lock-up Solenoid is stuck. Earlier versions were prone to become magnetized and irratic. If this has been prompted or present since colder weather, it could be the solenoid, and/or the wiring to the solenoid.
I'm spectulating, but I believe if you had a PCM (Power Control Module) issue causing this, you'd get a error code. But I'm not certain of that.
On the 46RE, the TC Lock-up Solenoid is number 2 on the Transmission Solenoid Assembly. Check the wires for corrosion or shorts and/or tap on the assembly with a small tool.
Best regards,
Dusty
the "right" thing to do is honour what is in your owner's manual in regards to oil changes. doesn't matter if you are using dino oil or synthetic. if you look i'll bet it spells that out right in there...
My personal opinion is that 25,000 miles is too long to go with the very best oil for that reason.
Best regards,
Dusty
One day he was in the shop for an oil change and after we drained the motor oil I found that three quarts filled it past the "full" mark. Now the Slant Six always took 5 quarts with a filter. I recommended that we pull the oil pan, but this guy didn't want to bear the expense at the time.
About a year later his wife called and said that the oil pressure light would illuminate every time she stopped. Unwisely, her husband had told her to keep the car going fast enough to extinguish the oil light. By the time she got it to me I could hear a rod knock.
Since the car was still in great mechanical condition, it was decided that the engine should be repaired. At tear-down the oil pan was found to have about 6 inches of sludge in the pan. That's why it wouldn't take much more than two-and-a-half quarts. I had to replace the crank on that engine, and of course we installed new bearings. We later found out that the previous owner never changed the oil, just added.
Regards,
Dusty
The Cummins 600, as mentioned with 325hp and 600 lb-ft, replaces three separate engines:
- California Cummins, rated at 235/460
- Standard Cummins, 250/460
- High Output Cummins, 305/555
The Cummins 600 meets CARB emissions standards, and is thus available in all 50 states.
The key change to the engine was the addition of a second pilot injection of fuel prior to combustion - this reduces emissions as well as quiets the engine even more than the 03/04 common-rail engines.
One has to note the power increases, while minimal over the last HO, are substantial for us 12-valve owners. The original 1989 Cummins Ram was rated at 160/400 - we now have the same basic block producing more than double the horsepower and a 50% increase in torque. I'm looking forward to driving my 180/420 Ram back to back with the 325/600 engine... hopefully my teeth won't dry out from exposure due to the permanent smile.
kcram
Host
Smart Shopper and FWI Message Boards
So, yesterday I installed a set of 33x12.5/17's and Gibson Extreme dual exhaust on my 02 Ram QC. You have to see this to believe it...
email me at the address listed in my profile and I'll send you some pics.
John
Unless you plan to tow that much weight regularly, I think the 3.73's would be more than adequate. They would certainly pull at the max rated for the truck, just not quite as well as 4.10's. Of course if you aren't doing that very often, it really wouldn't matter much. Theres at least one to two mpg difference when running empty just from the gears, so if empty drive is the majority of your miles the 3.73's make perfect sense.
I was concerned that it wouldn't be able to tow our big trailer, so I had a salesman check the specs and he showed me the book. At least for 99 there is no difference in towing capacity with the 3.55 vs the 4.10 rear end, both are rated 12,500 lbs. Fine by me, that's exactly what our trailer is rated for so the truck and trailer are a perfect match.
I'd rather have the 3.55 in a dually (maybe that's the difference), its averaging 10 mpg in the winter (driving logging roads in 4x4, running 4x4 on the highway, idling, city driving). On highway trips it gets 13-14 mpg, not too bad out of a V10.
The reason you get decent mpg out of the V10 is because of the 3.55's. No doubt either gears will pull the trailer, it's just a matter of which will pull it better. The lower 4.10 gears will always move the weight better, but then you're stuck with lower mpg when not pulling. Dually is just for more stability when towing and would have no effect on gear selection.
It's all about matching the gears/engine/chassis for the job you're doing. Lots of dealers don't really understand this and will defer to the stat sheets without a full understanding of why these choices are available.
John
Having had the chance to pull a trailer with a Cummins and a V10 I can honestly say the V10 was much better and got better fuel economy. That said, the Cummins was in my dad's 2001 Ram 2500, so its the low hp/torque engine mated to the automatic.
We have owned 2 V10's, on a 2002 Ram 2500 auto with a 4.10 rear end and the other our current 1999 Ram 3500 V10 auto 3.55 rear end. The 99 is much better on gas (due to the rear end) but seems just as willing and able to move our big trailer as the 2002 was.
However, would we buy another Dodge, probably not, I think we will go back to Ford. Our 99 Ram has been nothing but trouble, granted some of it was hubby induced, but the steering problems, oil leaks, tcase trouble is all truck related. This truck only has 14,950 miles on it, but its eaten 2 steering gear boxes, the ball joints are bad, its leaking oil, the tcase is noisy and leaking, not too thrilled with it at the moment, it has an appt on 3/16 to visit the service dept for a few days. Glad we bought an ESC when we bought the truck in November (and no, it didn't have a hard life before we bought it, but it did blast through 3 owners in its short 4 year/11,300 mile life). We will keep it until the ESC is up, then dump it and buy a Ford, that is unless it straightens up and flies right. Hubby does love his truck.
My '01 Ram sounds identical to your fathers. I've got 135k miles on it now with ball-joints being the only repair (at 80k miles). My '03 HO six-speed with 4.10's is a completely different animal. I've pulled a stock trailer (maybe 8,000#) with a V10 and it would be hard to convince me a V10 is a better puller. It may have accelerated quicker with such a light load, but it didn't maintain all that well. Even my low-power '01 diesel will maintain without downshifting constantly.
I can't imagine pulling 15,000# with a V10. I can see it feeling quicker than a diesel under certain circumstances, but I don't know how you sqeezed out better mpg. The trip I made with the V10 was about 600 miles and we were getting between 7-9mpg and we stopped for fuel four times as the fuel tank was apparently tiny. My all-time low on the '01 was 10mpg for a leg across OK with killer head winds and about 10,000#. My '03 will get 11-13mpg with 15,000# on. That's usually what most folks I know with V10's get when pulling empty, although I don't think I know anyone with 3.55's on a V10 so that should be good for a mpg or two.
Why its so low mileage, who knows, its kind of an oddball truck. Its a reg cab, V10, dually, 4x4, fully loaded, and we do know it has, in the past, carried a truck camper. We found where the tie downs and wiring used to be.
Now as far as towing goes, we used my dad's Ram to tow our 5000 lb horse trailer and it averaged 8 mph and seemed to struggle (transmission did a lot of hunting). Our V10 would get an easy 10 mph towing that same horse trailer, why the difference? Who knows, but that's our experience with the two engines.
I would have him check the lift-pump as it's likely failing and the truck isn't getting nearly the fuel pressure it requires. That's a common problem on that year's Cummins. Put a fuel pressure guage on there and I'll bet it's way below what it should be. Probably working that truck like you were pulling 10,000# instead of 5,000#. If it's not that, it's something else because 5,000# shouldn't even effect that truck in either power or mpg.
John
John
I have not driven a new-style 2500, but I cannot believe that a steering wheel vibration is normal. I know the 1500s are as smooth as glass.
You may have more of a dealer problem than a truck problem. Keep at them to get it fixed correctly.
Good luck,
Dusty
I have tried pressures at the 40 Psi, recommended with no load and the 65/75 full load pressure I use for plowing for the load range E tires . The vibration is still there . I have started to research this problem and I am finding out it is a problem but sporadic .
As far as the dealer is concerned ..... There is no reason this truck wouldnt ride smooth as glass at highway speed . They are just seeing if I will go away . I contacted D/C they have opened a file and want me to drive another 2500 to see if I sense the vib . I am guessing they may think I am to picky . No way, this is a distinct vibration . Waiting to hear from dealer
some were having trouble with the car pulling to one side all the time...turned out to be the tires!
Also, I would not always assume a dealer is going to figure it out the first time. I bought a new set of tires once and immediately I had terrible vibration from 55mph on up. After three trips back to the tire dealer who claimed "everything is balanced, it must be mechanical" (what are the odds??). So I went to another tire shop and they left the hood up on the balancing machine and stood back looking at the tire. You could see the tire making an "S" as it spun. Turned out there were three of them like that and it was just a bad run of tires.
Rotating your tires (swap fronts/rears) should help you narrow it down unless you have more than one bad tires like I did! You won't notice the vibration if the bad tire is on the back.