Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Inconsiderate Drivers (share your stories, etc.)

15758606263478

Comments

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    To be sure I can understand the passion that drives this type of legislation, etc.

    The problem is the overall fatality indicators (NHSTA) show that not only is the (per capita) fatality and accident and injury rates down but they are at the lowest per capital rate in years. In addition, the miles are up, the population is up, the vehicle population fleet is up and the rate is going down!! (so please don't shoot the messenger) DUI fatalities still hover around 40%.

    I happen to read somewhere that in CA, which I think most would agree has probably the most of everything; only had something like 2,700 auto fatalities. Please don't start on the mantra of "if we can prevent just even ONE death" it would all be worth it!

    While I agree in theory that one should in effect "throw the book" at so called DUI drivers, in practice, the asset confiscation and the laws governing it, leaves a LOT to be desired.
  • bottgersbottgers Member Posts: 2,030
    Speed limits can hardly be considered devices for generating revenue if they aren't enforced. Where I live, speeders run rampent.
  • andyman73andyman73 Member Posts: 322
    Seems to me that he intentionally created a hazardous situation by having a DVD playing. He put it, and He pushed play. No accident. It was intentional. Should be involuntary vehicular manslaughter, and should be mandatory 5 year minumum sentence.
  • bottgersbottgers Member Posts: 2,030
    I think many people are missing the point all together. Distrations inside the vehicle cause many accidents, but the vast majority of those distractions these days are caused by people using hand held cell phones. It seems the people who use cell phones while they drive are all to quick to point out other things that cause distractions to try and take the focus off the main cause......cell phones! A national ban on cell phone usage while driving (that's actually enforced) would drastically reduce the number of accidents caused by distracted drivers.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Even if there's a ban on cell phone usage (which I'm for), you will always have people who will defy it. If you push for Hands-free usage, anyone can simply lie and say they weren't on the phone, since you don't see them holding anything up to their ear.

    I use hands-free myself, but continue to focus more on the driving, than the actual conversation. And have always been able to deal with dicey situations, without the cellphone having any effect over the situation, I just say "Hold on" before I cut someone off or use the emergency lanes.

    Ever there's some people who drive, who they feel the need to make eye-contact with you as a passenger, while they are driving ? Already it shows what they are focusing on... I being the passenger, I'm constantly slapping them and telling them to look forward, urrrr annoys me.
  • andyman73andyman73 Member Posts: 322
    My wife used to think that I was ignoring her, by paying attention to the road. After a few close calls, when she was driving, she doesn't look at me anymore. Most of the time she lets me drive us around, anyway. I don't suffer from her mild case of indecision(sp?) when I drive. By the way, I may make 1 cell phone call a month, or less, while driving. As an aside, I see people at work, on night shift, on their cells at every break time. I often wonder who they are waking up to talk to, every 90 minutes. These aren't teens either, but mature adults. Well, okay, not mature.
  • smittynycsmittynyc Member Posts: 289
    "The problem is the overall fatality indicators (NHSTA) show that not only is the (per capita) fatality and accident and injury rates down but they are at the lowest per capital rate in years. In addition, the miles are up, the population is up, the vehicle population fleet is up and the rate is going down!! (so please don't shoot the messenger) DUI fatalities still hover around 40%."

    The improved auto accident fatality rates are impressive, but I think they're a result of cars being safer, not drivers. You'll notice that the injury rate is decreasing at a much flatter rate than the fatality rate.

    And in any event, 42,643 people died on American roads in 2003. Regardless of proportions and percentages, that is a huge number, and I fail to believe it can't be reduced further--and substantially, too, not just incrementally.

    "While I agree in theory that one should in effect "throw the book" at so called DUI drivers, in practice, the asset confiscation and the laws governing it, leaves a LOT to be desired."

    I disagree. When it comes to DUI, I will always prefer to err on the side of overzealousness rather than the drunk driver's "rights". Driving under the influence isn't a hell of a lot different than putting on a blindfold and firing a gun in random directions. It's an extremely serious crime that isn't punished anywhere near as stringently as it ought to be.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Well I understand where you are coming from, but let us look at the practicality of it. I do not know the fatality rate of NY. But as I have said, I read that the fatality rate of CA is app 2700. So if I drive in CA, what practical application does the fatality rate have in NY and vice versa???

    Now when I drive in NM and AZ, two states that vie for the capital of DUI fatalities, then subconsciously and consciously I AM concerned! :):(
  • smittynycsmittynyc Member Posts: 289
    re "practicality": I assume you're talking about the practicality of instituting New York City's impound law nationwide? Trust me, if it can be done in New York City, it's not impractical to do it other places. If it can be logistically accomplished in a place that has 8+ million people in 309 square miles, I don't see what would hamstring it elsewhere.

    And I don't understand the point of comparing apples and apples--the root of the problem is drunk driving, not the number of people who happened to be killed by drunk drivers.
  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    Any statistics on accidents, regardless of fatalities or injuries?
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    Will we then need a ban on DVD player fiddling? Shouldn't we ban reading? How about a freedom fry law?

    I'd rather penalize driving while distracted, whatever the cause.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Not quite. I think that instituting the NYC impound law would be fairly straightforward as a procedure, but it would take a whole "[non-permissible content removed] like" attitude to get it passed nationally. What I am alluding to by what I am saying is if there is 2700 fatalities in CA and if the averages are true 40% are due to DUI that is 1080. The other thing is: does this NYC law do what it proports to do and is not merely another easy way of asset confiscation in the guise of preventing drunk driving? The other thing is the NYC fatality rate good or bad is really not going to effect or affect the fatality rate in CA, again good or bad. If we need it more plain, a drunk NYC driver driving in NYC is not going to kill me a driver in CA!-unless he or she is a drunk driver from NYC driving drunk in CA and vice versa!
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    how many accidents are [i][b]due to[/i][/b] DUI? The way the stats are collected if anyone involved in the accident (includes drivers, passengers and pedestrians if any) has measurable blood alcohol it's an alcohol-related accident. Doesn't have to be over the BAC limit, or even in the driver's blood. That means if you are designated driver and have had nothing to drink, and you get rear-ended at a traffic light by a sober person it's an alcohol-related accident.

    Once such statistics are recorded in that way, alcohol is presumed to be causal in all alcohol-related accidents. Neat bit of card-stacking by MADD - probably inflates the number of alcohol caused accidents, injuries and deaths by double or better. Amazing what an agenda can accomplish...
  • akanglakangl Member Posts: 3,282
    Had a Corolla pass us at a high rate of speed today today, less than 5 miles down the road the trooper had him pulled over. Just goes to show ya that speeding doesn't get you anywhere fast. hehehe
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    All depends upon the situation, I'm a proponant for speeding within reason. There's one avenue off my house that I have the lights timed, and know when and how I can get away with... Had a friend on the car behind me following me (had to go somewhere in seperate cars)... we were doing a casual 45 (limit 40MPH) for around 40 blocks... very laa dee daa driving, nothing aggresive or hard...

    Then suddenly past one avenue I told her (Yes we were on the cellphone even if she was in the car behind me) to slam the gas hard and hit 60MPH because if not we miss the next light. So it's now known, we need to hit 60 to make the next light.

    Then 5 lights after that one, you get stuck with a red, but when it turns green, just accelerate to a mild 20 and let it coast because the next one 2 blocks down will still be red.

    So again, all depends...
  • andyman73andyman73 Member Posts: 322
    Sounds a bit like the anti gun freaks that lump all killed under the age of 21 as children. Including older teen gangbangers(intentionall killing each other)and military members dieing in armed conflicts. Just like the alcohol related incidents, and smoking related deaths. Weed out all the deaths that weren't actually caused by DUI drivers, deaths not actually directly related to smoking, and children not accidently killed by firearms, and the numbers will shrink dramatically. Of course that will take a lot of hot air out the nay-saying windbags.
  • bottgersbottgers Member Posts: 2,030
    Why do people need to talk on cell phones while they're driving anyway? Can't they make their calls before they leave, or after they arrive at their destination?
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Sometimes people do get calls WHILE driving. And when your stuck in 2 hours worth of traffic, it's not uncommon to get quite a bit of calls... If anything, people have noticed that while I'm on the phone I actually follow the speed limit and driving like normal sane people... If I'm not on the phone and focus my attention to looking for cops, then I end up driving much faster, heh...

    But again, I'm not a proponent of using cell phones while driving.. There's some people who can do it, do it well... But most other's can't, and those are the one's that cause issues.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    I was tailgated on a narrow two-lane numbered highway near Sevierville TN. It was marked for 40 mph limit, over 30 was treacherous on some of the curves. For about 15 miles a lady talking on her cellphone with a cigarette in her other hand tailgated me in her Honda (of course).

    She wouldn't pass when there was a strip. She wanted to follow someone to guide her home, but she wanted them to go faster.

    Still wish I'd rigged up a pump that sprays used motor oil in a vapor out the back of the car to mess up the windshield of tailgaters!!!

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • akanglakangl Member Posts: 3,282
    Coming home from Anchorage with our new popup (driving the Titan of course). Got to a spot where the road went from 2 lanes north into 1 lane. Guy in an old MPV minivan was behind us in the lane that merged and decided he was going to jump ahead. He comes up beside us, then almost in front, starts merging over, hubby had to hit the brakes to avoid being hit. He blared the horn at him and the guy flipped him off, then hung half way out the window, turned around to try to egg on a fight, after that he sat back down and slammed on his brakes.

    Hubby was pissed to say the least, but I have to give him credit for not ramming the guy off the road, I know the thought was there, lol.

    Something about that Titan brings out the jerk in other drivers.
  • bottgersbottgers Member Posts: 2,030
    Here's an idea; turn the cell phone off while you're driving, then you won't get any calls while you're driving. Cell phones have this nifty little feature that lets you know who has called while the phone was turned off. There's absolutely no reason why anyone needs to talk on the phone while they're driving. Now if your vehicle is broken down, that's a different story, but while you're driving, no way.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    that some people are not distracted by their cell phone. I've heard most of the responses people give (...maybe you are distracted but I'm not - I can drive just as well on the phone as I can when I'm not on the phone...)

    I ain't buying it. I simply don't believe it. I don't think most people have any idea how their driving changes when they pick up the phone. I don't support laws banning hand-held phones, but I think people need to accept simple reality.

    FTM, the 46-60 acceleration "to make traffic lights" sounds to me like something that needs the benefits of enforcement (although I admit I'd have to see the area. If it was an industrial area that is abandonned at night it might make sense.) I also do not support many of the rediculous speed laws, but some reason needs to prevail. Just my $.02.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    "maybe you are distracted but I'm not"

    That excuse is in the same category as the "A little drink doesn't bother me. It may bother other people's ab ility to drive, but not mine!"

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • bottgersbottgers Member Posts: 2,030
    Have you noticed nobody's answered my question? I asked why people think they HAVE to talk on cell phones while they're driving, and nobody can answer. That's because there is no reason.
  • andyman73andyman73 Member Posts: 322
    That would have been the perfect time to test the power of the engine, as I am sure your husband could have easily fended off that MPV. I don't usually condone that. However, the fact that he made his move near the end of the 2 lane, shows that his head is on backwards already.

    I recently passed someone on the shoulder, they were hogging both lanes in an uphill section with a slow truck lane. No they weren't in a truck, was a Stratus RT. They didn't seem to happy, however, they were doing 5 under the limit, and I was around long before it went back to one. In my mirror I could see that they never sped up, as traffic was quickly piling up behind them.

    Several years ago, I actually had someone chase me for 20 miles!!!!! They must have felt I slighted them by passing traffic before being trapped by the slow movers. They were in a 1st gen. Aerostar, smoking badly, no contest for the 98 Malibu I was in. The guy driving was hanging out the window yelling, and shaking his fist. Had a young boy in the front passenger seat, with no seatbelts on. A few turns and hi speed forays down some North Carolina coastal forest roads, left him to choke on his own smoke. Funny thing is, he never honked once. Usually if someone cuts you off, you honk at them, right? Anyways, that was the only time I was ever chased. Anyone else here get chased?
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    I'm with you on this one. Somehow, I'm not entirely sure how, we managed to get civilization through the first 30-40,000 years without the need to be in constant communication. I guess that has all changed now. I was interested in the number of Olympic athletes who marched around the stadium in the opening ceremony on the phone.

    The convenience is inescapable, but easily made unnecessary by a small bit of planning... or patience, whichever comes first. Trouble is nobody has patience for anything any more, especially for someone else. "The hurry I'm in is more critical that the hurry you're in" is the rule of the day.

    But I'm afraid we'd better get used to the instant-gratification generation, and learn to deal with it. It's no-doubt here to stay. <sigh!>

    :)
  • akanglakangl Member Posts: 3,282
    He wasn't about to risk the Titan (he's very attached to the truck) getting hit or the new camper getting wrecked. Plus he had me and the kids in the truck. I have to give him credit for not fighting back. If he gets in trouble with the law again (long story) he could end up back in jail, so he has to mind his P's and Q's.

    Yes the Titan could have easily stayed put and fended the guy off, but I think we would have been hit. The guy looked like the type with no insurance and basically a loser, was better to just let it pass.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    the girl headed to Burger King in her uniform in a Duster or such before the era of cellphones. Apparently her distraction was that she put on her makeup during her drive to work. She was tailgating me around a ramp on very low traffic new interstate onto a local back highway ramp near Cincinnati. She was putting on lipstick as she continued to tailgate me.

    I tapped the brakes to flash the lights, waited about 5 seconds and slowed down. I saw her hit the curb on the outside of the ramp. I suspect her lipstick was smeared a little.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • andyman73andyman73 Member Posts: 322
    Would have been a good time to use your cellphone, as a passenger, and report a possible drunk driver. And no, I don't want your other half to enjoy more hospitality at the local graybar hotel. What I was implying, is, when the moron made his move, tramp the gas, and keep him behind you, is all.
  • akanglakangl Member Posts: 3,282
    Hubby was butted right up against the rear end of a Ford F-250, he either had to hit the brakes and allow the guy in the MPV to merge or get hit. We'd rather not have body work done to the Titan and this guy was planning to ram us, no doubt in our minds, when hubby hit the brakes the guy was less than 6" from taking the front end of the Titan off and he was closing fast. I did think about calling the cops, but chose not to, just moved on. Just makes me wonder what people think when they pull stunts like that. He was tangling with a much bigger vehicle, pretty brave (or stupid) if you ask me.
  • andyman73andyman73 Member Posts: 322
    Too bad the F250 didn't see what was going on, perhaps they could have lent a hand. I bet if the cops had been involved, the brain damaged guy would have said ya'll tried to run him off the road, and were passing him on the shoulder, while towing.

    When my father was stationed in Germany, with the Army, he had this MPV driver's relative, try the same stunt. Only thing was, dad was driving a 5 ton, towing a trailer. This idiot tried passing the trailer, and then cut in between the trailer,and truck! And yes, moron blamed my dad. A little accident investigation proved him wrong, and he got jail time for false accustions and various traffic violations. The German Polezei don't take too kindly to idiots on their roads.
  • akanglakangl Member Posts: 3,282
    He was definatly in the wrong. He was in the lane that had to merge, we were minding our own business in the correct lane. It was truely best to let it go and just move on, but we did talk about all the things that could have happened to the moron when he leaned out of the van....lol, made for good conversation. If we had seen a gun hubby would have rammed him, thankfully the moron wasn't that brainless.
  • andyman73andyman73 Member Posts: 322
    I often wonder about people like that. Don't they even wonder what the other person may do? What if the person they cut off is just like them, or worse. Go ahead, make my day! Do you feel lucky, punk? Well, do ya?

    I was learning to drive, in So. Cal, when the freeway shootings were all the rage. Most of that was happening in and around the greater L.A. area. I was living in the High Desert area. That was 14 years ago.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Had a fun one today. I was cruising along a one lane in each direction residental arterial, at exactly 35mph, which is the speed limit. Nice sunny Sunday afternoon, and I am the only car on the road for blocks. Off a side street, an old man in a Caravan pulls onto the road right in front of me, causing me to slam on my brakes. He then accelerates up to maybe 20mph. He must have thought I was following too close (I might have been, and I was flashing my lights, but that's not the point), as he played the brake tapping game. So I just said to hell with it, and passed him. He was going so slow, my car didn't even have to downshift. When I went around him, he was yelling at me, which was amusing, as his window was up. So to egg him on, I gave him the finger and laid on the horn. I got around him and he didn't speed up...maybe he realized he was in the wrong, or maybe he thought 15-20 was a good speed in a 35. He was out of my field of vision in no time.

    Still...if you don't notice a shiny big 2 ton Mercedes on a sunny day, what else are you missing? Smaller cars, two wheeled transport, and pedestrians, at least. And how many lives are you risking? And why do you think you have any legitimate right to be endangering others? Something really needs to be done about some older drivers. The days of mandatory testing at a certain age better be coming.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    for drivers licenses.

    I agree that mandatory testing it needed at a certain age is needed. I think it should start at 18 and continue every two years thereafter. If my car needs checking every two years in case it pollutes, a license needs review every two years.

    Many older drivers need to be filtered that need glasses or other reviews about driving, but many younger drivers need to be reviewed on basic driving safety and courtesy. I think each age group has its deficits which would benefit from a review of the laws of physics and driving.

    What's especially irritating is that in Ohio the license is renewed every 5 years. They now have a cursory eye test but there's no real review of driving rules.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • gambit293gambit293 Member Posts: 406
    If I receive a call while driving:

    A) If I left my phone somewhere difficult to reach, I ignore it.

    B) If I'm city-driving, I'll find somewhere to park until the conversation is over.

    C) If I'm on a freeway, I'll get into the right lane and pace someone (not tailgate, just pace). Pacing someone at a safe distance is a fairly brainless activity that doesn't require a lot of concentration.

    D) Most family and friends know I don't like talking while driving so if I let them know I'm in a car, they say they'll call back.

    Of course, I'm hardly a good example since I don't use my cellphone much anyway. (maybe 2 or 3 calls per week??)
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    what you described is an act that really irritates me. I've had it happen to me plenty of times...nothing behind me for as far as the eye can see, but some knucklehead just can't wait the 3 seconds it would take for me to go on past...they have to pull out right in front of me!

    I ran a Dodge Colt off the road once in a situation like that. I was delivering pizzas in my Grandma's '85 LeSabre, and this colt makes a right turn on red without even stopping, and just leisurely rolls out in front of me. I laid into the horn and didn't even try to stop, although I did make sure that there was nothing in the oncoming lane, so I could dive over there if need be. But I guess the Colt's driver wasn't in the mood for a LeSabre enema, so he ducked off onto the shoulder.

    And, instead of learning from his mistake and vowing never to do anything so stupid again, I'm sure that he spent the rest of the week whining about the psycho in the old lady car who ran him off the road!
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Nope doesn't work that way... I just got this cell phone 3 months ago. I was always using everyone elses to make calls. I would arrive at home, it was 10+ calls daily of things I had to answer, calls I can answer and give orders as I receive them, and not be bogged down with calls...

    Some other are calls I must make from one worksite, to another. Sometimes I'll have last minutes calls saying "it's raining, don't bother coming"... This obviously saves time. OTher for other's I tell them the same, to just leave their voicemail on, BUT I, and 2 other friends I have are the only one's who can drive perfectly fine without the cellphone being a distraction.

    Not everyone goes brain dead when a cellphone is turned on... Even in stores I've had people bump into me, who were on cell phones. I'm a believer when the cellphone turns on, people's brains turns off... of course, in a store I can push back, be confrontational, and curse at them... While when I see someone driving ON a cellphone and they do something stupid, I cut them off and pretend they aren't even there :-)
  • bottgersbottgers Member Posts: 2,030
    gambit239

    Like I said, why not just turn the phone off when you get in the vehicle. You don't need to answer it while you're driving.

    ANT14

    BS! No one can drive perfectly while using the cell phone. No matter how good you think you drive while using it, it's still a unnecessary distraction.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    "...if you don't notice a shiny big 2 ton Mercedes on a sunny day, what else are you missing?"

    Yeah, really! One morning I was driving on a similar road at the 40mph limit with an older woman about 150 yards behind - the only two vehicles in sight. Ahead I saw a brick laying in the road, and straddled it. In the mirror I watched as the old woman ran over it with both right-side wheels! Then she's all upset, looking in the mirror with that "What was that!" look on her face.

    Golly, a brick is huge, clearly visible, and there was ample space between us for her to steer around it.

    Sometimes I wonder what people are looking at when they stare out the windshield! Scary...
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    Finding, answering, determining the reason for the call, and decided to continue or return the call later were the most _distracting_ parts of phone calls I used to get on the way home from work, usually from other buildings in the workgroup.

    Talking on a cellphone is distracting, just like tuning the stereo, eating, putting on makeup, reading the paper, are distracting during driving.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    (which I can see without picking up my phone), and then let the call go to a message. If it's a call I must return, I stop to do so. If not, I get it when I get home. If I'm on the highway I wear a headset, so I can answer and hold a short conversation, or stop for a longer one.

    Most of these multiple calls people keep getting while they are driving are because their fan club knows they are available at that time. Let them know you are not, and the calls will go away.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,675
    I wish more did as you do while driving.

    Even answering a call on ONSTAR distracts while I push the button.

    How do you see the caller ID without having to pick up the phone?

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    on the console. Caller ID shows through the flip cover, clearly visible. It does take a glance downward, which I do if I can.

    Sometimes I have to put down either my coffee or the newspaper, but heck that's no problem...

    ;)
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    When that old fart pulled out in front of me, I was wishing I was in like a 1950 Dodge Power Wagon or something...something I could crash and have no damage to my vehicle. Not wanting to hurt the guy of course...just mess up his car and maybe make him realise what he's doing. I bet yesterday wasn't the first careless move he's done. It's just a matter of time before he takes out a motorcycle or a bike or a pedestrian. I am sure the Caravan driver got home and whined about the jerk in the Mercedes too...how dare I not stop and let him into traffic (being me, the only car on the road for at least a half mile), and then go half the limit.

    I too once had a run in with a Dodge Colt. The driver turned left in front of me in a green light intersection. I intentionally didn't slow down, as I could tell I wasn't going to hit it, and missed it by a second. At the last moment the driver noticed me, and looked very startled. It would have been like a hot knife through butter.

    I've noticed when some people smoke and drive, they can go off into la-la land.
  • alfoxalfox Member Posts: 708
    on what they're smokin'...

    ;)
  • gambit293gambit293 Member Posts: 406
    If I'm on my way to an appointment/meeting, then I want whoever I'm meeting to be able to call me. There are plenty of other situations when one would expect to be called in a car. Such as traveling in a group or having to help a friend with directions when you're both on the way to the same place.

    I forgot another option: Often I give the phone to my girlfriend since she knows most of my friends/family. I let her handle the conversation, and then she debriefs me later on what's going on.

    This is all in spite of the fact that I don't get many calls in the first place. I guess I don't have many friends? (:-<
  • jaserbjaserb Member Posts: 820
    Yesterday my 2 year old announced that she wanted to go for a ride in Daddy's car. Atta girl. We're live near the mountains so we decided we'd take a nice Sunday drive up the nearby canyon to get a breath of fresh air. It's a fairly narrow paved 2 lane, that's a lot of fun at a reasonable clip (40 or so) in my SE-R.

    On the way down, we got stuck behind a diesel Dodge truck pulling a horse trailer. He was doing 20-25 in the straight sections, 10-15 in the curves and belching diesel stench the whole way - not exactly the fresh mountain air we were looking for. Now, generally folks towing trailers are pretty courteous and pull over to let you pass. This guy was having none of that. He passed up at least three turnouts in the 2 or 3 miles we were stuck behind him.

    Finally the road went straight for a stretch with a dotted yellow line with plenty of room and nobody coming, so I downshifted and went for the pass. Right as I got along side he moved over to the left halfway into the oncoming lane, forcing me into the gravel along the left side of the road! I floored it and got past him ASAP and didn't see him again.

    I suppose it could have been an honest mistake. After all, I'd only been following him for almost 10 minutes. Maybe he didn't see me flash my lights and toot my horn to let him know I was about to pass. Or, maybe he just thought it would be fun to try and kill my whole family off. Jerk.

    -Jason
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    He probably didn't like you flashing your lights and honking at him.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    You should ride with me then, you'll see how well I can pull it off. Like I stated, just because the majority ruin it, doesn't mean it affects all who drive with cell phones. It can be done.
Sign In or Register to comment.