Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options

Ford Freestyle - Taurus X

1102103105107108146

Comments

  • Options
    northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    Sam,

    You are correct.

    After more than a year with my Freestyle, I am convinced there is nothing like it. I am not convinced Ford sees it that way and it may be offering the Edge as a consolation prize (I am sure that the Edge is a fine vehicle in its own right, but not a Freestyle). :shades:
  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    We hosts don't usually get clued in on upcoming stories, and none of us are in the Santa Monica office so it's not like we can walk down the hall and snoop either. :blush:

    The best way to find out what's being tested is to follow Karl on Cars, our chief editor's blog. And sometimes they spill the beans in the Letters to the Editors.

    Steve, Host
  • Options
    bruneau1bruneau1 Member Posts: 468
    it's probably premature to compare these two vehicles when one is not on the market yet. Certainly the Edge will have more power, but less space, and probably not as good a chassis. The Freestyle will be gone; there isn't too much doubt about that. We who have it now hope its parts will be available in the future.
  • Options
    northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    OK, a last comment on the new Ford Edge CUV features:

    http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=22340

    Not to be confused with the Nissan Urge. :shades:
  • Options
    volfangaryvolfangary Member Posts: 105
    Amazing it gets only 24 mpg?
  • Options
    figueroafamilyfigueroafamily Member Posts: 223
    Well, I put forward my suggestion.

    ---------------
    Thank you for e-mailing Edmunds.com. The reference number for your inquiry is '060114-000020'. We appreciate hearing from you. While we try to answer each question as quickly as possible, please note that due to the volume of e-mail we receive, there may be a delay in our response. We appreciate your patience. If you have any SPAM filters enabled, please allow replies from Edmunds.com to your Inbox. Thank you.
    ---------------

    Let's see what the future holds.

    Sam ;)
  • Options
    figueroafamilyfigueroafamily Member Posts: 223
    Note the Edge is higher than Freebie, which generally means less MPG. (My unscientific "higher is guzzlier" rule. :D )

    My suspicion is that if Freebies were to get Cyclones (Duratec 35s), they would be far more fuel-saving. The FWD would be in near-30 highway, and the AWD making as much as present FWDs.

    Also, with 250/250 horse & torque, it would eat Maximas for breakfast. :P

    Sam ;)
  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    if Freebies were to get Cyclones

    Hey 060114-000020, I've always wondered what would happen if you put a Tornado in a Cyclone -- you'd probably have gas coming out the fuel tank. ;)

    Since everyone says the Freestyle is history (except Ford), I suspect the editors will be more likely to add an Edge to the test schedule than the Freestyle. Keep your fingers crossed.

    Meanwhile you can write your own review.

    Steve, Host
  • Options
    figueroafamilyfigueroafamily Member Posts: 223
    We can't agree more on the Freebies. :D

    I learned on my Masters' that many Companies fail because they don't capitalize newer technologies until after it's profitability and dominance had long been established. The best analogy is surfing. To best "catch the wave", it's best to be in at right before it begins to rise. Thus you're on top of it before/during/after it reaches full height. Failing companies try to get in the wave at "during full height". Way late.

    The current Ford situation in the market is not peachy by any means. They're beaten with all the Japanese "better products all-around" customer mindset. Hearts and minds are hard to change. To me, the crossover market is the "wave" Ford needs to catch to regain former glories.

    I believe Freebie is a perfect embodiment of this "catching the wave". Technologies within it truly show promise. The CVT is the best example, as even when mated to "underpowered" Duratec 30s the whole system does deliver reasonable power.

    This "wave catcher" perspective propelled me to buy it, just as much as all the vehicles features we know and love. I realized the vehicle was a transition product, yet thought it would had a long life on its own. (I mean with transition that it would help bridge production line changes between the -then- "today" of '04 models and the CD3-based vehicles galore of the future.)

    I really got disappointed at the news of cancellation, as Freebies would not show their true potential without Cyclones. (You may recall my "Merlin Mustang" analogies. The original WW2 Mustang fighter was underpowered, but became the legendary plane we know after it got the Merlin engine upgrade.)

    My measure of Ford's long-term viability is Freebie. The way they (mis-) handled it indicates to me Ford Management is too stuck in "Profit as the sacred variable". They don't think of having product offerings that offer flexibility to varying market circumstances. For example, the highly-profitable Explorer got a beating post-Katrina in its sales. Profits of vehicles not sold are zero.

    Ford should had pumped ads (like Toyota did after Katrina) showing a vehicle fitting seven with AWD, five-star safety, etc. All that and doing 27 mpg, (vs. 30 for most cars). People would had flocked to the Freebie wagon bandwagon :surprise: .

    On the other hand, one possibility running in my mind is that Freebie is a victim of internal "personality" politics. That also explains the Freebie dilemma. :mad:

    Just some thoughts. :D

    Sam ;)
  • Options
    figueroafamilyfigueroafamily Member Posts: 223
    Except Ford... You mean there's still hope for a long history of Freebies? I couldn't be more hopeful. :)

    Tornado on a Cyclone... Sir Steve, I think you found the perfect name to a supercharger, should they make a Freebie SVT. :D

    Sam ;)
  • Options
    bigred13bigred13 Member Posts: 25
    I too am having problems with my PIE device. Upon following the instructions about allowing it to recognize the device, The headset icon comes on, it works for a day or two and it's gone and doesn't work.

    Do I have a defective device or is this that chip you are all talking about. I do not have the chip. Should I try acquiring that first. We were trying to use it initially for an ipod but gave up on that. We're now planning to hook up our Sirius Kenwood receiver to try and bypass having to use the FM transmitter (which I loathe)
    Thanks in Advance for any help
  • Options
    barnstormer64barnstormer64 Member Posts: 1,106
    Contact PIE, and get them to send you the upgrade IC chip, if you don't have it in the device.

    And if your device does have the new IC chip, PIE has found that disconnecting the negative battery cable for about 15 seconds (just need to do this ONCE) has solved the problem of "losing" the adapter.
  • Options
    simonsnanisimonsnani Member Posts: 6
    1 still have the plans for the cabin air filter for your freestyle.they are free.email me and i will them send to you. it made a big diffrence in my 05 freestyle interior air quality, jack
  • Options
    maxdrawmaxdraw Member Posts: 21
    Yes, it sounds like you have the original version. The latest version fixes this and Logjam will gladly replace it. In the mean time you can disconnect the 16pin factory connector to the PIE harness and everything will work except speed control and the stereo lights will dim.

    After contacting Logjam I replaced mine and sent the old one back to them (Postage paid both ways by Logjam) and the whole system is working great! This setup is highly recommended if you want to use your Ipod.
  • Options
    bruneau1bruneau1 Member Posts: 468
    has anyone replaced the mediocre Continentals with a different tire? I realize there aren't many choices. I want to do a 225/65/17. I want quiet and smooth since our climate is mild.
  • Options
    willie19willie19 Member Posts: 139
    Good assessment of the Freebie, Sam.
    I take it you're disappointed Ford is not taking full advantage of the Freestyle's product life cycle and possibly killing it somewhere in the development stage.Doesn't look like a good business plan without full capital recovery, let alone talk about profitability.

    If Ford is continuing production of the 500 and the Milan at the Chicago plant how are they going to make up for unused capacity since the two remaining D3s are not expected to increase sales significantly with the new Fusion now available. The Freestyle suffered from almost a complete lack of promotion, not a lot of people even knew it existed and at the time I was shopping for it some sales people were even confusing it with the Freestar.

    As for your hope to fit the 3.5L Cyclone with the Freestyle for its full potential, unfortunately the CVT's torque limit would come up short around 220#. Maybe if the Freebie should survive with rising demand then the 3.5 with the new 6-speed trans. wouldn't be too hard to swallow. :confuse:
  • Options
    fsmmcsifsmmcsi Member Posts: 792
    I liked driving my brother's new Freestyle SEL AWD recently, but I think I understand why Ford may move the Freestyle to Mercury. I just used Edmunds to compare a Freestyle as I would buy it and an Explorer as I would buy it. Even though I drive 35,000 miles per year, the Freestyle would only use about $700 less gasoline per year than the Explorer, and it would only cost $3,185 (sticker price) less than the Explorer.

    What I compared was an Explorer Limited V8 with rear wheel drive, 21E safety canopy, 96B ultimate convenience, and 76R reverse sensing and a Freestyle Limited with CVT&AWD (most comparable to rear wheel drive), 87E safety canopy, 76R reverse sensors, 90B power pedals, and 175 Homelink.
  • Options
    gogophers1gogophers1 Member Posts: 218
    What I compared was an Explorer Limited V8 with rear wheel drive, 21E safety canopy, 96B ultimate convenience, and 76R reverse sensing and a Freestyle Limited with CVT&AWD (most comparable to rear wheel drive), 87E safety canopy, 76R reverse sensors, 90B power pedals, and 175 Homelink.

    You're not comparing apples with apples here. AWD is not "most comparable" to 2WD. It's most comparable to 4WD and that expands the price difference by another $1800. Your MPG difference is flawed on this basis as well.
  • Options
    fsmmcsifsmmcsi Member Posts: 792
    Sorry, but we disagree. Front wheel drive feels and handles worse than rear wheel drive (I have owned both, and now own vehicles with each type drive system), so the way to make the Freestyle more comparable is to have AWD. However, changing the comparision as you suggest produces essentially the same result. While the price difference is slightly greater, the fuel cost difference is changed by an insignificant amount.
  • Options
    northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    There are some strong personal preferences that may make certain features more valuable to some. I have driven Explorers, Escapes, and the Freestyle. The Explorer handles like a truck to me. The Freestyle handles most like a car. The Escape is closer to a car in handling than the Explorer, but doesn't have the Freestyle's space or finesse.

    Living in snow country, FWD or AWD handle better in the snow and muck, in my experience, than RWD. One of the Freestyle issues seems to be that it is a bit cheaper than the Explorer (which can reach $40K) and has been eating into the Explorer sales. That might be Ford's dilemma. :shades:
  • Options
    jnlmomjnlmom Member Posts: 5
    Where might I find a picture or information on this edge you all are talking about? Can't believe they would do away with freestyles! It is the greatest vehicle ever!!!
  • Options
    tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    Ford Edge or2007 Ford Edge would be a better place to ask.

    tidester, host
  • Options
    dnashdnash Member Posts: 35
    I agree with gogophers on the handling (unless you are driving a sports car), and I think you make a good argument for the Freebie. 3K off the top plus 700 a year is a decent amount for a vehicle with practically the same function (save towing ability) and one that I think rides and handles better and is more flexible (and probably better residuals). If you were looking at 4WD Explorers for some off-road ability, the story would be different, but for your comparison, the Freestyle is a good choice.
  • Options
    nitromaxnitromax Member Posts: 640
    Lets not forget that the Freestyle scored top marks in the rollover tests, and the Explorer didn't.
  • Options
    bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    The Freestyle handles better, is safer, has more interior space, and in general, the Freestyle feels and drives like a car, as compared to the Explorer which drives and feels like the truck-based SUV that it is. Even if the Explorer was cheaper, I'd still buy the Freestyle. Plus I only paid $25K for my FWD SE (with safety package, dual& rear climate, convenience pkg). If I needed the extra towing and better off-road capability, then I would consider the Explorer, but as a 7 pass car, the Freestyle is hard to beat, especially for the interior space.

    That being said, it wouldn't suprise me that Ford is shifting the Freestyle over to Mercury to prevent the competition to the Explorer
  • Options
    fsmmcsifsmmcsi Member Posts: 792
    You raise an interesting point. The Freestyle has a lower center of gravity, but not stability control, not even as an option, while the Explorer has Ford's stability control with enhanced roll stability features. I wonder which would perform better in actual testing, not just the NHTSA's desk calculations based on center of gravity?
  • Options
    nitromaxnitromax Member Posts: 640
    True, the Explorer does have stability control...because it needs it. The Freestyle has Volvos AWD platform and traction control.

    The explorer with the V8 will give you better off the line acceleration and towing power, but if you can live with 0-60 mph numbers in the mid 8's then the Frestyle might be fine for you.
  • Options
    figueroafamilyfigueroafamily Member Posts: 223
    They may do the Crossover Comparison down the road.

    --------------------
    Samuel,

    Many thanks for your question, and for your kind feedback. We don't have any immediate plans to do a crossover comparison, but it's very likely that we'll schedule one over the next few months.

    Warren Clarke
    Content Editor
    Edmunds.com
    --------------------

    Sam ;)
  • Options
    rbunch4468rbunch4468 Member Posts: 1
    I am considering the Freestyle for my next purchase. I am asking this forum for 'How many miles have you driven your Freestyle'? I am specifically concerned about testimonials for the CVT, which would be a very new feature for me.

    Any thoughts? Feedback?

    Thanks!

    Rick
  • Options
    bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    1 year old, 23K miles, zero problems with CVT or anything. I have a FWD SE.
  • Options
    mikeg7mikeg7 Member Posts: 1
    :sick: Bad news for me - Ford provided road side assistance on our 95 Freestyle when we had a Flat tire. The response time was great but when completed - the vehicle was severely out of alignment. Took it to the dealership where the Ford Certified Mechanic said that the right rear toe arm was bent when the vehicle was jacked. The tow company that provided the Ford Service had incorrectly jacked the vehicle. It needs to be replaced for $275. After spending 7.5 hours on the phone with customer service they stated that it is not a warranty item because the factory did not create a bad product and the tow company said they did not do it. So Ford instructs me that I am out of luck.

    The jack man lied to his boss who then tells Ford that they did not do it. However the Certified Ford Mechanic said they did do it. Isn't it good to know Ford does not stand behind their mechanics but instead believes a sub contracted firm.

    Lets see - I spent 7.5 hours on the phone with 9 different individuals with a cost of at least $75 per hour for a total of $562.5. The cost to fix the vehicle is $275.51.

    Next month I was going to purchase a new F150 Quad Cab 4X4 - well not anymore.

    In the end the customer is always right. I do not need them but they need us.

    So now I will appreciate the fact that Ford is laying off employees because they have earned it. :sick:
  • Options
    passat_2002passat_2002 Member Posts: 468
    I've had my'05 SEL FWD for 8 1/2 months now and have almost 9,000 trouble free miles on the odometer. The CVT is one of my favorite features, especially when on the road when it really gets to show off. At 60MPH the engine just loafs at around 1600RPM. Entry/Exit ease is superb because of the Freestyle's height. The vehicle has a very solid feel to it at all times. It's a Volvo XC90 at a bargain price.
  • Options
    passat_2002passat_2002 Member Posts: 468
    Just exactly how do you figure that Ford is not standing behind it's mechanic here? Both Ford, the mechanic, and you all agree that the damage was done by the person who performed the tow. Ford cannot (and should not) assume liability for damage done to it's vehicles by others. The fact that Ford paid for the tow has nothing to with who is liable for the damage. I understand your frustration, but you need lay the blame where it belongs.
  • Options
    freestylegalfreestylegal Member Posts: 70
    Dear rbunch,
    I've had my Freestyle SEL FWD for a little over a year and have 31,000 trouble-free miles on it. I have absolute confidence in the CVT. My Ford 150 truck drivin' husband loves it, too. It's his car of choice on road trips. I had no trouble getting used to the CVT--I really didn't feel like I had to "get used" to it at all, actually. My grown children love the car, too, because there is room for carseats, big people and all of their stuff, but yet it's a pleasure to drive. I've had Thunderbirds, Expeditions, Explorers, and a Taurus, and this is my favorite (the Explorer was my least favorite). In my opinion, it's one of the smartest cars around. Now, if they ever make a hybrid version, I'm way down for that!
  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Ford hired the tow company not the customer if I'm reading the post correctly. So I think Ford should make the tow company make it right.

    Steve, Host
  • Options
    bongo3bongo3 Member Posts: 8
    Private security people are using them in Iraq. I saw 1 on TV that had been hit and it was laying there with coolant running out of like blood, sad.
  • Options
    vwcarcrazyvwcarcrazy Member Posts: 52
    4500 miles since Sept 2005 on a 2006 SEL FWD Freestyle. So far:
    The CVT takes a lot of getting used to. Would have ordered the 6 speed auto if was available.
    Car is somewhat underpowered, but works well if you are not a speed-demon.
    Gas mileage is close to EPA estimates (23 mpg overall 50/50 mix).
    Cloth seat snags and stains easily - get the leather if you can.
    Pebble cloth interior color is very nice, but the carpets are too light colored. Get a set of after-market mats quick (and Ford does not offer mats for the 3rd seat).
    The standard Continental tires are crap. Very bad handling in rain or snow, almost dangerous if you live in a northern clime. Get the optional 18" tires.
    The 6-CD player sounds like a garbage disposal - slow and noisy.
    No body-side molding makes car a door ding magnet.
    No cargo area cover available.
    Overall a great car. Nothing is perfect. Best luck in your decision - Freestyle is still the best option out there for 6-7 passengers in comfort and good mileage.
  • Options
    bruneau1bruneau1 Member Posts: 468
    We have about 8,000 on our FWD. The CVT is the star of the vehicle and has operated without flaw. As reported earlier, the pebble dash has an unacceptable shine in the windshield, the 17" tires are not the best. We get good mileage and the sound of the engine at high rpms, while a little more than ideal, does not bother us. We had a small alignment problem which our selling dealer made worse. Took it to a different dealer in whom I now have confidence. I enjoy driving it every time, but am a little dismayed by the long list of problems reported in this forum. Buy the extended warranty. Vive Freebie.
  • Options
    schilkeschilke Member Posts: 11
    Something isn't right. Ford's version of a Customer Service Engineer, or Regional Service Manager should take care of this. I would ask the dealer service manager for the Ford rep's name and give him a call. Seems if Ford Hired the tow truck, then Ford should handle the damages.

    Question though, why didn't you just change the flat yourself?
  • Options
    schilkeschilke Member Posts: 11
    8500 miles. '06 SEL AWD

    No issues other than my wife refuses to keep the darn thing clean. Should you really feed an entire box of yogurt covered raisins to a 1.5 year old? Carpet shampoo, here we come!

    Have noticed (and like very much) that it is heaver and seems to be more predictable in the snow. Comparing it to a Subaru (my mother's), I like that it is bigger and heavier. Although the Subie is fun to do 4wheel drifts with 25ft high rooster tails of snow from all the wheels, the Freebie seems to be a bit more sedate and harder to make wonky in slippery conditions.

    Road manners are pretty good otherwise.
  • Options
    fordformefordforme Member Posts: 44
    The Freestyle should have stability control at least as an option. It would definitely benefit from it. I think the car is a great buy and a good alternative to the Explorer.
  • Options
    freealfasfreealfas Member Posts: 652
    "The CVT takes a lot of getting used to. Would have ordered the 6 speed auto if was available."

    I've heard this any number of times now and after owning ours for 6mos I have no idea what all this "getting used to" exactly means. Press the gas pedal the car goes, how is this different than a normal slushbox, it goes through its gear adjustments smoothly, the gearbox allows improved mileage, no real discernable shifting hence the car is very smooth and comfortable to drive. What am I missing here someone tell us this already...

    "Car is somewhat underpowered, but works well if you are not a speed-demon."

    It's not a sports car, its a crossover that is MORE than capable of getting out of its own way and cruising at highly illegal speeds if need be. This is just another fallacy propagated in this forum, plain and simple if you want fast buy a sports car. Read the comparisons to its competitors, ITS THE FASTEST PEOPLE despite not having all of the extra horsepower of the other motors, it just uses what is has more effectively. Move on from this criticism already. 8 sec 0-60 time for a rig this size is more than safe and apropos. If you need to tow all of these comments do not apply and you need to look to other vehicles.

    "The standard Continental tires are crap. Very bad handling in rain or snow, almost dangerous if you live in a northern clime. Get the optional 18" tires"

    Incorrect, while they may not be the best tires out there they have gotten through a Chicago winter no problems with a FWD FS. I won't be replacing them with like tires because indeed there are better options but by no means are these "crap", yet another fallacy...

    "Gas mileage is close to EPA estimates (23 mpg overall 50/50 mix)."

    agree

    "Cloth seat snags and stains easily - get the leather if you can.
    Pebble cloth interior color is very nice, but the carpets are too light colored. Get a set of after-market mats quick (and Ford does not offer mats for the 3rd seat)."

    Have black leather and am happy we do as to the glare issues and what has become apparent with stains on the cloth optioned seats.

    My biggest gripe has been minor quality control stuff, trim pieces, molding fit, and the dealer to a point. Was not real impressed with how we were handled but that's another story.

    The bottom line on our 6mos old '05/7.5k miles FS LTD is that we enjoy it for what it is, the most capable crossover out there. We carried 6 for new years eve to consolodate to one car, another day 7 with grandparents and aunts and uncles in tow, its stylish, reliable, comfortable and safe for the family. You cannot find a similarly capable rig for the price that is better. Buy it and you will not be sorry.
  • Options
    freealfasfreealfas Member Posts: 652
    "The Freestyle should have stability control at least as an option. It would definitely benefit from it."

    WHY, has it because of its LACK of electronic stability control(ESP) thrown you from the road lately or have you heard of a rash of Freestyle's flipping, etc. The FS is more than capable and has proven to be a class leader in stability testing.

    What, other than increased cost, would the benefit be. Bottom line is the DRIVER is still the one who has to be IN CONTROL of the vehicle and what he/she is asking it to do at any given moment. Heck the majority of driver's don't know what ABS does for them and how to use it to it's best effect and now we are going to give ESP to customers and tell them that this will take care of all of their driver errors. Hit a 45mph corner at 90 and regardless of ESP or not you are going to be in the ditch.

    The Explorer has proven to more or less NEED an ESP due the limitations of its size, weight, center of gravity, for what people ask it to do, travel at high speeds on roads that change direction thereby taxing the dynamic limits of a truck based SUV. The FS was designed to carry people safely and securely, it does that significantly better than any Explorer ever could.

    ESP is really only used effectively at a vehicles dynamic limits, the more capable the vehicle is the less the ESP would come into play. How often would you find yourself at the dynamic limits of a FS, really. In the end you need to ask what the real world benefits would be to the majority of the drivers and I would argue in this case it's just not worth it. Drive this vehicle within its limits and responsibly and you will find it more than capable and enjoyable for what you ask of it.
  • Options
    northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    Good summary.

    Regarding a 6 speed transmission, the new one (Ford-GM design) may be better, but one review of the Ford 500 last year thought the 6 speed spent too much time hunting for the right gear, which became irritating on hills and the like.

    I can only add that my shale-colored cloth seats benefited greatly from a $4 can of Scotchgard as soon as I got the Freestyle. A year and another $4 later and the cloth is still in good shape. :shades:
  • Options
    fordformefordforme Member Posts: 44
    Do a google search on stability control. First off, it has reduced fatal accidents considerably in Europe. No vehicle can defy the law of physics. Any device/feature that assists me is welcome addition. A ScionB has it for free on those models. Yes, it has a tall profile, but Ford has its head up its butt sometimes when it comes to safety. This is why I would not get this vehicle. Stability control is great on curves where there could be black ice or snow driving at night. It works, I know.
  • Options
    brantybranty Member Posts: 53
    We've had our AWD Ltd Freestyle for just over one year and have put on 15,800 miles. The CVT has been flawless is one of the selling features of this vehicle for us. It does not take any time to get used to and certainly contributes to the excellent fuel consumption numbers (given the vehicle weight).
    Power has never been an issue...if necessary you can stomp on it and power is there (although not to the extent of a V8).
    We have the pebble interior and I have no complaints about it - you just have to keep the carpets clean but that's no big deal. The leather is real easy to care for.
    Another one of the great capabilities is the Freestyle's handling/performance in snow. The AWD certainly contributes to this performance as do good winter tires but it is certainly another selling point for this vehicle (if you live in a snowy climate).
  • Options
    fordformefordforme Member Posts: 44
    CVTs are great in cars like this. The torque is there when you need it and it is extremely smooth. It seems lately that more and more car manufacturers are offering these transmissions in their vehicles. Glad to hear you're happy! :)
  • Options
    northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    You may note that on page 15 of the Ford Freestyle brochure, the Freestyle is going around a curve and hitting different flavors of slippery patches of road. The combination of traction control and electronic AWD show benefits like stability control to me.

    You correctly state that stability control helps going around curves at limits. So do tires and center of gravity. Some erroneously think stability control prevents rollovers, which it doesn't. That being said, not all stability control systems are created equal. Some are smarter than others. Some are added to compensate for a less than optimum suspension design.

    As far as safety, the 5 star front and side crash ratings, four star rollover ratings, three-row side air curtains, center of gravity, and Volvo chassis/safety cell construction, were the icing on the cake that sold me on the Freestyle. Living in snow and ice country, I would take my Freestyle against a ScionB any day (though the customizability is tempting...). :shades:
  • Options
    jazzycatjazzycat Member Posts: 2
    Just curious if anyone else with the Freestyle has a squeaky steering wheel? We took it into Ford and they changed the steering column but that didn't work. They said when they look it up on their computers they have no fix for it. They tried to get an engineer out to check it out but he never showed. We finally contacted Ford headquarters on this problem and they finally came back and said it's normal. BS!
  • Options
    volfangaryvolfangary Member Posts: 105
    I don't know what your hangup is with stability control. My Freestyle does better on curves than any Chevy or Ford SUV I have ever owned! Why pay extra for something that a car does not need or expect a company to put on a car that it is not needed on.
Sign In or Register to comment.