By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
-Ian
$16,9xx, plus freight, plus $500 processing and $500 ad fee. Even then it would be a deal.
Maybe that's the up-front cash price for a 4 year lease. I've seen tricks like that.
This is why I prefer no-haggle dealers, no game playing.
-juice
Looking forward to more sightings.
Steve
-juice
-juice
-juice
Mike
My Forester's clutch was lighter from the get-go.
-juice
Is the cover Subaru is offering a locking one, or just a cover? Anyone here get the locking one yet? Is it very expensive?
Mark
The Subaru Crew meets every Thursday at 6PM PT/9PM ET... stop by and join us to talk Subaru or anything else automotive that might come up! Hope to see you there tonight!
/direct/view/.eea5f48
PF Flyer
Host
Pickups & News & Views Message Boards
Mark
I absolutely agree with that. They've got too much time and effort committed to making this work. The formula is not right; we all know that. My guess is it won't be until the next generation model, before they really "get it right." I think the current Baja platform, even with a turbo, will never have the capability in terms of towing an hauling, that it needs to have.
If it remains on the (next-generation) Legacy/Outback platform, I just hope it will have extra built-in strength that will be needed for the Baja. Keep in mind, the current Legacy/Outback were created before the Baja existed, so certain "capabilities" were never part of the gameplan. Now that the Baja "does" exist, I hope Subaru has taken that into account when they designed the basic structure of this new-generation Legacy/Outback/Baja.
Bob
Payload is less than the Forester; it should be not only the same, but greater. It's meant to haul stuff.
Then towing, again two other Subie lines can handle 2400 lbs, so at a bare minimum match that.
Make the midgate a true full-sizer like the concept.
Offer forced induction from the get-go.
Streth the wheelbase 4". 2" for the cabin, 2" for the bed. But stretch the bed 4", i.e. 2" on either side of the axle for balance.
Delete the cladding to save costs, and please just add a full size spare.
Sound like a plan?
-juice
Bob
Self-leveling would be a good idea in order to help beef up the payload. It should be at least a half ton.
-juice
Maybe it needs to be a 2-part unit, so that one person can easily do this? A 2-part unit could also be stacked on the roof rack, therefore would not hang off the edge, like a 1-piece unit would. This means no bumping one's head getting in and out of the vehicle.
Bob
I like your suggestions. The saleman had mentioned he was suprised when they came out with the pass through, rather than the full size fom the concept vehicle. He did mention something about having to go this route for safety sake.
If they can refine the design a little, I would definitely look into the Baja as my next vehicle (which is a couple of years off, maybe).
Mark
Baja Sport
• I don't expect to see anything other than what's already been announced. In fact, I believe the Baja Sport is an'04 model, as it now stands.
Baja Turbo
• I'm hoping this replaces the leather-clad Baja.
• I'm hoping leather becomes an option.
• I'm hoping the AWP becomes standard.
• I'm hoping it gets the Forester XT engine.
• I'm hoping it gets the Forester XT direct-control automatic.
• I'm hoping it gets the Forester XT Hill-Holder clutch.
• I'm hoping it gets the Self-Leveling rear suspension, which will allow for an:
> Increase of 200 pound payload, bring it up to 1000 pounds.
> Increase of 600 pounds towing, bring it up to 3000 pounds.
• I'm hoping all the color choices will be monochromatic.
For both models, I'm hoping a factory-approved lockable hard tonneau cover will be released.
Bob
On thing on your list would be tough - the clutch is different than what goes in the Forester. So they'd have to engineer a new one or get one from the Legacy platform in a different market.
Mark: I don't buy the "safety" argument, that's pure BS. Avalanche managed, Baja can too.
-juice
As for the 2-piece hard tonneau cover, the Avalanche has a multi-piece hard cover. I wonder how watertight it is? I haven't heard of any leaking problems.
Bob
They could at least have the Baja's midgate fold the whole lower half. That would allow a tough brace across the middle, and maybe a 4' wide sheet of plywood could slip inside.
-juice
Bob
-juice
Bob
A new phrase enters the Edmund's vocabulary, to join "turbot" and "rally bread"...
Ed
-juice
PS Sorry, that was my wife that called you this AM by accident, Ed. She found my cell phone and by coincidence it was on your name, she accidentally hit dial! Oops. She could tell, in seconds, that you have a sarcastic sense of humor, LOL!
BTW, for everyone else here at Edmund's, I did hear a dog barking on the other end of the line. If that was Hadji, I can assure you that he is either a dog or a cat that does an excellent dog impersonation.
Ed
Sure enough, that was Hadji, the dog (impersonator). ;-)
-juice
LOL!
Bob
Bob
-juice
Seriously, the Baja needs some major revamping to make it viable, and Bob's prescription is right on target: more power, more utility, less flash, optional luxury = better value, better market fit.
There is one additional change that Bob didn't mention - 5 passenger seating. OK, you're not going to travel cross-country with 3 people back there, but it sure would be nice to fit 3 across town. It kills the Baja as a second car for family types like myself. As soon as I saw that, I said, "oh well, I'm out".
As to the pass through, I have expressed my deep disappointment in this decision before. That change alone absolutely neutered the concept car, robbing it of it's biggest single "unique selling proposition".
As to safety and the Avalanche design, I wonder if they had too much flex without the upper "crossmember" behind the rear seat. The Outback wagon doesn't have one either, so I'm not sure I buy that either. On the other hand, the Avalanche is body on frame, and sold as a truck, meaning that it needed meet passenger car requirements. Are there passenger car requirements that might have shot down the mid-gate ? Smells more like GM twisting their arms off to me...
Damn shame, frankly...
The concept car really had a lot going for it.
-brianV
Did you mean to say that the Avalanche doesn't need to meet passenger car requirements? (As opposed to the car based Baja that does have to meet the stricter passenger car standards)
-Frank P.
But my idea would allow a cross brace at a critical point.
5 passenger seating is a good suggestion, I think with more than the current payload that would be automatic.
-juice
-mike
-juice
Mike - Does Subaru consider the Baja a truck across the board (safety, emissions, etc) ? I thought it was emissions only.
-brianV
-juice
5-passenger seating (@ 150 lb/passenger, which the figure the government uses, I believe) + 800 pounds payload rating = 50 pounds left for bed cargo. As a 4-passenger vehicle, the Baja can put 200 pound in the bed, with four 150 passengers aboard.
Bob
Bob
BMW has Dinan, what does SOA have? Thanks in advance.
-mike
Bob
Interesting that a big part of this company's early success was due to being an OEM supplier for Subaru! They made the "caps" for the Subaru BRAT!
http://www.snugtop.com/about.htm
Bob