Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Inconsiderate Drivers (share your stories, etc.)

18485878990478

Comments

  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    You say it was your boss's Explorer, so it was a company vehicle. Did it have a logo on the side? That might've looked like a police logo?
  • bigeauxbigeaux Member Posts: 46
    Not company vehicle, boss's personal vehicle. Long story. So no, no sitcker or logo on it that might have confused someone.
  • loncrayloncray Member Posts: 301
    A possibility I haven't seen posted - any chance the other car was using you as a rabbit? I do that every so often on the interstate - I'll find someone who's going the speed I want to go and follow them. I don't tailgate, but I don't pass either. It keeps me from getting too wild with the accelerator, and it gives me an extra margin of not-getting-a-ticket.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,336
    lots of people do that, most of them (IMO) don't do it intentionally. They just seem more comfortable having someone to pace off of. Might be a psychological thing.

    The other reason (that I like) is they run interference for you with the Smokies.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • bigeauxbigeaux Member Posts: 46
    Yes, the rabbit thing crossed my mind. And makes sense, to a point.

    I wasn't the fastest on the road. A few cars were passing me. It would seem to make more sense to use one of them.

    He was following pretty closely, too. And why sit in my blind spot so long? I mean, if you want someone smoke out the 5-0, wouldn't you hang back a bit further so as not to get caught at the same time?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050408/ap_on_re_us/montana_drinking

    What is the world coming to? :)

    Once again "Thank Heavens for Mississippi!! :)
  • bolivarbolivar Member Posts: 2,316
    This is the region of Louisana where the local and county (parish) police have a strong history of pulling over suspected drug haulers. And confiscating their car and cash, in many cases with no actual evidence.

    In one reported case, a poor lady had her car taken because the spare tire carrier at the rear of the car had been removed, and the police said that was evidence that the car had been used as a drug transportation car, by placing the drug in the gas tank above the tire carrier. Of course, the lady was not moving drugs, but it took months and many dollars to get the car back.

    The '60 Minute' crew did a big bit on this also. They trolled I-10 in a rental Lincoln Contiental with out of state tags. After only a couple of hours the first day of doing this, a parish cop tailed them for a long time, finally pulling them over for 'weaving'. The CBS crew was running the camera all the time, and they were not weaving or speeding. The cop took them to town and gave them the third degree. Only when taken before the JP or whatever, and it was obvious he was part of the nasty deal also, did they tell who they were.

    The parish sherrif was 'shocked'. And fired the deputy. And he was hired in the next parish or city over in a few days.

    I decided then I would make every effort to never drive through Louisana. This included missing their casinos when I was on a gambling vacation.

    Did your bosses Explorer have non-Louisana tags? If so, I think you were tailed by a cop who was attempting to make you break some law, probably speeding, so he could pull you over (or call in the marked cars) and yank everything out of your car looking for drugs......
  • toomanyfumestoomanyfumes Member Posts: 1,019
    Did'nt they pull over a conversion van with a family traveling somewhere? They were carrying a large amount of cash. An old school type of guy who had no checking account or credit card. The cops confiscated it,claiming it was drug money, it took them forever to get it back.
    2012 Mustang Premium, 2013 Lincoln MKX Elite, 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I got pulled over on I-10 in Louisiana, going East. Jennings was the name of the town, I believe. It was around mile marker 56 or so. I'll always remember that because there was a black '55 DeSoto out in a field near there visible from the highway, and when I went through there a year later it was still there! There was a Rolls Royce, of all cars, parked next to it.

    The cop did mention drug dealers and drug trafficking, and he searched my car. Truthfully he didn't do a very good job though. In fact, looking back on it, I wonder if it might have even been a botched attempt at racial profiling? If you throw a baseball cap on me, hiding my brown hair, I do look kind of Latino. I'm wondering if the cop pulled me over thinking that, but once he saw me up close, and heard my rural Maryland accent, he realized he probably wasn't going to find anything, but then tried to save face by doing a half-arsed car search? Didn't stop him from writing me a ticket though. $189.75. 82 in a 70. But just so you all don't think I was driving foolishly, I WAS going with the flow of traffic! In fact, I was slowly passing an 18 wheeler at the time. Normally I like to get past the 18 wheelers quickly, in case they have to change lanes or something, but at the speed we were already going, I didn't want to go TOO much faster!
  • PF_FlyerPF_Flyer Member Posts: 9,372
    You cannot post third party personal information in the forums. That would include posting license plate numbers of some of the unusual drivers we run into out there.
    Sharing stories about what you see out on the roads is fine. PLEASE don't try to personally identify others here. The two posts that just went up with plate numbers in them have been taken down. Any further postings like this could lead to loss of posting privileges and I really don't want to see that happen to anyone.

    Thanks for your cooperation on this!

    PF Flyer
    Host
    News & Views, Wagons, & Hybrid Vehicles
  • bigeauxbigeaux Member Posts: 46
    I know the story. I live in Louisiana (New Orleans), been here about 5 years. Boss's Explorer had LA tags. Car tailing me was a BMW, so unlikely to be law enforcement. I would think my braking and then tailing would have prompted him to pull me over, were he an actual cop.
  • bolivarbolivar Member Posts: 2,316
    A BMW could well be a true drug dealers confiscated car....

    But I agree, what you say you did was enough to get you pulled over by a real cop.
  • john500john500 Member Posts: 409
    I remember that 60 Minutes episode. On the other hand, I've lived in Louisiana for four years now and I haven't been pulled over yet, even during the six months that I had out of state tags. Until recently on I-10, it was like the wild west. You could open your car up to 120 (km/h, of course) and not see a cop the whole length of the highway until Texas. There were some accidents on a narrow stretch called the Atchafalaya River basin which resulted in a crack-down on speeders (due to the massive backups following the accidents). My one piece of advice to anyone before driving in Louisiana is to go to your local go-kart track and practice. This will prepare you for the no-signal, high-speed style of driving in Louisiana. As far as cops wringing out of state drivers, it is probably similar everywhere in the US.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ..."As far as cops wringing out of state drivers, it is probably similar everywhere in the US. "

    I think also the states try to balance this a bit. Most states do not want to develop a reputation of being "anti tourista".

    It actually might mirror the balance shown on the animal channel; with the crocodiles and the willdabeasts!

    An out of stater is probably not likely to go back to the (far away) municipality to contest. But in CA, a highway patrolman gets app 300 dollars to appear in court for folks that actually contest their tickets. So it is almost a can't lose situation for the enforcement end.
  • springs1springs1 Member Posts: 3
    A lot of times in Louisiana I see people not paying attention to the traffic light. When it turns green, they are busy digging through their vehicle and not caring about the people behind them.
    I also have a problem when the light turns green and people let people in from a place of business. If the light is GREEN, it means GO, NOT STOP! How inconsiderate is it to make all the people behind you wait for 1 vehicle that has to yield to us. Then, I am the one that gets the next light and the guy ahead of me makes the light because of the person that let that car in at the GREEN light. Also, at intersections, why is it that people at stop signs think when the light turns green that they have right-of-way? I do the RIGHT thing and don't block the intersection. So, why they think I am suppose to sit there a few seconds longer to let them in from a STOP sign. STOP the last time I knew, it meant just that STOP. Green means GO. So, if I am doing the right thing and not blocking the intersection, then if you pull in front of me, then YOU are blocking the intersection until the light turns green. That is ILLEGAL. WHY do people always think of the people that are pulling out and NOT of the people BEHIND them? I am ready to get going at the light and YOU have NO right to just sit there and let them in when they have a stop or yield sign. Also, if they are just coming out of a business, they have to yield to the drivers on the roadway.
    I also hate when people wait til the LAST minute to get into a lane. I have had people stop and keep braking, holding up all the traffic behind me and myself. When I honked on them to go, they had the audacity to flip me off as if I am the villian. I have made u-turns to be considerate of the people behind me when I have missed my turn before. Why are people so SELFISH? It is also illegal to block traffic.
    I also hate it when I am going the SPEED LIMIT like the law states and people honked or tailgate me. Are they that stupid that they want to have an at-fault accident and hit me from behind? I have NEVER gotten a ticket of ANY kind in my lifetime and I have been driving since 1998. Yes, when I was young I have gone over the speed limit. Now, I really don't want to pay over $100 or so just to go fast, it's NOT worth it. It is also MUCH safer to go slower. I always go the speed limit unless people in front of me aren't going speed limit and I can't pass them or it is unsafe because of weather conditions.
    People also don't understand that when you pull out of somewhere or an intersection you have to consider that the person in the middle lane may change lanes and when you pull into the right lane at the same exact time, it could cause an accident. I wait until it is completely clear to go because most people don't use their signals.
    I also hate it when people don't use their signals. Like people are suppose to be mind readers or something. Even if it looks like they want to get in, I WON'T let them WITHOUT their signals unless it will cause an accident. It is the LAW to use signals to change lanes and to make turns.
    People in parking lots I hate are the people that BLOCK the WHOLE lane to get one space and the people are still putting their groceries in their car. If they were backing out, that is DIFFERENT. One time I was at Wal-Mart and they had a van in front of me. They also had a truck behind me. I was LITERALLY TRAPPED! This van kept sitting there and I didn't honk. It was at least 2 to 3 minutes and they decided to drive off because the people were taking to long. WHY are people so inconsiderate? Why not try going towards the side of the lane instead of blocking the middle of it? When I see people coming, I MOVE out their way. I think of other people's feelings.
  • springs1springs1 Member Posts: 3
    I go speed limit! "WAS going with the flow of traffic!" You deserve the ticket. I do the right thing and follow the speed limit, you should too. That is 12 miles over the speed limit. Maybe, 5 miles they may not stop you, but 10 or over is pushing it.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I don't think any one is trying to tell you to go a speed that you do not wish to go. But I think if you are in multiple lanes then the rules and courtesies and customs indicated KEEP RIGHT EXCEPT TO PASS and/or SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT. Also in CA anyway, and I wouuld think LA has a similar thought; if you are impeding 5 cars then it says one should pull off the side of the road to let them by.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    "A little man follows the letter of the law, but a true man serves justice"

    Well, okay, it wasn't a wise old prophet, it was Gil Gerard in the second season of "Buck Rogers" :)

    I was going with the flow of traffic when I got that speeding ticket. If I deserved that speeding ticket, than so did everybody else on that highway. And trust me, that stretch of I-10 is so straight, desolate, and boring, with visibility for miles, so 10 over was certainly not "pushing it", given the conditions that day (nice, sunny day, dry roads, etc)

    I'd rather see the police patrol areas where speeding is truly dangerous, such as school zones, residential streets, etc. Or go after the truly dangerous acts, such as weaving in and out of traffic, improper lane discipline, aggressive driving, driving too fast over the speed of the flow of traffic, not keeping to the minimum posted speed on limited access highways, left lane camping, etc. Leave the poor working stiff who just happens to be rolling along with the flow of traffic alone. When I see the police start to do stuff like that, THEN I'll be convinced that they're in it for public safety, and not profit.

    And BTW, had I been doing the speed limit on that stretch of road, I would've been the slowest car on it, and created a bottleneck. Of course, if I was doing the speed limit I would've also been in the slow lane, and not left lane camping, so there's that, at least. But still, in this situation, doing 70 mph would've actually been MORE dangerous than doing 82, because of the difference in vehicle speeds.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    "If I deserved that speeding ticket, than so did everybody else on that highway"

    After the police officer pulled me over for speeding, I asked him why he chose me out of the hundreds of speeders on the road as some were going much faster. He asked me "If I had ever gone fishing". I Said: "Yeah, Why?". He said: "Ever catch every fish?" :D
  • springs1springs1 Member Posts: 3
    If you think 82mph isn't fast, you should look at some traffic accidents on the internet. I have been in an accident where someone didn't stop at a stop sign and I hit them directly in the middle of their truck in the year 2000. I was going the speed limit which was 45mph. My vehicle was totaled and so was his. I was lucky I had my seat belt on (always) and my air bag that deployed. Back then, I was young and wasn't a defensive driver. My point being, 82mph is to me pretty fast. I know it may not make much difference from 70mph in an accident, but I was scared when I did go 80 when I was young. I still go speed limit even if everyone else is passing me up NOT to get a ticket. I would love to go 70mph in a 60mph, but I don't. I did go over speed limit when I was younger, but now that I am older I feel like I don't want to go to work to have to pay part of my weeks paycheck to the police.
    I also don't think it makes sense when I see drivers that speed like you and then don't pay attention when the light turns green and it is clear to go. That doesn't make sense. Why did the person ever speed to begin with if they were so much in a rush? Also, those same people that speed also let people in from gas stations or other businesses. I will NEVER understand WHY they sped to begin with? What is the point?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Smells fishy, but it always smacks of revenue! The best is to be behind the prowling predator, unless of course he is signalling that he is not in the predation mode.

    Since officers have wide discretionary powers, and wide discretion in how they use power, it can pay to see which way the wind is blowing so to speak. I literally have been passed many times highway patrol cars (with no particular place to go ) while going 90 mph in a 65 mph zone. I have also seen folks pulled over for 1 mph over the speed limit.

    Actually in my very long driving career, the closest calls have been with cops. Once in the desert with literally unlimited visibility, a highway patrol almost side swiped me while he was merging because he was fiddling with something in the cabin. When he woke up, he sort of sheepishly grinned and I just looked away and shook my head.

    Another time (in the desert) a truck enforcement highway patrol made an "illegal" U-TURN to change his direction 180 degrees. (there is really a reason why a u turn on a freeway is illegal?) Naturally it sent up dust clouds so I knew something was up and was in full defensive mode.. Of course he decides to enter the #1 lane while I was in the #2 lane, up along side of meat the same precise time.. Since I had slowed when I saw the dust cloud this caused a fully loaded tractor trailer to try to pass me in the #1 lane. I do not think the clueless truck enforcement officer saw the MASSIVE smoke stacks belching smoke as he made hurried downshifts or THE panic look on the big rig drivers face as he was praying to GOD , not rear end him in the #1 lane..
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I can understand your point of view but I think you might need more time and miles under your belt. Also what you did while it is logical that it was the person who ran the red lights fault, in CA you might have been held partially responsible for hitting him. :(
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    There are no cross streets on the interstate. Not much chance of t-boning another car when everyone is travelling in the same direction.

    If you drive worrying about the "what ifs", please stay at home.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    "Smells fishy, but it always smacks of revenue!"

    Yes and it should. Egregious speeders are a danger to other drivers. I have no problem in the cops giving a ticket to someone driving to excess. I have no problem in using it for revenue. Maybe the speeder will think twice the next time.

    Cops give tickets to stop sign rollers. Danger. Nah. Revenue. Yes. Don't like the idea? Don't do it.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    You might have that very backwards. Intersections by their very design are much more dangerous places than interstate highways. Not much revenue in T bone accidents eh? :( A majority of debilitating accidents and fatalities occur at intersections. How much of a difference attitudinally is there between a stop sign runner and a red light runner??

    Not that I recommend you get into an accident in either place but: On a recent central valley CA interstate pile up during a tule fog, there was a 108 vehicle pile up and EVERYBODY lived!!?? with no life threatening injuries ( involved were suvs; large and small, small cars, big cars, big rigs, small rigs, etc. etc!)
    As you have probably seen before, most fatalities happen at under 45 mph. Intersections are more dangerous than interstates.

    By the way I have never received a "speeding" ticket or citation for stop light or sign violation. Why? because sign and light violations are inherently dangerous!!??
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,336
    saw a license plate bracket on an Expedition the other day (I think it had a "3" sticker too, so you'll know why): "I'm not tailgating. I'm drafting".

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    The rolling stops I'm referring to are backroads. No cars on the roads except for stops. I do not advocate dangerous driving. There's an old saying about statistics, which is apt: "Statistics lies and liars figure".
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Rural roads are ALSO more dangerous than interstates. If you are suggesting that you subscribe to the ..."old saying about statistics, which is apt: "Statistics lies and liars figure"."... then you are just not reading for understanding the NHTSA (among others) data/s and how you can best make use of it.

    Wasn't there a Congressmen who was recently convicted of manslaughter ? He was doing exactly what you are referring, executing: "rolling stops on back roads". Supposedly not a SOUL around for miles!? Seems was executing your advocated "safe move" and chose to do that when a 53 year old motorcycle rider was going through after he had stopped at a 4 way stop. So if the Congressman had actually stopped, he might have not been convicted at all even if he still killed the motorcyclist!? Yes you are right that is guess and conjecture. The for sure part was the motorcyclist was 100% DEAD after the "safe rolling stops" on back roads. Tell the Congressman about the statistics, and yes liars do figure. He plead NOT GUILTY. Evidently the evidence and "statistics" convinced a jury other wise.

    I might be in the minority here, but I will pass on "your rollling stops".
  • grbeckgrbeck Member Posts: 2,358
    Anyone who thinks that a "rolling stop" on a rural road is no big deal, while exceeding the speed limit on a limited access highway is dangerous, has got to be kidding.

    As for "statistics lie and liars figure" - that's the refuge of those who either can't understand statistics and their application to the discussion at hand, or are arguing from a position not supported by the facts.
  • fitguyfitguy Member Posts: 220
    This one could be hard to beat: When I was about 20, living in Hyannisport on Cape Cod (no I was not rich- working as a mechanic), I was T-Boned at an intersection by a kid in a Gremlin (remember those) who ran a stop sign. He was drunk. I had a big 'ol '69 Galaxy that took the hit well, but it was forceful enough to push that big car sideways across the intersection into a stockade fence on the opposite corner. Crushed most of the fence down and came to rest. I had to crawl out of the passenger side window (door crushed in) because the driver side was totalled up against the fence. Realized when I got out of the car, got my senses back (only minor bruises) and saw two enormous men in suits, with bulges underneath near the armpit area, standing there, just who that fence belonged to. A family called the Kennedy's, and yes that was the edge of their "Compound". Needless to say, the two Secret Service gentlemen were not too happy with me so I was quick to point out the blame was with the offending T-Bone artist, not me. I was hoping they might invite me in to wait for the towtruck and have a drink (or several) with Ted, but no go.
    Funny thing was, they hounded me and the insurance company for two months about paying to repair the fence! And the other driver? Couldn't care less that he wrecked two cars, injured me, himself, and two passengers in his car- just upset that he would lose his license! Talk about inconsiderate...... :(
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    Well I beg to differ. Rolling through a stop sign at 2 mph, not 20 mph, is a heck of a bit different and probably safer than speeding at 90, when the rest of the road is doing the speed limit at say 65.

    You can twist and turn it anyway you want. The reason most of fatalities occur at 45 is statistically most traffic in the US moves at less than 45. Ever driven in Manhattan? Thousands of cars with an average speed of 7mph. My average speed according my on-board trip computer is about 25mph. Taking into account the fact the my daily commute consists of 10 miles at 55+.

    For every example you cite I can cite a counter-example as well. It has been years (10+) in my town where someone was killed rolling through a stop sign at 2mph. Yet there are plenty of fatalities on the road that results from excess speed.

    BTW - where did I ever advocate unsafe driving habits. If you read carefully, I was referring to the degrees in which the law was broken. Shall I post some links to articles detailing the fatalities on the roads while people were engaged in the "safe" practice of speeding as you advocate?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    "You can twist and turn it anyway you want. The reason most of fatalities occur at 45 is statistically most traffic in the US moves at less than 45. Ever driven in Manhattan? Thousands of cars with an average speed of 7mph. My average speed according my on-board trip computer is about 25mph. Taking into account the fact the my daily commute consists of 10 miles at 55+. "

    Well I think you are doing the twisting! To me in NYC it is even more imperative to stop at intersections (given the situations of course) Rolling stop through intersections is trolling for an accident/tragedy.

    Driving in NYC to me is an absolute hoot. It is actually more fun when you are in a government vehicle or have diplomatic immunity!

    However despite the stereotype of the quintessential NYC cabbie and the ill deserved bad rap that NY state drivers have , NY staters have conspired to make NY state one of the safer states in terms of fatalities and accidents!
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    Well I think you are doing the twisting! To me in NYC it is even more imperative to (stop at intersections) obey the speed limits (given the situations of course) (Rolling stop through intersections)Speeding is trolling for an accident/tragedy.

    And there we have it. I claim rolling through a stop sign at 2mph, which I don't do, is safer than speeding. You claim speeding is the safer law to break. Just like I don't have any evidence rolling through a stop sign is dangerous, you don't have any evidence speeding and othe excessive behaviours are dangerous. Right?
  • PF_FlyerPF_Flyer Member Posts: 9,372
    Don't let a difference of opinion turn into a personal beef, OK?

    Thanks!
  • navigator89navigator89 Member Posts: 1,080
    Once, while we were attending a high school awards ceremony, a guy parked his blue Mercedes Benz ML350 behind our Toyota Camry. Needless to say, were boxed in. Had to wait for twenty minutes before the owner of the vehicle came and moved it away. He claimed he parked there because he couldn't find a parking space. However, he wasn't the only one. Pretty much every one else had parked behind cars, trapping them there.

    Another time at the same high school, we were atending a parent teacher conference, when a grey Saab 9-5 parked behind us. Somehow, we managed to wiggle the car out of the parking spot, as the spaces on our left and right sides were empty.

    Both were very annoying experiences. If people can't find room to park, is it my problem? No way. They should find another place to park. Stupid guys.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    "And there we have it. I claim rolling through a stop sign at 2mph, which I don't do, is safer than speeding. You claim speeding is the safer law to break. Just like I don't have any evidence rolling through a stop sign is dangerous, you don't have any evidence speeding and othe excessive behaviours are dangerous. Right? "

    Wrong! On both counts!

    According to your own stated behavior, you dont roll through stop signs at 2 mph?? So even you don't believe your own assertions. GOOD!, for I don't roll through intersections either. (given the appropriate situations) YOU are the one claiming that speeding is the safer law to break- NOT ME!

    Also, if the majority of fatalities happen at less than speed limit speeds (fully 80% of fatalities occur at 45 mph and UNDER., the smart money would be on that which is being glossed over.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    Well, I respectfully disagree. I never asserted either behavior is good. But I will assert rolling stops have a higher probability of a non-injury accident, in the aggregate than speeding with excessive speed differentials on the road. Again, a rolling stop is 1 or 2 mph, not 20 or 30 mph. Of course, there is always some extreme example of some driving law being broken that results in a catastrophe. Then again, there are a lot of catastrophes that happen without any law being broken, and even above 45. The recent pileups on Route 78 is a prime example of what happens to speeders in excess of 65mph.

    I believe in respecting the driving regulations as much as possible and the spirit of the driving regulations. There is not a driver amongst us, that has not broken some driving law, somewhere somehow or the spirit of the law. So none of us are lily white. I'm teaching my kids that as well as they learn to drive.

    And there are clearly those anti-social driving behaviors and rules, which when broken have a greater chance of injury or fatality than others. Any other thought to the contrary is not rational.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Certainly no one has too much of a problem with you going 45 mph in a 65 mph zone when the traffic patterns allow for it. Especially when you don't feel safe going over the speed limits (65 mph for example) In those cases, KEEP RIGHT EXCEPT TO PASS or SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT. Believe it or not this works!

    You can assert whatever you wish, You dont't believe your own assertion/s, as evidenced by your stated behavior and neither do I, for I don't roll through stop signs or lights either. So on THAT point we seem to agree, although sometimes I think you just need to express the contrarian in you. :)

    ..."Any other thought to the contrary is not rational."...

    I am not sure why you would entertain irrational thoughts?
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    It's not a matter of believing assertions. It's a matter of doing what's right. We're having a general conversation that has somehow evolved into - which law breaking behavior results in the least(or most) possbile injury. I just happen to pick that one as an example as it is a very common behavior with little or no consequences in 99.9% of the cases.

    Another law-breaking behavior, I've seen is gunning through yellow lights. Most of the time this results in nothing. However there are times a ticket or accident will accrue from this.

    We could be having an irrational conversation :sick:
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ...
    'We could be having an irrational conversation "

    I am glad you are finally starting to see....

    Also as you are probably aware, most times law enforcement does not begin to give so called "speeding" tickets till about 9 mph over the speed limit. So as an experiment would you be willing to do your stop signal/ sign roll through at that speed? I don't know about you, but I would have NO part of that bet. We really need to move on. The position you have taken has been totally untenable from the start.
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    "statistics lie and liars figure", Oh please, I can't believe that no one corrected that quote. It's supposed to be "Figures lie and liars figure".

    Now I'm going to "make like a tree and get out of here". :shades:

    james
  • euphoniumeuphonium Member Posts: 3,425
    Your neighbor North of you suggests your quote be corrected to read:

    "make like a tree and leaf"
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I like the geese one: lets get the flock out of here.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    I'll agree my side has been intenable and your side has been irrational.

    I tell you what. I'll take part in the experiment to see how many miles a cop will give a ticket above the speed limit, if you take part in an experiment to see how fast rolling through a stop sign it takes to get a ticket.

    In the meantime, I'll make like a cow and hide.
  • PF_FlyerPF_Flyer Member Posts: 9,372
    :P Now that we've all made up, let's get back to the topic...

    Somebody out ther please do something stupid on the road... we can wait
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    While you are trying to reverse the untenable position and pin irrationality on me; outcomes are more than predictable.

    The one who will get the most notice and the most tickets and probably get into the most accidents and takes the FAR greater chance on fatalities is the stop signal/sign roller (remember T boning can be a very serious accident?).

    I think even though you say it isn't true: your stated behavior sez otherwise.
  • oregonboyoregonboy Member Posts: 1,650
    Thanks, but I was making a (small) joke. Didn't you see "Back to the Future"?

    james (who lives and works in WA, but prefers his home state of OR)
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,336
    I got the reference.

    Now, how was that for inconsiderate when he plowed into the manure truck and dumped the load into the convertible? Always wondered what a manure truck would be doing parked on the town square, but I might be taking this too seriously...

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    This was more fun when we just told stories here.

    A strange thing has happened to me a couple of times lately. Last night I was driving through the city, at ~10 above, on roads that weren''t very busy. Two lanes in each direction, but one of them was taken by parked cars (weird how they do that... there are definitely lane lines for two lanes, but also parking meters - so unless no one's parked, there's really only one lane). I guess the guy behind me (who wasn't tailgating me, I should point out) got exhasperated, spotted a hole in the parked cars, and cleverly maneuvered around me. He must be in a hurry, I thought. Nice move.

    But after a few seconds, he's only going 5-6 above! He's going a little bit slower than when he was behind me! Why?? A fun part of the road was coming up so it was particularly frustrating, and I still don't get the point.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    You can have the last word on this. I'm going to make like a tree and leaf.
Sign In or Register to comment.