Ford Freestyle - Taurus X

1109110112114115146

Comments

  • nitromaxnitromax Member Posts: 640
    have a golf cart on a 5x8 utility trailer weight about 1300 lbs. would i trouble with the cvt pulling this. thanks for any feedback

    The towing capacity for the Freestyle is 2000lb. I'm assuming that the 1300lb is total weight of trailer and golf cart?
    If so, it won't be a problem.
  • odie6lodie6l Member Posts: 1,173
    but remember the 2000lbs towing capacity is also without a Towing Package that will add a engine cooler, heavy duty alternator, better suspension, or Oil Cooler (most important part), plus the only way you can get a hitch for the freestyle is aftermarket. Ford should have made an available trailering package for the vehicle and beefed up the towing capacity to 3500lbs (like the escape). The only other problem I see with not having a towing package is you may burn your brakes up faster.

    Odie
  • nitromaxnitromax Member Posts: 640
    but remember the 2000lbs towing capacity is also without a Towing Package that will add a engine cooler, heavy duty alternator, better suspension, or Oil Cooler (most important part),

    I don't believe a towing package is needed for towing below 2000lbs. 2000 is considered "light"

    plus the only way you can get a hitch for the freestyle is aftermarket.

    Since it's based on a car frame and it can only tow 2000 lbs or less, why should Ford spend time and money on products that most Freestylers won't need. The trucks and SUVs are where the heavy towing will be.

    Ford should have made an available trailering package for the vehicle and beefed up the towing capacity to 3500lbs (like the escape). The only other problem I see with not having a towing package is you may burn your brakes up faster.

    The CVT can not handle heavy towing due to it relying heavily on load feedback for gear ratio selection. Towing heavy trailers would make the CVT "hunt" for the proper ratio whenever you went over a bump and the trailer bounced. A 6 speed will solve that problem.

    My guess is that the next version of Freestyle will offer both the 3.5L and the 6 speed as an option.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "Good news: I just found out that the Goodyear Fortera Tripletred (great tire) is available in 225/65-17, which should fit without any problems. Its only 0.2 inches more into the wheelwell height, and sticks out by about that amount sideways, compared to stock 215/65-17."

    Note to everyone! Be very careful when putting larger wheels on this car. The owners manual has a warning that you cannot use any snow cables (even type "S") with the 18" wheels. I think that Ford chose the 215/65 size because that is the only size that would allow for snow cables. So if you live in a colder climate (unlike here in sunny LA) your might want to stick with the stock sizes. Unless you can find snow tires in 225/65 - maybe that would work and not need chains.

    If anyone does try the 225/65 size, please post your experience with using snow chains...

    I think that the 18" wheels come standard with AWD Limited models. I have no idea what Ford was thinking with the wheel tolerances - are Limited models just not supposed to slip in snow?
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    From the Ford Media kit on the 2006 Freestyle:

    http://tinyurl.com/97now

    Base curb weight

    FWD 3,649
    AWD 3,825

    Of course, they also list a 6 speed automatic transmission, with the CVT as optional, so I'm not too confident. Sounds a bit like the Ford 500 specs to me. Maybe that is where the confustion over the gross weight is coming from. I had thought that the FS weighs about 4000 lbs. Actually, I still think that.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    are you keeping in your FS? Please list 17" or 18".
  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    32-35 all around 17"
  • coldcrankercoldcranker Member Posts: 877
    Last message: Base curb weight
    FWD 3,649
    AWD 3,825


    The 2005 FreeS was listed at 4,000 lbs, and it changed suddenly with the 2006 listing. Its the same vehicle, so I don't know why the difference is there.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    I said it for many months that the FS wasn't going anywhere, that it wasn't going to get killed unlike many of these other automotive publications were claiming. If anything, the vehicle will be improved. The "Way Ford-ward" plan was to kill the alternative offering which is the Mercury version. Why spend millions on spinning off a new vehicle, whereas it's better to invest it on other things if sales are doing well anyways.

    The FS will do fine being offered along with the Escape (being redone soon as well), Edge, Fairlane (which will be vastly larger and taller). The FS sort of fills a niche that the Taurus wagon left. Ironically the Taurus wagon was the best seller, and in general Ford has the most wagon offerings across all their brands. (small useless factoid). Case in point, people want more space and flexibility in their vehicles.

    The vehicle will receive the Duratec35 as well as Tire-pressure monitoring, a few extra toys and a new front fascia next year (2007 that is).
  • ottavottav Member Posts: 31
    So where does that leave Mercury? I thought the way forward plan mentions new products for Mercury.
  • bruneau1bruneau1 Member Posts: 468
    FWD 3959, AWD 4112. These are curb weights and they may be some variation among models, but never as low as 3649 and 3825.
  • volfangaryvolfangary Member Posts: 105
    May I ask where you obtained the numbers? Thanks.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "FWD 3959, AWD 4112. These are curb weights and they may be some variation among models, but never as low as 3649 and 3825."

    Hmmm, Edmunds lists 3649, other sites 3,959. I suspect the 3959 is correct for the SEL, and the other number is actually the Ford 500 number, which is listed at - you guessed it - 3,649.

    Anyone care to drive their FS to some truck weights?
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I see 3,643 listed as the curb weight here for the Ford 500 Limited (and 3,664 for the '06 SE). I don't see 3,649 anywhere. So many numbers it's starting to look like tax day.

    Is there another official Ford site to check with besides the media one linked above?

    Steve, Host
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "Is there another official Ford site to check with besides the media one linked above? "

    The ford site doesn't list the weight with the specifications.

    http://tinyurl.com/b94jk
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    PDF format of the owner's manuals and quick reference manuals.

    http://tinyurl.com/b87gl
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    PDF format of the owner's manuals and quick reference manuals.

    http://tinyurl.com/b87gl
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    Here is a link to the Motorcraft site that allows you to purchase a subscription to search the TSBs. The 72 hour subscription is 9.99. You can input a VIN and see what TSBs may apply. The ordering portion only works in IE6, not FireFox.

    http://tinyurl.com/dccz8
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    It will, but thats still being planned out currently. This years Mercury sales should improve thanks to the Milan, and Mariner, which will offset the Monterrey and Mountaineer decline. And dealers will be happy with increasing sales of Zephyrs (selling a bit more than the Milan-remember, most Lincoln showrooms include Mercury) and the introduction of the MKX.
  • coldcrankercoldcranker Member Posts: 877
    "Hmmm, Edmunds lists 3649, other sites 3,959. I suspect the 3959 is correct for the SEL, "

    From the Kelly Blue Book ( http://www.kbb.com ), the first number listed is for the Freestyle SE front-wheel-drive 2005 model, and the second number is for the 2006 model. I don't know what to believe anymore:
    Wheel Base 112.9 inches 112.9 inches
    Overall Length 199.8 inches 199.8 inches
    Width 74.4 inches 73.0 inches
    Height 65.9 inches 64.9 inches
    Curb Weight 3649 lbs. 3959 lbs.
    Tires / Wheel Size P215/65R17 P215/65R17
  • coldcrankercoldcranker Member Posts: 877
    And Edmunds has:

    2005 Model SE Front Wheel Drive:
    Exterior
    Length: 199.8 in. Width: 74.4 in.
    Height: 65.9 in. Wheel Base: 112.9 in.
    Curb Weight: 3959 lbs.

    2006 Model SE Front Wheel Drive:
    Exterior
    Length: 200.7 in. Width: 74.5 in.
    Height: 60.1 in. Wheel Base: 112.9 in.
    Curb Weight: 3649 lbs.
  • marcopolomarcopolo Member Posts: 4
    I have a 2005 Limited with that has the auto dimming rear view mirror. My wife complains that it becomes too dark at night, and she has a hard time using it. Is there a way to override the auto dimming feature, or adjust it not to dim so much? There are two holes a the bottom of the mirror that I could tape over, but that is ugly. Or I could disconnect the wires, which probably disables other features.
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,814
    i think there is a button on the mirror to turn off the autodim function.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • min1min1 Member Posts: 20
    Just picked up my 05 SEL FWD with 6500miles on it a week ago. Yesterday after doing some hwy driving and using the brakes at higher speeds, I noticed they were making a squealing noise that cut out as the speed decreased. My hubby didn't hardly notice it at all and said that I was just hyper sensitive because the car is new. I still don't think they should make any noise when the car is this new. btw, I had taken the car out for a longish drive the night before, so I can't imagine there was rust build up, and the squealing lasted the whole time we were out.
    Is this indicative of anything? The dealer did a "down demo" inspection and said the brakes had "more than 5mm".
    Any input would be appreciated.
    Thanks!
  • scootertrashscootertrash Member Posts: 698
    Turn it off?
  • northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    I remember some discussion on squealing brakes from about a year ago. Apparently, there is a tech service bulletin on the matter (see message 2839 on this forum). It sounds more like the material on some brake pad installations rather than worn pads. Moisture will reduce the squeal, further indicating brake pad materials are the culprit.

    You can also track down TSBs at www.safercar.gov. In the end, your high frequency hearing must be better than your spouse's. Enjoy your Freestyle. Hopefully you have a good dealer who can resolve your brake issue. :shades:
  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    Latch in 3rd row? I see one in the 3rd row on the right side, but what good is just one? There would need to be one in the middle too.
  • min1min1 Member Posts: 20
    checked out the TSBs but they relate more to a thumping brake problem, rather than a squeal. I'm bringing it in on Wed, so we'll see what they say. Not acceptable to have squealing brakes on a basically new car, imo!
  • pasoc24pasoc24 Member Posts: 1
    Am interested in the Freestyle with two reservations. First, Ford service, with which I've never been happy (my husband has a mustang convertible). Second, there seems to be a lot of talk about lack of power and/or Ford abandoning the vehicle. I'm in no rush. Once I buy a car I usually hold on to it for a very long time. Would you recommend waiting til 2007 to buy? What is the Duratec that is said to be new for 2007? Your advice is appreciated.
  • passat_2002passat_2002 Member Posts: 468
    pasoc24,

    Welcome to the board.

    First of all, Ford is not "abandoning" the Freestyle. If anything, with the "Way Forward" plan that was announced last month, Ford seems re-dedicated to continuing and improving the Freestyle, a vehicle which competes in the burgeoning "crossover" market. Ford does not want to cede sales in that market to anyone. As for it's supposed lack of power, well... a Ferrari it isn't. But what it is, however, is the fastest vehicle in it's segment from 0 to 60MPH, beating the Chrysler Pacifica (for example) by a full second despite the Pacifica's much higher horsepower ratings. Nuff said!

    The present day Freestyle has a Duratec engine in it now. A newly developed 3.5 liter Duratec will start to appear in some Ford vehicles later this year in their '07 model year forms. It is not known whether or not Ford will put the 3.5 in the '07 Freestyle. Most of us here, however, believe it will almost surely be included in the '08 MY version of the Freebie which may appear as early as Spring 2007.

    I might also add here that the Freestyle is built on the Volvo P2 platform (same as the Volvo XC90 CUV and S80 Sedan) and has achieved a 5 star safety rating in all the tests that NHTSA performs, even without the benefit of the optional side-curtain airbags.

    I personally have never had any problems with my local Ford dealer's service department. In a previous life I have owned and driven both Honda and Volkswagen products. I would have less kind things to say about their service departments. The folks at my Ford dealer just seem a lot friendlier. As with any manufacturer however... YMMV.
  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    Anyone know if there's a way to modify the 2nd row bench so it slides fore and aft? Sometimes it's nice to have a little more legroom in the 3rd row.
  • vwcarcrazyvwcarcrazy Member Posts: 52
    Since the seat belts are attached to the seats, there is no legal way of doing this. If you or anyone else were to modify using non-Ford parts, and someone gets hurt in an accident - you would be personally liable. You might be able to installed a set of Limited bucket seats, or SE/SEL seats with the Limited base in place of the 40/60 bench. But that would be costly, even if you could find the parts in a scrap-yard.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "You might be able to installed a set of Limited bucket seats, or SE/SEL seats with the Limited base in place of the 40/60 bench."

    I thought the sliding rear buckets was an option on the Limited? Is it standard?
  • kjnormankjnorman Member Posts: 243
    I thought the sliding rear buckets was an option on the Limited? Is it standard?

    I have the limited and I believe the sliding buckets were standard with the bench being a no cost option.
  • northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    Ford announced sales figures for January of 2006 as compared to the same month on 2005.

    * Freestyle: 13.7%
    * Escape: -14.4%
    * Explorer: -22.5%
    * Freestar: 4.1%
    * F-Series: 7.0%

    The Freestyle sales volume is one tenth that of the F-Series pickups, but growing twice as fast (this month).

    Oh, and the Five Hundred grew 32.6% over 2005. There are no year to year figures for the Fusion, but for January, it sold ~ 40% more vehicles than the Five Hundred.

    Just thought you would want to know. :shades:
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    From the Owners Manual:

    "Do not use tire chains, cables, or optional traction devices with optional P225/60R18 tires."

    Has anyone tried using chains with the 18" wheels?
  • teldocteldoc Member Posts: 49
    We own an 04 Expedition and 05 LR3. The Expy went to the shop for hail repairs and Enterprise supplied me with an AWD Freestyle. My expectations were pretty low, "just give me something to drive this week while my main rig is out of commission." I must say, I am REALLY impressed with this car, er suv, er tall wagon. The ride is excellent, the interior room is expansive, the mileage rocks (how could it not, compared to the beasts mentioned above) and overall, this thing is really just a blast to drive.

    The CVT tranny takes a few days to adjust to but I think I like it better than feeling the car pull through each gear.

    I could go on but wanted to chime in for anyone considering getting one, I'm really impressed.
  • saabturboidsaabturboid Member Posts: 178
    I wonder how much of that 13.7% gain is from fleet sales? I discovered the Freestyle last month when Hertz gave me one as a rental car. I don't believe Freestyles were in the rental fleets last year.

    Having the Freestyle in the rental fleets is good and bad. The good is that Ford increases their sales by selling the vehicles into fleets which increases exposure to unsuspecting renters like me, but the bad news is that typically models that are sold into rental fleets on a large scale cause rapid depreciation for the entire model line. IE:The Taurus! This means our Freestyles are likely to be worth less down the road than they otherwise might.

    Ever notice you don't see high resale vehicles like Toyota Camrys and Honda Accords in rental fleets?

    - Chad
  • fsmmcsifsmmcsi Member Posts: 792
    On the Five Hundred / Montego discussion, ANT14, who apparently works for Ford or is a Ford dealer, indicated that a maximum of 15% of the production of the vehicles (Five Hundred, Freestyle, and Montego) will be sold to fleets, vs 50% for the Impala, and 25% for the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Magnum. By the way, I do see rental Hondas and Toyotas.
  • northlakesnorthlakes Member Posts: 368
    The sales growth of the Freestyle, the greatest of any Ford "non-sedan" in January, means the continuation and improvement of the model for a few more years. It suggests that it took about a year for the Freebie to catch on - it is not a cookie-cutter vehicle. As recent posts have shared, it is much better than people expect from Ford.

    Interesting to me is the trend of the Explorer sales.

    As a footnote, my first drive in a Camry was in a rental car in Orlando. :shades: It is a high-value vehicle too.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Camry in rental fleets?...hehe... Here are the numbers...

    Out of Camry sedans, 8-13% are fleet. Solara enjoys around 15-19%, (and there's word of possibly more since it's not selling as well). Hertz has a load of them actually.

    Accord, yes 4-8% are fleet. I dont have Altimas numbers, but last year they dumped quite a bit.

    And if you really want to break down the math (I won't do it but someone pick up on the numbers if they wish to). If the Camry sells 430K units, and 8-13% goes to fleet...do the math. As oppose to a 500 which sells at 1/4th that amount but capped at 15%.
  • savethelandsavetheland Member Posts: 671
    But if you look at Hertz car sales they sell Camry/Corolla/Accord for almost price of new vehicle. E.g. Camry for $15,500. Accord even more. Compare it with $10,500 for Taurus for almost same price as Focus.
  • coldcrankercoldcranker Member Posts: 877
    Good point. I wouldn't mind paying $10,500 for a Taurus. I would have a problem with the almost-new-price for the others, though! This is a classic example of the market over reacting. Use it to our advantage.
  • barnstormer64barnstormer64 Member Posts: 1,106
    I would have a problem with the almost-new-price for the others, though!

    And only an idiot WOULD pay "almost-new-price" for a rental car vehicle. Which makes me suspect that Hertz doesn't really get that much for them, or there's a lot of idiots driving foreign cars. :P
  • savethelandsavetheland Member Posts: 671
    Well, the last statement seems to be more reasonable.
  • drivemonkeydrivemonkey Member Posts: 14
    I just posted this on the Accessories board, then realized maybe I'd get more input over here ...

    I just bought a black-on-black Freestyle (and love it!), but with 2 small kids (and another on the way) I'm quickly realizing that dust and pebbles show up really well on the black carpet. I'm trying to decide on floor mats, and I'm having a hard time deciding between the Catch-All floor liners and the Husky floor liners. I've looked at all the floor mats posts on this board. Do you Husky owners use your floor liners year-round, or just in winter with the mud and snow? I'm looking for a year-round floor mat to replace the standard (small) Freestyle ones. The Catch-All ones look great, but do they show dust and dirt just as much as the stock Freestyle mats? And does mud and snow grime rinse out of them easily, or does it take a scrubbing? I prefer the less utilitarian look of the Catch-Alls, but I'm not sure they'll hide and resist the dirt like I need them too. Both mats look like they provide great coverage and a snug fit. Any general opinions on rubberized vs. carpeted-with-waterproof-backing floor liners? Basically, why do you love your floor mats? Thanks!
  • bruneau1bruneau1 Member Posts: 468
    The Freestyle has respectable sales even with Ford's lack of interest in advertising it. All evidence at this point indicates it will continue, but one never knows. As for power, if you intend to use it primarily as a car with a lot of cargo room when needed, you will not be disappointed. if you are going to fill up all the seating positions and climb big hills a lot, look for a vehicle with more torque. We enjoy ours (usually two people and a dog); it has lively acceleration once under way and gets good mileage. If you don't need AWD, and most don't, don"t pay for it. You'll get better mileage and a little more pep, and better reliability. We paid $27,500 for a FWD Limited and bought a 6 year Premium warranty for $800.
  • coldcrankercoldcranker Member Posts: 877
    "If you don't need AWD, and most don't, don"t pay for it. You'll get better mileage and a little more pep, and better reliability."

    I agree. This country is too obsessive about AWD or 4WD. It makes gas mileage worse, handling a little worse (weight), raises noise levels a bit, and reduces acceleration. Front wheel drive with traction control is usually plenty.
  • min1min1 Member Posts: 20
    "If you don't need AWD, and most don't, don"t pay for it. You'll get better mileage and a little more pep, and better reliability."
    I wanted to chime in with this also. For most people who learned to drive in winter conditions with FWD or RWD they will be fine with FWD. It is so silly to think you need to have AWD if you have to drive in winter weather. My hubby used to drive a Sprint Convertible to work (1 hour each way hwy) and I drove a Neon the same distance in the countryside around Ottawa ON. If you gear your driving to the conditions, 99.9% of days you should have no problems (unless its glare ice on the road). I think that AWD or 4WD gives people too much confidence and IMHO you only need 4WD to get out of the ditch, not keep you out. Driving training is a much better investment than AWD. Lasts a lifetime! ;)
  • tim156tim156 Member Posts: 308
    I took mine in for the fuel strap replacement this morning. I made an appointment a couple of weeks in advance to be the first vehicle in for service at 7:00am and it took less than an hour.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.