Inconsiderate Drivers (share your stories, etc.)

1171172174176177478

Comments

  • 210delray210delray Member Posts: 4,721
    I agree totally, and you said it much better than I did a few posts back.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Member Posts: 3,062
    Yes it is but since I have noticed more young guys driving rice rockets (racing is a better word) in a reckless manner all the time wearing nothing but shorts and sandals I am not surprised.

    Now is it my imagination or do those who dress properly (long sturdy pants, boots, helmet and the like) also tend to ride safer?


    I see a lot of motorcycle drivers on summer weekends who like to ride out in the country area. There are big packs, multiples, pairs and single bikes - some riding solo and others with a passenger. They usually appear to be driving sanely and within speed limits. Their dress ranges from full leather protection/helmet to t-shirt, levis, boots, no-helmet.

    The crazies that I see are either on the interstate, sometimes going well over the limit, individual riders on loud bikes doing wheelies on back roads and very loud trail bikers ripping up some unused farmland or vacant lots. These are inconsiderate.

    There are young guy motorcycle drivers who have their young girl friends (or maybe wife) along who both are dressed very skimpily and without helmets. Guys typically have t-shirt, shorts, sneakers and girls typically have halter top, shorts and sneakers. Have not counted, but seems like a lot of blonde riders. Too bad these guys/gals can't see some photos of drivers/riders in a hospital ER, and then in the OR, who have had their skin taken off and/or have gravel/sand imbedded in their skin that needs to be removed and treated. These young guys are inconsiderate/foolish for exposing their female companions to such high risk behaviour.

    Have never seen a female motorcycle driver with a male passenger.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,576
    Personally, I can't feel sorry for those female passengers. Nobody put a gun to their heads...the perpetual victim stuff for that demographic can't apply everywhere. Sometimes I kinda hope they fall off...at low speeds of course. Just a bump and a bruise to turn their brains back on. They are much more inconsiderate to other motorists who get delayed when these idiots crash, and we all get to fund the medical expenses.

    I got behind a harley yesterday, and I could feel the exhaust vibration through my steering wheel, when stopped at a light. Just stupid...the street racer crowd gets hassled by revenue collectors/cops...the middle aged hog rider should too. Of course, it's tougher when you aren't picking on kids.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Too bad these guys/gals can't see some photos of drivers/riders in a hospital ER who have had their skin taken off and/or have gravel/sand imbedded in their skin that needs to be removed and treated.

    I one time ended up taking a spill on a gravel road doing maybe 40-45. But since I had on a heavy jacket, heavy jeans, boots, gloves and a helmet I only had some abrasions on one arm where there was a gap between the gloves and the jacket.

    Have never seen a female motorcycle driver with a male passenger.

    I have and maybe someday over a beer I will tell you about that.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,704
    Just heard on the radio news that a 40 year old was dead after crashing his motorcycle. The car driver and his wife or girlfriend were unhurt.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    I was a pedestrian and observed this at a mall entrance. Two cars enter a mall from the street early in the morning. Lead car stops in the middle of the intersection, with second car a few feet behind. Not a car in sight. Lead car sits there for 30 seconds. Suddenly the second car looked liked a Christmas tree, and out of the loud speaker an angry cop told the driver to move his car out of the intersection. The look on the drivers face was priceless. He starts moving, goes down the road with the cop behind him, turns around and then heads back toward me. Now, it would have just been easier to move through the intersection and park your car until you got your bearings.

    Cops 1, inconsiderate drivers 0.

    At a commuter train station. Very clearly marked at the crossing with signs and yellow cross hatching is a do not stop for about 20 feet on both sides of the crossing, both sides of a street. Driver in a car, stops in the no stopping zone, to unload a passenger. A lineup of about 5 cars ensues, because no driver can go around due to the crossing. Suddenly, sirens and loudspeakers. One of the drivers is an unmarked police car. Police sez: "if you don't move NOW, you will be ticketed". Passenger closes trunk, get's in car and driver pulls around to a *safe* location, looking rather annoyed the cop made him move for his safety and to stop blocking traffic.

    Cops 1, stupid non sign reading and traffic obeying drivers 0.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    ... and traffic as usual is backed up for a light. Well the van two cars ahead of me stopped way short of the guy ahead of him as not to block the entrance to a shopping area (a considerate driver). Well the guy behind him (the guy right in front of me) pulls out into the oncoming lanes (no traffic approaching) passes this guy in the van and pulls in front of him. :confuse: I mean all this guy did was just pass the car in front of him getting one car length further ahead and blocking an entrance (the inconsiderate driver).

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    I don't even know how to describe everything that was happening. It was Friday at 1pm, on a major multilane freeway (680), where a couple of lanes go off on the right to merge with another major freeway (880). One of the lanes goes north, one goes south, and the next lane over keeps you on 680. Personally, I think the signage is just fine.

    It was just a mess. Traffic in the right lanes slowed down suddenly from 65mph to 40 or so. This one beige Crown Victoria couldn't decide which lane it should be in. It slowed down a LOT, causing people behind it to brake hard and in some cases swing onto the shoulder to avoid a collision. Then the Crown Vic jumped to the rightmost lane. Then it jumped to the 2nd lane and forced a car out of that one, who squeezed back into that lane ahead of the CV.

    Meanwhile a van of some sort did the opposite, jumping from the rightmost lane to the 2nd lane, then back. A few other cars made very last minute decisions. Several alert drivers swerved to not get hit.

    It was just the most amazing display of confusion and cluelessness I've probably ever seen on the road.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,576
    Could it be considered inconsiderate to drive a car with damaged bodywork hanging out like at least 8 inches, like this?

    image
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Depends:

    Is this a parking lot with wide spaces and the car is between the lines? If yes then no its not inconsiderate.

    Is it on a narrow city street that makes passing it very difficult? If yes then no its inconsiderate.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • smittynycsmittynyc Member Posts: 289
    "It was just the most amazing display of confusion and cluelessness I've probably ever seen on the road."

    I saw such a display yesterday morning, although fortunately it was limited to only one driver.

    Northbound on the Hutchinson River Parkway headed toward CT, traffic moving 15+ above the 50 mph limit, entering the always exciting, heavily trafficked, confusing-for-newcomers, and dangerously designed double interchange with I-287 and I-684.

    I notice a couple of cars in the center-right lane quickly swerving left. I move over a lane as well and quickly come upon an -- ahem -- older lady in a 200X Camry who is literally stopped about halfway down the entrance ramp from I-287 NB, wheels *completely* cocked for a left turn, slowly edging into the rightmost lane! After I passed I watched her in the rearview -- she had plenty of opportunities to merge, but she opted not to. My guess is she was actually waiting for a pause in all four lanes of traffic so she could get to the leftmost lane, which is the exit lane for I-684.

    What makes this dangerously inconsiderate act particularly galling is that this entrance ramp is one of only a handful of modernized entrance ramps along the entirety of the Hutch and Merritt Pkwys (which were constructed as part of the WPA). Oh, and that the exit ramp for I-684 is a little more than a mile past that merge -- it's not a fun procedure, by any means, but hardly impossible. And certainly nothing worth risking a fiery, multiple-vehicle pileup for -- there are numerous back-roads alternatives for the timid/senile/unskilled driver.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,576
    I'd be worried about that panel clipping someone in tight traffic or pedestrian situations. Seems pretty dangerous to me. And who knows what could fly off at higher speeds.

    Apart from the usual slowness and LLCs, no problems in my area lately.
  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    I'd be concern about that body damage too, but it's such a mild level of bad citizenship compared to everything else we talk about here. And with stuff like that you never know if it just happened. But judging from that poor parking job, I'd expect that driver to have really earned that body damage and have more on the way.

    Seriously bad car problems are when none of the brake lights work, or when the car's missing its entire front clip and looks like a black hole from the front (no headlights). Or 80mph on the little spare. Those did scare me.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    I'd be worried about that panel clipping someone in tight traffic or pedestrian situations.

    Although its hard to tell by the picture but if that panel would clip someone then the side mirror has a very good opportunity as well.

    And who knows what could fly off at higher speeds.

    Again you cannot tell by the picture but the panel may still be bolted onto the car very well.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    I'd be concern about that body damage too, but it's such a mild level of bad citizenship compared to everything else we talk about here.

    I agree, also we don't know when the damage was done. It could have happened that morning and the body shop told the owner "we can take you in next Tuesday".

    Seriously bad car problems are when none of the brake lights work,

    Since you mentioned that many a year ago I came very close to rear ending someone who didn't have any working brake lights. The scary thing was that this was a brand new car, still had the temporary tags on it.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    "Red-Light Runners Ticketed This Week At Intersections"...

    A front page article in the local rag, SJMN, Aug 7.2006. Its Time to Stop And Think Connie Skipitares.

    County numbers "red light violation"

    Year / Collisions / Deaths / Injuries

    2005 1,122 4 1,029

    2004 1,147 2 1,042
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,704
    Is there a link to the article?
    Did they use real policemen or the cameras to give out tickets? I have a real problem with camera route as a fundraiser instead of using policemen who move from light to light looking for the omnipresent runners.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    You have a problem with using cameras to enforce the law but not with policemen doing the same thing? I, for one, would not care one bit if they had red light cameras at every intersection.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    www.mercurynews.com/news.

    Yeah I feel the same way. It needs to be done by real police presence. The editorial comment was made that red light running is as dangerous as DUI. If that is true (which for my two cents, I happen to agree) then CLEARLY taking a picture of it and asking for money is a disengenuous way to generate revenue.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,576
    How much of that red light revenue goes back to the camera firm? Now there's some shady business.

    re: the Corolla fender...it was not a fresh hit, the car was covered in grime equally everywhere. I wouldn't want that thing on the road beside me...if anything, pound it in a little.

    Just the other week I got behind a car with inop brake lights (and it wasn't an ancient car - doesn't every modern car have dash lights for this?), and now and then I'll see cars with nothing in the way of a front clip or hood. These things seem to get law enforcement/revenue collection attention about as often as cars with a big FOP sticker on the window.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,704
    IIRC the camera company got 80% or more and Dayton, Ohio, got 20% or less. Of course they're not the sharpest tacks in the box at negotiating and managing money in the urban city. Others probably have a fairer distribution.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,704
    >You have a problem with using cameras to enforce the law but not with policemen doing the same thing?

    The cameras don't enforce. They don't stop the driver, delay them, and render a ticket then and there. They don't check for drug use, warrants on the driver, lack of vehicle insurance. They collect an $85 fee and add no points to the driver's record.

    >I, for one, would not care one bit if they had red light cameras at every intersection

    The don't even put the cameras on both streets, just the main street carrying out-of-towners who stumble into their web. The cross streets with junker cars, drunk drivers, druggies, warrant-wanted drivers don't have a camera. I'm more worried about cross traffic hitting me on the main street than someone of the 4-lane used to be highway hitting someone on the cross street.

    They don't have cameras at best, most dangerous locations. I watch locals (see above descriptions) running lights at lights with 3-4 llights of the setup locations. One day I watched three run the red (not yellow) light in front of a drug sales location next to a past 7-11 location now a local food mart (and drugs mart). On down, at a T-street with low traffic volume in front of a post office, they have a speed camera. Three hundred feet away is a main cross street for the locals in that poorer side of town where traffic in all 4 directions is much higher.

    Roving cops make much better use of time and money. They check for warrants and condition of driver and car. The cameras, well, they make money for a Scottsdale AZ company! :grin.

    I, for one, would not care one bit if they had red light cameras at every intersection

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Income generation from stuff like camera's at cross walks can be a slippery slope.DANGEROUS from a civil rights point of view. Several examples. Ticket for every J walker or pedestrian who crosses against a light. Say you have a eating drinking establishment. You stop/and/or ticket EVERY driver that comes out of the parking lot. (probable cause DUI) As you know we all have our day in court, so let THEM sort it out. On the odds that most will pay rather than say spend 1000-5000 for legal representation, it is an easy 200-500 dollars. Of course the hard core criminal types will probably not have the money so now you what do you do? Lock em up? Oh yeah, dont forget that now you have probably cause for asset forfeiture.....so you need an undercover MB for drug undercover work.... target and execute.....
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,704
    I didn't mention a million or more in $$$$ is unpaid. Mostly to locals, many of whom have multiple tickets. The city who's always quick to brag can't seem to find its own residents.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    The cameras don't enforce.

    Neither does a policeman there, Since the law gets broken there was no enforcement of the law. Once the law has been broken its not enforcement it is identifying the law breaker and imposing the penalties for breaking the law. Thats what the policeman does and that is what the red light camera does.

    The don't even put the cameras on both streets, just the main street carrying out-of-towners

    Oh I am sorry I was unaware that there was different roads for out of towners and locals. I have to check into this and see what roads I as a local am allowed to take.

    They don't have cameras at best, most dangerous locations.

    Around here they do, many at grade level railroad crossings where we have always had issues with people going around gates.

    Roving cops make much better use of time and money.

    Actually no, cameras stay on duty 24 hours a day, don't get paid overtime or benefits and watch the intersection constantly, they never call in sick or take vacation days.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,704
    >The cameras don't enforce.

    Neither does a policeman there,


    Actually when people know there are officers LOOKING for redlight runners, the enforcement is there. Cameras have no impact other than on locals who know the cameras are there.

    >Oh I am sorry I was unaware that there was different roads for out of towners and locals.
    The routes I'm noticing are used by people from the next country to get to I75 in many cases. They don't travel the roads daily, as do locals, and therefore haven't noticed that there are cameras present on the main road (but no on the cross street which is primarily local people). I'll overlook the sarcasm. Perhaps your area has better city management for placement since they decided to use the cameras.

    >Actually no, cameras stay on duty 24 hours a day, don't get paid overtime or benefits and watch the intersection constantly, they never call in sick or take vacation days

    See earlier post about locals running lights where they know there is no camera. Roving policemen might get overtime and benefits, but they would find the redlight runners when they're present and check for sobriety, warrants, insurance.

    Guess we just disagree.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Actually when people know there are officers LOOKING for redlight runners

    And if people know there is a red light camera there there is enforcement. The key word is "know".

    The routes I'm noticing are used by people from the next country to get to I75 in many cases.

    Again this is no different than having a police officer hiding around the corner watching.

    See earlier post about locals running lights where they know there is no camera.

    One cure is occasionally switching where cameras are.

    but they would find the redlight runners when they're present and check for sobriety, warrants, insurance.

    I am not saying they shouldn't be used, just saying for enforcement purposes there really isn't justification for hating the system of cameras.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Yeah actually it tends to make ones attitude harder toward a truly dangerous behavior: red light running. Like for example, folks put down the sun visor and or obscure ones features, features so they stand a better chance beating the rap in court due to "reasonable doubt" principles. There is also a license plate "fuzzer" sold for that purpose.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,576
    Maybe people should just start shooting out the cameras.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,576
    Oh yeah, and are minivans allowed to go around corners at more than 3mph?
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,704
    >shooting out the cameras

    Funny you'd mention that. An adjacent city added a few cameras since the urban area was making so much money. One of theirs got "run over."

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • grbeckgrbeck Member Posts: 2,358
    A London paper recently published an editorial from a bicyclist written in response to the mayor's proposal that all bicyclists pay a registration fee.

    One of the claims made by the writer was that reliance on photo cameras for enforcement has led to a reduction in police presence in London. This, in turn, has led to increased bad behavior by drivers that can't be recorded by the traffic cameras. (These cameras are EVERYWHERE in Great Britain, and are used to enforce the speed limit even more so than red-light running. There are even traffic camera detectors sold openly, much as radar detectors are sold here)
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,735
    Ugh.... that is horrible; truly a devistating situation. Why the mother was not inside the car, who knows, but behind it? Wow. :(
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • pearlpearl Member Posts: 336
    People failing to use turn signals is now epidemic - and dangerous. It used to be that people frequently would not signal right turns (in the U.S.), now it is left turns, lane changes, you-name-it. I saw a young woman jogger narrowly avoid being run over the other day when some guy made a left turn into the street she was crossing with nary an indication of what he was going to do. The cops will nail you for speeding, but I have yet to hear of any serious enforcement for lack of turn signal use.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    The cops will nail you for speeding, but I have yet to hear of any serious enforcement for lack of turn signal use.

    I know a couple of people who have been ticket for failure to use signals.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    I saw an article a while back about a study done in Northern Virginia where this red light cams were in use.

    The cameras became a nice revenue source for the counties, but did not affect the number of red light runners. Slightly increasing the time for the yellow light had much more effect.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,704
    >Slightly increasing the time for the yellow light had much more effect.

    From what I picked up the last couple of years the company putting in the cameras and poles sets the time for the yellow. They got caught on the one at a little used T-street for a post office parking lot. It must not have been "earning" enough revenue for them so they shortened the light about 1 second compared to the other lights down the 4-lane main feeder road. Someone who got caught there measured it and wrote in to the newspaper letters to the editor. I measured it shortly after and it had been lengthened. Convenient on their part, no?

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • 210delray210delray Member Posts: 4,721
    You mentioned brake light indicators on the dashboard. In an apparent cost-cutting move, most volume automakers no longer include them.

    Just the other day, I was behind a recent model crossover (maybe a Hyundai or Kia) that had only the high-mounted center brake light working. The left and right ones were kaput.

    Unfortunately it's not that easy to check if your brake lights are working -- you need 2 people or a good reflective surface behind you. (I find those massive chrome SUV or pickup bumpers are good for this when they pull up close behind you at a red light.) ;)
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,576
    I brought that up...and I wasn't aware of that feature being deleted. I know my mom's Taurus has an indicator, and my MB have had it (save for the fintail - we didn't think of such frills in the 60s). That's kind of a bad thing to leave off, seeing as a picky cop will nab you for it.
  • 210delray210delray Member Posts: 4,721
    I meant to respond to you and not snake.

    Yeah, kind of dumb to not have an indicator. Turn signals will usually flash twice as fast if one goes out, and taillights aren't as critical, IMO, especially since a lot of cars have more than one bulb per side.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,576
    Seems a lot of cars have only one brake light bulb per side, though. I saw what I recall was an Exploder with the same issue, only the high mount working.

    But if it saves 5 cents per car...axe it.
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,735
    I frequently see this as the catalyst for pulling over folks and subsequently issuing DUI, along with the failure to signal! Signals and "no front license plate" are common ones for pulling over the 'slightly' inebriated.

    However, it is so common an offense, police would scarcely have any time for anything else were they to enforce it rigidly! :sick:
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • redmaxxredmaxx Member Posts: 627
    Tailgating. It's an epidemic here. Just put a few cops on the road and the locals will think they are there for speed enforcement. Little will they know that the police are there to pull over a line of 25 cars for tailgating. They could really rake in the money. :D
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    You mentioned brake light indicators on the dashboard.

    Just for clarity someone else did.

    Unfortunately it's not that easy to check if your brake lights are working -- you need 2 people or a good reflective surface behind you.

    Next time you go to a strip mall or some place that has a glass front park across the lot from it. When you back up you can check out your lights in their windows.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,704
    You can back up to your garage door (at night) and check you lights, brake, turn, driving, and backup lights.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • xrunner2xrunner2 Member Posts: 3,062
    You can back up to your garage door (at night) and check you lights, brake, turn, driving, and backup lights.

    Don't forget to check your rear license plate light. It must be lit when your headlights are on. A few years ago, just beyond sunset on a particular day, a lady driver followed me into a Home Depot parking lot and approached me as I was getting out of my car. She said that my license plate light was out. I checked and it was out. She was a very "considerate" driver.

    Next day, checked the bulb and bracket assembly and there were some rusted connectors in an assembly. Checked with Nissan dealer and parts dept wanted about $45 for new assembly. I rebuilt the old assembly for a few bucks in non-Nissan parts and the lights then worked.

    I have noticed some inconsiderate drivers who have some kind of smoky plastic covers over their rear license plate. On a few occasions I have mentioned this to them if I happen to pull up even with them at the next traffic light. They kind of have a sheepish grin like they intentionally want to have obfuscating covers. If I were a cop, I would ticket every one of these drivers and would also look for more wrong stuff on their cars.
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,735
    Hahahha... that would be great!

    Not tailgating, but just as inconsiderate IMO:

    This morning as my wife was driving me to work (2-lanes each direction), I said to her, "That Impala that just turned on the road up there is an unmarked police car." We were cruising at 60 in a 55, so I had no real concern with the officer himself, but followed up with, "so watch out for that Alyeska truck in front of us, because he is probably going to hit the brakes instead of passing." Sure enough, this joker drops to 40 to avoid passing as the officer got up to speed. Thankfully, the Alyeska driver was turning right onto the expressway, while we and the officer were turning left. So, up on the expressway, the officer is poking along at (what looked to me from my perspective on the speedometer) about 53. My wife verbally considers passing, and I say, sure. But, as she is getting ready to pass (it takes her a while to "prepare" for this sort of thing), a Toyota Tundra is gaining on her at a fairly high rate of speed. She says, "I'm going to wait for this truck." I laughed and said, "If you wait, you are not going to be passing because this guy is going to choke the road and not pass." She did not believe me, but sure enough, the Tundra brakes and sits there, about 4 lengths behind the officer, and forms the classic rolling roadblock. :sick:

    My wife was annoyed and somewhat incredulous, but I warned her from the word "go." People are so predictable. :P
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • redmaxxredmaxx Member Posts: 627
    I have noticed some inconsiderate drivers who have some kind of smoky plastic covers over their rear license plate. On a few occasions I have mentioned this to them if I happen to pull up even with them at the next traffic light. They kind of have a sheepish grin like they intentionally want to have obfuscating covers. If I were a cop, I would ticket every one of these drivers and would also look for more wrong stuff on their cars.

    I have seen ones around here that aren't too bad, where the plate is still clearly readable. What they are trying to avoid is the red-light camera tickets.
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,735
    If I were a cop, I would ticket every one of these drivers and would also look for more wrong stuff on their cars.

    Folks get pulled over for that sort of thing occasionally... "obscured license plate." Other odds and ends for which folks are stopped: no front license plate (very common); clear turn signals or off colors like blue, purple, etc; strange, pointless, and bright glowing neon lights underneath the vehicle that cause incredibly bad glare on ice; lack of safety equipment (no headlights on the car, no tail lights, stuff like that); lack of headlight use (like at 1 am in July when folks think it is okay to not use headlights beacause it is light enough to see the road without them); and, BIG one, one inoperable headlight.

    I was behind a small coupe a couple years ago that had clear tail lights. No, not clear lenses with red lights.... clear lights and lenses! It was horribly bright and very obnoxious. Every time she would step on the brakes, I would respond with my driving lights. It took about 4 times of doing that before she pulled off the road and let me pass. Whew, what a relief. She probably thought I was crazy, but then again, drivers like her are hopelessly clueless.
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.